Q1.1 How do you USUALLY access Reddit?

Q1.2 How often do you typically... [Visit/Browse]

Q1.2 How often do you typically... [Post/Comment]

Q1.3 How active would you consider yourself to be in the following subreddits? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q1.3 How active would you consider yourself to be in the following subreddits? [r/Cosmere]

Q1.3 How active would you consider yourself to be in the following subreddits? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q1.3 How active would you consider yourself to be in the following subreddits? [r/Mistborn]

Q1.4 How many years have you been active in the Sanderson fandom on Reddit?

Q1.5 How far into the books were you when you began participating in Sanderson subreddits?

Q2.1 Do you feel our spoiler policy is clear? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q2.1 Do you feel our spoiler policy is clear? [r/Cosmere]

Q2.1 Do you feel our spoiler policy is clear? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q2.1 Do you feel our spoiler policy is clear? [r/Mistborn]

Q2.2 How do you feel about our stringency in removing posts with spoilery titles? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q2.2 How do you feel about our stringency in removing posts with spoilery titles? [r/Cosmere]

Q2.2 How do you feel about our stringency in removing posts with spoilery titles? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q2.2 How do you feel about our stringency in removing posts with spoilery titles? [r/Mistborn]

Q2.3 How do you feel about our stringency in removing spoilers within posts or comments? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q2.3 How do you feel about our stringency in removing spoilers within posts or comments? [r/Cosmere]

Q2.3 How do you feel about our stringency in removing spoilers within posts or comments? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q2.3 How do you feel about our stringency in removing spoilers within posts or comments? [r/Mistborn]

Q2.4 How do you feel about our timeliness in removing spoilers? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q2.4 How do you feel about our timeliness in removing spoilers? [r/Cosmere]

Q2.4 How do you feel about our timeliness in removing spoilers? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q2.4 How do you feel about our timeliness in removing spoilers? [r/Mistborn]

Q2.5 Do you know how to cover spoilers in comments?

Q2.6 Do you know how to flair a post for spoilers?

Q2.7 If you've read most or all of the Cosmere, would you like to take a few moments to weigh in on a few additional questions about our policy on Cosmere spoilers?

Q2b.1How do you feel about our policy of strictly limiting discussion of Cosmere crossovers outside of tags for all books involved?

Q2b.2 How should we moderate minor spoilers in WoBs for content later revealed in books?

Q2b.3 Brandon occasionally shares information via WoB that many of people consider to be spoilery. How do you feel about our moderation on Words of Brandon in general?

Q2b.4 Should we keep r/Stormlight_Archive's "RoW/Warbreaker" flair? (multiple answers allowed)

Q2b.5 How do you feel about our spoiler policy with regard to unpublished, upcoming books?

Q3.1 Do you generally understand what Rule 9 entails?

Q3.2 In your opinion, should Rule 9 be enforced in each of these subreddits? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q3.2 In your opinion, should Rule 9 be enforced in each of these subreddits? [r/Cosmere]

Q3.2 In your opinion, should Rule 9 be enforced in each of these subreddits? [r/BrandonSanderson]

Q3.2 In your opinion, should Rule 9 be enforced in each of these subreddits? [r/Mistborn]

Q3.3 In the subreddits where Rule 9 is enforced, how do you feel about the rule's stringency? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q3.3 In the subreddits where Rule 9 is enforced, how do you feel about the rule's stringency? [r/Cosmere]

Q3.4 Would you like to take a few moments to weigh in on Rule 9 in greater detail?

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Simple things reminiscent of the books (storms, chasms, big horses, responsive plants, etc.) ]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Complex things reminiscent of the books (cymatics demonstrations, women's script analog, etc.)]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Pictures of merchandise]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Items with common symbols/quotes stamped, printed, burned, etc.]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Tattoos of common symbols/quotes]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Unique tattoos]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Quotes without much commentary]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Images of others' reactions (e.g. reactions shared via text message)]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Unexpected references online (including other subreddits)]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Unexpected references in real life]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Basic casting posts]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Pictures of children named after characters]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Pictures of pets named after characters]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Memes]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Text posts making a short joke or funny remark]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [News about sales, discounts, etc.]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Minor progress updates (<10% change)]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [General reading order requests]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Reading order requests under unique circumstances]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Requests for book recommendations]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Requests for recommendations on quotes, tattoos, names, etc.]

Q3b.1 How do you feel about these types of posts? [Poll posts]

Q3b.2 We've relied on various ways over the years to provide an outlet for posts restricted by Rule 9. What do you feel is the best way to do this? [r/Stormlight_Archive]

Q3b.2 We've relied on various ways over the years to provide an outlet for posts restricted by Rule 9. What do you feel is the best way to do this? [r/Cosmere]

Q4.1 How well do you feel that we moderate reposts?

Q4.2 Rule 5 restricts crossposts between r/Stormlight_Archive, r/Cosmere, r/BrandonSanderson, and r/Mistborn. What's your opinion on this rule?

Q4.3 How do you feel about our moderation of sensitive topics, like politics or religion?

Q4.4 Have you noticed any issues with trolling?

Q5.1 How are the moderators doing in these areas? [Moderators are friendly and welcoming.]

Q5.1 How are the moderators doing in these areas? [Moderators are prompt and responsive.]

Q5.1 How are the moderators doing in these areas? [Moderators communicate clearly.]

Q5.1 How are the moderators doing in these areas? [Moderators enforce the rules consistently.]

Q5.1 How are the moderators doing in these areas? [Moderators are fair and unbiased.]

Q6.1 Approximately when did you start reading Sanderson?

Q6.2 What book/series introduced you to Sanderson?

Q6.3 What is your favorite Sanderson story?

Q6.4 How do you USUALLY read Sanderson books?

Q6.5 What language(s) do you PRIMARILY read Sanderson books in?

Q6.7 What is your gender?

Q6.8 Where are you from?

Q6.9 If you could have any creature from one of Sanderson's books as a pet, what would it be?

Desktop site (old Reddit), Official Android app

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site (old Reddit), Official Android app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Printed books, Audiobooks

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Desktop site, Official iOS app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits WITH NO EXCEPTIONS.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Yes (keep things exactly the way they are)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site, Mobile browser

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not strict enough. ("I don't want to see any mentions of Nightblood in an Stormlight-tagged post because he hasn't been called that in Stormlight Archive yet.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Audiobooks

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed), Not sure

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Ebooks, Audiobooks

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits WITH NO EXCEPTIONS.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Audiobooks

Desktop site (old Reddit), Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site, Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Yes. If information from a WoB is later revealed in the books, those WoBs should only be discussed in the context of books published after the in-book revelation.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Allow this content all the time but require special flair.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

No, but I rarely/never post.

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits WITH NO EXCEPTIONS.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Audiobooks

Desktop site, Mobile browser

Read most/all of the books first

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Audiobooks

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

The dumb grass. Im not really an animal person.

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Trolls have not been an issue

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Printed books, Ebooks, Audiobooks

Desktop site, Mobile browser

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Larkin, although an Aviar would be pretty cool too. Then again, if I could have Calamity as a pet or friend, I'd like that too...

No, but I rarely/never post.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (keep things exactly the way they are)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not strict enough. ("I don't want to see any mentions of Nightblood in an Stormlight-tagged post because he hasn't been called that in Stormlight Archive yet.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site, Desktop site (old Reddit)

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Repost moderation seems fine

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Desktop site, Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Much too strict. ("It's stupid that we can't call Thaidakar by his real name. If you didn't read Mistborn before Rhythm of War that's on you.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

I get them in every format then read once and listen for rereads.

A real life Soonie pup, boy oh boy!

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Aviar (most kinds are fine)

Official Android app, Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Desktop site, Official iOS app

No, but I rarely/never post.

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Shadows for Silence in the Forests of Hell

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Desktop site (old Reddit), Official Android app

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Allow this content all the time but require special flair.

Allow this content all the time but require special flair.

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

This is a tough question, because the creatures I would want to be real are Spren, but considering their sentience I don't know if I could ever consider one as a pet. Syl is adorable, but not in the same way a dog is. I don't really know- I wouldn't want a chull as a pet, and I don't feel comfortable calling any of the other unique creatures (Spren, Mistwraiths/Kandra, Koloss, Seons, etc) pets.

Desktop site, Desktop site (old Reddit), Official iOS app

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

I feel that Words of Brandon are frequently spoilery, and I wish references too them were tagged far more often.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site, Mobile browser

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits WITH NO EXCEPTIONS.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

This sort of question does not interest me.

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not strict enough. ("I don't want to see any mentions of Nightblood in an Stormlight-tagged post because he hasn't been called that in Stormlight Archive yet.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere), Not sure

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Repost moderation seems fine

Sensitive topics are moderated too strictly.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site (old Reddit), Official Android app, Other mobile app

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Printed books, Ebooks, Audiobooks

Desktop site, Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Desktop site, Official iOS app

No, but I rarely/never post.

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Spren? Not exactly a pet though

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have been a minor issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Awakened doomslug plush

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Desktop site, Official iOS app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Desktop site (old Reddit), Mobile browser

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (keep things exactly the way they are)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are not moderated strictly enough.

Trolls have been a minor issue

A chicken. Is this a trick? Is there any other answer? Good way to weed out the uninitiated!

Desktop site, Other mobile app

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Does a spren bond count?

Official iOS app, Mobile browser

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Desktop site, Official Android app

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

Yes (keep things exactly the way they are), Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Crossposts between these subreddits should NOT be restricted.

Trolls have not been an issue

No, but I rarely/never post.

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Official Android app, Mobile browser

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not strict enough. ("I don't want to see any mentions of Nightblood in an Stormlight-tagged post because he hasn't been called that in Stormlight Archive yet.")

Yes. If information from a WoB is later revealed in the books, those WoBs should only be discussed in the context of books published after the in-book revelation.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Crossposts between these subreddits should NOT be restricted.

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

I feel that Words of Brandon are frequently spoilery, and I wish references too them were tagged far more often.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be allowed in at least two subreddits by default. (if the content is on-topic)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific), Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Don't enforce Rule 9 one day each week. (current method)

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated too strictly.

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 enforced (except on Fridays)

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Rule 9 is good the way it is

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Mistborn: The Final Empire

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

It depends on the WoB. (on how spoilery the info is, the nature of the in-book revelation, etc.)

Some Words of Brandon (such as the Sixth of the Dusk 2 reading, or a certain Taln WoB) are spoilery, and I think discussion of these things needs to be specially tagged.

No (it should be replaced with something more generic, like the "Mixed" flair in r/Cosmere)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Not sure, but I rarely/never post.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

No, but I rarely/never post.

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

A little too strict. ("Well of Ascension isn't going to be ruined for anyone just because they saw an explanation of what Shards are and a list of Shard names that included Ruin.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

No (people can use the "Cosmere" flair and edit the text if they want to be more specific)

The current policy works just fine. People avoiding pre-release content are responsible for avoiding those spoilers. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere" tags but not in "Cosmere (No SA5)" tags.)

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Require this content to be posted as comments in a weekly post.

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Read most/all of the books first

Yes (Warning: Cosmere spoilers ahead!)

Not strict enough. ("I don't want to see any mentions of Nightblood in an Stormlight-tagged post because he hasn't been called that in Stormlight Archive yet.")

No. If Brandon didn't mind sharing the WoB at the time he did, then it's okay for people to continue discussing that WoB in the context of books that were published at the time.

Words of Brandon have always been part of the conversation in the fandom, for better or worse, and we shouldn't put extra hurdles for these discussions.

Yes (and add a "RoW/Mistborn" flair as well, and other similar options if needed)

The current policy should be more friendly to those avoiding pre-release content, with that content only allowed under tags that explicitly mention it. (SA5 spoilers are allowed in "Cosmere + SA5" tags but not in "Cosmere" tags.)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 enforced (at all times)

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be more strict

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Rule 9 should be enforced at all times. An outlet isn't needed.

Repost moderation seems fine

Posts should be restricted to only one of these subreddits by default. (current rule)

Sensitive topics are moderated well.

Trolls have not been an issue

Printed books, Ebooks, Audiobooks

Desktop site (old Reddit), Other mobile app