A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Relevant Project | Definition of Key indicators | EPI-Sindh surveillance reports | mCCT ZM-EIR database | Documents (compiled by telecommunication vendors, complaint center, EPI) | Interviews with caregivers performed by Monitoring officers and DFCs | Field reports by DFCs/Monitoring Officers/DIOs (Photographs included) | Reports (Financial & correspondence) | Training material including tests/attendance sheets | Communication related documents | Logs (call, procurement) | Others | Frequency | Responsible | Sampling | Baseline rate Cumulative crude vaccination coverage in 2020 birth cohort against estimated 2020 Govt. of Sindh targets in ZM-EIR in Sindh, for 7 high risk districts (Jan 1, 2020-Aug 31, 2021) | Cumulative average monthly visits of 7 high risk districts (Mar 23, 2020 - Aug 31, 2021) (High risk districts: Hyderabad, Jacobabad, Kambar, Karachi central, Karachi east, Karachi west, Sujawal) | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Long-term impact | Indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Reduced child morbidity and mortality in Sindh | % drop in child mortality in Sindh relative to pre-intervention provincial child mortality rate | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children dying before the age of five | Annual | Health Department | Not applicable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | % drop in reported Vaccine Preventable Disesase (VPD) cases among children across Sindh | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of VPDs (for which preventive vaccines are available, e.g. Measles, Pneumonia, Polio etc.) cases | Annual | Health Department | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Better health outcomes among vulnerable communities | Reduced disparity in VPD prevalence among 7 districts of Sindh | mCCT, ZM | Difference in VPD cases among all 7 districts of Sindh | Annual | Health Department | Not applicable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Reduced disparity in VPD prevalence between urban and rural areas of Sindh | mCCT, ZM | Difference in VPD cases between urban and rural areas of Sindh | Annual | Health Department | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Reduced disparity in VPD prevalence between slum and non-slum union councils (UCs) of Sindh | mCCT, ZM | Difference in VPD cases between slum and non slums UCs of Sindh | Annual | Health Department | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Outcomes | Indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 1. Increased immunization coverage | Outcome 1 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Key indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | % change in Fully Immunized Child (FIC) coverage in Sindh among 12-23m old children, relative to pre-intervention period | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received all EPI-recommended vaccines | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 361,240 children (12-23 months of age) enrolled in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children 12-23 months of age who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts | 45.3% | Complete dataset of all enrolled children in 7 high-risk districts from January 2019 till date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | % change in coverage of BCG from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received BCG (bacille Calmette-Guerin) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 621,455 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts in 7 high-risk districts | 68.3% | 23,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | % change in coverage of Pentavalent-1 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 1 (Pentavalent-1) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 553,540 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Pentavalent-1 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Pentavalent-1 vaccine | 68.4% | 22,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | % change in coverage of Pentavalent-2 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 2 (Pentavalent-2) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 537,351 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Pentavalent-2 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Pentavalent-2 vaccine | 57.7% | 20,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | % change in coverage of Pentavalent-3 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 3 (Pentavalent-3) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 2481,499 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Pentavalent-3 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Pentavalent-3 vaccine | 47.7% | 19,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | % change in coverage of Measles-1 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Measles 1 (first dose) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 637,228 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Measles-1 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Measles-1 vaccine | 35.2% | 20,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | % change in coverage of Measles-2 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Measles 2 (second dose) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 458,662 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Measles-2 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Measles-2 vaccine | 8.6% | 16,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Additional indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | % change in coverage of OPV-0 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received OPV-0 (Oral polio vaccine) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 621,455 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts | 44.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | % change in coverage of Hep-B from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Hepatitis B vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 621,455 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts | 3.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | % change in coverage of PCV-1 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV-1 (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-1) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 553,573 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for PCV-1 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for PCV-1 vaccine | 68.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | % change in coverage of Rota-1 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Rota-1 (Rotavirus 1 vaccine) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 548,483 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Rota-1 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Rota-1 vaccine | 67.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | % change in coverage of PCV-2 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV-2 (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-2) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 536,947 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for PCV-2 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for PCV-2 vaccine | 57.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | % change in coverage of Rota-2 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Rota-2 (Rotavirus 2 vaccine) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 528,170 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Rota-2 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Rota-2 vaccine | 56.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | % change in coverage of PCV-3 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV-3 (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-3) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 481,535 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for PCV-3 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for PCV-3 vaccine | 47.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | % change in coverage of IPV-1 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received IPV 1 (Inactivated polio 1 vaccine ) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 609,924 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for IPV-1 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for IPV-1 vaccine | 52.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | % change in coverage of Typhoid from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Tyhphoid vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 586,375 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for Typhoid vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for Typhoid vaccine | 38.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | % change in coverage of IPV-2 from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received IPV 2 (Inactivated polio 2 vaccine ) vaccine relative to pre-intervention period | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 103,894 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR who are eligible for IPV-2 vaccine from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children who enrol in the ZM-EIR in 7 high-risk districts and are eligible for IPV-2 vaccine | 13.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 2. Increased immunization equity | Outcome 2 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Reduced gap in FIC rate between rural and urban districs | mCCT, ZM | Difference in proportion of children who received all EPI-recommended vaccines between urban and rural districts | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 294,663 vs 66,577 children (12-23 months of age) enrolled in the ZM-EIR from urban vs. rural areas from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children 12-23 months of age who enrol in the ZM-EIR from urban vs. rural areas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Reduced gap in FIC rate between UCs designated as 'high-risk' and non high-risk UCs | mCCT, ZM | Difference in proportion of children who received all EPI-recommended vaccines between UCs categorized as high risk for polio outbreak, and other UCs | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 53,078 vs 568,377 children (12-23 months of age) children enrolled in the ZM-EIR from high-risk vs. non high-risk UCs from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children 12-23 months of age who enrol in the ZM-EIR from high-risk vs. non high-risk UCs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | Reduced gap in FIC rate between slum and non-slum UCs | mCCT, ZM | Difference in proportion of children who received all EPI-recommended vaccines UCs categorized as slums and other UCs | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 120,628 vs 240,612 children (12-23 months of age) enrolled in the ZM-EIR from slum vs. non slum UCs from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: All children 12-23 months of age who enrol in the ZM-EIR from slum vs. non slum UCs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | % change in zero-dose children enrolled in EIR from pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Percentage point increase in enrollment of children who did not receive Penta-1 before their first birthday | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Complete dataset of all children vaccinated from 7 high-risk districts from January 2020 till date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Change in male/female ratio at district and union council levels relative to pre-intervention period | mCCT, ZM | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 318,326 male and 303,129 female children enrolled in the ZM-EIR at a UC and district level from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: X male and Y female children who enrol in the ZM-EIR at a UC and district level | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Reduced gap between timeliness of vaccination for each antigen among male and female children at UC and district levels | mCCT, ZM | Comparison between antigen wise vaccine timeliness between male and female children at UC and district level | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 466,898 male and 443,845 female children vaccinated at a UC and district level, by antigen from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: X male and Y female children who will recieve vaccination at a UC and district level | Pre-intervention: X male and Y female children vaccinated at a UC and district level from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: X male and Y female children who will recieve vaccination at a UC and district level, by antigen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 3. Increased immunization timeliness** | Outcome 3 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | Key indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for BCG | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received BCG on time (within 28 days of birth) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 300,449 children who recieved BCG through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve BCG through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Pentavalent-1 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 1 on time (between 39-70 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 273,128 children who recieved Pentavalent-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Pentavalent-1 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Pentavalent-2 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 2 on time (between 67-98 days of age) vaccine | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 167,923 children who recieved Pentavalent-2 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Pentavalent-2 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Pentavalent-3 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Penta 3 on time (between 95-126 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 107,347 children who recieved Pentavalent-3 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Pentavalent-3 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Measles-1 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Measles 1 on time (between 270-71 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 163,822 children who recieved Measles-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Measles-1 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Measles-2 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Measles 2 on time (between 453-484 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 104,464 children who recieved Measles-2 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Measles-2 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Additional indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for OPV-0 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received OPV 0 on time (within 28 days of birth) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 280,277children who recieved OPV-0 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve OPV-0 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for OPV-1 | mCCT, ZM | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 273,719 children who recieved OPV-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve OPV-1 through ZM-EIR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for PCV-1 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV 1 on time (between 39-70 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 273,095 children who recieved PCV-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve PCV-1 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Rota-1 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Rota 1 on time (between 39-70 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 269,313 children who recieved Rota-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Rota-1 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for PCV-2 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV 2 on time (between 67-98 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 167,963 children who recieved PCV-2 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve PCV-2 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Rota-2 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Rota 2 on time (between 67-98 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 164,546 children who recieved Rota-2 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Rota-2 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for PCV-3 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received PCV 3 on time (between 95-126 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 107,207 children who recieved PCV-3 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve PCV-3 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for IPV-1 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received IPV 1 on time (between 95-126 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 121,830 children who recieved IPV-1 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve IPV-1 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for Typhoid | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received Typhoid on time (between 270-71 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 156,939 children who recieved Typhoid through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve Typhoid through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | % increase in proportion of children vaccinated on time for IPV-2 | mCCT, ZM | Change in proportion of children who received IPV-2 on time (between 270-71 days of age) | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 26,356 children who recieved IPV-2 through ZM-EIR from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will recieve IPV-2 through ZM-EIR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | 4. Higher uptake of routine immunization services | Outcome 4 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | Increase in EPI center client flow at the aggregate level in each district | mCCT | Change in number of EPI center visitors at the district level | Quarterly | DFC | Pre-intervention: 568,062 children who visited the EPI center at a district level from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention:Children who will visit the EPI centers at a district level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | % increase in proportion of children (segragated by gender) enrolled at fixed sites (EPI centers) | mCCT | Change in proportion of children (male and female) enrolled (vaccinated for the first time) at fixed centers | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Pre-intervention: 180,302 male and 170,772 female children who were enrolled at fixed sites, by gender from January 2020 till August 2021; Post-intervention: Children who will be enrolled at fixed sites, by gender | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | Lower BCG to Measles drop-out in each district relative to pre-intervention | mCCT, ZM | Difference in number of children who receive BCG and Measles in each district compared to pre-intervention levels | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Complete dataset of all children in 7 high-risk districts from January 2020 till date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 5. More engaged communities who proactively seek immunization | Outcome 5 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | Number of helpline calls and SMS queries | mCCT, ZM | Calls and queries reached on phone helpline and SMS | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All calls and SMS recieved from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | Number and type of formal and informal complaints, compliments and suggestions reported on the ticketing system | mCCT, ZM | Categories of messages/queries received on call and SMS | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All complaints recieved from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | Number of mail and email queries | Queries received through mail and email | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All mails and emails recieved from 7 high-risk districts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 6. Improved immunization service delivery | Outcome 6 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | Evidence of increased use of routine immunization data for EPI-program and policy decision-making | Post intervention increase in immunization coverage for the high risk areas/communities and those areas/communities which were lagging behind pre intervention. | Quarterly | Senior Manager - Government and Partner engagement | All meeting minutes, EPI newsletters and other forms of dissemination materials | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | Evidence of increased use of rural-urban equity data by government and stakeholders | ZM | Post intervention increase in targeted immunization strategies focusing on rural areas which were lagging behind in terms of immunization coverage during pre intervention period | Quarterly | Senior Manager - Government and Partner engagement | All meeting minutes, EPI newsletters and other forms of dissemination materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | Evidence of increased use of socio-demographic equity data by government and stakeholders | ZM | Post intervention increase in targeted immunization strategies focusing on deprived social groups which was lagging behind in terms of immunization coverage during pre intervention period. | Quarterly | Senior Manager - Government and Partner engagement | All meeting minutes, EPI newsletters and other forms of dissemination materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | Evidence of increased use of gender equity data by government and stakeholders | ZM | Change in targeted immunization strategies focusing on areas where gender is a predictor of poor immunization outcomes | Quarterly | Senior Manager - Government and Partner engagement | All meeting minutes, EPI newsletters and other forms of dissemination materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | High vaccinator attendance rates (80% EPI-set target maintained) | ZM | Change in vaccinator attendance rates | Monthly | DIOs/Regional Coordinators | Complete attendance data of all vaccinators from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | % reduction in missed opportunities of age-appropriate vaccination in each district relative to pre-intervention | ZM | Change in missed opportunities of vaccinations (contact with the health system which does not result in vaccination) in each district compared to pre-intervention levels | Quarterly | Data Analyst | Complete dataset of all children vaccinated from 7 high-risk districts from January 2020 till date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | Outputs | Output 1 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | 1. Enrollment of eligible children in the mCCT project | Total children enolled in mCCT project from each district | mCCT | Number of children enrolled in the mCCT project from each district | Monthly | Data Analyst | Complete dataset of all children enrolled from 7 high-risk districts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | Proportion of EPI target enrolled per month | mCCT | Number children enrolled each month as a proportion of EPI target set for that month | Monthly | Data Analyst/Data Support Officer | Complete dataset of all children enrolled from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | Proportion of children enrolled through the Pregnant Women and Birth Registry | mCCT | Number of children enrolled through the Pregnant Women and Birth Registry a proportion of number of children enrolled in mCCt | Monthly | Data Analyst/Birth Registry Manager | Complete dataset of all children enrolled from the Birthing centers in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | Proportion of Sindh's estimated live birth cohort enrolled in mCCT project | mCCT | Sindh's estimated live birth cohort as a percentage of children enrolled in mCCT | Monthly | Data Analyst/Data Support Officer | Complete dataset of all children enrolled from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 2. ZM-EIR software linked to mCCT airtime disbursement system | Output 2 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | Average time lapse between immunization event and mCCT airtime disbursement to eligible caregivers | mCCT | Difference between timing of immunization event and mCCT airtime disbursement to eligible caregivers | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | Complete dataset of all mCCT airtime incentives disbursed from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | Average time required to resolve bugs in the software | mCCT, ZM | Time taken to resolve software related bugs | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All bugs reported from 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | 3. Project operational across Sindh | Output 3 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Number and proportion of districts with mCCT roll-out | mCCT | Districts where mCCT was rolled out | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All 7 high-risk districts with mCCTs roll-out | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | Number and proportion of functional EPI centers with mCCT roll-out | mCCT | Service-providing EPI centers where mCCT was rolled out | Weekly | Monitoring Officer | All EPI centers in 7 high-risk districts with mCCTs roll-out | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | Number and proportion of mobile immunization vans linked to mCCT project | mCCT | Mobile immunization vans used to mCCT project | Weekly | Mobile Van Manager | All mobile vans in 7 high-risk districts with mCCTs roll-out | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | Number and proportion of eligible caregivers incentivized in each district | mCCT | Caregivers who were selected for the incentive | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All caregivers incentivized in 7 high-risk districts, by district | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | Number of mCCT airtime disbursements in each district | mCCT | mCCT airtime disbursements sent | Monthly | Monitoring Officer | All disbursements in 7 high-risk districts, by district | All mCCT airtime disbursements in 7 high-risk districts, by district | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | Proportion of mCCT airtime disbursements | mCCT | Number of mCCT airtime disbursement recieved by caregievrs as a proportion of mCCT airtime disbursements sent | Monthly | MNO Vendors | All mCCT airtime disbursements in 7 high-risk districts, by district | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | Proportion of total mCCT allocated budget disbursed by project end | mCCT | Amount of mCCT budget disbursed as a proportion of mCCT budget allocated for disbursement | Quarterly | Disbursement Officer | All mCCT airtime disbursements in 7 high-risk districts, by district | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | 4. Trained cadre of health workers and officials | Output 4 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | Number and proportion of vaccinators trained on the mCCT module | mCCT | Vaccinators trained on the mCCT module | Quarterly | Master Trainers | All vaccinators in 7 high-risk districts, by training status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | Number and proportion of supervisors trained on the mCCT module | mCCT | Supervisors trained on the mCCT module | Monthly | Master Trainers | All supervisors in 7 high-risk districts, by training status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | Number and proportion of health officials trained on the mCCT module | mCCT | Health officials trained on the mCCT module | Monthly | Master Trainers | All health officials in 7 high-risk districts, by training status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | Number and proportion of scheduled trainings conducted | mCCT | Number of trainings conducted out of number of trainings scheduled | Quarterly | Provincial Government Liasoning/Government and Partner engagement | All trainings planned in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | Number of refresher trainings conducted | mCCT | Refresher trainings conducted for mCCT module | Quarterly | Master Trainers | All refresher trainings conducted in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | 5. Trained cadre of helpline responders | Output 5 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | Proportion of helpline and SMS queries successfully resolved | mCCT, ZM | Client's complaint addressed and client informed of the resolution | Quarterly | Monitoring Officer | All helpline and SMS queries recieved in 7 high-risk districts, by status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | Percentage of unresolved complaints or disputes | mCCT, ZM | Complaint did not reach 'resolved' status as a percentage of total complaints | Quarterly | Monitoring Officer | All helpline and SMS queries recieved in 7 high-risk districts, by status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | 6. Regular government engagement | Output 6 indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Number of meetings held with relevant government officials | ZM | Meetings held with relevant government officials | Quarterly | Provincial Government Liasoning/Government and Partner engagement | All meetings conducted in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | Number of reports shared with government | ZM | Reports shared with the government | Quarterly | Provincial Government Liasoning/Government and Partner engagement | All reports shared with officials in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | Frequency of data-sharing | ZM | Number of times data was shared with the government | Quarterly | Provincial Government Liasoning/Government and Partner engagement | All reports shared with officials in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | Number of government employees trained on dashboard and data | ZM | Government employees who received training on the dashboard and data | Quarterly | Master Trainers | All government employees trained in 7 high-risk districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | Number of trainings (including refresher trainings) held with government employees | ZM | Trainings and refresher trainings held with the government employees | Quarterly | Master Trainers | All government employees who recieved refresher trainings in 7 high-risk districts |