ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Student Scores and Performance Levels for --- Rebuilding a Boardwalk Post-Hurricane SPA
Licensed under the ​Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
2
Student AStudent BStudent CStudent DStudent EStudent FStudent GStudent HTotal
3
000000008
4
Performance Levels for 2-ESS2-1 --- Summary of student points across the task
5
PE: 2-ESS2-1. Compare multiple solutions designed to slow or prevent wind or water from changing the shape of the land.* [Clarification Statement: Examples of solutions could include different designs of dikes and windbreaks to hold back wind and water, and different designs for using shrubs, grass, and trees to hold back the land.]
Additional CCC: Cause and Effect
6
Performance Level: Advanced (7 - 8 points)
Responses show that the student is connecting evidence and reasoning sufficiently to support a claim for the solution that best slows or prevents the effects of wind and water during hurricanes. By citing evidence, the student provides the information needed to sufficiently compare multiple solutions. The responses use relevant and accurate evidence and reasoning and their connections to the claim are explicit.		0# students in level 40%% students in level 4
7
Performance Level: Approaching Proficiency (5 - 6 points)
Responses show that the student is beginning to support a claim by citing relevant evidence and/or reasoning that compares multiple solutions. But the claim for the solution that best slows or prevents the effects of wind and water during hurricanes is only partially supported because the student has not fully explained how the evidence or reasoning supports the claim. The evidence and/or reasoning are relevant and accurate, but the explanations of how they are significant is vague or incomplete.		0# students in level 30%% students in level 3
8
Performance Level: Developing (3 - 4 points)
Responses show that the student is beginning to cite relevant evidence or reasoning that compares multiple solutions. However, there is no connection between the evidence or reasoning and the claim for the solution that best slows or prevents the effects of wind and water during hurricanes. Evidence or reasoning may include inaccuracies, or they may be so vague that it is unclear how they are meant to support the claim. 		0# students in level 20%% students in level 2
9
Performance Level: Emerging (1 - 2 points)
Responses demonstrate that the student is engaging with the questions by including limited information related to dimensions being measured but includes little to no relevant evidence or reasoning. Responses may have incorrect or inaccurate information and/or may be vague or incomplete.		0# students in level 10%% students in level 1
10
Performance Level: No Evidence (0 points)
Responses provide an irrelevant claim for the solution. OR Responses do not show any evidence of engaging with the questions or dimensions being measured. Responses are unrelated to the questions.


8# students in level 0100%% students in level 0
11
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100