✅ Yes, I hope to support 3 levels of permissions in v1: Instructors can see all events for their courses, Org admins can see all events for all courses in the org, site operators can see all event data and create / edit reports.

❌ No, data is not likely to be stored in such a way that this is possible. Data that needed more granular permissions would need to be stored in different tables. Currently there isn't a plan to include anything but learner traces, however.

〰️ Maybe, right now all permissions come from LMS but I will put a note in the Superset permissions ticket to see if we can allow site operators to override those permissions. I don't think we'll be able to do it on a course-by-course basis though.

✅ Yes, but we're not likely to have those reports pre-written as part of v1. They'll have to write them themselves, and are likely to be slow.

〰️🦾 This will be possible for site operators, but the system won't be optimized for this at large scales, usability would depend on the size of the install, how much money they want to spend, and the types of queries they want to run

〰️🦾 This will be possible at the org level and site operator level, but usability will also depend on the size of the install and how much data they want to work with

❌ v1 will be the first step to this, and this ticket will help us understand how this might work, but adaptive learning is a huge task that is not planned yet

✅〰️❌ Some yes, some no. There are a number of things conflated here. We expect to have deep engagement data on things like problems and videos. It's not clear to me how that could be used to tease out why a learner is struggling. As above, v1 doesn't currently have a path back to the LMS for adaptive learning but we have some discovery work for it.

❌ I don't believe that we will have enough data on the problems themselves to answer this question. We would need to have some information on "how correct" each answer is, and I don't believe that exists. We could report on, ex, number of attempts per student or usage of the "show hint" / "show answer" functionality to help understand the difficulty of the problems or identify learners that are having an unusually hard time which is not really the same thing. I think we would need LMS changes to support this.

〰️ It seems like there are a lot of requests for page view times / counts. We don't currently support that for v1, so I'll see what we can do to add it. It's vastly more data than we were expecting to collect at this point.

✅〰️ Probably, I'm not sure how Insights calculates this but I think we can do the same or similar. If it's in the "existing in Insights" bucket I would expect that we will do it in v1

✅ I'm not sure what "units were released last" week means here, but we will display which videos were viewed and segment that by time frame

〰️🦾 These will all be technically possible, but there will likely not be "out of the box" built in reports to surface them all in v1

❌ Not out of the box in v1. They would need to do the work to bring in data from the offline course into the LRS, which is an open standard so pretty feasible, then tie the OeX user to the offline user and generate custom reports. So it would be doable with some work, and it would be work documenting how to do it, but it's not a v1 use case.

❌ Not in v1. We won't have access to cohorts or group data in v1, for the blended case the answer is the same as Penn State's above.

🧑🏾‍🎓〰️ Maybe, we are set to have a discussion about this soon, as some places only want anonymized data and others only want identified data. It seems likely that we will settle on a way to let site operators choose which identifiers to use for their install.

🧑🏾‍🎓〰️ Maybe, see line 23. If we are only storing anonymized data the identifier will remain the same for a course so tying user data together will still work, it will just be more difficult to tie it back to a person's identifying information. If we go with storing personal information, or allow a site admin to choose that route, the answer would be yes.

🧑🏾‍🎓〰️ Maybe, see line 23 (the general expectation is that data will be "near real time", seconds behind LMS)

❌ No, this is LMS functionality. There are currently no plans to surface any of this data to learners for v1.

〰️🦾 Maybe. It's a vague ask, but the data generated could be exported into a variety of formats, and reports that we offer might satisfy this need... or custom reports written to do that.

🧑🏾‍🎓〰️🦾 Maybe, if the zoom call is from a specific page / block in the LMS and they're storing user identifying information. Otherwise I don't know how we would track this.

✅ Yes, and we support GA outside of this system as well

✅ Yes, but completion is a difficult problem in the platform. We will be using the best data we have, but I suspect it will be an issue of ongoing debate until the platform can finally tell us once and for all, definitively, what "complete" means.

🧑🏾‍🎓〰️🦾 I'm not sure what this one means, if there is a non-OeX LMS in play the integration will depend on what it is and what data it expects. Definitely won't be a seamless thing out of the box, and we don't currently plan to do anything with grades, but using xAPI gets us a much better level of interoperability than we've ever had.

〰️❌ I'm not sure what this one means specifically, but I think it's the same as line 19. We'll be able to show what problems have been completed in a given time frame. I don't expect we will be able to roll up to the level of "unit" until the "completions" xblock is on by default. Currently it's behind a waffle flag

✅ Yes, student activity should be able to be tracked by various time slices