google-maps-ratings-data

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M
1
2	Google Maps Restaurant Ratings Pilot: 12 City Centers & 6 Wider Urban Areas
3	Extracted wtih: gmaps-scraper-bro. Active restaurants require Status = Open, primary category = restaurant, and Reviews Count >= 20.
4
5	1. 12 Sampled City Centers — Active Restaurants (20+ reviews)
6	Sampled Area	Country	Geometry	Discovered Places	Active Restaurants (20+ rev)	Mean Rating	Median Rating	P25	P75 (Top 25%)	P90 (Top 10%)	Share < 4.5	Share >= 4.5	Share >= 4.7
7	Tokyo (JP)	JP	600x600m	1,014	299	4.22	4.20	4.00	4.50	4.70	70.9%	29.1%	17.1%
8	Utrecht (NL)	NL	600x600m	803	167	4.25	4.30	4.00	4.60	4.74	64.7%	35.3%	16.8%
9	Pittsburgh center (US)	US	small-poly	453	75	4.32	4.30	4.20	4.55	4.70	64.0%	36.0%	17.3%
10	Bologna (IT)	IT	600x600m	840	104	4.33	4.40	4.10	4.50	4.70	60.6%	39.4%	11.5%
11	Ghent (BE)	BE	600x600m	674	148	4.25	4.40	4.10	4.60	4.80	60.1%	39.9%	16.2%
12	Valencia (ES)	ES	600x600m	1,082	176	4.27	4.40	4.10	4.70	4.80	53.4%	46.6%	27.8%
13	Nancy (FR)	FR	600x600m	527	109	4.39	4.40	4.20	4.70	4.80	52.3%	47.7%	28.4%
14	Manchester center (GB)	GB	small-poly	486	73	4.35	4.50	4.20	4.70	4.80	47.9%	52.1%	32.9%
15	Lyon (FR)	FR	600x600m	861	179	4.49	4.50	4.30	4.80	4.90	37.4%	62.6%	40.2%
16	Leeds (GB)	GB	600x600m	286	47	4.46	4.60	4.30	4.70	4.80	36.2%	63.8%	40.4%
17	Athens (GR)	GR	600x600m	983	82	4.53	4.60	4.33	4.80	4.90	35.4%	64.6%	46.3%
18	Berlin Prenzlauer Berg (DE)	DE	small-poly	278	63	4.56	4.60	4.40	4.70	4.80	27.0%	73.0%	46.0%
19	Total / Pooled (12 city areas)	-	-	8,287	1,522	4.33	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	54.9%	45.1%	25.6%
20
21
22	2. Review-Volume Strata & Retail Store Comparison (12 City Centers, Open Places)
23	Sampled Area	Rest. 20-99 rev (n)	Rest. 20-99 Med	Rest. 20-99 >= 4.5	Rest. 100-499 rev (n)	Rest. 100-499 Med	Rest. 100-499 >= 4.5	Rest. 500+ rev (n)	Rest. 500+ Med	Rest. 500+ >= 4.5	Stores 20+ rev (n)	Stores Med	Stores >= 4.5
24	Tokyo (JP)	105	4.30	38.1%	154	4.20	24.7%	40	4.20	22.5%	147	4.50	57.8%
25	Utrecht (NL)	12	4.65	58.3%	68	4.35	38.2%	87	4.20	29.9%	287	4.50	56.4%
26	Pittsburgh center (US)	14	4.45	50.0%	21	4.30	19.0%	40	4.40	40.0%	140	4.50	55.0%
27	Bologna (IT)	9	4.50	66.7%	28	4.50	53.6%	67	4.30	29.9%	300	4.40	46.3%
28	Ghent (BE)	10	4.70	70.0%	59	4.30	37.3%	79	4.30	38.0%	232	4.40	45.7%
29	Valencia (ES)	21	4.50	52.4%	38	4.60	55.3%	117	4.40	42.7%	372	4.60	59.4%
30	Nancy (FR)	12	4.20	25.0%	39	4.50	61.5%	58	4.40	43.1%	192	4.60	57.8%
31	Manchester center (GB)	12	4.05	25.0%	21	4.50	52.4%	40	4.60	60.0%	193	4.30	35.2%
32	Lyon (FR)	16	4.65	62.5%	62	4.70	72.6%	101	4.50	56.4%	310	4.70	73.9%
33	Leeds (GB)	4	n.a.	n.a.	13	4.70	69.2%	30	4.50	60.0%	72	4.60	66.7%
34	Athens (GR)	24	4.60	54.2%	26	4.65	76.9%	32	4.50	62.5%	328	4.70	74.1%
35	Berlin Prenzlauer Berg (DE)	7	4.60	71.4%	24	4.70	70.8%	32	4.60	75.0%	86	4.70	67.4%
36
37
38	3. Separate Wider 6-Area Benchmark Run — Multi-Neighborhood Polygons (11,649 Places)
39	Wider Urban Area	Country	Geometry	Discovered Places	Active Restaurants (20+ rev)	Mean Rating	Median Rating	P25	P75 (Top 25%)	Share < 4.5	Share >= 4.5	Share >= 4.7	Rest. 500+ >= 4.5
40	Manhattan, NY (US)	US	wider-polygon	4,459	1,377	4.33	4.40	4.20	4.60	56.8%	43.2%	16.3%	47.4%
41	Manchester wider (GB)	GB	wider-polygon	2,773	558	4.37	4.40	4.20	4.60	50.5%	49.5%	23.7%	54.0%
42	Boulder, CO (US)	US	wider-polygon	2,032	290	4.37	4.45	4.30	4.60	50.0%	50.0%	21.7%	46.4%
43	Pittsburgh, PA (US)	US	wider-polygon	532	93	4.45	4.50	4.30	4.70	43.0%	57.0%	26.9%	53.5%
44	Leipzig (DE)	DE	wider-polygon	113	51	4.46	4.50	4.35	4.70	41.2%	58.8%	31.4%	61.1%
45	Prenzlauer Berg wider, Berlin (DE)	DE	wider-polygon	1,740	378	4.56	4.60	4.43	4.70	25.1%	74.9%	42.1%	72.6%
46	Total / Pooled (6 wider areas)	-	-	11,649	2,747	4.38	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	49.7%	50.3%	22.6%	52.4%
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100