ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASAT
1
Category of material Was an associated body worn video clip viewed?Please describe and identifying features of this caseWhat was the perceived ethnicity of the individual who was stopped?Did officers follow GOWISELY: .G – Did the officer(s) provide clear explanation grounds for suspicion – for example, information, intelligence or specific behaviour of a person.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .O – Did the officer(s) provider a clear explanation of the object and purpose of the search in terms of the article being searched for.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .W- Did the officer(s) present a warrant card, if not in uniform or if requested.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .I- Did the officer(s) state their identity: name and number or, in cases involving terrorism or where there is a specific risk to the officer, just warrant or collar numDid officers follow GOWISELY: .S – Did the officer(s) state the station they work at.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .E – Did the officer(s) inform of the entitlement to a copy of the search record within three months.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .L – Did the officer(s) inform on which legal power used.Did officers follow GOWISELY: .Y – Did the officer(s) state ‘you are being detained for the purposes of a search’ this is a requirement.If GOWISELY was not or partially followed please provide detailsWere handcuffs used?Please select the nature of the handcuffing Was a taser used?Was the individual detained for a strip search? Which station did the strip search take place?Was an item (object) found in the search?Details of object found **Did the item found match the item (object) officer(s) were looking for? Did the panel observe any identifiable vulnerabilities in the person stopped?If yes, please provide more details Based on the perception of panel members, did the officer(s) recognise and appropriately respond to the identified vulnerabilities during the interaction?Please note any evidence of good/best practice.Please provide further detailsDid the officer(s) effectively and respectfully communicate with the individuals they encountered?Please note any evidence of good/best practice.1Please provide further details1From what the panel have observed, would you say the officer(s) behaved in a way that escalated or de-escalated the situation?Comments?Does the panel have any concerns about possible officer bias relating to this interaction?Please provide details Did the officer(s) provide the individual of details of how to make a complaint?If clear, please select which MPS team conducted the viewed stop and search.Please specify.Please rate how the officer closed the interaction.CommentsPlease select the origin of the encounter with the police officer(s)?If other, please provide details Were the stop and search/use of forms completed correctly/accurately/appropriately?Comments1Overall Panel Scrutiny AssessmentAssessment Feedback Best Practice Recommendations Please specify the category of recommendations 
2
Stop and Search form YesSection 23 search of area known for common drug use. crack pipes and drug paraphernalia found on floor. Group were stopped and searchedBlack female YesYesYesYesNot clearYesYesYesNoNoNoNoYesDrug userDon't knowYesDeescalatedNoNoPanel not able to identify GoodDon't know/UnclearDon't KnowNeutralStandard stop and search carried out compliantly without use of force, and prolonging longer than necessaryBest practice feedback (informal)
3
Stop and Search form YesS23 search after individual was seen parked up with grinder on lap, allegedly smelling of cannabis, and with bloodshot eyes. Multiple officers

Cannabis found in back of vehicle, details of individual taken for follow up action 		South Asian YesYesN/AYesYesYesYesYesNoNoNoYesCannabis foundYesNoYesDeescalatedNoNoPanel not able to identify GoodDon't know/UnclearDon't KnowNeutralCompliant stop and search. Only concern is number of officers required for the stop and search of 1 individual - I counted at least 5, for only a small amount of cannabisLearning and development feedback (informal)
4
Stop and Search form YesOfficers called to tube station, following report by someone that the individual had spat on him and pulled out a machete. He was pointed out by the informant and officers ran towards him to detain, using red dot challenge to get him on the ground for the search. Armed officers were present. Nothing found but individual was arrested for common assault for spitting at someoneBlack maleYesYesN/AYesYesNot clearYesYesRushed through requirement re entitlement to search record, where sentence was not completed. ‘You are entitled to’ then stopsYesNoNoNoNoSomewhat? Panel not able to assessNoNoPanel not able to identify FairGenerated by alert from member of the publicDon't KnowNeutralRushed through GOWISELY even once detained/under control - this meant search receipt point not fully set outLearning and development feedback (informal)
5
Stop and Search form YesSuspect stopped in a vehicle, believed to be smoking cannabisSouth Asian YesNoN/AYesYesNoYesYesDidn't say what they were looking for
YesCompliant NoNoNoYesHe told the officers he's on anti-depressants and has ADHDYesThey asked where his medication was BUT wouldn't take handcuffs off so he could call his brother to bring his medication to him NoAsked multiple questions that would have been more appropriate to an interview after arrested. Told him what he was saying was "bullshit". It seemed like they were trying to catch him out throughout. They also threatened to arrest him for stealing the car despite not having evidence it was stolen. I find the faux-matey tone quite disrespectful and patronising, it also really jarred with them then disbelieving him/being sarcastic towards him. They also made jokes to each other about him. There was a complete absence of professionalismEscalatedNoNoTerritorial Support Group (TSG) (External OCU)Arrest made N/AIdentified by officers proactivelyYesAmberGrounds fairly spurious: Police said eyes were glazed, he seemed startled and there was a smell of perfume that could be using to cover up the smell of cannabis.

Issues with communication (see notes on this) 		Best practice feedback (informal);Learning and development feedback (informal)
6
Stop and Search form YesSearch of a group of drug users where drugs paraphenalia seen South AsianYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesCould have spoken slowly and more clearly NoNoNoYesPerson volunteered that he had cannabis on him NoYesSaid he was known to police for possession of Class A, also said he had a metal plate in his wrist (but he wasn't handcuffed so that wasn't an issue)Don't knowSomewhat? The female officer was respectful, the male officer was abrupt in tone and accused him of waiting for a dealerPanel not able to assessFemale officer de-escalated, male officer did not assist NoNoTower Hamlets Response Team Panel not able to assessDidn't see the end of the clip BWV cut offIdentified by officers proactivelyYesNeutralFemale officer had a good tone. Needs to make sure BWV not obscured and it doesn't stop before interaction ends Best practice feedback (informal)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100