Direct capture / No RPL minipools / Diverted Rewards

Universal Variable Commission

Achieves the goal of reducing RPL requirement for node operators but does so at the expense of added complexity compared to other ideas that achieve the same result.

Relatively simple idea to reduce RPL requirement in terms of implementation but the of an off-chain management committee to determine "supported" loans is more messy than other solutions.

A slightly more novel way to achieve the goal of reducing RPL requirement for node operators but implementation wouldn't be as straight forward as other methods.

A straight forward method of rapidly increasing supply of node operators in a very simple way.

I don't think it would be a very attractive product and also quite complicated to explain. Definitely a novel approach that could work but I think there are simpler ways to achieve the desired goal.

A variable commission makes total sense to me. Letting market forces act efficiently to balance supply and demand is great. Only downside is that it achieves supply growth at the expense of demand.

A reasonable idea that should be looked into further but I don't think it would have an immediate strong positive effect on supply.

Penalties resulting in reduction in commission is a great idea. Seems like an obvious step in the right direction for an area that deserves some attention.

Good from a node operators perspective for reducing the RPL requirement.

Seems like a reasonable proposal that aims to resolve a potential future issue. Somewhat at ends with the goal to increase supply which is done more rapidly with lower bonded minipools.

Could be worth further exploration. Feels a bit like a watered down megapool which I think offers the same benefits but at a greater scale.

Pre-signed exit messages add a lot of complexity and will be redundant once EL exits are implemented.

Would be great but I don't think the offering is compelling enough to generate significant supply.

Very similar to some of the other ideas about commission redirection. Reasonable idea but not as fleshed out as some of the others.

Well thought out and presented idea which I think is heading in the right direction to rapidly increase supply.

Great research and good suggestions. I think this idea paired with one of the RPL reduction strategies would rapidly increase supply in the protocol.

Great out-of-the-box thinking but the proposed design is very complex and could actually make things worse for people with unrealised gains on their ETH.

Good idea and great research. I like the idea of trying to improve the rETH yield out of what we already have. I think we need more discussion on this topic.

Great idea and excellent research. I do think this idea, along with the other similar ones, are heading in the right direction and should receive more focus and discussion.

Well prepared proposal that is definitely heading us in the right direction but I think the design itself is more complicated than some other proposals that achieve the same result.

Feels more like a bandaid solution to increase demand for RPL. I don't see any benefit to having a secondary deposit pool that is used first for minipools. It's a novel proposal but not one that I can see a whole lot of benefit for.