Disorders Project Rubric.xlsx
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2
3
Exemplary 5 Standard 4Broad/ Vague 3 Incomplete 2Insufficient 1
4
Section A Introduction: Introduces disorder by category, definition, history and statisticsAll aspects of the introduction portion are present, of high quality, and presented wellAll aspects of the disorder are presented adequatelyOne aspect of introduction missingTwo aspects of introduction missingOnly presented one of the necessary criteria of the disorder introduction
5
Section B Symptoms: Presentation of key symptoms of the disorderAll major symptoms of the disorder are presented with relevance and clarity in a high quality mannerSymptoms are presented adequately. Relevance or clarity may be inferred or alluded toSymptom identification lacks clarity and/or relevance. Minor omissions possibleMajor omissions, lack of clarity and relevance, symptoms inferredSymptom identification unclear, incorrect or not easily identified
6
Section C Culture, Age, Gender: Discussion and application of cultural, age and gender factors related to the disorder All age cultural, gender and age based criteria presented with relevance and clarity in a high quality mannerAll aspects discussed adequately, and appropriatelyOne aspect missing, or incompletely addressedMultiple aspects missing or inadequately addressedGross negligence or incorrect information.
7
Section D Etiology: Explanation of theories for cause of the disorder.Multiple potential causes of the disorder explained with reference to research, high quality Multiple potential causes explained with acknowledgement of research, adequately presentedReference to potential causes for the disorder are inferred or alluded toPassing mention of causes, or inconsistencies in informationGross negligence or misinformation
8
Section E Treatments: Explanation of possible treatments for the disorder In-depth explanation and discussion of eclectic treatment options for disorderAdequate explanation and discussion of multiple treatment optionsBrief explanation of two treatments, or passing reference to one of two discussedBrief mention of two treatments or only one treatment discussedGross negligence or misinformation
9
Section F Case Study: Explanation and discussion of one case study related to the disorder Thorough explanation of case study is present and well developed. Evidence of depth of understandingSolid explanation of case study with all necessary information, depth of understanding is not evidentCursory explanation of study leaves gaps in understanding or questions unansweredCase study is mentioned or referenced, but not well explainedGross negligence or misinformation
10
Section G Works Cited Proper format. sufficient number of sources and qualityImproper format, correct number of sources, quality is questionableImproper format, some sources missing, some unreliableFormatting and content are significantly insufficientGross negligence or misinformation
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Master
BW
Presentation
Grp Mbr
Disoder Assn
Sheet1
 
 
Main menu