| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Search tip: To search for a specific resource, click the "Ctrl" and "F" keys together on your keyboard and a search bar will appear in the upper right corner. Use this to find key words, authors, or titles! | ||||||
2 | Category | Resource Name | Access | Resource Type | Author(s) | Year | Description/Details |
3 | CARE Principles | Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures (2021) | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-021-00892-0 | Article | Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance (CIDG) | 2021 | This manuscript briefly introduces the CARE Principles and describes CARE in the context of scientific data, FAIR in the context of Indigenous data, how FAIR and CARE intersect, and implications and next steps for actionable change toward operationalizing FAIR with CARE. |
4 | CARE Principles | The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance | https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043 | Article | Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance (CIDG) | 2020 | In this first formal publication of the CARE Principles, we articulate their rationale, describe their relation to the FAIR Principles, and present examples of their application. |
5 | CARE Principles | Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.823309/full | Article | Stephanie Russo Carroll, Ibrahim Garba, Rebecca Plevel, Desi Small-Rodriguez, Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka, Maui Hudson, Nanibaa' A. Garrison | 2022 | This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice. |
6 | CARE Principles | Extending the CARE Principles from tribal research policies to benefit sharing in genomic research | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1052620/full | Article | Stephanie Russo Carroll, Rebecca Plevel, Lydia L. Jennings, Ibrahim Garba, Rogena Sterling, Felina M Cordova-Marks, Vanessa Hiratsuka, Maui Hudson, Nanibaa' A. Garrison | 2022 | Using a legal epidemiology approach, the paper discusses findings from a review of Tribal research legislation, policy, and administrative materials from 26 tribes in the US. The discussion specifies issues viewed by tribes as facilitators and barriers to securing benefits from research for their nations and members/citizens, and describes preemptive and mitigating strategies pursued by tribes in response. These strategies are set within the framing of the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance, a set of standards developed to ensure that decisions made about data pertaining to Indigenous communities at the individual and tribal levels are responsive to their values and collective interests. Our findings illustrate gaps to address for benefit sharing and a need to strengthen Responsibility and Ethics in tribal research governance. |
7 | CARE Principles | GIDA-RDA COVID-19 Guidelines for Data Sharing Respecting Indigenous Data Sovereignty | https://www.gida-global.org/s/GIDA-RDA-Indigenous-Peoples-COVID-19-Recommendations-and-Guidelines-30-June-2020_Endorsed-Final_0.pdf | Article | Stephanie R. Carroll, Pyrou Chung, Donna Cormack, Maui Hudson, Tahu Kukutai, Robyn Rowe, Rodrigo Sara, Michele Suina, Maggie Walter | 2020 | The Indigenous Data Guidelines set out the minimum requirements for Indigenous-designed data approaches and standards, inclusive of Indigenous rights to data governance and decision-making within the planning and design of Indigenous data collection and sharing. The Indigenous Data Guidelines also highlight the inadequacy of personal and individual consent and data privacy protections. For Indigenous Peoples, collective consent and data privacy protections, supported via community-controlled data infrastructure, are essential to ethical Indigenous data practices. These Indigenous Data Guidelines apply across all sections of the RDA COVID 19 Guidelines and Recommendations. |
8 | CARE Principles | CARE Principles in different languages | https://www.gida-global.org/care | Guiding principles/protocols | Global Indigenous Data Alliance (GIDA) | CARE Principles in different languages | |
9 | CARE Principles | CARE Principles for ESIP Data Repositories | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xq-C2csB0hY | Workshop/Webinar/Training | O'Brien, M., Earth System Information Partners | 2021 | CARE Principles for Earth sci data repositories. Overview of Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP) project aligning TRUST, FAIR, and CARE principles for research data repositories |
10 | CARE Principles | Working with the CARE principles: operationalising Indigenous data governance | https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/blog/care-principles-operationalising-indigenous-data-governance/ | Web blog | Carroll, S.R. et al. | 2020 | This blog discusses the creation and application of CARE principles |
11 | CARE Principles | Science Seminar: Implementing the CARE Principles in open data repositories | https://www.neonscience.org/get-involved/events/science-seminar-implementing-care-principles-open-data-repositories | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Stephanie Carroll and Lydia Jennings | 2023 | NEON Science Seminar talk on implementing CARE Principles in open data repositories |
12 | CARE Principles | Works in Progress Webinar: Operationalizing the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance | https://www.oclc.org/research/events/2020/081120-operationalizing-care-principles-for-indigenous-data-governance.html | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Stephanie Carroll and Jane Anderson | 2020 | OCLC Works in Progress Webinar on CARE Principles. Learn how they work to address the historical legacy of data inequities that impact Indigenous Peoples. Presenters will also discuss how the CARE Principles promote a broader understanding of the FAIR Principles when applied to Indigenous data and collections. |
13 | CARE Principles | Be FAIR and CARE: The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYaJLcckNCY&t=668s | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Lydia Jennings | 2021 | EarthCubeNSF Webinar on CARE Principles |
14 | CARE Principles | Applying CARE: Documenting Ethical Data Procedures and Sensitive Data at the Arctic Data Center | https://arcticdata.io/all/blog/2022/04/applying-care-documenting-ethical-data-procedures-and-sensitive-data-at-the-arctic-data-center/ | Web blog | Natasha Haycock-Chavez, Amber Budden and Matt Jones | 2022 | At its foundation, open-science is based on making all aspects of scientific research accessible across broad communities, whether professional, academic, or public. This includes publications, data, software, samples, and code, and at its core, open science is built on principles of transparency and capacity for collective knowledge. The practice of open science is being increasingly adopted by researchers across disciplines. There are organizations and working groups such as FORCE11 that promote and support this through development of principles and guidelines that inform research activities. Open-science affords researchers the opportunity to extend the reach of their work (Puebla & Lowenberg, 2021) and increase transparency and public trust, however, such transparency creates challenges for researchers working with sensitive data and Indigenous knowledge. Western knowledge concepts largely inform open science principles and do not consider Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous Knowledge (Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group, 2019). |
15 | CARE Principles | The CARE Principles and the Reuse, Sharing, and Curation of Indigenous Data in Canadian Archaeology | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/advances-in-archaeological-practice/article/care-principles-and-the-reuse-sharing-and-curation-of-indigenous-data-in-canadian-archaeology/D94CDC00AC7FD5E365A28C668C2812AF | Article | Gupta et al. | 2023 | Reuse and sharing of archaeological data are tied to ethics in data practice, research design, and the rights of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about their heritage. In this article, the authors discuss how the CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) principles and Indigenous data governance create intellectual space for archaeological research. We show how archaeologists can use this framework to highlight hidden costs and labor associated with the “data ecosystem,” which are often borne by Indigenous nations and communities. The CARE framework gives voice to Indigenous peoples’ concerns around data sharing, curation, and reuse; ways we can redress these issues; and strategies that facilitate Indigenous nations and communities in deriving collective benefit from research. In archaeology, these efforts include greater work on heritage legislation and policy, repositioning Indigenous peoples as active stewards of their data, and building capacity in digital methods and ethical data practice. Each Indigenous nation and community has its own interests, values, and protocols, and we suggest paths to bring data practice into alignment with the CARE framework. |
16 | CARE Principles | Opening research data: What does it mean for social sciences? | https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/9123 | Article | Berkowitz, H. and Delacour, H. | 2022 | Recent international trends demonstrate multilevel efforts to ‘open’ science across its whole ecosystem and lifecycle – from capturing research data through to publishing results. In social sciences, the publication process is already largely ‘open access’ or transitioning toward it. However, opening research data raises specific issues and concerns for the field. Here, we set out to understand what open research data mean for social sciences, and if, why, and how data should be made open. We argue that while the ecosystem of actors, infrastructures, standards, and principles is starting to take structure in France and abroad, there are several barriers to the process of opening data in social sciences: (1) a misperception of the motivations for opening data (i.e., focusing on risks of exercising control over researchers and their academic freedom and overlooking motivations like data patrimonialization, pooling and potential synergies, trust-building, and broader engagement), (2) a system based on competition and the dominant process of ‘starification’ in research, (3) a lack of resources and capabilities that might further exacerbate inequalities among genders, communities, institutions, and countries, and (4) the potential risks inherent to opening data and the specific constraints posed by social science data. Against this backdrop, we investigate several ways forward to operationalize not only FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) but also CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, Ethics) principles for open data in social sciences, before going on to present M@n@gement’s new open data policy. |
17 | CARE Principles | Dear Colleague Letter: Update to the Division of Earth Sciences (EAR) Data and Sample Policy | https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23131/nsf23131.jsp | Press release/communiqué/statement | National Science Foundation | 2023 | Earth Scientists increasingly rely on access to and reuse of data and samples originating from a variety of sources, including through research supported by the NSF Division of Earth Sciences (EAR) in the Directorate for Geosciences (GEO). Public access to data and samples promotes equity in research and education, enables the use of cutting-edge data driven techniques, and expands the benefit of NSF research investments. Adherence to open, inclusive, and transparent research practices, including those articulated through the FAIR Guiding Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable)1 and the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics)2,is critical for maximizing the value of data, samples, and other research products supported through EAR awards. |
18 | CARE Principles | Applying the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ to ecology and biodiversity research | https://www-nature-com.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu/articles/s41559-023-02161-2 | Article | Jennings et al. | 2023 | Indigenous Peoples are increasingly being sought out for research partnerships that incorporate Indigenous Knowledges into ecology research. In such research partnerships, it is essential that Indigenous data are cared for ethically and responsibly. Here we outline how the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ can sow community ethics into disciplines that are inundated with extractive helicopter research practices, and we provide standardized practices for evolving data and research landscapes. |
19 | CARE Principles | CARE Statement for Indigenous Data Sovereignty | https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/GDC-submission_WAMPUM_Lab_and_the_Collaboratory_for_Indigenous.pdf | Press release/communiqué/statement | Leonard, K., et al. | 2023 | The Wampum Lab at the University of Waterloo and the Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance partnered to co-develop the CARE Statement for Indigenous Data Sovereignty. This statement builds on the work of the Global Indigenous Data Alliance, including the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. From outreach and planning to virtual co-writing sessions, the team created this statement with the intent for it to inform the drafting of the Global Digital Compact and become a catalyst for Indigenous data sovereignty, ethical data governance, and interdisciplinary justice action. |
20 | CARE Principles | How data governance principles influence participation in biodiversity science | https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2214155 | Article | Beckett Sterner & Steve Elliott. | 2023 | Biodiversity science is in a pivotal period when diverse groups of actors – including researchers, businesses, national governments, and Indigenous Peoples – are negotiating wide-ranging norms for governing and managing biodiversity data in digital repositories. The management of these repositories, often called biodiversity data portals, can serve either to redress or to perpetuate the colonial history of biodiversity science and current inequities. Both researchers and Indigenous Peoples are implementing new strategies to influence whom biodiversity data portals recognise as salient participants in data management and use. Two notable efforts are the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority, Responsibility, Ethics) Data Principles. Actors use these principles to influence the governance of biodiversity data portals. ‘Fit-for-use’ data is a social status provided by groups of actors who approve whether the data meets specific purposes. Advocates for the FAIR and CARE Principles use them in a similar way to institutionalise the authority of different groups of actors. However, the FAIR Principles prioritise the ability of machine agents to understand the meanings of data, while the CARE Principles prioritise Indigenous Peoples and their data sovereignty. Together, FAIR and CARE illustrate a broader emerging strategy for institutionalising international norms for digital repositories about who they should recognise as having a formal role in determinations of the fitness-for-use of data. |
21 | CARE Principles | Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2023.1272318/full | Article | Garba et al. | 2023 | Indigenous Peoples are reimagining their relationship with research and researchers through greater self-determination and involvement in research governance. The emerging discourse around Indigenous Data Sovereignty has provoked discussions about decolonizing data practices and highlighted the importance of Indigenous Data Governance to support Indigenous decision-making and control of data. Given that much data are generated from research, Indigenous research governance and Indigenous Data Governance overlap. In this paper, we broaden the concept of Indigenous Data Sovereignty by using the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance to discuss how research legislation and policy adopted by Indigenous Peoples in the US set expectations around recognizing sovereign relationships, acknowledging rights and interests in data, and enabling Indigenous Peoples' participation in research governance. |
22 | CARE Principles | The CARE Principles of Indigenous Data Governance | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=309QIZt9H74 | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Stephanie Russo Carroll and Talia Anderson | 2022 | The current shift to big data, open science, and open data does not fully engage with Indigenous Peoples rights and interests. Over the past five years, Indigenous data sovereignty has become a movement to increase both Indigenous access to Indigenous data and Indigenous leadership within data governance. Given that most Indigenous data are held by non-Indigenous governments, institutions, and agencies, increasing Indigenous Peoples participation in data governance activities is central to realizing Indigenous data sovereignty. How can organizations like CGIAR (1) support the creation of new institutional frameworks that center the terms of Indigenous communities around research and data partnerships and (2) enact policy and practice changes that protect and strengthen Indigenous Peoples’ relationships with their data, information, and knowledge? |
23 | CARE Principles | How data governance principles influence participation in biodiversity science | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09505431.2023.2214155 | Article | Beckett Sterner and Steve Elliott | 2023 | Biodiversity science is in a pivotal period when diverse groups of actors – including researchers, businesses, national governments, and Indigenous Peoples – are negotiating wide-ranging norms for governing and managing biodiversity data in digital repositories. The management of these repositories, often called biodiversity data portals, can serve either to redress or to perpetuate the colonial history of biodiversity science and current inequities. Both researchers and Indigenous Peoples are implementing new strategies to influence whom biodiversity data portals recognise as salient participants in data management and use. Two notable efforts are the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority, Responsibility, Ethics) Data Principles. Actors use these principles to influence the governance of biodiversity data portals. ‘Fit-for-use’ data is a social status provided by groups of actors who approve whether the data meets specific purposes. Advocates for the FAIR and CARE Principles use them in a similar way to institutionalise the authority of different groups of actors. However, the FAIR Principles prioritise the ability of machine agents to understand the meanings of data, while the CARE Principles prioritise Indigenous Peoples and their data sovereignty. Together, FAIR and CARE illustrate a broader emerging strategy for institutionalising international norms for digital repositories about who they should recognise as having a formal role in determinations of the fitness-for-use of data. |
24 | Cross-cultural framework | Testing Justice: New Ways to Address Environmental Inequalities | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z0ZN8Q5dCT9a72kexMT1ZS2QztwgH9AD/view?usp=drive_link | Article | Montgomery, M. & Blanchard, P. | 2021 | Eco-Critical Race Theory and 7 R’s of Indigenous research |
25 | Cross-cultural framework | The Ethical Space of Engagement (2007) | https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/ilj/article/view/27669/20400 | Article | Willie Ermine | 2007 | Issue 1 of Volume 6 in Indigenous Law Journal. The ethical space of engagement proposes a framework as a way of examining the diversity and positioning of Indigenous peoples and Western society in the pursuit of a relevant discussion on Indigenous legal issues and particularly to the fragile intersection of Indigenous law and Canadian legal systems. |
26 | Cross-cultural framework | AAG Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group, 2010, Declaration of key questions about research ethics with Indigenous communities | https://kipdf.com/aag-indigenous-peoples-specialty-group-s-declaration-of-key-questions-about-rese_5ac965921723dd71e855b2d2.html | Guiding principles/protocols | Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group (IPSG) of the Association of American Geographers (AAG) | The IPSG collaboratively compiled a list of questions that we would ask of prospective geographic researchers approaching Indigenous communities—and more importantly, what we believe researchers should reflect upon and ask themselves. These statements and questions are intended to stimulate researchers to think before they research, and to internalize collaborative attitudes during the process of researching. | |
27 | Cross-cultural framework | Protocol and Best Practice for the Research on and Public Distribution of Information from Projects involving Indigenous Peoples | https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/56ddf1e1e4b015c306fb22fa | Guiding principles/protocols | Coeur d’Alene Tribe & University of Idaho | 2015 | Pg. 23-27: Appendix 2 Best Practices for Metadata Creation in ISO 19115 - Provides NOAA definition/best practice and recommendations for TEK-related data products for each Metadata Description/element name. This protocol aims to protect the intellectual property and traditional knowledge of federally recognized American Indian tribes by providing a secure process through which research can be effectively obtained and distributed. |
28 | Cross-cultural framework | 2020 Ocean Resources Management Plan: Coastal Zone Management Mauka to Makai | https://planning.hawaii.gov/czm/ormp/ | Management plan | The State of Hawaii, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development | 2020 | Mandated by state law, component of State Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, which is a federal-coastal states partnship to address national coastal issues (2020 plan is 5th version of ORMP). The ORMP is a statewide plan that seeks to resolve coastal problems and improve State policies for ocean resources by addressing management gaps in our State. Unique in its collaborative implementation through the CZM Network, which includes Federal, State, County, and community representation.The plan highlights three areas of need within the coastal zone: Development and Coastal Hazards, Land-Based Pollution, and Marine Ecosystems. |
29 | Cross-cultural framework | Throwe, Native American Fish & Wildlife Society, American Society of Adaptation Professionals Named NCRF Field Liaisons | https://throwe-environmental.com/press-release-112822 | Press release/communiqué/statement | Throwe Environmental | 2022 | Press Release - Funds and technical assistance from federal funds. Native American Fish and Wildlife Society named field liaison for the National Coastal Resilience Fund |
30 | Cross-cultural framework | Assembly of First Nations, 2009, Ethics in First Nations research | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-f0JIvgCxWjlDmJXIhi8Tb8h7ZLHjw4h/view?usp=drive_link | Guiding principles/protocols | Assemby of First Nations | 2009 | This paper discusses appraches to conducting ethical research, highlights flaws in past research methods and offers solutions, and and provides research protocols/ethics to guide the roles of researchers and First Nations to support ethical research |
31 | Cross-cultural framework | HI Sea grant: Kūlana Noiʻi | https://seagrant.soest.hawaii.edu/kulana-noii/ | Guiding principles/protocols | University of Hawai‘i Sea Grant College Program, Kuaʻāina Ulu ʻAuamo (KUA), the Hawaiian Islands Sentinel Site Cooperative, the He‘eia National Estuarine Research Reserve, and others | 2021 | Ethical research framework/guidlines for researcher-Indigenous community partnerships in Hawai'i. A guideline/starting point for achieving reciprocal, non-extractive research partnerships between academic researchers/institutions and the Indigenous community. This document serves as a starting point for deeper conversation and lays out a set of ideas, values, and behaviors that serves as a resource to facilitate open conversation and clearly articulated expectations between the community and researchers |
32 | Cross-cultural framework | ANKN & UA Fairbanks 2006, Alaska Federation of Natives Guidelines for Research | https://drive.google.com/file/d/19BzDKhkR4tGxeCJSnUFsbpd5NjiTkMjS/view?usp=sharing | Web blog | Alaska Native Knowledge Network (ANKN) | 2020 | At its quarterly meeting in May 1993, the AFN Board of Directors adopted a policy recommendation that includes a set of research principles to be conveyed to scientists who plan to conduct studies among Alaska Natives. The principles were sent out to all Native organizations and villages in the hope that compliance by researchers will deter abuses such as those committed in the past which have lately come to light. |
33 | Cross-cultural framework | JIT Course - Indigenous Research Governance | https://igp.arizona.edu/events/97-indigenous-research-governance | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Co-teachers: Ibrahim Garba and Dominique David-Chavez | 2024 | Training (formal, synchronous, short-course). 3 day virtual 1 credit course through University of Arizona. Online for 2023. "This course uses codes, policies, and protocols to consider the historical, ethical, and policy contexts for increasing self-determination for Indigenous Peoples in research in light of the current national and international policy climate." |
34 | Cross-cultural framework | Center for Braiding Indigenous Knowledges and Science | https://www.umass.edu/gateway/research/indigenous-knowledges | Website | University of Massachusettes Amherst | The Center for Braiding Indigenous Knowledges and Science (CBIKS) will examine how to effectively and ethically braid Western and Indigenous science research, education, and practice related to the urgent and interconnected challenges of climate change, cultural places, and food security. Established in 2023, CBIKS is headquartered at UMass Amherst with university and Indigenous community partners across the United States and internationally. CBIKS' research is fully community-based, developed from Indigenous community priorities and conducted in full partnership with our community partners. CBIKS education components involve Indigenous community members and students at the preK–12, undergrad, and graduate level to train professionals who are skilled leaders in the ethical braiding of Indigenous and Western Sciences. CBIKS knowledge exchange activities provide workshops, trainings and internships for ethically utilizing them for policy makers and state, federal, and Tribal agencies who manage and care for our nation's lands, waters, and cultural places. CBIKS brings together arts and storytelling as a means to share scientific research with the public, Indigenous communities, and diverse audiences. | |
35 | Cross-cultural framework | Ethical Space | https://indigenousclimatemonitoring.ca/ethical-space/ | Web blog | Indigenous Climate Monitoring Toolkit | 2023 | Climate monitoring projects typically use both Indigenous Knowledge Systems and science and involve both Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants and partners. The concept of “ethical space” has been used by Indigenous scholars and Elders such as Willie Ermine, a professor from Sturgeon Lake First Nation, and Dr. Reg Crowshoe, a Piikani Blackfoot Elder, to provide a framework for collaboration between Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge systems. Ethical space is complementary to the Two-Eyed Seeing approach which generally refers to using the strengths of both worldviews. |
36 | Cross-cultural framework | Building Authentic Collaborations with Tribal Communities | https://www.climatesciencealliance.org/info/meaningful-engagement | Website | Climate Science Alliance | 2023 | In 2021, the Climate Science Alliance and the Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center (SWCASC) co-hosted the Southwest Adaptation Forum (SWAF), which included an engaging training experience for climate practitioners interested in fostering meaningful engagement with Tribal communities. Adapted from the 2021 SWAF Attendee Workbook, each section of this resource guide provides important information, key resources, and listed actions to take prior to reaching out to build new relationships with Tribal communities. |
37 | Cross-cultural framework | Indigenous Stewardship Methods and NRCS Conservation Practices | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qblA5PaROk5s4N-3eWK-7kwH3iR12RQL/view | Management plan | United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service | 2010 | The Indigenous Stewardship Methods and NRCS Conservation Practices guidebookprovides guidance to employees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and to indigenous cooperators whowork with NRCS. It provides a sensitive process in which knowledge is shared, allowing employees to incorporate the indigenous knowledge into NRCS’ assistance through its conservation practices. The indigenous perspective of living in harmony with the earth and the agency perspective of scientific and experiential learning are portrayed in the words of the guidebook. |
38 | Cross-cultural framework | Wisdom & Reciprocity: Tips on building effective and meaningful collaborations with Tribal Nations | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qO_334TB6HnDcUisTCebKUrLrE4KEsWB/view | Handout | Southwest Adaptation Forum | 2021 | This document encapsulates takeaways from the 2021 Southwest Adaptation Forum panel on wisdom and reciprocity. It is by no means an exhaustive list and comes from the lens of climate adaptation planning, but our hope is that it provides basic guidance for scientists and practitioners interested in collaboratively partnering with Native Nations. |
39 | Cross-cultural framework | ENRICH: Equity for Indigenous Research and Innovation Coordinating Hub | https://www.enrich-hub.org/ | Organization/institution | ENRICH | 2023 | ENRICH supports the development of Indigenous based protocols, Indigenous centered standard setting mechanisms, and machine-focused technology that inform policy, transform institutional and research practices, and reform relationships between Indigenous communities and wider society. |
40 | Cross-cultural framework | Advancing Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) | https://www.idsovandresearcher.com/ | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Advancing Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) | 2023 | We are committed to the highest standard of research ethics and accountability between Indigenous peoples and settlers in Canada. The TRC’s Calls to Action usher in a new era of relationship-building and collaboration. As citizens, scholars, educators, and allies, we understand it to be our responsibility to learn how to build respectful, reciprocal, ethical, and sustainable research relationships with Indigenous colleagues and partnering communities. We recognize that the incorporation of Indigenous knowledges and values at every stage of the research process has revolutionized the ways in which ethical research is being reconceptualized, re-defined, re-articulated, regulated, and operationalized within academia. Our aim is to create a safe space where diverse stakeholders can come together to think about, actively engage with, and work through thought-provoking research and data management issues. |
41 | Cross-cultural framework | A Global Assessment of Indigenous community Involvement in Climate Research | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300/meta | Article | David-Chavez, D. and Gavin, M. | 2018 | For millennia Indigenous communities worldwide have maintained diverse knowledge systems informed through careful observation of dynamics of environmental changes. Although Indigenous communities and their knowledge systems are recognized as critical resources for understanding and adapting to climate change, no comprehensive, evidence-based analysis has been conducted into how environmental studies engage Indigenous communities. Here we provide the first global systematic review of levels of Indigenous community participation and decision-making in all stages of the research process (initiation, design, implementation, analysis, dissemination) in climate field studies that access Indigenous knowledge. We develop indicators for assessing responsible community engagement in research practice and identify patterns in levels of Indigenous community engagement. We find that the vast majority of climate studies (87%) practice an extractive model in which outside researchers use Indigenous knowledge systems with minimal participation or decision-making authority from communities who hold them. Few studies report on outputs that directly serve Indigenous communities, ethical guidelines for research practice, or providing Indigenous community access to findings. Further, studies initiated with (in mutual agreement between outside researchers and Indigenous communities) and by Indigenous community members report significantly more indicators for responsible community engagement when accessing Indigenous knowledges than studies initiated by outside researchers alone. This global assessment provides an evidence base to inform our understanding of broader social impacts related to research design and concludes with a series of guiding questions and methods to support responsible research practice with Indigenous and local communities. |
42 | Cross-cultural framework | Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-020-0228-x | Article | Hudson, M., et al. | 2020 | Addressing Indigenous rights and interests in genetic resources has become increasingly challenging in an open science environment that promotes unrestricted access to genomic data. Although Indigenous experiences with genetic research have been shaped by a series of negative interactions, there is increasing recognition that equitable benefits can only be realized through greater participation of Indigenous communities. Issues of trust, accountability and equity underpin Indigenous critiques of genetic research and the sharing of genomic data. This Perspectives article highlights identified issues for Indigenous communities around the sharing of genomic data and suggests principles and actions that genomic researchers can adopt to recognize community rights and interests in data. |
43 | Cross-cultural framework | Centering justice in the convergence of sciences, communities, and actions | https://risingvoices.ucar.edu/events/workshops/2021 | Workshop/Webinar/Training | NCAR Rising Voices | 2021 | We chose the theme of Centering Justice in the Convergence of Sciences, Communities, and Actions for the Rising Voices 9 theme to emphasize the importance of centering justice in collaborations between Indigenous and Earth sciences as these collaborations contribute to scientific efforts, community capacities, and actions for more sustainable and regenerative futures in response to climate change. “Convergence science” conveys the idea of many disciplines and many ways of knowing coming together to create a whole that is larger than the sum of its parts. |
44 | Cross-cultural framework | UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science | https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/about?hub=686 | Guiding principles/protocols | UNESCO | 2023 | The UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science provides an internationally agreed definition, as well as a set of shared values and guiding principles for open science. It also identifies a set of actions conducive to a fair and equitable operationalization of open science for all at the individual, institutional, national, regional and international levels. |
45 | Cross-cultural framework | Data Sharing Principles | https://worlddatasystem.org/about/data-sharing-principles/ | Guiding principles/protocols | World Data System | 2023 | World Data System aims to promote universal and equitable access to quality-assured scientific data, data services, products and information, with a view towards long-term data stewardship. These data sharing principles advance those goals. |
46 | Cross-cultural framework | Why the federal government needs to change how it collects data on Native Americans | https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-the-federal-government-needs-to-change-how-it-collects-data-on-native-americans/ | Web blog | Robert Maxim, Gabriel R. Sanchez, and Kimberly R. Huyser | 2023 | Web blog outlining misrepresentation of Indigenous rights and issues in data collection |
47 | Cross-cultural framework | Ethical Principles for the Conduct of Research in the North | https://acuns.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/EthicsEnglishmarch2003.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies | 2003 | The 20 principles presented here are intended to encourage the development of co-operation and mutual respect between researchers and the people of the North. They are also intended to encourage partnership between northern peoples and researchers that, in turn, will promote and enhance northern scholarship. |
48 | Cross-cultural framework | Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement | https://hh30e7.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/EEE-Protocols-LR-WEB.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Inuit Circumpolar Council | 2022 | This document should be accepted and seen by others as an invitation to consult and cooperate with Inuit by illustrating for researchers, decision-makers and others what is needed to genuinely be responsive to the urgent call for recognizing the interrelated, interdependent and indivisible rights of Inuit. The elements embraced in this publication can be employed by others in any facet of engagement with Inuit and the diverse subject matter that affects our day to day lives. We especially invite scientists, researchers, funders, and decision-makers to digest and ultimately implement these protocols with Inuit. Finally, we insist in a good way that overall results will produce a higher standard and quality of research beneficial for Inuit and all others. |
49 | Cross-cultural framework | Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans | https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2022-en.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Government of Canada | 2022 | The Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS or the Policy) is a joint policy of Canada’s three federal research agencies – the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), or “the Agencies.” This Policy expresses the Agencies’ continuing commitment to the people of Canada to promote the ethical conduct of research involving humans. It has been informed, in part, by leading international ethics norms, all of which may help, in some measure, to guide Canadian researchers, in Canada and abroad, in the conduct of research involving humans. |
50 | Cross-cultural framework | Inuit Arctic Policy | https://lcipp.unfccc.int/sites/default/files/2021-10/Inuit-Arctic-Policy.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Inuit Circumpolar Council | 2021 | However, as we worked to gain our rights nationally and internationally, it also became apparent that the original Arctic Policy needed revisions and updating for the Inuit Arctic Policy is a living and evolving document. This work was entrusted to Aqqaluk Lynge, ICC Greenland and Marianne Stenbaek, McGill University, Canada. |
51 | Cross-cultural framework | Inuvialuit Regional Corporation Guidelines for Research in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region | https://nwtresearch.com/sites/default/files/inuvialuit-regional-corporation.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Shannon O’Hara | The following is a brief introduction to the Inuvialuit Research Policy and is meant to be an overall guide as to how a researcher should approach Inuvialuit communities to establish and undertake research projects; and how Inuvialuit Institutions and communities can coordinate and facilitate research projects. | |
52 | Cross-cultural framework | National Inuit Strategy on Research | https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ITK_NISR-Report_English_low_res.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami | 2018 | The purpose of the NISR is to address these challenges through coordinated actions that enhance the efficacy, impact, and usefulness of Inuit Nunangat research for Inuit. The NISR is domestic in scope yet it also acknowledges the international dimension of research on Inuit Nunangat. The objectives and actions that ITK is committed to implementing in partnership with Inuit representational organizations, governments, and research institutions, fall within five priority areas: 1) Advance Inuit governance in research; 2) Enhance the ethical conduct of research; 3) Align funding with Inuit research priorities; 4) Ensure Inuit access, ownership, and control over data and information; and 5) Build capacity in Inuit Nunangat research. |
53 | Cross-cultural framework | Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers | https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Negotitiating-Research-Relationships-Researchers-Guide_0.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute | 2007 | Northern researchers are ever-aware of the growing expectations on them to ensure that northern communities are involved in, and benefit from, research. But what are researchers really being asked to do? How can community members participate meaningfully in research? What level of community involvement is appropriate in a given project? What are the best ways to communicate with local people? How can researchers initiate and maintain a meaningful relationship with community members? This guide is an attempt to address these questions, and provide practical advice to assist researchers who plan to work with, or in the vicinity of, Canadian Inuit communities in the regions of Nunatsiavut (Labrador), Nunavik (northern Québec), Nunavut, and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region of the NorthwestTerritories (NWT).This guide presents some core “universal” themes in communication and relationship-building that apply to natural, physical, biological, and social scientists working in the Canadian North. A range of information is provided to help researchers tailor ideas to their specific project objectives, whether they are just beginning or they wish to improve ongoing community-researcher relationships. |
54 | Cross-cultural framework | Principles for Conducting Research in the Arctic | https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/arctic/conduct.jsp | Guiding principles/protocols | National Science Foundation | 2018 | These Principles are directed at academic and federal researchers funded by IARPC agencies but are equally relevant to other individuals and organizations pursuing or funding research in the Arctic. They are guidelines for conducting responsible and ethical research and they encourage respect for all individuals, cultures, and the environment. The Principles are not intended to supplant existing regulations and guidelines; researchers should follow federal, state, and local regulations, policies and guidelines. Research involving human subjects must adhere to specific requirementsv. Projects on Indigenous homelands or involving Indigenous Peoples should be coordinated with Indigenous leadership and should follow all applicable regulations and local research guidelines. |
55 | Cross-cultural framework | Working Together Towards Relevant Environmental Monitoring and Research in the NWT | https://nwtdiscoveryportal.enr.gov.nt.ca/geoportaldocuments/Working_Together_FINAL_LR.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Northwest Territories (NWT) Discovery Portal | Community engagement is crucial to developing more relevant research and monitoring, and as such is becoming more important to funders and licensing authorities. While scientists have made great strides in working with northern partners, community stakeholders (residents, local governments and regulatory authorities) still indicate that there is room for improvement. The Working Together: Towards Relevant Environmental Monitoring & Research in the NWT document was developed by the Cumulative Impact Monitoring Program (CIMP) and the Aurora Research Institute (ARI) as a guide to help the NWT research and monitoring community improve the significance and success of their programs by working more effectively with community partners. The framework of the guidance document is based on the Pathway approach which was developed by CIMP to support research and monitoring in the north. | |
56 | Cross-cultural framework | Working with Aboriginal People and Communities: A Practice Resource | http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/321308/working_with_aboriginal.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Aboriginal Services Branch in consultation with the Aboriginal Reference Group | 2009 | A number of NSW Department of Community Service (Community Services) regions as well as several other government agencies have created their own practice guides for working with Aboriginal people and communities. In developing this practice resource, we have combined the best elements of existing practices to develop a resource that provides a consistent approach to working with Aboriginal people and communities |
57 | Cross-cultural framework | All Our Relations: Assuring Tribal Ethics from Generation to Generation | https://www.tuskegee.edu/Content/Uploads/Tuskegee/files/Bioethics/JHSH-V6n1-Fall-Spring2016-spreads-FINAL3-2.pdf | Article | Malia Villegas, et al. | 2016 | The primary learning presented is that assuring ethics from generation to generation with tribal nations requires a constant engagement with what it means to be a good human being. Being a good human being is a concept that comes out of some Indigenous cosmologies and represents an understanding of role and relationship in the cosmos. |
58 | Cross-cultural framework | Engaging with Indigenous Australia—exploring the conditions for effective relationships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities | https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7d54eac8-4c95-4de1-91bb-0d6b1cf348e2/ctgc-ip05.pdf?v=20230605181119&inline=true | Guiding principles/protocols | Janet Hunt | 2013 | To implement the Closing the Gap policy, Australian Government policy aims to strengthen government engagement and partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, recognising that without genuine engagement it will be difficult to achieve the key policy targets (the COAG targets) (FaHCSIA 2011a). This paper overviews the research-based evidence on how such engagement can be developed and maintained. |
59 | Cross-cultural framework | The Mataatua Declaration on Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples | https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/databases/creative_heritage/docs/mataatua.pdf | Press release/communiqué/statement | Commission on Human Rights Sub-Commission of Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities Working Group on Indigenous Populations | 1993 | The Conference met over six days to consider a range of significant issues, including; the value of indigenous knowledge, biodiversity and biotechnology, customary environmental management, arts, music, language and other physical and spiritual cultural forms. On the final day, the following Declaration was passed by the Plenary. |
60 | Cross-cultural framework | Ways of Being, Ways to Talk | https://docplayer.net/54968537-Ways-of-being-ways-of-talk.html | Workbook | Department of Education | 2002 | For the past seven years, the Department of Education and Training, Western Australia has supported a unique research effort by a collaborative team of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal researchers from the Department and from Edith Cowan University. The aim of this work has been to make education more appropriate and effective for students who speak Aboriginal English, using an inclusive approach that will benefit all students. |
61 | Cross-cultural framework | The Give Away Spirit: Reaching a Shared Vision of Ethical Indigenous Research Relationships | https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol5/iss2/4/ | Article | Jioanna Carjuzaa and Kay Fenimore-Smith | 2010 | This paper discusses the dilemma that emerges when codified protocols taken from dominant research paradigms are applied to research in Indigenous communities. We examine the underlying beliefs and assumptions of research paradigms, both Western and Indigenous, and explore how this incompatibility can be reconciled. We seek to reframe paradigmatic structures to reflect the values and beliefs of Indigenous peoples so that the Indian/non-Indian divide is bridged with a culturally responsive research paradigm. This process raises a number of ethical issues related to voice and privilege that we believe have to be resolved in order to be inclusive of multiple perspectives. Grande (2008) points out the problem of “nations [that] get trans- or (dis)figured when articulated through Western frames of knowing” (p. 234). It is this presence of intellectual colonialism that troubles us as educators and researchers as we struggle to maintain our commitment to promoting social justice and ethical interactions within the tribal and academic communities in which we work. |
62 | Cross-cultural framework | Indigenous Research at Memorial | https://www.mun.ca/research/indigenous-research-at-memorial/ | Web blog | Memorial University | 2024 | The resources on this webpage focus on research with, by and for Indigenous peoples that emphasizes engagement based on understanding and respect. |
63 | Cross-cultural framework | Indigenous Data Sovereignty: How Researchers can Empower Data Governance | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjolET69Z8c&t=2s | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Lydia Jennings | 2022 | Indigenous land management practices result in higher species richness, less deforestation, and land degradation than non-Indigenous strategies. Many environmental researchers, data repositories, and data service operations recognize the importance of collaborating with Indigenous nations, supporting their environmental stewardship practices, and aligning land stewardship mechanisms with Indigenous rights. Yet these individuals and organizations do not always know the appropriate processes to achieve these partnerships. Calls for government agencies to collaborate with Indigenous land stewards require an increasing awareness of what Indigenous data are and how to manage these data. Indigenous data sovereignty underscores Indigenous rights and interests and can provide a structure for data practices. |
64 | Cross-cultural framework | The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons | https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/book/state-open-data-histories-and-horizons | Book | Tim Davies, Stephen B. Walker, Mor Rubinstein, and Fernando Perini | 2019 | In the decade since open data first broke onto the global stage, thousands of programs and projects around the world have worked to open data and use it to address a myriad of social and economic challenges. Meanwhile, issues related to data rights and privacy have moved to the centre of public and political discourse. As the open data movement enters a new phase in its evolution, shifting to target real-world problems and embed open data thinking into other existing or emerging communities of practice, big questions still remain. How will open data initiatives respond to new concerns about privacy, inclusion, and artificial intelligence? And what can we learn from the last decade in order to deliver impact where it is most needed? The State of Open Data brings together more than 60 authors from around the world to address these questions and to take stock of the real progress made to date across sectors and around the world, uncovering the issues that will shape the future of open data in the years to come. |
65 | Cross-cultural framework | Good data (Theory on Demand #29) | https://eprints.qut.edu.au/125605/ | Book | Daly, Angela, Devitt, Kate, & Mann, Monique (Eds.) | 2019 | In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in the collection and automated analysis of information by government and private actors. In response to the totalizing datafication of society, there has been a significant critique regarding ‘bad data’ practices. The book ‘Good Data’, that will be launched at this event, proposes a move from critique to imagining and articulating a more optimistic vision of the datafied future. With the datafication of society and the introduction of new technologies such as artificial intelligence and automation, issues of data ethics and data justice are only to increase in importance. The book ‘Good Data’, edited by Angela Daly, S. Kate Devitt and Monique Mann, examines and proposes ‘good data’ practices, values and principles from an interdisciplinary, international perspective. From ideas of data sovereignty and justice, to manifestos for change and calls for activism, this edited collection opens a multifaceted conversation on the kinds of futures we want to see. The book presents concrete steps on how we can start realizing good data in practice, and move towards a fair and just digital economy and society. |
66 | Cross-cultural framework | Why the federal government needs to change how it collects data on Native Americans | https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-the-federal-government-needs-to-change-how-it-collects-data-on-native-americans/ | Web blog | RESEARCH Why the federal government needs to change how it collects data on Native Americans Robert Maxim, Gabriel R. Sanchez, and Kimberly R. Huyser | 2023 | Describes the issues arising from using race data to denote Indigenous Peoples |
67 | Cross-cultural framework | Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement | https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8 | Article | Huria et al. | 2019 | Research reporting guidelines are increasingly commonplace and shown to improve the quality of published health research and health outcomes. Despite severe health inequities among Indigenous Peoples and the potential for research to address the causes, there is an extended legacy of health research exploiting Indigenous Peoples. This paper describes the development of the CONSolIDated critERtia for strengthening the reporting of health research involving Indigenous Peoples (CONSIDER) statement. |
68 | Cross-cultural framework | ICIRAS: Research and reconciliation with indigenous peoples in rural health journals | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543535/ | Article | Lock et al. | 2022 | We aim to promote discussion about an Indigenous Cultural Identity of Research Authors Standard (ICIRAS) for academic journal publications. |
69 | Cross-cultural framework | Requirement for Meaningful Engagement of First Nations, Inuit, Métis, and Indigenous Peoples in Publications About Them | https://link.springer.com/article/10.17269/s41997-020-00450-y | Article | Smylie et al. | 2020 | Increasing publication standards to meaningfully engage First Nations |
70 | Cross-cultural framework | CONVERGE Training Modules | https://converge.colorado.edu/resources/training-modules/ | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Natural Hazards Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder | The CONVERGE Training Modules incorporate an all-hazards approach grounded in cutting edge research from the social sciences, public health, engineering, and other disciplines. Module focal areas include: Indigenous Sovereignty, Cultural Competence , Positionality, Reciprocity and other social dimensions of hazards and disaster research and practice. Each training module features learning objectives, lesson plans, written content, and disaster-focused case study vignettes from the U.S. and across the globe. The modules also include a list of publications for further reading as well as access to related standardized scales and measures, online resources, data sets, and other information. Each module is followed by a short multiple choice quiz. Those who receive a score of 80% or higher will receive a CONVERGE Training Module Certificate of Completion and one contact hour of general management training through the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) certification program. | |
71 | Cross-cultural framework | Navigating University Openness in Research Policy Inconsistent with Indigenous Data Sovereignty: A Case Analysis | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500202 | Article | Molly Wick, Deanna Erickson, Joel Hoffman, Lucinda Johnson, Ted Angradi | 2024 | Indigenous nations and communities in the United States have rights as sovereign governments to exercise control and ownership over all data and information generated by or from the tribes, tribal members, or tribal resources. Indigenous nations exercise these rights through data ownership policies established in response to unethical research practices in research involving Indigenous communities. Most universities in the U.S. have “openness in research” policies to ensure academic freedom to publish freely, exercised by retaining university control of data. Here, we describe our study of cultural ecosystem services in the St. Louis River estuary region (Nagaajiwanaang in the language Ojibwemowin) in Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior, Wisconsin, U.S., an area that includes portions of the 1854 and 1842 Ceded Territories and reservation lands of a local band of Ojibwe (hereafter referred to as “the Band”). In this university-led, Band-supported study, both the university and the Band sought ownership of data collected based on their respective policies, resulting in a research delay of nearly a year. We found that open research policies that do not consider Indigenous sovereignty can hamper collaboration between university researchers and tribal nations, even when there is broad agreement on research goals and objectives. University open research policies that do not explicitly address Indigenous sovereignty fall short of the open research principles they intend to support and should be revised. Formal adoption of principles for ethical research with sovereign tribal governments by universities is needed to improve coordination and trust among university and tribal researchers and members. |
72 | Cross-cultural framework | Maintaining Confidentiality for Traditional Ecological Knowledge Obtained from Indigenous Nations: Overcoming the Presumption of Public Disclosure | https://www.calindianlaw.org/uploads/2/8/4/5/28458371/final_journal_plus_footnote.pdf | Article | Curis Vandermolen | 2021 | Article in the California Indian Law Legal Journal that briefly outlines the background for understanding TEK in context |
73 | Cross-cultural framework | The National Institutes of Health and Capacity Building: A Recognition of Tribal Data Sovereignty | https://www.calindianlaw.org/uploads/2/8/4/5/28458371/final_journal_plus_footnote.pdf | Article | Kevin W. Doxzen & Alec D. Tyra | 2021 | Article in the California Indian Law Legal Journal that summarizes the collective componsation model in support of Indigenous data sovereignty |
74 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research | https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss1/art34/ | Article | Ellam Yua, Julie Raymond-Yakoubian, Raychelle Aluaq Daniel, Carolina Behe | 2022 | We argue for systematic change in how research-related activities are conducted in the Arctic. Bringing together multiple knowledge systems, specifically Indigenous Peoples' knowledge systems and science, can lead to more equitable, inclusive, and useful outcomes. The co-production of knowledge framework that we forward is designed to assist researchers, decision makers, and communities in moving toward those goals. |
75 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | WH Guidance for Federal Dept and Agencies on Indigenous Knowledges | https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/OSTP-CEQ-IK-Guidance.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | White House/OSTP/CEQ | 2022 | Federal Guidance |
76 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Alaska Native Knowledge Network (ANKN), 2000, Guidelines for respecting cultural knowledge | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NrsBdwx-mcIg2cFGsxWWWqqQbM241jjd/view?usp=sharing | Guiding principles/protocols | Alaska Native Knowledge Network (ANKN) | 2000 | The following guidelines address issues of concern in the documentation, representation and utilization of traditional cultural knowledge as they relate to the role of various participants, including Elders, authors, curriculum developers, classroom teachers, publishers and researchers. |
77 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Building A Fire | http://buildingafire.org/ | Website | Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange | 2022 | Includes the following tools: Indigenous Climate Education Bilbliography; Intertribal Interinstitutional Theory of Change; US Indigenous Peoples and Places Map |
78 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Tribal Relations & Traditional Knowledge | https://arizona.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=23e259ce-4c37-460a-ae79-ac62017b629f | Workshop/Webinar/Training | Crystal Leonetti | 2020 | A presentation by the first Indigenous woman to ever serve as a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American liaison - Crystal Leonetti. Organized by the University of Arizona. |
79 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Guidelines for the uses of Traditional Knowledges | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBNclSxLTpQ | Video | Ann Marie Chischilly | 2021 | This series organized by ESA's TEK Section facilitates a virtual space to welcome and hear from Indigenous voices who work to sustain and nurture traditional ecological knowledge in their communities. This presentation was made by Ann Marie Chischilly from Northern Arizona University and its Office of Native American Initiatives, and the Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals. |
80 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Guidelines for Considering Traditional Knowledge in Climate Change Initiatives | https://climatetkw.wordpress.com/ | Guiding principles/protocols | Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup | 2014 | The Third National Climate Assessment issued in May 2014 contained a chapter dedicated to the impact of climate change on tribal peoples. In light of the increasing recognition of the significance of traditional knowledges (TKs) in relation to climate change, a self-organized, informal group of indigenous persons, staff of indigenous governments and organizations, and experts with experience working with issues concerning traditional knowledges (The Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup – CTKW), felt compelled to develop a framework to increase understanding of issues relating to access and protection of TKs in climate initiatives and interactions between holders of TKs and non-tribal partners. The Guidelines were originally developed to inform the Department of Interior’s Advisory Committee on Climate Change and Natural Resource Science (ACCCNRS) and the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative in May 2014. The CTKW developed these Guidelines through a collaborative effort with funding support from individual tribal governments, the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative, the Northwest Climate Science Center and the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. |
81 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | How to Include Indigenous Researchers and Their Knowledge | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g2uFuPcFV81eqD4ngDakn9epUbyELi4j/view?usp=drive_link | Article | Otakuye Conroy-Ben | 2021 | Researchers from Native American and Indigenous communities explain how colleagues and institutions can help them to battle marginalization. |
82 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Arctic Research Plan | https://www.iarpccollaborations.org/uploads/cms/documents/final-arp-2022-2026-20211214.pdf | Management plan | Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee of the National Science and Technology Council | 2021 | The Arctic Research Plan 2022-2026 prioritizes four areas: Community Resilience and Health, Arctic Systems Interactions, Sustainable Economies and Livelihoods, and Risk Management and Hazard Mitigation. These priority areas address the relationships between people and the environment and the urgently needed research to better understand and respond to the most rapidly changing region on Earth. The plan’s cover graphic brings together many of the natural and cultural elements of the Arctic, including the importance of participatory research, Indigenous leadership in research, and co-production of knowledge between academic science and Indigenous Knowledge. The center art was produced by Molly Trainor (mollytrainor.com), an artist, designer, and copywriter from Nome, Alaska. Molly’s Iñupiaq heritage influences her work, which is aimed at cultural heritage preservation by combining traditional technology and science subjects, storytelling, and pop culture. Design of the complete cover graphic was produced by Eric Cline of TerraGraphica. |
83 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Aotearoa New Zealand Antarctic Research Directions and Priorities | https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/environment/antarctica-and-the-southern-ocean/aotearoa-new-zealand-antarctic-research-directions-and-priorities/ | Management plan | New Zealand Government | 2021 | Aotearoa New Zealand’s plan for research in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean over the next decade has been approved by Cabinet, following public consultation. The Antarctic Research Directions and Priorities 2021-2030 reaffirms Aotearoa New Zealand’s focus on impactful science that helps understand the role of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean in global systems, and recognises and reflects the value of mātauranga Māori. |
84 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Conduct of Traditional Knowledge Research— A REFERENCE GUIDE | https://wmacns.ca/resources/conduct-traditional-knowledge-research-reference-guide/ | Guiding principles/protocols | Peter Armitage, Stephen Kilburn, and Wildlife Management Advisory Council (North Slope) | 2015 | This report is different and much needed. As a reference document, it provides detailed technical guidance and, importantly, supporting rationale for best practices that should be fully considered by anyone contemplating, undertaking and applying traditional knowledge research on the Yukon North Slope. Its intended audience is traditional knowledge researchers and those organizations – government agencies, co-management bodies, environmental assessment boards, aboriginal authorities and industry – that require and work with traditional knowledge. |
85 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Conducting Traditional Knowledge Research in the Gwich'in Settlement Area: A Guide for Researchers | https://nwtresearch.com/sites/default/files/gwich-in-social-and-cultural-institute_0.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | The Gwich’in Tribal Council, Gwich’in Social and Cultural Institute, The Gwich’in Welcome Collaborative Research | 2011 | Guidance for the collection, use, and distribution of Gwich’in Traditional Knowledge. |
86 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Sambaa K'e Dene Band Policy Regarding the Gathering, Use, and Distribution of Yúndíit’õh (Traditional Knowledge) | https://nwtresearch.com/sites/default/files/sambaa-k-e-dene-band.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Sambaa K’e Dene Band | 2003 | Sambaa K’e Dene Band will take all steps necessary to ensure that all land use and resource development activities in the Sambaa K’e traditional land use area incorporate yúndíit’õh (traditional knowledge) at all phases of development -- including research and planning, project implementation, ongoing project monitoring,and closure / remediation – according to the principles and procedures identified in this policy document. |
87 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | The Contributions of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies with Science | https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000225242 | Guiding principles/protocols | Thaman, R., Lyver, P., Mpande, R., Perez, E., Cariño, J. and Takeuchi, K. (eds.) | 2013 | Part I of this document provides the report of the IPBES Expert Meeting on the Contribution of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies with Science that is also available as IPBES/2/INF/1 at http://ipbes.net/plenary/ipbes-2-documents.html. It has been enhanced with case studies generously contributed by participants to the meeting. Part II presents the Initial elements of an IPBES approach: Towards principles and procedures for working with Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) systems that is also available as IPBES/2/INF/1/Add.1 at http://ipbes.net/plenary/ipbes-2-documents.html. |
88 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Indigenous Communication and Indigenous Knowledge | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268040873_Indigenous_Communication_and_Indigenous_Knowledge | Press release/communiqué/statement | Paul Mundy and J. Lin Compton | 1991 | Development Communication Report 74, 1991/3. Clearinghouse on Development Communication, Arlington, VA. An elder in a Pacific island fishing village stands in a beached outrigger canoe. A circle of younger villagers sits in the sand around the boat. The old man peers beneath the canoe as if searching for fish, gestures, hauls on an imaginary net. Too old to go fishing himself now, he is explaining fishing techniques to the less experienced youths. The old man is passing on to the younger generation a lifetime of experience and knowledge. Knowledge of fish behavior, subtle changes in the sea and the sky, ways of handling nets and boats. Knowledge that means the difference between boats coming home full of fish and boats returning empty. Knowledge that represents the villagers' very survival. |
89 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Consideration of initial elements: recognizing indigenous and local knowledge and building synergies with science | https://www.ipbes.net/document-library-catalogue/ipbes1inf5 | Guiding principles/protocols | IPBES/INF | 2013 | The present document highlights some of the issues that need to be addressed in developing the procedures for recognizing indigenous and local knowledge and for building synergies with science to achieve the objectives of IPBES. These issues are briefly outlined below in order to inform discussions and decisions for consideration by the plenary on a possible process to further develop the procedures on recognizing indigenous and local knowledge and building synergies with science. |
90 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Knowledge for the twenty first century: indigenous knowledge, traditional knowledge, science and connecting diverse knowledge systems | https://www.ipbes.net/resource-file/3572 | Guiding principles/protocols | IPBES | 2012 | This document is one step in a project aiming to create and support a dialogue on potential pitfalls and opportunities, as well as novel ideas for exchange between knowledge systems in an open process with partners and interested stakeholders. |
91 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Center for Oral History (COH) | https://oralhistory.hawaii.edu/ | Organization/institution | Center for Oral History (COH), University of Hawai'i | 2000 | We collect, document, preserve, and highlight the recollections of Native Hawaiians and the multi-ethnic people of Hawaiʻi. We produce oral histories and interpretive historical materials about lifeways, key historic events, social movements, and Hawaiʻi’s role in the globalizing world, for the widest possible use. We develop books, articles, podcasts, and videos based on oral histories, serve as a resource center for oral history materials, and train groups and individuals in oral history research. |
92 | Engaging Indigenous knowledges | Sciences and the Sacred: Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Knowledge Stewardship | https://seagrant.soest.hawaii.edu/news-and-events/sciences-and-the-sacred-indigenous-data-sovereignty-and-knowledge-stewardship/ | Workshop/Webinar/Training | University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program | 2018 | In Spring 2022 the seminar series centered conversations with Indigenous practitioners from continental and oceanic spaces in a knowledge-sharing exchange to advance kanaka ʻōiwi efforts towards data sovereignty. It is our hope that creating dialogue between kanaka ʻōiwi and allies and other Indigenous communities will lay the groundwork for collaborative partnerships within Hawaiʻi that are grounded in Indigenous data sovereignty principles. |
93 | Ethics in practice | Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS), 2020, Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research | https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-10/aiatsis-guide-applying-code-ethics_0.pdf | Guiding principles/protocols | Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) | 2020 | Describes the updated AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research and how researchers can apply these Ethics principles in their projects. It is also useful for ethics review boards to review research proposals. |
94 | Ethics in practice | Local Contexts Hub | https://localcontexts.org/tk-label-hub/ | Website | Local Contexts | Web portal for customizing/sharing labels/notices. The Local Contexts Hub is a web portal that allows Indigenous communities to customize the Local Contexts Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and share them nationally and internationally. The Labels support proper recognition and inclusion of Indigneous cultural authority in Indigenous collections and Indigenous data. The Local Context Hub also allows researchers and institutions to generate Notices that identify and disclose Indigenous interests in collections and data. The Local Contexts Hub allows researchers and institutions to connect directly to Indigenous communities and engage collaboratively about adding community Labels. | |
95 | Ethics in practice | Labriola National American Indian Data Center Indigenous Community-Driven Archives | https://lib.asu.edu/labriola/services | Website | Arizona State University | Labriola has an "archives starter kit" and educational materials used for numerous tribal projects focused on community-driven data archival processes specific to Indigenous and historically marginalized communities. | |
96 | Ethics in practice | Local Context: Library of Congress - Passamaquoddy Traditional Knowledge | https://loc.gov/item/2015655578 | Example/template | Fewkes, Jesse Walter, 1850-1930, recordist, speaker Selmore, Peter, performer | Passamaquoddy War song, Trading song with Local Context Labels | |
97 | Ethics in practice | Local Context: Passamaquoddy People: At Home on the Ocean and Lakes | https://passamaquoddypeople.com/ | Example/template | Passamaquoddy Peoples | The Passamaquoddy wax cylinder sound recordings were made in Calais, Maine in 1890. They were first returned to the Passamaquoddy community in the 1980s. David Francis, our ancestral language specialist was able to listen and transcribe 4 of these cylinders. In 2014 we began a new project with Local Contexts and the American Folklife Center to listen again to these recordings because the sound quality had been improved. This new project became the impetus for this digital archive. We wanted to put the recordings in a Passamaquoddy controlled archive where our community can listen to them and add the Passamaquoddy transcriptions and English translations in our own time. These recordings are dear to us. They connect us across time to our ancestors. We are the cultural authorities for this material. In 1890 our ancestors spoke Passamaquoddy and French; today we speak Passamaquoddy and English. Each song is a puzzle to fully interpret as no full songs were ever recorded. There are only partial songs on the cylinders. We have very few descriptions of these recordngs from the person who visited with us for three days and made them, Jesse Walter Fewkes. In our listening we connect to people in the present and in the past. | |
98 | Ethics in practice | Local Context: Sq’éwlets People Virtual Museum | http://digitalsqewlets.ca/index-eng.php | Example/template | Sq’éwlets Tribe | Example of Local Context in Practice by the Sq’éwlets People, Sqwōwich, People of the Sturgeon. This website shares our journey from ancient times to the present. Join us as we tell of our origins and personal histories, what we call our sxwōxwiyám and sqwélqwel. We live where the Harrison and Fraser Rivers of British Columbia meet. | |
99 | Ethics in practice | Local Context: Center for Native American and Indigenous Research | https://www.amphilsoc.org/library/CNAIR | Example/template | American Philosophical Society | The Center for Native American and Indigenous Research (CNAIR) at the APS Library & Museum works with Indigenous communities throughout the Americas and with campus- and community-based scholars in many disciplines and traditions. Its goal is to assist people in finding and utilizing the extensive archival collections at the Library and Museum of the APS in innovative ways that honor Indigenous knowledge, cultivate scholarship, and strengthen languages and cultural traditions. | |
100 | Ethics in practice | Local Context: Guide to the Indigenous Material at the American Philosophical Society | https://indigenousguide.amphilsoc.org/ | Example/template | American Philosophical Society | This guide provides broad coverage of the Native American and Indigenous archival collections at the Library & Museum of the American Philosophical Society (APS). These materials date from 1553 to 2022 and include manuscript, audio, and visual materials relating to Indigenous peoples throughout the Americas. | |