Constellation Project rubric 2017-18
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Students:Constellation:Per:
2
5 points each (this describes excellent work)Comments:
3
Background/Myth and history is complete, correct, and non-repetitive. Background is explained in a logical, easy to understand, and entertaining way (did not include facts they can not explain).
4
Stars - number of stars, names of stars and what is known about those stars appears complete and correct (did not include facts they can not explain).
5
Other information - Good information on that region of space. Explained what the different objects are in a clear, logical way (did not include facts they can not explain).
6
Overall project is neat, colorful and easy to read. Good use of contrast. Font size was appropriate (no smaller than 24 point). Number of words per slide was kept to a minimum (no more than 35 words on most slides). Bullet points were used well. Several pictures useful for presenting details of the subject were used.
7
Collaboratively - Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. Group members respect each other. Students excelled at staying on task. Group worked well together. Good use of class time.
8
Technically - Correctly applies and uses all relevant scientific vocabulary. Uses proper English terms. References appear complete and accurate.
9
10
11
12
Students:Constellation:
13
5 points each (this describes excellent work)Comments:
14
Background/Myth and history is complete, correct, and non-repetitive. Background is explained in a logical, easy to understand, and entertaining way (did not include facts they can not explain).
15
Stars - number of stars, names of stars and what is known about those stars appears complete and correct (did not include facts they can not explain).
16
Other information - Good information on that region of space. Explained what the different objects are in a clear, logical way (did not include facts they can not explain).
17
Overall project is neat, colorful and easy to read. Good use of contrast. Font size was appropriate (no smaller than 24 point). Number of words per slide was kept to a minimum (no more than 35 words on most slides). Bullet points were used well. Several pictures useful for presenting details of the subject were used.
18
Collaboratively - Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. Group members respect each other. Students excelled at staying on task. Group worked well together. Good use of class time.
19
Technically - Correctly applies and uses all relevant scientific vocabulary. Uses proper English terms. References appear complete and accurate.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
simplified rubric
project rubric
writing rubric