| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | parametre | default v4.2.0 as of June 2022 | coupled or forced ? | to be tested ? | why, expected effects | "Namelist_1" ie new "ref" as of July 2022, | Namelist_2 | modifs Casimir | Myriam VLR (ORCA2) | ||
2 | durée de simu | 200 yr | 100 yr | 500 yr | |||||||
3 | @JZ:omr/ues27zx/CM6.5Work/modipsl/config/IPSLCM6/CM65Work-Spinup-Namelist-1 | @JZ:omr/ues27zx/CM6.5Work/modipsl/config/IPSLCM6/CM65Work-Spinup-Namelist-2 | @JZ:rgzi002/IGCM_OUT/IPSLCM6/DEVT/piControl/CM65v420-LR-CdL-pi-01 | ||||||||
4 | https://vesg.ipsl.upmc.fr/thredds/fileServer/idris_work/ues27zx/IPSLCM6/DEVT/piControl/CM65Work-Spinup-Namelist-1/MONITORING/index.html | https://thredds-su.ipsl.fr/thredds/fileServer/ipsl_thredds/cetlod/interMonitoring/CM65v42work_IDRIS_InterMonit/index.html | http://webservices2017.ipsl.fr/interMonitoring/tmp/interMonitoring_plot01_8Xnld6_prod/ | ||||||||
5 | namdom | time step | 2700 s | both | yes if stability increases | reducing CPU cost | 4800 s | ||||
6 | |||||||||||
7 | nn_fwb | 2 | forced | Casimir uses option 1, ie every time step | |||||||
8 | |||||||||||
9 | ABL | not used | both | to be discussed further with GM : en 1D faisable en 3D dev a faire (BDY on ABL) | Not used | ||||||
10 | |||||||||||
11 | namtra_qsr | Forced mode : suspiscion of bug in Chl profile when using RGBc (RGB+Chl data). | "true" | ||||||||
12 | |||||||||||
13 | namsbc_ssr | rn_deds | -166.67 | forced | Casimir uses -220. 166=> ~60days time scale on 10 meters, 220=> 45d on 10m | Not used | |||||
14 | nn_ssr_ice | 1 | forced | Casimir uses 1 because of the freshwater budget control | Not used | ||||||
15 | |||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||
17 | namsbc_rnf | both | distribution at depth which is computed at initialization or can be read in a file | check what is done in current coupled | "false" | ||||||
18 | How : from a runoff climatologie and at a given depth over which runoffs is spread | computed at initialisation | |||||||||
19 | nam_isf | both | requires distribution of rain/snow precip over Antarctica | test interactive melt rate | |||||||
20 | |||||||||||
21 | nambbl | nn_bbl_ldf | nn_bbl_ldf = 1 | both | Casimir uses nn_bbl_ldf = 0 | yes | helps cascading AABW around Antarctica | nn_bbl_ldf = 0 | nn_bbl_ldf=0 | ||
22 | nn_bbl_adv | nn_bbl_adv = 0 | both | Casimir nn_bbl_adv = 2,m with rn_gambbl increased to 20 | yes | helps cascading AABW around Antarctica | nn_bbl_adv = 2 | nn_bbl_adv=2 | |||
23 | namtra_adv | traadv_FCT | 2nd ordre | both | on both H & V directions | ||||||
24 | |||||||||||
25 | namtra_ldf | ln_traldf_msc | "false" | Seb advocates to switch to "true" GM: with lap, I have to check... | "method of stabilizing correction" ?!? | "true" | ln_traldf_msc = .true. | ||||
26 | nn_aht_ijk_t | 20 | Casimir uses 21 with increased coefficient (*1.5) | 20 | nn_aht_ijk_t = 20 | ||||||
27 | Clement uses 31 for regional high res | ||||||||||
28 | |||||||||||
29 | namtra_mle | rn_ce | 0.6 | both | to be tuned again | 0.6 | |||||
30 | |||||||||||
31 | namtra_eiv | 21 | both | Casimir uses option 21 but halved the coeff (hard coded) | check maximum value of eiv | MOC penetrates deeper ? | nn_aei_ijk_t = 21 | ||||
32 | |||||||||||
33 | namdyn_adv | ln_dynadv_vec | "true" | Julie advocates to try "false" ie flux form GM: no significant differences expected | "false" | "false" | |||||
34 | ln_dynadv_cen2 | "false" | Julie advocates to switch to "true" as 1° dyn is ~geostrphique except in OBL | "true" | "true" | ||||||
35 | |||||||||||
36 | namdyn_spg | ln_bt_fw | "true" | used to be false in IPSL-CM6A-LR : false increases the C02 release.... | check with Jerome the expected impact | ln_dynspg_ts=.true. /ln_bt_fw not used | |||||
37 | |||||||||||
38 | namdyn_ldf | ahm_ijk_t | we have to use updated file from Katherine with open cavities | -30 | |||||||
39 | |||||||||||
40 | namzdf | ln_zad_Aimp | "false" | Seb recommands to switch to true GM too ! | stabilizing the code | "true" | "true" | ||||
41 | new mass flux convection | Julie agrees to test new scheme GM it has a bug in ln_linssh=true | |||||||||
42 | ln_zdfddm | "true" | Casimir recommends "false" | "false" | "false" | ||||||
43 | rn_lc | 0.20 | Casimir recommends 0.25 | 0.25 | not used | ||||||
44 | ln_zdfiwm | "true" | check revision of code to include latest developments of Casimir + update namzdf_iwm if necessary | done | "true" | ||||||
45 | ln_mevar | "false" | Casimir recommends false | "false" | |||||||
46 | ln_tsdiff | "true" | Casimir recommends false | "false" | "false" | ||||||
47 | nn_etau | 0 | Juliette recommands to try option "4" from UK 4 doesn't exist in the ref (coupe penetration TKE dans hemisphere nord). | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||||
48 | coupled | Seb recommands to try option "3" in coupled GM: useless with HF coupling! | |||||||||
49 | GM: keep using 1 (2 doesn't have significant effect) | ||||||||||
50 | Curious to know what is behind the british case 4. I think there is a GMD on that. | ||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||
52 | parametres glace de mer | ||||||||||
53 | ln_aEVP | true / false | |||||||||
54 | nn_qtrice | 0 / 1 | |||||||||
55 | ln_leadhfx | true / false | |||||||||
56 | nn_nevp | 200 / 120 | |||||||||
57 | |||||||||||
58 | color coding | ||||||||||
59 | TODO JULIE | ||||||||||
60 | TODO CHRISTIAN | ||||||||||
61 | SIMULATION TO LAUNCH | ||||||||||
62 | TO DISCUSS FURTHER | ||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||
64 | NEW REF ? | ||||||||||
65 |