CADathon 2 Scoring Sheet

Still loading...

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	Q	R	S
1	Team	Bailey			Comments	Richard			Comments	Nick			Comments	Total Points	Rank	Creativity avg	Detail avg	Effectiveness avg
2	Team	Creativity (1-5)	Detail (1-5)	Effectiveness (1-10)	Comments	Creativity (1-5)	Detail (1-5)	Effectiveness (1-10)	Comments	Creativity (1-5)	Detail (1-5)	Effectiveness (1-10)	Comments	Total Points	Rank	Creativity avg	Detail avg	Effectiveness avg

3	25	3	4	5		3	4	4	kiwi unstable on slopes and with unbalanced loads, challenge for coders	4	4	5	Interesting intake, definitely unique. Kiwi will struggle in pushing matches for control of hills	36	10	3.33	4.00	4.67
4	26	2	2	2	I'm not convinced this will even move...	1	2	3	it will fall	2	2	3	Kiwi Wallbot, any non fwd/bwd movement would be difficult, fwd/bwd will drift a ton	19	18	1.67	2.00	2.67
5	28	2	2	3	looks incomplete?	2	2	3	sketchy, with some good ideas	2	3	3	Chassis could flex, not a lot of bracing, cylinder mounts for claw are weak/flexible	22	17	2.00	2.33	3.00
6	30	3	4	5	Interesting arm.. but is this the best and most effective effector you can think of?	3	3	6	nice arm, solid drivetrain, low cg, where is the battery?	4	4	6	Somewhat along the right track strategy wise, don't need all 5 to capture center hill, those last two deep within the robot will be tough to do. Also not sure how robot would deal with opponent locked onto center hill when they arrive	38	7	3.33	3.67	5.67
7	34								withdrew					-60	20	0.00	0.00	0.00
8	35	4	4	5	This seems intensely complicated...	3	5	5	interesting grabber. is swerve a good idea here?	4	5	5	Not sure pwnage has even done something so complicated. Intake is a bit confusing, and im not sure swerve is giving you an edge	40	6	3.67	4.67	5.00
9	37	4	5	8	I Like this, A lot.	4	5	7	robust -- this one should survive	4	5	7	Most complete robot. Not sure how necessary it is for the arm to go to both sides, but intake should be effective. A funneling system to guide the claw to a flag would make it easier.	49	3	4.00	5.00	7.33
10	38	3	3	4	It looks like there may be interference when the arm is lowered? Arm is only 1x1, and the rotation point is weak.	2	3	3	flimsy arm	2	3	4	Arm joint will most likely get bent or ripped off, claw plates are also thin with not a lot of supprt.	27	13	2.33	3.00	3.67
11	40	3	2	5	interesting construction, but there is some interference with electronics. The concept is obvious, but a bit more work is needed to make this design effective.	3	3	5	simple concept, needs detail	3	3	5	Simplistic concept which is generally a good approach, but this needs to be fleshed out more	32	11	3.00	2.67	5.00
12	41	4	4	7		2	2	3	how does the end effecter work?	4	4	6	Love the end effector, only issue is that the two belt sides need to be preloaded in/closed. Maybe that's in the design and I missed it.	36	9	3.33	3.33	5.33
13	42	4	5	8	Simple, well thought out. Top Tier.	4	5	8	best drivetrain + pwning arm = top seed robot	4	5	7	Would definitely do well in qual matches. Small issue is when scoring flags, might be tougher with flag not parallel to flag holder	50	2	4.00	5.00	7.67
14	43	5	4	7	I Like the manipulator	3	4	7	very compact, should do well	4	4	7	Interesting manipulator, like the adjustability it has.	45	4	4.00	4.00	7.00
15	44	5	4	6		4	3	7	still has CAD file issues -- good DT, arm, turret, intake	5	4	6	How does the flag get between the rollers before it starts pinch rolling it up?	44	5	4.67	3.67	6.33
16	45	3	3	3	too much time spent on the DT.	2	5	4	six wheel swerve for this game? nice looking 4-bar, but it will break	2.5	4	3.5	Scores are averages of Bailey and Richard. Not scoring personally due to confliuct of interest. However will say too much time on drive train, also not sure what advantage swerve has in this game, let along six wheel.	30	12	2.50	4.00	3.50
17	46	1	1	2	...	1	2	2	BLT	1	2	2	Not much detail, it's so small that as a defensive robot it would just get shoved out of the way.	14	19	1.00	1.67	2.00
18	47	4	3	6	Frame will be weak, but very cool manipulator	3	4	5	short arm = good	3	4	5	Claw that holds flag is thin, could bend. Frame needs more supports.	37	8	3.33	3.67	5.33
19	48	5	5	9	Great Game Piece Manipulation and incredible game analysis for the cam brake.	5	5	8	very robust arm and intake, solid drivetrain	5	5	8	Great drive and arm, probably best intake, my only question is do the outer funnel wheels on intake need to be powered?	55	1	5.00	5.00	8.33
20	49	2	3	4		2	3	3	will struggle to climb	2	3	3	Worried about chassis clearance on hill, like most claws, without a funnel system it will be hard to line up to flags	25	15	2.00	3.00	3.33
21	50	3	2	4	you need more crossmembers in the frame.	3	2	3	looks like it will get stuck	3	2	3	Intake is interesting concept but needs to be though through more. Drive train will flex all over, not nearly enough cross members	25	16	3.00	2.00	3.33
22	51	4	3	2	the overall construction is not strong enough and no game piece manipulation	4	2	3	no CAD that I can see; pentaswerve looks cool, but why?	3	3	2	Cannot open CAD model, no 3D preview. would love to hear reasoning behind the 5-wheel swerve. no game piece maipulation makes it hard to understand what the strategy here is.	26	14	3.67	2.67	2.33
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100