| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1. English Language Arts / Reading (Productive Habits of Mind) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Goal #1: All schools will implement high-leverage instructional strategies that will support students’ ability to acquire and effectively apply critical thinking, creative thinking and self-regulated thinking to be academically prepared for lifelong learning and the world of work. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | District Action Steps | District Outcome and Implementation Measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1. Provide professional development in the administration and use of the universal screener data to drive instruction and set school goals. | 1. Increase in percent of students in grades K-3 demonstrating at/above proficiency on BOY to EOY on mclass DIBELS reading assessments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 2. Implement the newly revised curriculum in grade K and grades 6-12. | 2. Increase in the percent of students in grades 4-8 demonstrating at/above proficiency on the iReady reading assessment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3. Develop shared vision of and professional development for high-leverage instructional practices to support early grade reading and literacy skills. | 3. Increase in the percent of students in grade 9-12 passing their core ELA class. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 4. Review available student performance data(universal screeners, grades, on-track data) quarterly to monitor growth among student groups. | 4. Decrease in achievement gaps among student groups. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | School Action Steps | School Outcome and Implementation Measures | BOY Outcome/Implementation Measures - September | MOY Outcome Measure - February | EOY Outcome Measure - June | ||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 1. Increase in the percent of students in grades 6-8 demonstrating at/above proficiency on the iReady reading assessment. | 1. By June 2024, students will improve in their placement category by 10% | Of the 579 students that completed the BOY iReady assessment, 12/% are Mid or above grade level, 11/5 are early on grade level, 16% are one grade level below, 10% are two grade levels below, 50% are three or more grade levels below | Of the 615 students that completed the MOY iReady assessment, 17% are mid or above grade level, 10% are early on grade level, 15% are one grade level below, 11% are two grade levels below, 48% are 3 or more grade levels below | Of the 589 students that completed the EOY iReady assessment, 17% are mid or above grade level, 11% are early on grade level, 11% are one grade level below, 10% are two grade levels below, 50% are 3 or more grade levels below | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 2 By June 2024, students who are currently two grade levels or more below will demonstrate improvement | Student typical growth is projected by the BOY i-Ready data and will progress monitored at MOY assessment. | Grade 6- 40% of students meeting growth, Grade 7- 38% of students meeting growth, Grade 8-52% of students meeting growth | Grade 6- 40% of students meeting growth, Grade 7- 42% of students meeting growth, Grade 8-44% of students meeting growth | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 2. Utilize a tiered approach to supporting all students based on iReady assessment data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 3. All teachers will receive professional development in understanding and using iReady data to differentiate instruction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 2. Math (Productive Habits of Mind) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Goal #2: All schools will implement high-leverage instructional strategies that will support students’ ability to acquire and effectively apply critical thinking, creative thinking and self-regulated thinking to be academically prepared for lifelong learning and the world of work. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | District Action Steps | District Outcome and Implementation Measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | 1. Provide professional development in the administration and use of the universal screener data to drive instruction and set school goals. | 1. Increase in percent of students in grades K-5 demonstrating at/above proficiency from BOY to EOY on the iReady math assessment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | 2. Implement the newly revised curriculum for our secondary math classes. | 2. Increase in the percent of students in grades 6-8 demonstrating at/above proficiency from BOY to EOY on the iReady math assessment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 3. Develop shared vision of and professional development for high-leverage instructional practices to support early grade reading and literacy skills. | 3. Increase in the percent of students in grade 9-12 passing their core MATH class. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 4. Review available student performance data(universal screeners, grades, on-track data) quarterly to monitor growth among student groups. | 4. Decrease in achievement gaps among student groups. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | School Action Steps | School Outcome and Implementation Measures | BOY Outcome/Implementation Measures - September | MOY Outcome Measure - February | EOY Outcome Measure - June | ||||||||||||||||||||
38 | 1 Increase in the percent of students in grades 6-8 demonstrating at/above proficiency on the iReady math assessment. | 1. By June 2024, students will improve in their placement category by 10% | Of the 587 students that completed the BOY iReady assessment, 6% are mid or above grade level, 14% are early on grade level, 25% are one grade level below, 12% are two grade levels below, 43% are 3 or more grade levels below | Of the 619 students that completed the BOY iReady assessment, 11% are mid or above grade level, 13% are early on grade level, 24% are one grade level below, 10% are two grade levels below, 42% are 3 or more grade levels below | Of the 611 students that completed the BOY iReady assessment, 15% are mid or above grade level, 16% are early on grade level, 19% are one grade level below, 8% are two grade levels below, 41% are 3 or more grade levels below | ||||||||||||||||||||
39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | 2 By June 2024, students who are currently two grade levels or more below will demonstrate improvement | Student typical growth is projected by the BOY i-Ready data and will progress monitored at MOY assessment. | Grade 6- 39% of students meeting growth, Grade 7- 21% of students meeting growth, Grade 8-50% of students meeting growth | Grade 6- 52% of students meeting growth, Grade 7- 36% of students meeting growth, Grade 8-50% of students meeting growth | |||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 2. Implement the newly revised curriculum for our secondary math classes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | 3. Utilize a tiered approach to supporting all students based on iReady assessment data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 3. All teachers will receive professional development in understanding and using iReady data to differentiate instruction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 3. Attendance and Engagement (Productive Habits of Body) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | Goal #3: All schools will foster a culture of consistent school attendance for all students PK-12, promoting an environment of engagement, academic success, and overall well-being. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | District Action Steps | District Outcome and Implementation Measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 1. All schools will form attendance committees that will meet at least monthly. | 1. 100% of schools will implement attendance teams monthly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 2. Attendance teams will systematically address chronic absenteeism through a multi-tiered approach to intervention. | 2. Improve district-wide Average Daily Attendance for both High Needs and Non-High Needs students. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 3. Attendance teams will collect and analyze attendance data to monitor trends at the individual, group, and school levels. | 3. Decrease district-wide chronic absenteeism for both High Needs and Non-High Needs students. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | 4. Attendance teams will implement evidence-based practices to address student needs and improve attendance at the school level. | 4. Improve district-wide Average Daily Attendance as disaggregated by student groups (race, gender). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | 5. District will collaborate with the Mayor’s Youth Service Bureau, Family Centers, Here-to-Help, and other community partners to develop and provide targeted interventions at the school level and in the community to students and families. | 5. Decrease district-wide chronic absenteeism as disaggregated by student groups (race, gender). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | School Action Steps | School Outcome and Implementation Measures | BOY Outcome/Implementation Measures - September | MOY Outcome Measure - February | EOY Outcome Measure - June | ||||||||||||||||||||
68 | 1 Improve school-wide Average Daily Attendance for both High Needs and Non-High Needs students. | 1 By June 2024, we will increase overall attendance of TOR students | 8/30/2023 ADA = 90.7% | As of March 8, 2024 ADA= 92.3% | As of June 17 2024 ADA= 92% | ||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | 2 By June 2024, we will decrease chronic absenteeism of our students | 20% of students were deemed chronically absent at BOY | 25% of students were deemed chronically absent at MOY | 29% of students were deemed chronically absent at EOY | |||||||||||||||||||||
73 | 2. Attendance committee will meet monthly and will collect and analyze attendance data to monitor trends at the individual, group, and school levels. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | 3. Attendance committee will identify ways to celebrate students who are at 90% ADA or above. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | 4. Social Emotional Learning (Productive Habits of Heart) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | Goal #4: All schools will implement evidenced based SEL programming and practices that support students’ capacity to build social-emotional competencies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | District Action Steps | District Outcome and Implementation Measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | 1. Schools will adopt a framework of SEL implementation utilizing the Resilient Scholar's Portal self-assessment process. | 1. 100% of schools will adopt and implement evidenced-based SEL programming and practices. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | 2. School will adopt and implement evidence-based SEL programming and practices. | 2. Increase in the percentage of students that achieve their growth goal as measured by the DESSA. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | 3. SEL PD will be embedded in district and school professional learning plans. | 3. Increase in the percentage of students identified "In Need of Instruction" on the DESSA that receive SRBI. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | 4. Schools will implement the SEL assessment system (DESSA). | 4. Increase in the percentage of DESSA trainings completed by staff. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | 5. All SPS staff will participate in at least three SEL professional learning sessions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | School Action Steps | School Outcome and Implementation Measures | BOY Outcome/Implementation Measures - September | MOY Outcome Measure - February | EOY Outcome Measure - June | ||||||||||||||||||||
98 | 1. Adopt and implement The Attuned Schools Approach programming and practices. | 1 Increase the percentage of students that achieve their growth goal as measured by the DESSA | 7% of students were rated as "in Need", 62% were rated "Typical" and 30% were rated "Strenth" as measured by the DESSA Universal Screener | 8% of students were rated as "in need", 57% were rated "typical" and 35% were rated "strength" as measured by the DESSA Universal Screener | 7% of students were rated as "in need", 60% were rated "typical" and 33% were rated "strength" as measured by the DESSA Universal Screener | ||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||