School / Partnership Initials: Example: Capital City XY, Boston Latin AB

Affirmative Plan Text (As used in round)

Off-Case Positions (please separate with a comma): Ex: Agenda Politics DA, Cap K, etc.

Link Your Evidence Set, If Applicable

monroe demonstration academy

THEREFORE WE PRESENT THE FOLLOWING PLAN IN DEFENSE OF THIS YEAR’S RESOLUTION: RESOLVED:THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE FISCAL REDISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES BY PROVIDING A BASIC INCOME.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TBASK3UqxGnJKCIZDGSjQhzYNQvisivWtBQjk7Ff93M/edit?usp=sharing

All Boston Schools (East Somerville, BCLA/McCormack, Eliot, Brooke)

Federal Jobs Guarantee: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by guaranteeing a job to all people in the United States.

Solving for homelessness, climate change

Economy DA, Affordable Housing CP (and case Neg all included in BDL packet)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19TNdIe-iDsLlTx4VrD7_54WD3Zkw3hw5?usp=drive_link (USE MS VARSITY VERSION)

All Boston schools (East Somerville, BCLA/McCormack, Eliot, Brooke)

Universal Basic Income: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by guaranteeing a Universal Basic Income of $1,000 per month to all people in the United States.

Solving for racial wealth gap, automation

Inflation DA, Baby Bonds CP (and case Neg, all included in BDL packet)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eEig0Z4o1CcNKVcGZUZkVgHhomf8RbnF/view?usp=drive_link

Boston Debate League / NDCA Packet

Adding these as potential cases and off-case for students to use, though I don't believe any students from Boston are planning to use these Affs.
Affs: Green New Deal Jobs Guarantee, Means Tested Basic Income, Universal Basic Income, Social Security

GND Jobs Guarantee - Climate Change, Agriculture
Means Tested Basic Income - Poverty, Economy
Social Security - Elderly Poverty
Universal Basic Income - Race, Gender, Poverty

States CP, Taxes CP, Economy DA, IRS Tradeoff DA, Capitalism K, Topicality

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Mh8ZGjWchuZH0c0kuHjFRTwnZNp74G9I

The United States Federal Government and all 50 US states should substantially increase their fiscal redistribution by enacting an annually revised Universal Basic Income under a human rights framework

n/a (but other UBI Neg answers will be applicable)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-6Vq-Qzer4kvdbqeT0hF1cM8to_2_yDdsJdNxBZeeVM/edit (still adding evidence)

(Same as Boston Debate League packet plan, but with more advantages, below) The United States Federal Government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by guaranteeing a Universal Basic Income of $1,000 per month to all people in the United States.

Racial Wealth Gap, Automation, Human Rights, Employment, Food Insecurity, Health

Baby Bonds CP, Inflation DA, some case Neg included in files

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Nqn6nKKsn61E2iwtskWzZl5Vz_rSKn9k?usp=sharing

danielle.dupree@urbandebate.org

Neuroth & Webster- The United States federal government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution in the United States by expanding Social Security through an integration of payroll taxes into general revenues.

Sullivan & Thorpe- The United States Federal Government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution to restore and make permanent the temporary 2021 version of the Child Tax Credit. OR The United States Federal Government should provide a federal jobs guarantee for returning citizens, formerly incarcerated, with a living wage
they will run 1 aff each preliminary aff round.
Pinson & Filliung-Reinard - The United States federal government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution in the United States by adopting a Universal Basic Income, funded by a Value-Added Tax.

Smith & Thorpe- Thus the plan: The United States federal government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution in the United States by implementing a UBI.

Neuroth & Webster- bridge to the doctorate expansion

Sullivan & Thorpe- Fem, Poverty, Econ OR poverty, womens rights, health

Pinson & Filliung-Reinard - Adv. 1: Inequality (Full adv. + impact) + Health Scenario (Full impact scenario w/separate impact)
Adv. 2: Econ

Smith & Thorpe- Sexual Assault
Abortion
Sex Workers
Domestic Violence
Poverty
Hunger
Health

Neuroth & Webster - T Universal (V Basic Income and Federal Job Guarangee Affs), T By (only resolutional actions), T substantial (spending), Cap K, Constitutional Convention CP, Modern Monetary Theory CP (v Affs with Tax mechanism), Deterrence DA (China), 2024 Elections DA (V Maddie and Anna: Abolition CP, Finnish Prisons CP, Death Penalty Adv. CP) (V Green New Deal: GND PIC (DO GND w/out jobs guarantee, Local Gov. Budgets DA)

Sullivan & Thorpe- Taxes T, T subsets, T USFG and T Implementation (V K Affs), Sortitions CP, States CP, CTC CP, Fossil Fuels PIC, Universal Basic Services CP, Tax PICs, Inflation DA, Populism DA, Rhetoric of Poverty K, Cap K, Fem K

Pinson & Filliung-Reinard - Recessions DA, Inflation DA, Sanctions DA, China Tech DA, Coercion DA, Deficit Spending DA, Elections DA, Populism DA,
CP:
ROTC (Reserve Officer's Training Corps) CP
Finnish Prisons CP
UBI CP
Means Test CP
Medicaid CP
Funding Mech PIC/CP
K:
Coercion K
Carpenter K
Cap K
Security K
1NC FW
Cede the Political

Smith & Thorpe- DAs:
Deterrence DA
Elections DA
Inflation DA
Taxes DA
Symbolic Acknowledgement DA (V K Affs)
CPs / PICs:
College CP
Anti Vaxxers PIC
Finnish Prisons CP
K's:
Ableism K, Capitalism K, Victimization K
T:
T SPEC
T -Basic Income
T - Jobs Guarantee

danielle.dupree@urbandebate.org

Baby Bonds + CTC - The USFG should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by expanding and making permanent to 2021 test of the CTC, and enacting a nationwide baby bonds program.

Baby Bonds - The USFG should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by enacting a nationwide baby bonds program.

Queer basic income - The USFG should create a basic income for all queer people in the US.

Advantage 1 is Racism
Advantage 2 is Poverty
Advantage 3 is Entrepeneurship

Off Case Disclosure: Queer K, Cap K, Substantial T, Fiscal T, Job Guarantee T, Housing DA, Spending Tradeoff DA. UBI CP, Job Guarantee CP, Baby Bonds CP, Congress T, Framework V Ks

danielle.dupree@urbandebate.org

The United States Federal Government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution by amending the Higher Education Act of 1965 section 437 to include all citizens receiving social security benefits.

Cristo Fascism K. NRA K. Isreal DA. Econ DA. Space Col DA. Politics DA. Fiscal redistribution T. UBI T. SSI T. FJG T. T universal. IRS DA. CT: charity cannibalism. Framing. Case.