| A | B | |
|---|---|---|
1 | Notes on how to engage with our cost-effectiveness analysis | |
2 | ||
3 | Published: November 25, 2019 | |
4 | ||
5 | This workbook contains our cost-effectiveness analyses. Individual staff estimates for a few parameters are included in the "User inputs" and "Moral weights" tabs. If you'd like to see how our results would change based on different inputs for these parameters, you can enter your own values in the "Anyone" columns in these two sheets, then select "Anyone" from the dropdown menus in the "Results" tab. You can also select an individual staff member's name from the dropdown menu to see how the results would change if we used their values. To see the results for programs in specific countries, select a country from the dropdown menus in the "Results" tab. Expanding the formula bar at the top of the page (by clicking and dragging the bottom boundary) may make it easier to read the contents of explanatory cells. | |
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
9 | Notes on text color coding | |
10 | Blue text: direct input | |
11 | Green text: pulling from another cell in this workbook | |
12 | Black text: calculation | |
13 | ||
14 | Index | |
15 | List of funding gaps | Estimates of the size and cost-effectiveness of top charities' current funding gaps |
16 | User inputs | Allows staff members or anyone else to supply their estimates for particularly uncertain parameters |
17 | Moral weights | Allows staff members or anyone else to supply numbers used to trade off different good outcomes |
18 | Results | Shows cost-effectiveness estimates for each top charity |
19 | AMF | Cost-effectiveness analysis for long-lasting insecticide-treated net distributions by the Against Malaria Foundation. |
20 | GiveDirectly | Cost-effectiveness analysis for uncondtional cash transfers by GiveDirectly. |
21 | Deworm the World | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Deworm the World |
22 | END Fund | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by The END Fund |
23 | SCI Foundation | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by SCI Foundation |
24 | Sightsavers | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Sightsavers |
25 | Malaria Consortium | Cost-effectiveness analysis for seasonal malaria chemoprevention by Malaria Consortium |
26 | VAS | Cost-effectiveness analysis for vitamin A supplementation by Helen Keller International |
27 | Counterfactual non-philanthropic | Used in the leverage and funging adjustment to our cost-effectiveness analyses |
28 | Inclusion/Exclusion | Used in the adjustment for excluded effects of our cost-effectivenes analyses |
29 | RFMF_AMF | Room for more funding projections for the Against Malaria Foundation |
30 | RFMF_GD | Room for more funding projections for GiveDirectly |
31 | RFMF_DtW | Room for more funding projections for Deworm the World |
32 | RFMF_END | Room for more funding projections for The END Fund |
33 | RFMF_SCI | Room for more funding projections for SCI Foundation |
34 | RFMF_Sightsavers | Room for more funding projections for Sightsavers |
35 | RFMF_MC | Room for more funding projections for Malaria Consortium |
36 | RFMF_HKI | Room for more fundin projections for Helen Keller International |
37 | Helper sheet | Used to simplify formulas on the "Results" sheet |
38 | ||
39 | Helpful GiveWell references | |
40 | Guide to GiveWell cost-effectiveness analyses | |
41 | Full reviews of our top charities | |
42 | Past versions of our cost-effectiveness analyses | |
43 | Discussion of cost-effectiveness as a criterion | |
44 | Blog posts discussing cost-effectiveness | |