(Reprint): http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20150706/entlife/150709982/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2015/09/08/why-theres-an-urgent-need-for-a-moratorium-on-gene-editing/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/09/18/as-british-scientists-seek-to-edit-the-genes-of-embryos-bioethicists-warn-of-potential-dangers/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2015/11/04/everything-you-need-to-know-about-why-crispr-is-such-a-hot-technology/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/12/01/historic-summit-on-gene-editing-and-designer-babies-convenes-in-washington/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/achenblog/wp/2015/12/02/professor-george-church-says-he-can-reverse-the-aging-process/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/its-too-early-for-gene-editing-of-human-reproductive-cells-experts-conclude/2015/12/03/d251c39a-99fc-11e5-94f0-9eeaff906ef3_story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/01/05/who-is-smart-enough-to-decide-how-to-improve-the-human-species/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/01/06/the-10-edgiest-innovation-concepts-of-2016/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/02/22/whats-the-difference-between-genetic-engineering-and-eugenics/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/02/24/why-are-we-telling-scientists-to-destroy-human-life/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/02/25/eight-questions-to-ask-before-human-genetic-engineering-becomes-the-norm/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/pondering-what-it-means-to-be-human-on-the-frontier-of-gene-editing/2016/05/03/a639b3ae-0bbb-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/05/20/how-diy-bio-hackers-are-changing-the-conversation-around-genetic-engineering/

https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/may/19/innovation-and-equity-in-an-age-of-gene-editing

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/sep/02/genome-editing-how-to-modify-genetic-faults-and-the-human-germline

https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/apr/07/human-genetic-engineering-demands-more-than-a-moratorium

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/23/scientists-genetically-modify-human-embryos-in-controversial-world-first

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/sep/01/editing-embryo-dna-genome-major-research-funders-ethics-debate

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/sep/18/uk-scientists-seek-permission-to-genetically-modify-human-embryos

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/21/scientists-ethical-debate-genetics-human-embryos

http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=8966

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/nov/28/future-human-gene-editing-landmark-summit-dna-crispr-embyos

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/dec/03/gene-editing-summit-rules-out-ban-on-embryos-destined-to-become-people-dna-human

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/dec/04/human-gene-editing-is-a-social-and-political-matter-not-just-a-scientific-one

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/dec/02/why-human-gene-editing-must-not-be-stopped

https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/mar/15/the-government-seem-more-interested-in-our-genes-than-our-voices

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/24/genetic-engineering-humans-great-potential-nobel-winner

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/20/science/biologists-call-for-halt-to-gene-editing-technique-in-humans.html?_r=0

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/science/jennifer-doudna-crispr-cas9-genetic-engineering.html

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/05/28/scientists-curbing-the-ethical-use-of-science/the-lessons-of-asilomar-for-todays-science

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/health/chinese-scientists-edit-genes-of-human-embryos-raising-concerns.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/science/a-scientific-ethical-divide-between-china-and-west.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/20/science/editing-of-pig-dna-may-lead-to-more-organs-for-people.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/magazine/the-crispr-quandary.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=EE815E3730F145FD0849FD9822FF560F&gwt=pay

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/science/crispr-cas9-human-genome-editing-moratorium.html?_r=2

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/18/opinion/a-pause-to-weigh-risks-of-gene-editing.html?_r=0

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/01/science/gene-therapy-muscular-dystrophy.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/health/crispr-gene-editing-human-embryos-kathy-niakan-britain.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/science/rna-c2c2-gene-editing-dna-crispr.html?_r=0

“Now that we can edit our genome, where do we go?”

Why there’s an urgent need for a moratorium on gene editing

British scientists seek to edit the genes of embryos

Everything you need to know about why CRISPR is such a hot technology

Historic summit on gene editing and 'designer babies' convenes in Washington

A Harvard professor says he can cure aging, but is that a good idea?

It’s too early for gene-editing of human reproductive cells, experts conclude

Who is smart enough to decide how to improve the human species?

The 10 edgiest inventions of 2016

What’s the difference between genetic engineering and eugenics?

Why are we telling scientists to destroy human life?

“Eight questions to ask before human genetic engineering goes mainstream”

Pondering ‘what it means to be human’ on the frontier of gene editing

How DIY bio-hackers are changing the conversation around genetic engineering

Innovation and equity in an age of gene editing

Genome editing: how to modify genetic faults – and the human germline

Human genetic engineering demands more than a moratorium

Scientists genetically modify human embryos in controversial world first

GM embryos: time for ethics debate, say scientists

UK scientists seek permission to genetically modify human embryos

Scientists must be part of the ethical debate on human genetics

Would you edit your unborn child’s genes so they were successful?

Future of human gene editing to be decided at landmark summit

Summit rules out ban on gene editing embryos destined to become people

Human gene editing is a social and political matter, not just a scientific one

Why human gene editing must not be stopped

The Government seem more interested in our genes than our voices

Genetic engineering of humans has great potential, says Nobel winner

Scientists Seek Ban on Method of Editing the Human Genome

“The Gene Editor”

The Lessons of Asilomar for Today’s Science

“Chinese Scientists Edit Genes of Human Embryos”

“Ethical Divide for China and West”

“Gene Editing Takes a Big Leap”

“Life Edited” (also “The CRISPR Quandary”)

Scientists Seek Moratorium on Edits to Human Genome That Could Be Inherited

A Pause to Weigh Risks of Gene Editing

“Gene Editing Offers Hope for Severe Form of Muscular Dystrophy”

British Researcher Gets Permission to Edit Genes of Human Embryos

Scientists Find Form of Crispr Gene Editing With New Capabilities

Type of Piece

Ariana Eunjung Cha

Dominic Basulto

Joel Achenbach

Joel Achenbach

Lenny Bernstein

Joel Achenbach

Dominic Basulto

Robert Gebelhoff

Joel Achenbach

Ellen Jorgensen

Charis Thompson, Ruha Benjamin, Jessica Cussins and Marcy Darnovsky

Sheila Jasanoff, J. Benjamin Hurlbut and Krishanu Saha

Marcy Darnovsky

Edward Hockings and Lewis Coyne

Andrew Pollack

Alexander Capron

DIDI KIRSTEN TATLOW; Vanessa Piao contributed research

Washington Post

Washington Post

The Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washtington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

Washington Post

New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

New York Times

New York Times

The New York Times

The New York Times

New York Times