patnaik

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
1	Patnaiks give a total estimate of funds extracted by Britain from India of £9 trillion
2	But this was estimated by compounding at 5% interest
3	The grey portion works back to the actual money transfers per year that they must be assuming. It is unclear whether present or historic values of the £ are assumed by them.
4	year	amount	interval	Compounding
5	2018	£9,000,000,000,000.00	0	1
6	1958	£481,819,713,718.45	60	0.05353552375
7	1938	£181,592,782,741.36	80	0.02017697586
8
9	integral of 1.05 for 100 years is	2673
10	The annual amount for the 100 years previously would be	£67,935,945.66
11	The annual amount for 173 years previously would be	£1,911,502.98
12	frpom 1765 to 1938 is	173	years
13	We see that the annual amount seems quite modest. Let us add it up over the period without interest.
14	Total without interest	£330,690,014.89			million acres	bushel per acre	million bushels	kilos million
15	We can now calculate how much of their estimate is due to charging interest	£8,999,669,309,985.11
16	That is essentially	100.00%	of their estimate is accumulated interest
17	Since the interest they impute is not included in the original surplus extracted from India, it amounts to a claim on surplus value extracted in Britain
18	The next section compares Indian food exports with UK production 70 years earlier, I could not find data for the UK in the 20s
19	food grain exports from india	million tons	imports from burma	britain 1850
20					million acres	bushel per acre	million bushels	kilos million
21	1920	0.38	1.07	wheat	3.6	28	100.8	2721.6
22	1921	-0.34	1.02	rye	0.1	28	2.8	70
23	1922	0.53	0.71	oats	1.5	35	52.5	787.5
24	1923	0.4	0.55	barley	2	40	80	1680
25	1924	2.28	0.64				236.1	5259.1
26	1925	0.67	1.03					5.26	million tons
27	1926	0.57	0.73
28	1927	0.19	1.12
29	1928	-0.08	1.27
30	1929	0.09	1.1
31	average	0.469	0.924
32	Average net import		0.455
33	Conclusion, India was a net importer not a net exporter of grain		Even if we ignore its imports and only take exports, these amounted to only 8% of UK grain production 70 years earlier
34			It thus seems unlikely that Indian grain exports were significant as a calorie source for the working population of the UK
35	source to look up
36	Statistical abstract relating to British India
37	. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office
38	1867-1922.
39	The following section critiques the claim that most oil comes from under developed regions
40	OIL DATA
41			2016
42		Fri Dec 14 2018 17:56:00 GMT+0000 (GMT Standard Time)
43	data from	Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
44	https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/data/browser	Natural Gas	Quad Btu	developed country share
45	refutes point on page 10	Eurasia( Former USSR)	29.16
46		Europe	9.05
47		North America	34.84
48		World	130.95	55.78%
49		Petroleum and Other Liquids
50		Eurasia( Former USSR)	29.97
51		Europe	7.22
52		North America	37.43
53		World	188.45	39.59%
54	The section after this supports the examples I give for ricardian trade theory
55	Ricardian example	Fish	Wine
56		labour per shipload	labour per shipload
57	Portugal	90	80
58	Iceland	100
59	Assumed trade rate of fish to wine Iceland	2	1
60
61	Initial allocation of labour
62	Portugal	90000	100000
63	Iceland	50000
64
65	Initial consumption and production
66	Portugal	1000	1250		normalise with respect to initial conditions
67	Iceland	500		vec length
68	Total	1500	1250	1952.562419	0.7682212796	0.6401843997
69
70	After trade of 10 ships of wine to Iceland				0.7683874141	0.6403228451
71	production
72	Portugal	990	1261.25
73	Iceland	500	0	vec len
74	total	1490	1261.25	1952.140252	0.7630998044	0.6459460593
75	labour				0.5862295082	0.4135245902	0.9997540984	norm inner product with respect to initial cond
76	Portugal	89100	100900
77	Iceland	50000			0.7632648313	0.6460857507
78	consumption				0.58648309	0.413703466	1.000186556
79	Portugal	1010	1251.25
80	Iceland	480	10
81	The next sections support my claims about growth of agricultural productivity in tropical areas
82	agricultural productivity	year	value in national currency 2010 value of currency	workforce	value added per person year in national currency const 2010 values	productivity gain
83	Indonesia	2008	892,886,201,338,125	39,556,000	22572712.14	0.91
84		1993	605,779,889,869,550	24485000	24740857.25
85	malaysia	2008	80,898,186,840	1,366,000	59222.68436	1.55
86		1993	59,555,409,054	1558600	38210.83604
87	Brazil	2007	147,204,128,712	16207220	9082.626676	2.00
88		1993	82,779,953,687	18254000	4534.893924
89
90	Annual deforestation rates
91	Africa	0.43%
92	Latin America	0.38%
93	South East Asia	0.91%
94
95
96
97
98
99
100