ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Serial No.Case NameCase No.STATUSDrive Link
2
1L&T Finance Ltd v. Mabsoot Buildhomes India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 11/2022
Appointment of arbitrator taking into account the consensus reached by both the parties
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UulqZ5k2MtCxeWjDi50U-oambYT2fY8-/view?usp=drive_link
3
2L&T Finance Ltd v. Coast Town Planners Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 12/2022
Appointment of arbitrator taking into account the consensus reached by both the parties
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11Hp_pecJtyWfzVFaIIHie2-BdvqjqHGG/view?usp=drive_link
4
3Select Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Shipra Hotels Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 18/2022
Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vj3UGsqAIxLZoXOn02d4_gIbmu3wn5hx/view?usp=drive_link
5
4M/s RK Sinha & Associates v. M/s Pyramid Finmart Pvt. Ltd.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 21/2022
Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OVRuoZAegDfwRpna583kdV_Vu2WztAbH/view?usp=drive_link
6
5
Brahmaputra Cracker & Polymer Ltd. v. MSJEWEL Overseas Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 26/2022
Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EujlHkg_30H_KPMdhZJeghI5_DbSlDCA/view?usp=drive_link
7
6Georges Monin Sas & Anr. v. Saksham Impex Pvt. Ltd.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 27/2022
Arbitrator was appointed and the relief sought under s 9 application could be contented before the arbitral tribunal u/s 17
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xucUcXYdd5mT1HzdOrhgcK6MnnKrnuWi/view?usp=drive_link
8
7Mansi Brar v. Shipra Estate Ltd. & Anr.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 34/2022
Matter was referred to arbitration and application be treated u/s 17.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pW_fpFjLVUGnrtW9A3cSpLIhJv-u9Mkr/view?usp=drive_link
9
8M/s Stellarjet Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Zexus Air Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 41/2022
Matter was referred to arbitration and application be treated u/s 17.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uMm5C96RfC4BM2HRSF8RR01LqnkCMrpq/view?usp=drive_link
10
9
Ayyappa Enterprises Trading as M/S Calonge v M/S Sugam Vanijya Holdings Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 57/2022Appointment of the sole arbitrator
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1STFmq9V0L2VoROgbJ3CsAVjXT0ldxSu7/view?usp=drive_link
11
10
Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 58/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link
12
11
Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 59/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link
13
12
Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 60/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link
14
13
Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 61/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link
15
14
Mansi Brar v Shipra Estate Ltd and Jai Krishan Estates Developers Pvt Ltd
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 62/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mqquJFuFWJGep0umRor4I5pTT4ydLizm/view?usp=drive_link
16
15
Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd v National Institute of Technology Meghalaya
O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 63/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQe2Z1SV-LRzcuTcPxyuOgGt81Fm1OOD/view?usp=drive_link
17
16Avish Gupta v Ankur Parwal & Ors.O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 64/2022The court appointed a Sole Arbitrator for the parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ul5N3e5dMBY15mFe03YYqeS3T4C9oDIY/view?usp=drive_link
18
17Bestech Advisors Pvt Ltd v Oriel Financial Solutions Pvt LtdO.M.P (I) (COMM.) 67/2022Appointment of Arbitrator
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pu5k_oO-VKv5mVr3lZhbcFQfamPMmemZ/view?usp=drive_link
19
18M/s Fedders Electric and Engineering Ltd v M/S Srishti ConstructionsO.M.P (I) (COMM.) 69/2022
Sole arbitrator appointed for the parties at the request of both parties.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14-38857mNxpkuRLNxB4PDmXK_dlxmyMh/view?usp=drive_link
20
19Nineleaps Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd v Dtwelve Spaces Pvt LtdO.M.P (I) (COMM.) 72/2022
Sole arbitrator was appointed as per both the requests of the parties
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l0LELUCut3Xap_zGerI5FOhId8DZNKm5/view?usp=drive_link
21
20CMI Ltd v Indusind Bank Ltd & AnrO.M.P (I) (COMM.) 90/2022
The Hon'ble court appointed an arbitrator and directed the parties to settle their disputes
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZYlmPG1EuQ-eV1oBw3Xf5tiYCJjbvnLH/view?usp=drive_link
22
21
West Gujarat Expressway Ltd v National Highways Authority of India & Ors
O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 94/2022
The court directed both parties to appoint arbitrators and try to settle their disputes through arbitration.The NHAI was also directed to desposit a sum of Rs 75 crore.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14i2KlH558i2-zMM-TllB7_bcHg1vlyq9/view?usp=drive_link
23
22
Millennium Education Management Pvt Ltd v Rajendera Educational Society
O.M.P (I) (COMM.) 96/2022
An arbitrator was appointed and the matter was directed towards arbitration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1no4wftpIVuqIZia1xGBg1iC-6tdjHOJc/view?usp=drive_link
24
23Karma Ecotech Pvt Ltd v NCDEX E Markets LtdO.M.P (I) (COMM.) 97/2022
The arbitrator was appointed and the matter was directed to arbitration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-S2CLYkiYTRZAjgd3yGxb05Mz2KTrTSW/view?usp=drive_link
25
24Paciffic Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Minus30 Private Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 123/2022
An Arbitral Tribunal can be constituted in these proceedings itself, and the proceedings can be commenced on an early date.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ymAGSheBMEDYQPOxLqGjksKxHIEUdEfu/view?usp=share_link
26
25Anju Somani Vs. Ginglani Distillers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 154/2022
Referred to arbitration with direction that the respondent No. 1 will maintain a minimum balance of ₹2.1 crores in its bank account.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10qKrnmtW5uHAFYyuSDbaIVHxeXBp1uHS/view?usp=share_link
27
26Sangeeta Sondhi & Anr. Vs. Rajiv K. Luthra And OthersO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 155/2022
Referred to arbitration with directions that the share of the petitioner in the firm will not be disturbed and induction of any new partner in the partnership of the firm will also be subject to the prior approval of the learned Arbitrator.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16erfECTTyEuSxwsjdoMIPtYySiC25H2r/view?usp=share_link
28
27Inox Leisure Limited Vs. Bhumika Enterprises Private LimitedO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 159/2022Referred to arbitration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z_lWhNymTMMSiKYOJHfpa0FxZlQj9QY_/view?usp=share_link
29
28Harshvardhan Chugh Vs. Perfect Readymix Solutions & Anr.O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 160/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l-vR-GX0xmhdr-auX3uJlv0UaAZHIJH-/view?usp=share_link
30
29
M/s Evergreen Landmark Private Limited Vs. M/s Indraprastha Buildcap Private Limited & Anr.
O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 161/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zefXr-uSFmvsO-uHg-8NMtYHkjF7oNIM/view?usp=share_link
31
30Slipco Constructions Pvt Ltd Vs. Tata Projects LtdO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 163/2022Directed that the petition be placed before the Arbitral Tribunal
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RWxZ8DA0AbhnVc3EmoP3vUhvtHdZT0ql/view?usp=share_link
32
31
Afcons Sibmost Joint Venture & Anr. Vs. Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways Government
O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 164/2022
Referred to arbitration and refielf granted till completion of arbitration proceedings
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H9mFSyUcJGZopxyjOCVt46uyXgUBE9ZQ/view?usp=share_link
33
32Sada It Parks Pvt. Ltd Vs. North Tree Teleconsulting LlpO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 165/2022
Arbitrator appointed and parties free to approach the arbitrator under section 17 for interim relief
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kDhsHpN-1Z_MrCP3G8Dfox6lMYN2Egpi/view?usp=share_link
34
33Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India & Ors.O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 171/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-kc8Z8nMNU7LDWW-HM2grUIMUn6Ljb-m/view?usp=share_link
35
34Ripple Effect Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikas AhlawatO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 178/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14jjtz_5LgI25Jf5HOjBheuBnYAUL5c7J/view?usp=share_link
36
35
M/s Express Food Services vs. Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation
O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 179/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nw9tzW_d1ElEl7NTRnkL4T1bpWwEldGF/view?usp=share_link
37
36
M/s Segrow Bio Technics India Private Limited Vs. M/s Affordable Infrastructure And Housing Projects
O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 189/2022Referred to arbitration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uNm4gAVqKEJOwqkP_RnoVMz1ESES3V_d/view?usp=share_link
38
37M/s Promax Power Ltd. Vs. Acme Solar Holdings Pvt LtdO.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 196/2022Referred to arbitration
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10gaxphqrKyukTS-zCt9DzLABiyqpqX3c/view?usp=share_link
39
38M/s Ktc India Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs. Randhir Brar & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 235/2022
Petitioners submitted that he shall be filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. He submitted that the present petition be held back for consideration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fy9NcO4iHxibISJHphnhYhyKDfeWtI-y/view?usp=share_link
40
39
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs. Vinayak Metasteel Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 267/2022
Parties were referred to mediation, while also appointing the Arbitrator. The Court further said that the interim order dated 16.09.2022 passed by this court shall continue unless modified or vacated by the learned Sole Arbitrator.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18N70EQNJ67i5_J9Dun1Ls-BXsIGIEGLp/view?usp=sharing
41
40
Samyak Projects Private Limited Vs. Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 287/2022
Court referred the matter to arbitration, and the respondent will file a reply to the application under Section 17
of the Act within one week after the learned Arbitrator enters into the reference.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WGMO7hV3zveV1jmdLHfW5BjdDrvv6eIE/view?usp=sharing
42
41Prime Property Realty Vs. Mr. Brij Mohan Bajaj & OrsO.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 292/2022
Court referred the matter to arbitration, and directed that the present petition will be placed before the learned arbitrator as
an application under Section 17.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FYs3QA9hg7PFmAxdn9dgHCb3WPWUfzeM/view?usp=sharing
43
42
CK Infrastructures Limted vs. National Highway & Devlopment Corporation Limited
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 293/2022
Court referred the matter to arbitration, and further directed that for the purposes of interim measures of protection sought by the
petitioner, the present petition will be treated as an application under Section 17 before the learned arbitrator.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aUakhWclLmFvS93MxJNYMmwgvbgs2Egv/view?usp=sharing
44
43Rajadhiraj Tirupani Vinayak Natraj Pvt. Ltd. v. Facor Alloys Ltd. FalO.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 310/2022
Matter was referred to arbitration and the S9 petition was directed to be treated as S 17 application
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vpYQED5BRMCzxFhnfbPoFufgeoaQqB_K/view?usp=drive_link
45
44Shreesatya Mines Pvt. Ltd. v. UoIO.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 314/2022
The matter is referred to arbitration and the S9 petition is directed to be treated as S17 petition
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DgHDurk4fqKSwt0cel2TSp-1irBpF794/view?usp=drive_link
46
45ADO (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd. v. Indiabulls Constructions Ltd. & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 321/2022
Matter was referred to arbitration and the S9 petition was directed to be treated as S 17 application
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U2vgMg9v7t56j7nguiANPi8atafMmGag/view?usp=drive_linkk
47
46
Excelling Geo & engineering Consultant Pvt. Ltd. v. CS Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. & Anr.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 334/2022Tribunal was constituted hence matter was disposed.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y15Yf72MP1gCuQuD8vI_8wMst6BWb3Hh/view?usp=drive_link
48
47Nidhi Sharma & Anr. v. Noida Toll Co. Ltd. & Anr.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 339/2022
The arbitrator was appointed and the S9 application was directed to be treated as S17 application
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kLRrxY2AOTgdnUabuKnF0fhRzeTKXlZP/view?usp=drive_link
49
48M/s SM Milkose Ltd. v. Arvinder Kaur Sethi & Ors.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 350/2022
The arbitrator was appointed and the S9 application was directed to be treated as S17 application.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17esbUNqJP_8iLRTZd1dP9V0-sMgO9m6g/view?usp=drive_link
50
49MVV Water Utility Pvt Ltd v Delhi Jal BoardO.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 372/2022
The court held that the parties have agreed to appoint a sole arbitrator and hence the petition was dimissed.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13yQ_Ds-atz6WLuCX0mCefkaBVP8xIotr/view?usp=drive_link
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100