ACDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
TimestampYour Discord nameOverall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to African Guild's budget?Which, if any, of the objections against African Guild's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget.		Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit.		Overall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to AI Sandbox/Think-tank's budget? Which, if any, of the objections against AI Sandbox/Think Tank's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget. 		Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit. 		Overall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to Education Guild's budget?
Which, if any, of the objections against Education Guild's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget.
Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit. 		Overall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to Marketing Guild's budget? Which, if any, of the objections against Marketing Guild's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget. 		Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit. 		Overall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to R&D Guild's budget? Which, if any, of the objections against R&D Guild's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget. 		Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit. 		Overall, given what you've read, do you now consent, object, or abstain to WWG's budget? Which, if any, of the objections against WWG's budget do you feel is a problem?
NOTE: you can still select one or more objections even if overall, you consent to this WG's budget.
Please add any (short-ish!) comment you want to make.
There's a 1,000-character limit.
2
31/03/2025 16:34:16LordkizzyI consentI consentI consentI consentI consentI consent
3
31/03/2025 17:11:14@awesome_willI consentI consentI abstainI abstainI consentI consent
4
31/03/2025 22:27:04ZalfreddI consentI consentI consentI abstainI consentI consent
5
01/04/2025 08:29:18greatnessoneI objectCopy-Paste Blindness - Q2 suggests 6 recurring tasks with explaining that there is only 6 weeks in Quarter 2. Even the quarter report leaves in the template info and Q1 Plans which is over., The WG pays $25 / hour for facilitation, compared to some other guilds and workgroups using $20/hour., The budget sheet seems to have some numbers in wrong columnsI consentI consentI consentI objectI find it disrespectful for a report to go tell the reader go find updates yourself. Well I did and I dont understand them https://github.com/R-D-Guild/Final-Version---CSDB-Collaboration-Skills-Database-/commit/f22df380ebfe3dd0c6a0f53e5e6c1df71b72a9a9 Looks to me database was just removed a lot of code. There is no info about Legacy work and Consensus Dashboard has 0 work done since it was first created last quarter. You share about showcases, but nothing showed, not even the links to townhalls you showed something., Budget lines are misleading. Technically what they are asking is extra Treasury to grant fund for Development projects that go through R&D's own proposal process and vetting.I consent
6
01/04/2025 12:24:38SlateI consentI consentI consentThe objections isn’t technically an objection, it’s an opinion I abstainI consentI abstain
7
01/04/2025 13:17:51Devon HardyI abstainI consentI consentI abstainI abstainI consent
8
01/04/2025 15:54:01MissAshleyDC#5833I consentI consentI consentI consentI consentI consent
9
01/04/2025 17:07:48KateriI consentI consentI consentI consentI abstainI abstainOver-centralisation in the WG. Several months ago, when this group's budget was late because Kenichi was unavailable to submit it, they agreed they'd decentralise their operations so there was no longer a single point of failure. But evidently they didn't do so, because this time, the reason given for (slight) lateness was again that Kenichi was unavailable. They still haven't organised themselves so that someone else can do core tasks if needed.
10
01/04/2025 19:43:19@martinsokiI abstainI consentI abstainI consentI abstainI abstain
11
02/04/2025 12:46:04CallyFromAuronI consentThe WG pays $25 / hour for facilitation, compared to some other guilds and workgroups using $20/hour.I'm completely fine with African Guild's payment structure. I've only ticked the box because I'd like us to discuss, in general terms, this issue of differing pay scales. I'd like to see if we can agree once and for all that it's actually **fine** for different WGs to pay different amounts for a task, and that there is no absolute standard.I consentI consentMajority of costed outputs of this guild of creating content nobody wants. There are hundreds of these similar AI videos produced in Youtube, why we keep paying to produce more of them? Also why not coordinate with Video Workgroup? I have forgotten whats the purpose of education guild? this Budget sheet is asking funds basically for nothing useful and for no purpose.I don't completely agree with everything in the objection - but I do agree that we need to look at who "wants" our public-facing content, and who's viewing it.
Maybe this could be part of the planned conversations about output quality in general.		I objectWhen you look at the structure for zealy inaitive for example, there are questions and operations that users need to answer and do in order to get the XP. None of this is shared Report. Makes it feel like they are hiding the actual result and impact. They don't even share the structure in report, but need to dig deep in GitHub comments. Some initiatives are great though, so it's a shame if some of them don't get funded because project management is bloated and some initiatives low quality and misleading.I agree with the objector that we need to talk about the impact and value of Zealy initiatives, and whether they are worth funding. (I've read the Zealy report, but it contains no direct evidence of the impact and value for sNET; only the impact for the participants. And it gives no evidence of the quality of the work done by participants in Zealy sprints.)

Is there any evidence that Zealy tasks have any major positive effect for sNET/the Ambassador Program, and/or that Zealy participants develop any interest in sNET? If not - is it a priority in times like these?
I consentI objectThe Point System was a project that got rewarded 900$. How did that go? because you ask 500$ more., Over-centralisation in the WG. Several months ago, when this group's budget was late because Kenichi was unavailable to submit it, they agreed they'd decentralise their operations so there was no longer a single point of failure. But evidently they didn't do so, because this time, the reason given for (slight) lateness was again that Kenichi was unavailable. They still haven't organised themselves so that someone else can do core tasks if needed.I agree that we need to give some scrutiny to the Points system - this objection isn't really addressed in the WG's responses doc, and on reflection I don't think it was adequately addressed in their quarterly report either.

I also think we need to look at how we follow up on what WWG says it has done to address centralisation.
12
02/04/2025 13:46:32Tevo SaksI objectCopy-Paste Blindness - Q2 suggests 6 recurring tasks with explaining that there is only 6 weeks in Quarter 2. Even the quarter report leaves in the template info and Q1 Plans which is over., The WG pays $25 / hour for facilitation, compared to some other guilds and workgroups using $20/hour., It seems rewards are simply distributed between selected people who joined meetings - the actual outcomes don't reflect the way the budget is constructed.The responses are not sufficient and does not reflect whats left in Quarterly Report (copy paste template info still remains) No reasoning provided in Budget sheet over deviation of hourly rates (considering this is only source of planning info, Response does address it, but is not included in budget sheet where they bring it out right that Africa Guild faciliation is more demanding and skilled role compared to other Workgroups)

The initiatives outcomes are great ideas, but could use some more explanation.
Breakdown was addressed in response, but no attempt to div it up in Budget sheet.		I consentI objectMajority of costed outputs of this guild of creating content nobody wants. There are hundreds of these similar AI videos produced in Youtube, why we keep paying to produce more of them? Also why not coordinate with Video Workgroup? I have forgotten whats the purpose of education guild? this Budget sheet is asking funds basically for nothing useful and for no purpose.There is no supporting material other than the previous Quarterly Report to know what Guild is doing and how to get involved. The Guild has big plans but is not transparent with budget details. Don't see the need to also build Guilds reserves. It has enough to cover continues meetings so that they can plan ahead what they want to deliver to community. I abstainWhen you look at the structure for zealy inaitive for example, there are questions and operations that users need to answer and do in order to get the XP. None of this is shared Report. Makes it feel like they are hiding the actual result and impact. They don't even share the structure in report, but need to dig deep in GitHub comments. Some initiatives are great though, so it's a shame if some of them don't get funded because project management is bloated and some initiatives low quality and misleading.In future include Roles and Responsibilies info directly in sheet, going back and forth is not convenient. The doc could be included as additional info.

This Guild is mainly giving out flat rewards based on role regardless of how much time it takes. Needs to be considered when asking large amount of funds. The team has not done any prioro research or measuring the actual time it takes to do these roles.

Zealy Report info does not sufficiently provide the info about tasks, impact and the actual things this program was paid to incetivise, still feels like wasted experiment for me as after a year I still dont know if it its any good		I objectI find it disrespectful for a report to go tell the reader go find updates yourself. Well I did and I dont understand them https://github.com/R-D-Guild/Final-Version---CSDB-Collaboration-Skills-Database-/commit/f22df380ebfe3dd0c6a0f53e5e6c1df71b72a9a9 Looks to me database was just removed a lot of code. There is no info about Legacy work and Consensus Dashboard has 0 work done since it was first created last quarter. You share about showcases, but nothing showed, not even the links to townhalls you showed something., Budget lines are misleading. Technically what they are asking is extra Treasury to grant fund for Development projects that go through R&D's own proposal process and vetting.No Updates made to Reporting or Budget Sheet. Quite hard to follow the Report. The formatting feels robust and unclear what is being reported in some casesI abstainNot a fan of Bringing concerns to Reporting, but instead more make it cohesive strategy of describing current challenges and ways they are addressed. However they were addressed imo.
13
02/04/2025 17:51:25inesgavI consentI abstainI abstainI consentI consentI consent
14
02/04/2025 18:04:50danialves3612I consentIt seems to me that the budget is very limited and may affect the possibility of community growth.I abstainI consentI consentI consentI consent
15
02/04/2025 18:11:17Andrea R's serverI consentI consentI consentI consentI consentI consent
16
02/04/2025 18:27:45guillermoluceroI consentAgree with concerns, lot of room for impoovement.I consentThe topic was already discussed in the governance meetings, and I understand the responses and arguments presented by guild members are ok. I believe it is valid to review the cost of contributions and reallocate funds to other guild efforts if feels necessary.

I believe it is worth highlighting that the concerns point out that clarifications of the case should be part of the report and budget initially and are intended to help WG leads improve on this aspect in future iterations.		I consentI agree with the concerns, but I still support the guild in using this quarter to address this issue and working to coordinate efforts with video, marketing, and regional WGs, for example, to find common ground on where to prioritize and put focus to. There's a lot of room for improvement, and I see this need to adapt to the needs of budget reductions as an opportunity.I consentI agree with the concerns, but I'm still deciding to support the guild in using this quarter to address this issue and working to coordinate efforts with video, education, and regional WGs, for example, to find common ground on what to prioritize. The guild has one of the largest budgets in the program! There's a lot of room for improvement, and I see this need to adapt to the budget reduction requirements as an opportunity. I will personally be getting involved in guild operations to better understand the needs and be able to contribute to the efforts.I consentThe clarifications of the case were made in an attached document, and I was responsible for arguing them. Even so, I believe the concerns are valid in some cases, and we will be striving to address the necessary solutions. Not everything is a problem resulting from market prices; there is room for improvement.I consentI agree with the concerns, but I'm still deciding to support the guild in using this quarter to address this issue and working to coordinate efforts with video, education, marketing and regional WGs, for example, to find common ground on what to prioritize. The guild has one of the largest budgets in the program! There's a lot of room for improvement, and I see this need to adapt to the budget reduction requirements as an opportunity. I will be getting involved in guild operations to better understand the needs and be able to contribute to the efforts.
17
02/04/2025 18:58:51Petere1234I consentI consentI consentI consentI consentI consent
18
02/04/2025 20:02:00sergiobenarI abstainI abstainI abstainI abstainI consentI abstain
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100