SCI coverage surveys (November 2016 update)
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABAC
1
For sources, see "Methods" sheet
2
By district
Country-level summary
3
CountryGeographic areaPraziquantel coverage, from surveyPraziquantel reported coverageAlbendazole or Mebendazole coverage, from surveyAdjustment factor for reported Praziquantel treatmentsNotesSurveyMedian PZQ coverage and rangeMedian ALB coverage and rangeMedian adjustment factor for reported data
4
Malawi (2012)Mangochi64%88%33%0.73For reported coverage, "Unclear/joint reporting," i.e. data not broken down into ALB and PZQMalawi (2012)77% (64%-90%)59% (33%-85%)0.89 (0.73-1.05)
5
Mulanje90%86%85%1.05"
Côte d'Ivoire (2014)
82% (67%-88%)82% (68%-89%)0.96 (0.86-1.07)
6
Malawi (2014)Blantyre77%82%77%0.94Coverage survey data values read off a graphUganda (2014)47% (24%-86%)N/A0.51 (0.35-0.95)
7
Chikwawa55%77%55%0.71"Malawi (2014)69% (55%-77%)44% (25%-77%)0.86 (0.71-1.00)
8
Dedza67%77%30%0.87"
Mozambique (2015)
81% (73%-89%)N/A0.91 (0.88-0.95)
9
Nkhata Bay71%84%38%0.85"Zanzibar (2015)80% (75%-85%)87% (84%-89%)1.00 (0.97-1.03)
10
Rumphi65%90%50%0.72"Zambia (2015)93% (89%-94%)N/AN/A
11
Salima75%75%25%1.00"Ethiopia (2015)85% (65%-97%)86% (65%-96%)0.92 (0.65-1.62)
12
Côte d'IvoireBouake Sud88%84%89%1.05
Madagascar (2016)
92% (85%-100%)92% (82%-100%)1.14 (0.97-2.41)
13
Niakara87%81%87%1.07
Mozambique (2016)
89% (47%-100%)N/AN/A
14
Tiassale67%78%68%0.86
15
Tiebissou77%90%77%0.86Median81.5840.92
16
UgandaBufumbo, Mbale86%91%-0.95Reported coverage is at the district level while survey coverage is at the sub-district levelAverage79.575.00.90
17
(SCI-supported districts only)
Bugulumbya, Kamuli24%69%-0.35"
18
Butebo, Pallisa46%90%-0.51"
19
Kassanda, Mubende42%95%-0.44"
20
Kyebe, Rakai48%93%-0.51"
21
Nyakashashara, Kiruhura49%98%-0.50"
22
Olok, Pallisa47%90%-0.52"
23
Paloga, Lamwo64%73%-0.87"
24
Mozambique (2015)Cabo Delgado89%100%-0.89
25
Nampula city73%83%-0.88
26
Nampula rural79%83%-0.95
27
Niassa84%92%-0.91
28
Zambezia81%86%-0.94
29
Zanzibar (children only reported here)
Pemba85%83%89%1.03
30
Unguja75%78%84%0.97
31
Zambia (children only reported here)
Chilanga89%---
32
Chirundu93%---
33
Shibuyunji94%---
34
Ethiopia (2015)Melkabelo97%60%96%1.62
35
Haromaya65%70%65%0.93
36
Harena Buluk95%105%95%0.90
37
Wogera70%63%73%1.11
38
Raya Kobo
Coverage survey not conducted
70%
Coverage survey not conducted
-
" Two districts from Amhara regional stage (Raya Kobo and Efrata Gidim) did not send teams of data collectors for the training due to competing priorities in the districts during the survey period. Subsequently, these districts were excluded from the survey meaning eight districts were surveyed." Pg 5
39
Aykel & Chilga82%100%82%0.82
40
Efrata Gidim
Coverage survey not conducted
100%
Coverage survey not conducted
-
" Two districts from Amhara regional stage (Raya Kobo and Efrata Gidim) did not send teams of data collectors for the training due to competing priorities in the districts during the survey period. Subsequently, these districts were excluded from the survey meaning eight districts were surveyed." Pg 5
41
Abeshege94%88%94%1.07
42
Wondo genet88%96%88%0.91
43
Benta Tsemay83%128%84%0.65
44
Madagascar (2016)Antsohihy85%78%82%1.09
Survey coverage and reported coverage rates read from a graph
45
Beroroha100%88%100%1.14"
46
Mahajanga II94%39%92%2.41"
47
Miandrivazo85%88%85%0.97"
48
Mitsinjo92%73%92%1.26"
49
Mozambique (2016) (districts with Praziquantel treatment only)
Palma74%---No information on reported coverage for praziquantel available in presentation slides
50
Larde58%---
51
Moma47%---
52
Monapo63%---
53
Maua95%---
54
Mecula84%---
55
Inhaussunge 1100%---
56
Inhaussunge 2100%---
57
Mopeia100%---
58
Namarroi95%---
59
60
61
62
63
3318
64
5327
65
0.62264150940.6666666667
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Results
Methods