ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAK
1
2
3
4
5
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM FOR MANCOM CHAIR
6
7
Name of the ManCom Chair:Computation for WBP
8
School/Unit:
9
Name of Evaluator:Period covered:2022-2023
10
Position of Evaluator:Date Completed:
11
12
Important Reminder: Please do not write over the red, black, and greyed out areas
13
Please assign weights to the following Performance Factors below
14
PERFORMANCE FACTORS (KRAs) FOR MANCOM CHAIRWeight assigned
15
16
Part 1: Evaluation of overall contribution to collegial governance25%
17
Part 2: Accomplishment of their respective ManCom portfolio25%
18
Part 3: Accomplishment of unit goals assigned to the ManCom or discharged of their line function40%
19
Part 4: Evaluation of performance in other assigned functions/ duties10%
20
TOTAL WEIGHT (should be equivalent to 100%)100%
21
22
WHAT RATINGS TO GIVE AND WHAT EACH RATING MEANS
23
RATINGMEANINGDESCRIPTION
24
5OUTSTANDINGOverall performance exceeded the expectations to a very high degree, and way beyond the standards of quality and time set. Consistent positive feedback and commendations from authorities or stakeholders were noted as a result of excellent performance and delivery, which may and/or can be used as evidence.
25
4EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONSOverall performance exceeded the expectation, and above the standards of quality and time set. A few positive feedback and commendations from authorities or stakeholders were noted as a result of above average performance and delivery, which may and/or can be used as evidence.
26
3MEETS EXPECTATIONSThe goals were achieved as planned.
27
2NEEDS IMPROVEMENTSomething was done to achieve the goal, only the goal did not reach the standards of quality, quantity, or time set. A few negative feedback from authorities or stakeholders were noted as a result of performance and delivery, which may and/or can be used as evidence.
28
1SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERPERFORMEDNo affirmative action was done to achieve the goal OR something was done to achieve the goals, only they did not reach the standards of quality, quantity, or time set to a considerable degree. Consistent negative feedback from authorities or stakeholders were noted as a result of underperformance, which may and/or can be used as evidence.
29
30
Important Reminder: Please do not write over the red, black, and greyed out areas
31
PART 1: EVALUATION TO OVERALL CONTRIBUTION TO COLLEGIAL GOVERNANCE
Please give a candid and objective evaluation of the individual vis-à-vis:		WEIGHT ASSIGNED TO THIS FACTOR
(Please make sure weight has been set above):		25%
32
Sub-factorsEVIDENCES BY CITING SPECIFIC INSTANCES HOW THIS BEHAVIOR WAS MANIFESTED
(links to evidences shared with your evaluator may also be presented)		MANCOM CHAIR'S SELF-RATINGEVALUATOR'S RATING/ FINAL RATING
33
ABILITY AND EXHIBITED COMPETENCE IN DISTRIBUTING FUNCTIONS IN RUNNING THE UNIVERSITY UNDER ITS RESPONSIBILITY, AS WELL AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LIAISON TASKS

Timeliness
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
34
35
36
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
37
38
ABILITY AND EXHIBITED COMPETENCE IN DISTRIBUTING FUNCTIONS IN RUNNING THE UNIVERSITY UNDER ITS RESPONSIBILITY, AS WELL AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LIAISON TASKS

Effectiveness (based on periodic self-assessment and feedback)
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION3
39
40
41
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
42
43
CONSISTENT UNDERSTANDING AND EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY/ACTION ON MATTERS THAT REQUIRE PRIOR CONSULTATION WITH THE PROPER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT UNITS AND/OR THE BOT
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
44
45
46
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
47
48
ADHERENCE TO UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
49
50
51
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
52
53
TIMELINESS/ACCURACY/ COMPLETENESS OF SUBMISSION/ DECISIONS

Works diligently on ManCom papers, avoids delays and gives priority to ManCom work
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
54
55
56
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
57
58
TIMELINESS/ACCURACY/ COMPLETENESS OF SUBMISSION/ DECISIONS

Follows the rules on collegiality in decision making
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
59
60
61
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
62
63
TIMELINESS/ACCURACY/ COMPLETENESS OF SUBMISSION/ DECISIONS

Maintains confidentiality
MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION5
64
65
66
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
67
68
CONTENT/ SUBSTANCE OF POSITION PAPERS

Prepares dossiers for decisions and write proponent papers that are clear, well-prepared, and include past decisions/ precedents on the matter, relevant policies, and criteria, and supporting documents		MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
69
70
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
71
72
73
TEAMWORK/HARMONY WITH SUBORDINATES, PEERS, AND SUPERIORS (Feedback from peers or people managed by the individual may be solicited as needed)MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
74
75
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
76
77
78
AVAILABILITY FOR MEETINGS AND CONSULTATIONS

Attends all ManCom meetings and is never absent without valid reasons		MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
79
80
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
81
82
83
AVAILABILITY FOR MEETINGS AND CONSULTATIONS

Habitually present and available for consultations		MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
84
85
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
86
87
88
AVAILABILITY FOR MEETINGS AND CONSULTATIONS

Effectively substitutes for designated ManCom member (according to substitution plan)		MANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
89
90
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
91
92
93
TIMELINESS IN THE COMPLETION AND SUBMISSION OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMS OF THE MANCOM MEMBERSMANCOM CHAIR'S JUSTIFICATION4
94
95
EVALUATOR'S REMARKS
96
97
98
RATING FOR PART 1 (OVERALL CONTRIBUTION TO COLLEGIAL GOVERNANCE): 4.00
99
100
PART 2: ACCOMPLISHMENT OF MANCOM PORTFOLIOWEIGHT ASSIGNED TO THIS FACTOR
(Please make sure weight has been set above):		25%