|The latest draft is at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o|
|Prov Terms||Section in which described (3.1, 3.2, 3.3, "okay to omit", "does not exist")||Reviewed by||Status (what concern is there, and what needs to be done?)|
|ActivityInfluence||okay to omit||https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/442|
|AgentInfluence||okay to omit||https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/442|
|Association||3.3 x 8||Jun||None|
|Attribution||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None||We can add a brief statement paraphrased from class defn. "Attribution is the ascribing of an entity to an agent." before Figure 3|
TL: I'm not sure, since the point of 3.3 is not to introduct attribution or association, but to show how to qualify them. The fundamentals are described in 3.1/3.2 and the definitions are readily available in 3.4. What itch are you trying to scratch?
Satya: Ok - this was my first term so I was not very clear about how much description to add in sec. 3. Its ok to ignore my initial comment
|Communication||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|Delegation||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|Derivation||3.3 x 3||Jun||None|
|End||3.3 (table only)||??||None||I think no need to expand it as its simple form has been explained in section 3.2. This applies to all other qualified influence classes in Table 2.|
|EntityInfluence||okay to omit||https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/442|
|Generation||3.3 x 5||Jun||None|
|Plan||3.3 x 2||Stephan||None|
|ProvenanceService||okay to omit||PAQ|
|Quotation||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None||Similar to "Attribution", We can just describe quotation allows to describe the provenance of an entity stated by someone other than the original author".|
TL: 3.2 has "More specifically, three subproperties of prov:wasDerivedFrom are provided for certain kinds of derivation among Entities: prov:wasQuotedFrom cites a potentially larger Entity (such as a book, blog, or image) from which a new Entity was created by repeating some or all of the original". I suggest we leave it at that.
|Revision||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None||Add a sentence "A special case of derivation is when an entity is derived from existing entity with substantial overlap in terms of "content". This is modeled using the "Revision" construct". We can add it at end of paragraph in Section 3.1 on prov:wasDerivedFrom.|
TL: I added to section 3.2: "prov:wasRevisionOf indicates that the derived Entity contains substantial content from the original Entity (e.g., two editions of a book),". I still think that the concepts should be introduced in 3.2, and NOT 3.3, which is for qualifying the concept.
Satya: Ok - if we need to reduce, we can remove the example (e.g., two editions of a book)?
|Source||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|Start||3.3 (table only) + 6||Satya||None|
|activity||3.3 (example generation)||Jun||none|
|hadActivity||3.3 (example Derivation)||Jun||none|
|hadGeneration||3.3 (example Derivation)||Jun||none|
|hadUsage||3.3 (example Derivation)||Jun||none|
|hasAnchor||okay to omit||PAQ|
|hasProvenance||okay to omit||PAQ|
|hasProvenanceService||okay to omit||PAQ|
|influenced||okay to omit||Jun||None|
|influencer||okay to omit||Jun||None|
|mentionOf||3.2||Jun||In the last two sentences, the description about prov:mentionOf is not as clear as the def in the ontology. I suggest we use the one in the ontology.|
TL: which definition is clearer? Is it "When :x prov:mentionOf :y and :y is described in Bundle :b, the triple :x prov:asInBundle :b is also asserted to cite the Bundle in which :y was described." ?
Jun: this one: "The mention of an Entity in a Bundle (containing a description of this Entity) is another Entity that is a specialization of the former and that presents the Bundle as a further additional aspect."
TL: I asked Jun to take a stab.
|qualifiedAttribution||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|qualifiedCommunication||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|qualifiedDelegation||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|qualifiedDerivation||3.3 (example Derivation)||Jun||None|
|qualifiedEnd||3.3 (table only)||Jun||None|
|qualifiedInfluence||does not exist||None|
|qualifiedInvalidation||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|qualifiedQuotation||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|qualifiedRevision||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|qualifiedSource||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|qualifiedStart||3.3 (table only)||Satya||None|
|provenanceUriTemplate||okay to omit||PAQ|