Guillermo Lagarejos rubric to assess his e-project
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS
1
FLAWLESSADVANCEDPASSNOT GOOD ENOUGHWEIGHING
2
POINTS4321
3
CONTENT / ORGANIZATIONThe content is well organized and coherent. The instructions are clear and easy to follow.
The text structure is attractive and well developed.
The content is well presented, although there are few mistakes regarding organization and coherence. Intructions and explanations are well detailed.The content presents several organization mistakes and some parts should be checked. However, the main ideas are clear and the inctructions can be easily followed. The content is poor. The text is misleading and the main ideas are not clear.20%
4
MULTIMEDIA SUPPORTThere is a load of multimedia artifacts
which support every part of
the content.
The artifacts are
engaging and adpated to the students level.
The are good multimedia artifacts
used
appropriately.
Some of the artifacts do not take into account students level or the appealing.
There is a lack of multimedia reources and support. However, there are few artifacts that are linked to the content.There is no multimedia device or in case they are, they are not well linked to the content.20%
5
ORIGINALITYThe materials used were created by the author
of the project. The content and the
artifacts are original
and innovative.
The author created
all the resources used
in the project but some
of them are basic and traditional.
The author has created
some materials
originally but he or she
has used other people
materials too. The
artifacts are not
original nor innovative.
The author did not create anything by themself and the content and artifacts are in general terms obsolete.20%
6
USE OF THE LANGUAGEThe e-project shows a
perfect use of the
grammar and the
spelling. There are no
errors.
The e-project has few
spelling or grammar
errors.
The e-project has some
spelling and grammar
errors that should be
changed.
The e-project has a lot
of grammar and
spelling errors and it is
difficult to read some
sections.
10%
7
ATTRIBUTIONThe author has
attributed all the
materials used and has
citing all the
information obtained
from other sources.
The author has
attributed everything
except for some specific information
obtained from other
sources.
The author has
attributed only some
materials and some obtained information
has not been cited.
There is no attributing or citing evidence.10%
8
ADAPTATIONThe e-project is perfectly
adapted to any student profile.
The vast majority of the e-project is adapted to students with special educational needs. The content and / or artifacts are not adapted to
people with special
needs in some occasions.
There is no adaptation regarding students with special educational needs.10%
9
DISSEMINATIONThe author has
disseminated the eproject
and the
artifacts through
different means.
The author has
disseminated the eproject
and the
artifacts through only
one dissemination
mean.
There are few parts of the projects which are well spread but the main ideas are not appreciable.
The author did not disseminate the project.10%
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Rúbrica
Alumnos