ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Sheet
2
Table
Contains the values from the various sources we collated
3
ColumnExplanation
4
Scientific NameScientific name of the taxon
5
English NameEnglish name of the taxon
6
Red List CategoryConservation status of the taxon as reported on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) Red List
7
NatureServeConservation status of the taxon reported by NatureServe
8
Assessment YearYear in which NatureServe last assessed status of the taxon
9
BCC List
Whether the taxon is listed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) or is listed on the US Endangered Species Act (ESA)
10
COSEWIC statusConservation status of the taxon as determined by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC)
11
RCPIResearch and Conservation Priority Index (RCPI) reported by Buechley et al (2019)
12
Loss Point EstimateMedian reported by Rosenberg et al. (2019) for the estimate of population decline since 1970
13
L95 LossLower 95% confidence limit reported by Rosenberg et al. (2019) for the estaimate of population decline since 1970
14
U95 LossUpper 95% confidence limit reported by Rosenberg et al. (2019) for the estaimate of population decline since 1970
15
Proportion Estimate in US and Canada
Proportion of the taxon's range that occurs within the continental US and Canada
16
Population EstimatePopulation estimate of the taxon reported by Will et al. (2020)
17
L95 Population EsitmateLower 95% confidence limit reported by Will et al. (2020) for the estimate of population size
18
U95 Population EstimateUpper 95% confidence limit reported by Will et al. (2020) for the estimate of population size
19
SWAPs 2005The number of State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) in which the taxon was listed as a of conservation concern in 2005
20
SWAPs 2015The number of State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) in which the taxon was listed as a of conservation concern in 2015
21
SWAPs DifferenceThe difference between the values of SWAPs 2005 and SWAPs 2015
22
RPI10Summary index of fall and spring migration count trends based on 2009-2019 Raptor Population Index results by Oleyar et al. (2021) Value ranges between -1 and 1, negative values indicate declining counts, positive increasing, and 0 stable counts. Values with an asterisk denote indices from 5 or fewer migration sites.
23
24
IBAs
Contains trigger species per Important Bird and Biodiversity Area
25
ColumnExplanation
26
SpeciesScientific name of trigger species
27
IBAThe Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) triggers by the species
28
29
Subnational Raw
Contains the species known to occur per state or province according to NatureServe
30
ColumnExplanation
31
State or ProvinceThe State or Province in which the species occurs.
32
RankThe conservation rank of the species. 1 (Critically Imperiled), 2 (Imperiled), 3 (Vulnerable), 4 (Apparently Secure), and 5 (Secure). B (Breeding only), H (Possibly Extirpated), NA (Not Applicable), NR (Not Ranked), X (Presumed Extirpated), U (Unrankable).
33
SpeciesThe scientific name of the species.
34
35
Subnational Sum
Contains the number of total and insecure species known to occur per state or province according to NatureServe
36
ColumnExplanation
37
State or ProvinceThe State or Province.
38
InsecureThe number of species within the state or province ranked as 1, 2, or 3.
39
AllThe number of species that breed within a given state or province.
40
41
Literature Cited
42
Buechley, E. R., A. Santangeli, M. Girardello, M. H. Neate-Clegg, D. Oleyar, C. J. W. McClure, and Ç. H. Şekercioğlu. 2019. Global raptor research and conservation priorities: Tropical raptors fall prey to knowledge gaps. Diversity and Distributions 25:856–869.
43
*Oleyar, D., D Ethier, L. Goodrich, D. Brandes, R.Smith, J.Brown, and J.Sodergren. 2021. The Raptor Population Index: 2019 Analyses and Assessments.
44
Rosenberg, K. V., A. M. Dokter, P. J. Blancher, J. R. Sauer, A. C. Smith, P. A. Smith, J. C. Stanton, A. Panjabi, L. Helft, M. Parr, and P. P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Page Science.
45
Will, T., J. C. Stanton, K. V. Rosenberg, A. O. Panjabi, A. F. Camfield, A. E. Shaw, W. E. Thogmartin, and P. J. Blancher. 2020. Handbook to the Partners in Flight Population Estimates Database, Version 3.1. PIF Technical Series No 7.1. pif.birdconservancy.org/popest.handbook.pdf.
46
47
*Subject to change upon manuscript publication
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100