ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
IPAPS; JD; PEM; JM;CS; AHERM Systems: Emerging Trends, and Opportunities for Publisher/Vendor PartnershipsPackage ID standards might help libraries and content vendors know which specific packages they licensed. Is a standard feasible?yesJG/CShCan look at past KBART Automation discussions ADD TO ACTION: SEND TO KBART SC / Need to address both ERM and linking aspects. Have multiple purposes and applications. ?Have IPA detail requirements? And then send to different groups which would apply.Send to IPA for further discussion.
2
IPAJD; PEM; JMOA MandatesMetadata around APCs is still the wild west. NISO standards, and COUNTER, and similar efforts could benefit the orgs involved in OA, PlanS, etc (includes OA status, licenses)yesAM/KWMETADATA. Growing need. Hard to keep track of where money is going and what article impact is. Feeds transformative discussions.
3
ICCJD:CSBig DataBest practices or guidelines for establishing metadata requirements for appropriate curation of data setsyesJO/MSMETADATA Ken: We should coordinate with RDA on this.
4
IPAOA MandatesCommunity education opportunities including checklist of Plan S/equivalent requirements for societies and small publishersyesAM/KWCommunity education
5
6
7
ICCJD; JM;CSDigital Humanities and Standards(11) Better metadata standards for digital humanities including access, language, provenance, CRediT roles, etc. Look carefully at what the IR world has for metadata standards before adding things that are “humanities specific”. They already deal with issues of privacy (trade secrets, patentable innovations, for example). Better to augment those standards than recreate a separate “humanities” set of standards, unless these is a compelling reason.yesAM/GGMETADATA; Landscape review: 11&12 can be combined DONE; 11 and 41 are the same (NL disagree)Need a landscape review to determine issues.
8
IDI/IPAPEM;CS; RWDiscovery and Building Better SearchValue indications beyond peer review, citation count, impact factor (dealing with resource types beyond the journal article)yesAM/PSA study group (like a pre-working group) to survety the landscape. Answers to these questions are always useful. New metrics are created by bodies like Elsevier, UW. Ex. Measurements for OER - what exists (besides known big names - and who says who is a big name)? Metrics for video, streaming media. User's/researcher's perspective - engage them! Qualitative vs. quantitative factors. (What is the difference between this and Altmetrics?) Library's role in student success related here (or is this a separate project that we should consider - which topic committee would that fall under)?Create a study group.
2- Explore possibilities for recommendations for measurement library's role in student success. (check notes for privacy session.)
9
IDI**; JD, KR; JMArtificial Intelligence and Machine LearningBest practices or guidelines for preparing training data for purposes of Machine Learning and AIyesJO/JWAnalysis of text for particular publisher purposes. Presenters seemed to ask for more guidance in particular areas, to help make decisions. [to make decisions on manuscript submissions.] What would the task/remit for a Working Group be? Many practices to compare against NLP. Audience woudl be small and medium sized publishers, and AI software designers (Scholastica as an example). Recurring theme: structured versus unstructured data. Another use: Automatic creation of metadata for repository submission. An international community exists around AI in libraries. Still fairly early days - a lot of interest, not a ton of practice exists yet. A new knowledge area for libraries - need more experience to be able to generate ideas. [Could AI be used to develop relationships - problem statement above.]A working group is an idea ... but need more consultancy. Talk to editors and manuscript analysis tools. Need more study (volunteers?)
How does bias affect this work?
Are there standards about how data is ingested into different systems? Create a committee/focus group to explore.
10
IDI/IPACSSearch/Retrieval/Discovery of Information — What Does the Future Look Like?Metrics - revisit what metrics make sense to use as indicators of value re uncommon formats. Presenter posed these questions/challenges: Who says what is good? What metrics and parameters beyond peer review and citation count are there? Don’t government reports, videos, blogs, need different metrics?yesJO/JWlast question in 50 is the same as topic in 49 (COMBINED) .. SEE NOTES ABOVE.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100