ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2
Primary Role, Faculty Advisor, and Graduate Student Awards
3
4
InadequateFairProficientOutstanding
5
0123
6
Award CriteriaIndicator: no evidence is demonstratedIndicator: no or little evidence is demonstratedIndicator: most evidence is
demonstrated; meets expectations		Indicator: all evidence is demonstrated;
exceeds expectations
7
- Vita/Resume - Up to 2 Letters of Support - Advising Philosophy - Summary of Qualifications
Incomplete packet. One or
more required items is
missing from the
submission.
Nomination packet offers broad,
sweeping statements as
qualifications without any
specific examples. All other
materials have been submitted.		Nomination packet outlines candidate’s qualifications using specific examples. There are no, or very few, supporting examples or documentation in summary statement.Nomination packet outlines candidate’s qualifications with specific examples, including comprehensive and extensive examples from others (colleagues and/or students) as well as quotes/comments. All materials have been submitted and are complete.
8
9
Interpersonal/Human Relations SkillsIs the nominee available and willing to meet with students and colleagues? Does the nominee excel in most or all of the following qualities and skills in their advising appointments: verbal/non-verbal communication, listening skills, questioning, problem-solving, decision making, assertiveness, social awareness/empathy, responsibility/accountability, and self-management? Does the nominee go beyond normal duties to meet with students in settings other than prescribed? Does the nominee demonstrate superior interpersonal skills with other members of their department and outside of the department?Nominee has little to no evidence through submitted material.Nominee has some evidence as demonstrated through submitted material. No specific examples from colleagues or students are provided and evidence is broad based.Nominee has compelling evidence as demonstrated through submitted material. Specific examples are included. Nominee has overwhelming evidence as communicated through submitted materials exemplifying the nominee’s interpersonal skills with specific examples or quotes from colleagues/students.
10
11
Commitment to Diversity, Equity and InclusionIs the nominee proactive and responsive to the needs of diverse student populations? Does the nominee strive to create a safe, welcoming, supportive, and inclusive campus climate for all students and colleagues? Does the nominee exhibit efforts to promote positive interactions and a commitment to the inclusion of persons of marginalized groups? Does the nominee partner with colleagues and or the community to create and implement initiatives and policies that build an inclusive environment?Nominee has little to no evidence through submitted material.Nominee has some evidence as demonstrated through submitted material. No specific examples from colleagues or students are provided and evidence is broad based.Nominee has compelling evidence as demonstrated through submitted material. Specific examples are included. Nominee has overwhelming evidence as communicated through submitted materials exemplifying the nominee’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion with specific examples.
12
13
Professional Practices/NACADA Core ValuesIs the nominee responsible to themselves and their profession; to individuals they advise; to their institutions; to higher education; to their educational community? Does this nominee promote advising on campus and proactively create advising interactions? Does this nominee utilize campus networks and make appropriate referrals? Is the nominee knowledgeable about their institution’s policies and procedures? Does the nominee set high standards of practice for advising? Do they participate in affecting change on campus?Nominee has little to no evidence supporting NACADA Core Values or demonstrated best professional practices.Nominee has some evidence supporting NACADA Core Values or demonstrated best professional practices.Nominee has strong or compelling evidence supporting NACADA Core Values or demonstrated best professional practices.Nominee has overwhelming evidence or body of experience that supports NACADA’s Core Values and best professional practices.
14
15
Documented SuccessDoes the nominee demonstrate planning/forethought, organization, presentation skills, creativity, initiative, trust, credibility? Is there data (such as student feedback, survey results, etc.) to show student success following advisor/student interaction? Nominee has little to no evidence of documented success. Nominee has some evidence or workplace experience with documented success.Nominee has strong documented and sustained contributions to advising on their campus. Specific examples included.Nominee has overwhelming documented and sustained contributions to advising on their campus. Specific examples included.
16
17
Documented Advisor DevelopmentThere is documented evidence that the advisor participates in and attends advising development workshops, webinars, and training as put on by MIACADA, their institution, or other related organizations. Has the nominee contributed to the professional development of others on the campus or through presentations at professional meetings and conferences?Nominee has no evidence of advisor development.Nominee has some documented ongoing participation in advisor development activities on their campus or in their region.Nominee has strong documented on- going participation in advisor development activities on their campus or in their region.Nominee has documented, sustained participation in advisor development activities on the campus, regional and/or national level, perhaps taken on a leadership role.
18
19
Personal Advising Philosophy No advising philosophy submitted.Advising Philosophy included is in the developing stages. There is some evidence of an emerging philosophy but further development would make it stronger. Advising Philosophy is included and is well-articulated, considers advising and/or student development theory and has depth of thought and application. Advising Philosophy is included and is well-articulated, and well-grounded in advising and/or student development theory; has depth of thought and application and clearly connects to the advisor’s work on a personal level.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100