ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2023 JOURNALISM CONTEST RUBRIC
2
3
NAME:TOPIC:
4
5
DriteriaDescriptionAccomplishedSkilledDeveloping or FairNeeds Improvement or Missingpts possiblepts givenjudge's comments (optional)
6
WRITING
7
Headline
Writing
Does the story have an interesting and infomative headline that applies search engine optimization?Headline is clever,
accurate and reflects
the story. Headline
and/or subhead
contain active verbs.
Headline is clear, but
does not draw reader
to the story.
Headline and/or
subhead contain
verbs.
Headline is dull or
inaccurate and does
not contain any verb.
No headline written. OR Headline is a title, label, no verb used, OR
headline is inaccurate.
6
8
Effective & Appropriate LeadIs the lede/lead informative, include all appropriate information while engaging the reader?Lead is original and catchy; fits well with the rest of the story; invites readers into the piece; contains a strong nut graph if lead is not a summary leadLead is appropriate to story and fairly effective at getting attention; shows some signs of originality; contains an effective nut graph, if necessaryLead is adequate but not extremely catchy or original; or there is no nut graph, even though it is necessaryLead is neither original nor catchy; is boring, overused or trite, or is inappropriate to story; no nut graph6
9
Adequate Use of Primary Sources, Mainly Interviews, Evidence of Careful ReportingDoes the story use primary sources responsibly and ethically?Evidence of reporter trying to get as many sources as necessary to adequately present all sides in the story; all are identified; info is properly attributed; all info is accurate, thorough; uses best sourcesA minimum of two sources are used and clearly identified in story; most information is attributed to sources; information is accurate. Most quotes show evidence of effective interviewing and use of good follow-up questions; quotes are interesting and story-telling.Two or fewer sources are used; some sources are improperly identified or some info or opinion is given without attribution; most info is accurate but may not be as thorough; missing key sources; may use too general infoNo quoted sources used in story; or sources are improperly identified; much info is given without attribution; inaccurate or vague info6
10
Quotes Show Evidence of Careful ReportingDoes the story show ethical use of attributed sources, research into the topic and relevant information?Strong evidence of good research and interviewing by the use of effective, story-telling quotes that cover a broad range of the topic; good use of quote-transition formulaMost quotes show evidence of effective interviewing and use of good follow-up questions; quotes are interesting and story-tellingOne or two of the quotes show evidence of good interviewing, but most do not help propel the storyQuotes are short, weak or ineffective; no evidence of follow-up questions being asked6
11
Effective Organization and Flow (deals with structure)Story uses inverted pyramid form with info in descending order of importance; LQTQ, or narrative style effectively and clearly without seeming overly formulaic.Story is organized and most transitions and connections are clear, but either organization is somewhat lacking or the sense of flow is somewhat abrupt or story is not in inverted pyramidStory lacks strong organization, jumps around too much or lacks effective transitions; not in inverted pyramid. Story is sometimes confusing, overly formulaic or tough to follow, but some attempt is made to
write in news style.
Story is choppy; organization is unclear; few effective transitions; not in inverted pyramid. Story is difficult to follow or confuses the
reader. No organization is evident. Story seems more like notes.
6
12
Clear Focus and Unity (deals with content)Does the story stay on topic and coherent?Focus of story is clear; nothing detracts from primary focus; everything contributes to overall angleFocus is fairly clear but on or two areas detract from the primary angleStory lacks strong sense of unity and focus; several areas seem to detract from angleNo clear angle; story is rambling and awkward6
13
Interesting & Effective Writing StyleDoes the story have an interesting voice?Writing is strong and effective with a clear voice and a variety of sentence structures; piece is tightly written; utilizes active verbs and vivid word choice; original writingWriting is adequate but not extremely compelling or original; may be wordy or voice may be unclear; diction and s/s may not be as vivid or sophisticatedWriting is rather bland; lacks a clear voice and/or sense of originality; is wordy or redundant; or diction &/or sentence structure may be repetitiveWriting lacks a clear voice and original style6
14
Journalistic StyleDoes story adhere to AP style and journalistic structure?NO errors in journalistic style (quotes, dates, scores, numbers, money, percents, time, commas, etc.); short paragraphs; quotes stand aloneHas few (one or two) errors in journalistic style; or may have non-journalistic paragraph structureHas several errors in journalistic style or non-journalistic paragraph structureHas many errors in journalistic style and/or non-journalistic paragraph structure6
15
Spelling/Syntax/GrammarDoes the story contain spelling/grammar errors?Stiory is free from errors.Some errors that do not distract the reader or cause difficulty understanding. Numerous errors that need to be fixed before re-submittal to the editor. Errors are too numerous and cause difficulty understanding content or meaning.6
16
Overall impactConsider the overall impact of the piece, including its ability to engage the audience and spark conversation or action.Story has great value, stays engaging throughout and leaves reader not only informed , personally inspired , etc.Story is intersting, but may be a bit mundane. Story is well written and interests readers, but lacks certain information or is too surface level.Story is too superficial and doesn't provide interesting or relevant new information.6
17
600
18
PHOTO STORY
19
Relevance/StorytellingIs photo content is relevant to the theme/subject/story?Series relates very closesly to the topic. Each image contributes individual pieces of the story narratives.Series tells the story, though some aspects may have been missed.Images contribute to the series,but some aspects may be missing or redundant. Images don't relate the topic well, are too redundant or missing. Not enough images chosen. 6
20
Technical QualityAre the photos properly exposed/in focus?Sharp focus on the subjects. Light is used to produce a desired emotion and greatly achieves this through visibility, clarity, texture without creating unwanted effects.Good focus on the subjects. Use of light is adequate, perhaps not exactly achieving the desired emotion. May have some unwanted shadows etc.Focus is marginal or lacking. The photos are too dark, underexposed, could have added flash. Blurry focus or on wrong subject. Photo does not seem to have a subject.6
21
CompositionDid the photographer use composition techniques?Photos are simple and uncluttered; applies rule of thirds or other compositional theme.Photos are simple and uncluttered. The rule of thirds is not necessarily followed but the subject is clear.Photos are uncluttered, subject is the center of attention. Crops or format (vertical/horizontal) could use better selection.Photos seems to lack purpose and organization. Crops or format is redundant or disadvantages images OR No discernable composition.6
22
CaptionsAre the photos properly captioned and all necessary information included?Captions are complete, accurate, informative, well written and give additional information.Captions are complete, but lack additional detail.Captions are present, but have errors or missing information.Captions missing or incomplete.2
23
Impact & CreativityIs the work original and creative, including unique angles, information and overall presentation.WOW factor; unique viewpoints! Standalone images have exceptional impact. Compelling images evoke laughter, sadness, anger, pride, wonder or another intense emotionCaught attention, shows merit!Accaptable, but a bit commonplace or familiar.Images lack imagination/vision.10
24
300
25
PHOTO PORTFOLIO
26
Lens FocusSharpness, quality of the subjects.Sharp focus on the subjects.Good focus on the subjects.Focus is marginal or lacking.Blurry focus or on wrong subject.1
27
LightingIllumination of the scenes or subjects.Light is used to produce a desired emotion and greatly achieves this through visibility, clarity, texture without creating unwanted effects.Use of light is adequate, perhaps not exactly achieving the desired emotion. May have some unwanted shadows etc.The photos are too dark, underexposed, could have added flash. Photos are over or under exposed to the point of being distracting. 1
28
Relevance/StorytellingSubject used to deliver a message well.It is obvious who or what the subject is. Image conveys a message well. It is obvious who or what the subject is. Some of the techniques used to increase emphasis.It is sometimes unclear who or what the subject is. At least some techniques used to share a message with the images.No clear focus or storytelling subject to the images.3
29
CompositionThe pleasing selection and arrangement of subjects within the picture area.Photos are simple and uncluttered; apply rule of thirds or other compositional theme.Photos are simple and uncluttered. The rule of thirds is not necessarily followed but the subject is clear.Photos are a bit cluttered, subject is not quite the center of attention or clearly distinguished. Crops or format (vertical/horizontal) could use better selection.Photos seems to lack purpose and organization. Crops or format is redundant or disadvantages images OR No discernable composition.1
30
CaptionsAre the photos properly captioned and all necessary information included?Captions are complete, give additional info and support the storytelling ability of the image.Captions are complete, but lack additional detail or information.Captions are present, but have errors or missing informationCaptions missing or incomplete.1
31
Impact & CreativityIs the work original and creative, including unique angles, information and overall presentation.WOW factor; unique viewpoints! Standalone images have exceptional impact. Compelling images evoke laughter, sadness, anger, pride, wonder or another intense emotionImages attracted attention and
conjured a feeling but some could use improvement to imrove impact.
Accaptable, but a bit commonplace or familiar.Images lack imagination/vision.3
32
100
33
34
JUDGE TOTAL
35
36
Grand Total: 0%
37
38
39
Possible: 100
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100