rubric_casestudy-LAW-201-may13
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Case Study Rubric
2
4
A-level qualities
(90–100)
3
B-level qualities
(80–89)
3
C-level qualities
(70–79)
1 or 0
D- or F-level qualities
(60–69 or below 60)
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
CompletenessComplete in all respects; reflects all requirementsComplete in most respects; reflects most requirementsIncomplete in many respects; reflects few requirementsIncomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements
5
UnderstandingDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)
6
Analysis and applicationPresents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; includes all necessary financial calculationsPresents a thorough analysis of most issues identified; includes most necessary financial calculationsPresents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; omits necessary financial calculationsPresents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified
7
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studiedMakes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studiedMakes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studiedMakes little or no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading
8
Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argumentSupports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective
9
Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the readingPresents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the readingPresents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the readingPresents realistic or appropriate recommendations with little, if any, support from the information presented and concepts from the reading
10
ResearchSupplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of informationSupplements case study with relevant research into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of informationSupplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consultedSupplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation
11
Writing mechanicsWriting demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organizedWriting is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organizedWriting lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organizationWriting is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; poorly organized
12
Total:
13
Thomas Edison State College
14
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
15
Scale: 16 = A (93-100); 15 = A- (90-92); 14 = B+ (88-89); 12-13 = B (83-87); 11 = B- (80-82); 10 = C+ (78-79); 8-9 = C (73-77); 7 = C- (70-72); 3-6 = D (60-69); 0-2 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Case Study Rubric