7_EoE_SPOTLOG_Registration_Latvia.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N
1				7th EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE EVENT - Riga, Latvia
2		7 - 9 May 2025
3	#	Name	Surname	Partner/Stakeholder	Organisation	Speaker	Presentation title	In-Person participation?	will you attend the study visit on 8 May?	will you join the lunch on 9 May?	Dietary needs/requirements	Choose dinner for 7 May (meat/fish/ vegetarian)	Choose dinner for 8 May (meat/fish/ vegetarian)	Observations
4	1	Jorge	Bandeira	LP	UAVR	Yes	Summary of potential measures needed to improve regional policies	Yes	Yes	Yes	no seafood
5	2	Eloisa	Macedo	LP	UAVR	Yes	Results of SPOTLOG Survey	Yes	Yes	Yes	no seafood, no sauces, mostly grilled	Meat	Meat
6	3	Rita	Merca	PP08	Vidzeme PR	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Fish
7	4	Zane	Pipkaleja	PP08	Vidzeme PR	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Fish
8	5	Anita	Abolina	PP08	Vidzeme PR	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Fish
9	6	Rūdolfs	Cimdiņš	Stakeholder	Riga Planning region	Yes	Shaping a Greener Future: Mobility Governance in the Riga Metropolitan Area	Yes	No	No	none	Meat	Fish
10	7	Laura	Franchi	PP03	TTS Italia	Yes	Project Communication updates - Internal meeting	Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Fish
11	8	Dominika	Grodkowska	PP06	MAE	no		Yes	Yes	Yes	vegetarian	Vegetarian	Vegetarian
12	9	Anna	Sitarska	PP06	MAE	no		Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Meat
13	10	Igor	Nowosielski-Hulewicz	PP06/Stakeholder	Nadarzyn municipality	yes	Point Infrastructure and Public Transport Organization in the Nadarzyn Municipality	Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Meat
14	11	Timo	Rainio	AP05	TAMK	Yes	Mobility Data Collection in Smart Urban Area - case Tampere	Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Meat
15	12	Sami	Kalliokoski	AP05	TAMK	Yes	Mobility Data Collection in Smart Urban Area - case Tampere	Yes	No	No	peanut allergy	Meat		no dinner on 8 May
16	13	Petri	Pohjola	AP05	TAMK	Yes	Mobility Data Collection in Smart Urban Area - case Tampere	Yes	No	No	none	Meat		no dinner on 8 May
17	14	Melania	Braghin	PP07	Municipality of Rimini	Yes	Rimini's SULP and SPOTLOG PROJECT	Yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
18	15	Carlo	Michelacci	PP07	Municipality of Rimini	no		Yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
19	16	Marian	Buric	PP04	Smart Cities of Romania Cluster	no		No	No	No	none
20	17	Mihai	Niculescu	PP04	Smart Cities of Romania Cluster	no		Yes	Yes	Yes	none	Meat	Fish
21	18	Tudor	Mancas	DP13	IALOVENI City Hall	yes	Efforts to improve the mobility and logistics in Ialoveni city	yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
22	19	Roman	Visternicean	DP13	IALOVENI City Hall	no		yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
23	20
24	21	Jana	Leiboma	PP08	Vidzeme PR	no		yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
25	22	Veerle	De Meyer	PP10	City of Mechelen	no		yes	yes	yes
26	23	Michaela	Gil	PP02	Municipality of Fundão	yes	Fundão Smart Micro Logistics Hub – pilot	yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
27	24	Alexandre	Amaral	PP02	Municipality of Fundão	no		yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
28	25	Lídia	Martins	LP	CCDRC	no		yes	yes	yes	none	Meat	Fish
29	25	Bernardo	Campos	LP	CCDRC	no		yes	no	no	none	Meat		no dinner on 8 may
30	26	Sarang	Ali	PP03	TTS Italia (InBlenda)	Yes	A New Approach to Logistics: Planning and Assessment for Carbon Neutrality	Yes	Yes	Yes	No Pork	Meat	Fish
31	27	George	Lupascu	PP09	CMA	yes	M100 - Constanta Climate City Contract	yes	yes	yes	no	Meat	Meat
32	28	Adrian	Craciun	PP09	CMA	no		yes	yes	yes	no	Meat	Meat
33	29	Carmina	Popescu	PP09/stakeholder	Constanta Municipality	no		yes	yes	yes	no	Meat	Meat
34	30	Costina	Buzatu	PP09/stakeholder	Constanta Municipality	no		yes	yes	yes	no	Meat	Meat
35	31	Julien	Bouvet	PP11	Ville de Lille	Yes	Construction logistics : Learnings from stakeholder meeting and oportunities	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Meat	Vegetarian
36	32	Richard	Lemeiter	PP11	Ville de Lille	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	No chocolate	Vegetarian	Vegetarian
37	33	Elisa	Lombardi	PP03/Stakeholder	TTS Italia	Yes	cycle-logistics solutions - TBC	No	No	No
38	34	Ann	Vandeurzen	PP10/stakeholder	City of Mechelen	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	none
39	35	Bart	Dumoulin	PP10/stakeholder	City of Mechelen	Yes	Towards zero emission logistics in Flanders – Recommendations and state of play	Yes	Yes	Yes	none
40	36	Claire	Schelfhout	PP10/stakeholder	City of Mechelen	Yes	towards sustainable urban logistics: integrating facilities and planning for carbon reduction	Yes	Yes	Yes	none
41	37
42	38
43	39
44	40
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100