A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Serial No. | Case Name | Case No. | STATUS | Drive Link | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1 | L&T Finance Ltd v. Mabsoot Buildhomes India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 11/2022 | Appointment of arbitrator taking into account the consensus reached by both the parties | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UulqZ5k2MtCxeWjDi50U-oambYT2fY8-/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | L&T Finance Ltd v. Coast Town Planners Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 12/2022 | Appointment of arbitrator taking into account the consensus reached by both the parties | https://drive.google.com/file/d/11Hp_pecJtyWfzVFaIIHie2-BdvqjqHGG/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 3 | Select Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Shipra Hotels Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 18/2022 | Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17 | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vj3UGsqAIxLZoXOn02d4_gIbmu3wn5hx/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 4 | M/s RK Sinha & Associates v. M/s Pyramid Finmart Pvt. Ltd. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 21/2022 | Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17 | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OVRuoZAegDfwRpna583kdV_Vu2WztAbH/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 5 | Brahmaputra Cracker & Polymer Ltd. v. MSJEWEL Overseas Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 26/2022 | Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17 | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EujlHkg_30H_KPMdhZJeghI5_DbSlDCA/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | Georges Monin Sas & Anr. v. Saksham Impex Pvt. Ltd. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 27/2022 | Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17 | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xucUcXYdd5mT1HzdOrhgcK6MnnKrnuWi/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 7 | Mansi Brar v. Shipra Estate Ltd. & Anr. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 34/2022 | Matter was referred to arbitration and application be treated u/s 17. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pW_fpFjLVUGnrtW9A3cSpLIhJv-u9Mkr/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 8 | M/s Stellarjet Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Zexus Air Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 41/2022 | Matter was referred to arbitration and application be treated u/s 17. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uMm5C96RfC4BM2HRSF8RR01LqnkCMrpq/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 9 | Ayyappa Enterprises Trading as M/S Calonge v M/S Sugam Vanijya Holdings Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 57/2022 | Appointment of the sole arbitrator | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1STFmq9V0L2VoROgbJ3CsAVjXT0ldxSu7/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 10 | Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 58/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 11 | Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 59/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 12 | Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 60/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 13 | Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 61/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 14 | Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd | O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 62/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 15 | Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd v National Institute of Technology Meghalaya | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 63/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQe2Z1SV-LRzcuTcPxyuOgGt81Fm1OOD/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 16 | Avish Gupta v Ankur Parwal & Ors. | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 64/2022 | The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ul5N3e5dMBY15mFe03YYqeS3T4C9oDIY/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 17 | Bestech Advisors Pvt Ltd v Oriel Financial Solutions Pvt Ltd | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 67/2022 | Appointment of Arbitrator | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pu5k_oO-VKv5mVr3lZhbcFQfamPMmemZ/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 18 | M/s Fedders Electric and Engineering Ltd v M/S Srishti Constructions | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 69/2022 | Sole arbitrator appointed for the parties at the request of both parties. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/14-38857mNxpkuRLNxB4PDmXK_dlxmyMh/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 19 | Nineleaps Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd v Dtwelve Spaces Pvt Ltd | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 72/2022 | Sole arbitrator was appointed as per both the requests of the parties | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l0LELUCut3Xap_zGerI5FOhId8DZNKm5/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 20 | CMI Ltd v Indusind Bank Ltd & Anr | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 90/2022 | The Hon'ble court appointed an arbitrator and directed the parties to settle their disputes | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZYlmPG1EuQ-eV1oBw3Xf5tiYCJjbvnLH/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 21 | West Gujarat Expressway Ltd v National Highways Authority of India & Ors | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 94/2022 | The court directed both parties to appoint arbitrators and try to settle their disputes through arbitration.The NHAI was also directed to desposit a sum of Rs 75 crore. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/14i2KlH558i2-zMM-TllB7_bcHg1vlyq9/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 22 | Millennium Education Management Pvt Ltd v Rajendera Educational Society | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 96/2022 | An arbitrator was appointed and the matter was directed towards arbitration. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1no4wftpIVuqIZia1xGBg1iC-6tdjHOJc/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 23 | Karma Ecotech Pvt Ltd v NCDEX E Markets Ltd | O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 97/2022 | The arbitrator was appointed and the matter was directed to arbitration. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-S2CLYkiYTRZAjgd3yGxb05Mz2KTrTSW/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 24 | Paciffic Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Minus30 Private Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 123/2022 | An Arbitral Tribunal can be constituted in these proceedings itself, and the proceedings can be commenced on an early date. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ymAGSheBMEDYQPOxLqGjksKxHIEUdEfu/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 25 | Anju Somani Vs. Ginglani Distillers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 154/2022 | Referred to arbitration with direction that the respondent No. 1 will maintain a minimum balance of ₹2.1 crores in its bank account. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/10qKrnmtW5uHAFYyuSDbaIVHxeXBp1uHS/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 26 | Sangeeta Sondhi & Anr. Vs. Rajiv K. Luthra And Others | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 155/2022 | Referred to arbitration with directions that the share of the petitioner in the firm will not be disturbed and induction of any new partner in the partnership of the firm will also be subject to the prior approval of the learned Arbitrator. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/16erfECTTyEuSxwsjdoMIPtYySiC25H2r/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 27 | Inox Leisure Limited Vs. Bhumika Enterprises Private Limited | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 159/2022 | Referred to arbitration. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z_lWhNymTMMSiKYOJHfpa0FxZlQj9QY_/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 28 | Harshvardhan Chugh Vs. Perfect Readymix Solutions & Anr. | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 160/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l-vR-GX0xmhdr-auX3uJlv0UaAZHIJH-/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 29 | M/s Evergreen Landmark Private Limited Vs. M/s Indraprastha Buildcap Private Limited & Anr. | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 161/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zefXr-uSFmvsO-uHg-8NMtYHkjF7oNIM/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
31 | 30 | Slipco Constructions Pvt Ltd Vs. Tata Projects Ltd | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 163/2022 | Directed that the petition be placed before the Arbitral Tribunal | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RWxZ8DA0AbhnVc3EmoP3vUhvtHdZT0ql/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 31 | Afcons Sibmost Joint Venture & Anr. Vs. Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways Government | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 164/2022 | Referred to arbitration and refielf granted till completion of arbitration proceedings | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H9mFSyUcJGZopxyjOCVt46uyXgUBE9ZQ/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
33 | 32 | Sada It Parks Pvt. Ltd Vs. North Tree Teleconsulting Llp | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 165/2022 | Arbitrator appointed and parties free to approach the arbitrator under section 17 for interim relief | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kDhsHpN-1Z_MrCP3G8Dfox6lMYN2Egpi/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
34 | 33 | Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India & Ors. | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 171/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-kc8Z8nMNU7LDWW-HM2grUIMUn6Ljb-m/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 34 | Ripple Effect Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikas Ahlawat | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 178/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/14jjtz_5LgI25Jf5HOjBheuBnYAUL5c7J/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 35 | M/s Express Food Services vs. Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 179/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nw9tzW_d1ElEl7NTRnkL4T1bpWwEldGF/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 36 | M/s Segrow Bio Technics India Private Limited Vs. M/s Affordable Infrastructure And Housing Projects | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 189/2022 | Referred to arbitration. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uNm4gAVqKEJOwqkP_RnoVMz1ESES3V_d/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
38 | 37 | M/s Promax Power Ltd. Vs. Acme Solar Holdings Pvt Ltd | O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 196/2022 | Referred to arbitration | https://drive.google.com/file/d/10gaxphqrKyukTS-zCt9DzLABiyqpqX3c/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
39 | 38 | M/s Ktc India Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs. Randhir Brar & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 235/2022 | Petitioners submitted that he shall be filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. He submitted that the present petition be held back for consideration. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fy9NcO4iHxibISJHphnhYhyKDfeWtI-y/view?usp=share_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
40 | 39 | Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs. Vinayak Metasteel Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 267/2022 | Parties were referred to mediation, while also appointing the Arbitrator. The Court further said that the interim order dated 16.09.2022 passed by this court shall continue unless modified or vacated by the learned Sole Arbitrator. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/18N70EQNJ67i5_J9Dun1Ls-BXsIGIEGLp/view?usp=sharing | |||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 40 | Samyak Projects Private Limited Vs. Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 287/2022 | Court referred the matter to arbitration, and the respondent will file a reply to the application under Section 17 of the Act within one week after the learned Arbitrator enters into the reference. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WGMO7hV3zveV1jmdLHfW5BjdDrvv6eIE/view?usp=sharing | |||||||||||||||||||||
42 | 41 | Prime Property Realty Vs. Mr. Brij Mohan Bajaj & Ors | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 292/2022 | Court referred the matter to arbitration, and directed that the present petition will be placed before the learned arbitrator as an application under Section 17. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FYs3QA9hg7PFmAxdn9dgHCb3WPWUfzeM/view?usp=sharing | |||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 42 | CK Infrastructures Limted vs. National Highway & Devlopment Corporation Limited | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 293/2022 | Court referred the matter to arbitration, and further directed that for the purposes of interim measures of protection sought by the petitioner, the present petition will be treated as an application under Section 17 before the learned arbitrator. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aUakhWclLmFvS93MxJNYMmwgvbgs2Egv/view?usp=sharing | |||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 43 | Rajadhiraj Tirupani Vinayak Natraj Pvt. Ltd. v. Facor Alloys Ltd. Fal | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 310/2022 | Matter was referred to arbitration and the S9 petition was directed to be treated as S 17 application | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vpYQED5BRMCzxFhnfbPoFufgeoaQqB_K/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
45 | 44 | Shreesatya Mines Pvt. Ltd. v. UoI | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 314/2022 | The matter is referred to arbitration and the S9 petition is directed to be treated as S17 petition | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DgHDurk4fqKSwt0cel2TSp-1irBpF794/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 45 | ADO (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd. v. Indiabulls Constructions Ltd. & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 321/2022 | Matter was referred to arbitration and the S9 petition was directed to be treated as S 17 application | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U2vgMg9v7t56j7nguiANPi8atafMmGag/view?usp=drive_linkk | |||||||||||||||||||||
47 | 46 | Excelling Geo & engineering Consultant Pvt. Ltd. v. CS Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. & Anr. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 334/2022 | Tribunal was constituted hence matter was disposed. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y15Yf72MP1gCuQuD8vI_8wMst6BWb3Hh/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
48 | 47 | Nidhi Sharma & Anr. v. Noida Toll Co. Ltd. & Anr. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 339/2022 | The arbitrator was appointed and the S9 application was directed to be treated as S17 application | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kLRrxY2AOTgdnUabuKnF0fhRzeTKXlZP/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 48 | M/s SM Milkose Ltd. v. Arvinder Kaur Sethi & Ors. | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 350/2022 | The arbitrator was appointed and the S9 application was directed to be treated as S17 application. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/17esbUNqJP_8iLRTZd1dP9V0-sMgO9m6g/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 49 | MVV Water Utility Pvt Ltd v Delhi Jal Board | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 372/2022 | The court held that the parties have agreed to appoint a sole arbitrator and hence the petition was dimissed. | https://drive.google.com/file/d/13yQ_Ds-atz6WLuCX0mCefkaBVP8xIotr/view?usp=drive_link | |||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |