| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pillar | Pillar Goal | Pillar objective/Program Element | Pillar Objective Goal | Milestone | Milestone Metric | Data Source/Form | Integrated into data entry form (Y/N) | Currently collecting (Y/N) | Outcome | Outcome ME Metric | Unit of Measure | Data Source/Form | I2L2 | Integrated into data entry form (Y/N) | Currently collecting (Y/N) | ||||||||||||||
2 | Community-Based Management | Using community mobilization and behavior adoption strategies, participatory approaches and a suite of innovative tools and training to build replicable and scalable management bodies that can provide effective protection to coral reefs and accrue the benefits of fisheries recovery through a rights-based framework | Networks of Marine Reserves | Use participatory approaches combined with scientific support to design MA+R areas that provide a biologically robust solution to replenish and sustain target fish species by balancing protecting a population through fully protected areas with spill over of individuals into fishing areas to support the fishery; and follow internationally recognized guidelines for developing equitable community-based tenure over natural resources right-sized for the appropriate scale to match the biological principles under-pinning the reserve networks | Ecological priority areas developed according to global reserve design guidance and presented to relevant governement entity decision makers | Proportion of regions with ecological strategy maps that have been presented to relevant governement entity decision makers | MA+R Tracker ("Ecological strategy map presented to relevant governement entity") | Y | N | Sub-national decision makers commit to protecting areas identified in ecological strategy maps | Proportion of relevant governement entity decision makers that made commitments to protect areas identified in ecological strategy maps | % | MA+R Tracker (# decision makers presented to/# decision makers that made commitments) | Influence | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||
3 | Optimized reserve placement options developed according to global reserve design guidance and presented to communities | Proportion of communities with reserve placement options developed according to the global reserve design guidance (larval dispersal, habitat quality, and optimal size data) | MA+R Tracker ("NMR design developed using larval dispersal, habitat quality, and optimal size data") | Y | N | Ecologically optimized reserve placement options reflect optimal connectivity, habitat protection, and reserve size. | Percent of recommended reserve size adopted | % | MA+R Tracker ("Percent of recommended reserve size adopted / Recommended reserve size (km) & Reserve size adopted (km)" | Learning | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Percent of key life history habitats protected within the reserve network | % (reserve habitat area / MA habitat area) | MA+R Tracker | N | N | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Mean larval connectivity source quantile within the reserve network | (average the quantiles for all species for each source point within the researve area, and then average all points together) | MA+R Tracker (Under reserves: Mean larval connectivity source quantile within reserve) | N | N | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Participatory workshops completed to finalize reserve boundaries that are consistent with optimized reserve placement options and agreeable to fishers. | Proportion of communities with finalized reserve boundaries | MA+R Tracker ("Reserve boundaries have been finalized by community through participatory process") | N | N | Community members are involved in developing reserve boundaries | Proportion of communities members who attended reserve design participatory workshops | % | Campaign Reach | Learning | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Reserve boundaries adopted by community leaders | Proportion of communities with legally adopted reserve boundaries | MA+R Tracker (reserve status = established or strengthened) | N | N | Ecologically and socially optimized reserve boundaries are adopted by the community | Total reserve area | hectare | MA+R Tracker | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
8 | Data for decision making | Provide essential and scientifically robust data on the status of local fisheries and critical habitat, using digital technology to provide information in user friendly and user useful ways, to fisher households, businesses and management bodies to underpin effective decision making. | Digital fisher registration system adopted by governments | Proportion of Managed Access areas that actively use a digital fishers registration system | MA+R Tracker ("Managed Access area is actively using a digital fisher registration system") | N | N | Fisher registration data accessible and useable by local decision makers | Proportion of management bodies that use fisher registration data to manage fishing effort | % | MA+R Tracker ("Management body has access to fisher registration data") | Learning | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||
9 | All known fishers recorded in local management body's registration system | Proportion of fishers registered | Program Footprint | Y | Y | Catch data is linked to individual fisher | Proportion of fishers with catch data recorded | % | OurFish | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Fish buyers trained to use the digital fisheries catch data system (OurFish) | Proportion of buyers trained to use OurFish | Program Footprint | Y | Y | Catch data is consistently recorded by buyers | Mean monthly frequency of catch records by buyer | records/month/buyer | OurFish | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Ecological monitoring completed and data entered through standardized platforms and formats | Proportion of managed access and reserve areas with ecoloigcal data entered through standardized platforms and formats | MA+R Tracker (Data Collection tab) | N | Y | Ecological data is available through the Fish Forever Portal to evaluate trends | Proportion of MA+R areas with ecological data accessible through the Fish Forever Portal | % | Ecological Dashboard | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | Management bodies trained to use catch and ecological data for decision making. | Proportion of management bodies that have received training to use catch and ecological data for decision making | MA+R Tracker ("Management body received training to use catch and ecological data for decision making") | Y | N | Data is used by management bodies to adapt fisheries management control rules | Proportion of management bodies that use catch and ecological data to adapt control rules at least annually | % | MA+R Tracker (Catch and ecological data are used to adapt control rules quarterly, twice a year or annually) | Learning | N | N | ||||||||||||||||||
13 | Data is shared by management bodies with governments and international organizations | Number of times the management body used ecological and catch data in reporting documents to government and international organizations (i.e.,FAO) | Number | MA+R Tracker ("Number of times the management body used ecological and catch data in reporting documents to government and international organizations") | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Effective Management Bodies | Build effective local management groups that have transparent, equitable and representative decision making over fishing activities in coastal waters; can receive and distribute legally recognized exclusive rights to community-based fishers for specified coastal areas | MA area has a management body formed | Proportion of Managed Access areas with a management body formed | MA+R Tracker ("Management body formed (date)") | ? | ? | Management body consists of members with appropriate competencies (Effective decision-making process, Policy execution, Enforcement and surveillance, Organizational and participatory planning, Financial planning, Communication and coordination, Conflict resolution, Networking, Management reporting for tracking activities and outcomes, Interpretting fisheries and ecological data, Strong relationship with relevant leaders) | Proportion of management bodies that meet all 11 competencies (funct. principle) | % | MA+R Tracker ("Management body consists of members with appropriate competencies (see principles)") | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||
15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Management body has a legal mandate to manage and enforce | Proportion of communities with a management body that has a legal mandate to manage and enforce (a policy is in place that grants local management body authority to manage and enforce the fishery) --- (legal principle | MA+R Tracker ("Management body has a legal mandate to manage and enforce (date)") | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Financing plan is developed to support management activities | Proportion of MA+Rs with a financing plan developed (funct. principle) | MA+R Tracker ("Funding and sustainable financing plan is in place to identify sources to support management activities") | Y | Y | Funding is received from government and non-government entities to support management activities | Proportion of managed access areas that received funding | % | MA+R Tracker (Funding secured/received (funding source, when was funding secured, how many years will it fund, what activities does it fund) | Learning | N | N | ||||||||||||||||||
18 | Fisheries management plan adopted/approved | Proportion of fisheries management bodies that have adopted a finalized/approved fisheries management plan | MA+R Tracker ("Management plan approved (date)") | N | N | Appropriate fisheries management controls included in management plan | Proportion of fisheries management bodies with adopted/approved fisheries management plan that includes controls appropriate for fishery status and trends as determined by the FF Fisheries Management Assessment Tool (legal principle) | % | MA+R Tracker ("Appropriate fishing regulations are established using catch and ecological data and defined in a policy and management plan") | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
19 | Management body represents all relevant stakeholders in local community | Proportion of management bodies that represent all relevant stakeholders in local community (fishers, women, buyers, gov't officials, others) -- (funct. principle) | MA+R Tracker ("Management body represents all relevant stakeholders in local community") | Y | Y | Community is confident is the ability of the management body to manage the fishery | Proportion of community members who feel that the fisheries management body makes decisions that benefit the fishery (improved fish catch) and community | % | Household Survey, Q22 (New HHS Q24) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | Proportion of community members who feel that their opinions/concerns are considered in decision-making processes | % | Household Survey, Q46 (New HHS Q61) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | Management body holds regular meeting | Proportion of management bodies that hold regular meetings (funct. principle) | MA+R Tracker ("Management body holds regular meetings" 3 criteria need to be met for this to be fully met) | Y | Y | Community members participate in management body | Proportion of fishers who attend management body meetings regularly | % | Household Survey Q44 Management Assessment (New HHS Q54) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | Management body is transparent and accountable | Proportion of management bodies that are transparent and accountable (1. clear goals and objectives; 2. clear strategies for communicating decisions; 3. clear desicion-making process) | MA+R Tracker ("Management body is transparent and accountable" 3 criteria need to be met for this to be fully met) | ? | ? | Decision making process is transparent | Proportion of community members who are aware of fishing regulations | % | Household Survey, Q34-41, and 67 (New HHS Q45-49, Q51-52) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | Decision making process is effective | Proportion of community members who feel that current fishing regulations are effective at managing the fishery and at ensuring catches remain stable. | % | Household Survey, 61a (New HHS Q74a) | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Community members are confident that their fisheries will improve and/or stabilize | Proportion of participants who are confident they will continue to benefit from community management of the fishery for the next 5 years. | % | Household Survey, Q22 and 52 (New HHS Q24 & Q66) | Learning | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Proportion of fishers who perceived that their catch remained stable or increased over the past 2 years | % | Household Survey, Q19 (New HHS Q21) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Management body has an external coordination plan in place to identify paths to influence and inform at a sub-national and national level | Proportion of management bodies with external coordination plan in place (funct. principle) | MA+R Tracker ("External coordination plan is in place to identify paths to influence and inform at a subnational") | Y | Y | Coastal fisheries are represented in sub-national and national fisheries management decisions | Number of times a management body representative participated in a national or subnational decision-making forum in the last 12 months | Number | MA+R Tracker ("Number of times a management body representative participated in a national or subnational decision-making forum in the last 12 months") | Learning | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
28 | Managed Access | Establish areas that maintain a limit on fishing effort through a cap on individuals and/or vessels in conjunction with additional management regimes such as harvest control rules. | Fisher access rights are established for managed access areas | Proportion of Managed Access areas with access rights established (legal principle) | MA+R Tracker ("Fisher access to the MA is managed") | Y | Y | Access rights distributed fairly | Proportion of fishers who believe that access rights have been distributed fairly | % | Household Survey, Q61e (New HHS Q74e) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||
29 | Enforcement system is developed and adopted | Proportion of Managed Access areas with adopted enforcement or surveillance system (legal principle) | MA+R Tracker ("Surveillance and Enforcement system is established") | Y | Y | Perceived increase in violators being caught | Perceived frequency of getting caught for violating regulations | % | Household Survey, Q51 d and e (New HHS Q65 d&e) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
30 | Perceived increase in compliance with regulations | Frequency of observed use of unapproved gear, fishing in reserve, and unpermitted fishing in MA | % | Household Survey, Q51a-c, 63a and b (New HHS Q65 a-c, Q77) | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | MA boundaries designed in accordance with global guidance | Proportion of communities with MA boundaries designed to incorporate geopolitical boundaries, traditional fishing grounds, and optimal reserve locations (legal principle) | MA+R Tracker ("MA+R boundaries incorporate geopolitical boundaries, traditional fishing grounds, and optimal reserve locations") | Y | Y | MA adopted and clearly designated | Total managed access area adopted | hectare | MA+R Tracker | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
32 | Proportion of communities with MA boundaries that are clearly established and defensible (4 criteria need to be met) (legal principle) | % | MA+R Tracker | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Behavior Adoption | Apply behavioral insights to shape norms, promote sustainable behaviors and deliver lasting change across various levels of human society. | Behavior Adoption Interventions - Registration | Proportion of communities where registration activities associated with the professional fisher campaign are completed | Campaign Reach | N | N | Fishers believe registering is important | Proportion of fishers who believe that registering will help to maintain or improve fish catch | % | Household Survey, Q61b (New HHS Q74b) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||
34 | Fishers register | Proportion of registered fishers | % | Fisher Registration | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Behavior Adoption Interventions - Participation | Proportion of communities where participation activities associated with the professional fisher campaign are completed | Campaign Reach | N | N | Fishers believe that participation will improve management | Proportion of fishers who believe that participation in management will help to maintain or improve fish catch | % | Household Survey, Q61c (New HHS Q74c) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
36 | Fishers participate in management body | Proportion of fishers who actively engage in the decision-making process | % | Household Survey, Q44, Managed Access and Reserve Planning (New HHS Q54) | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | Fishers encourage others to participate | Proportion of fishers that encourage others (both inside and outside their local community) to participate in sustainable/responsible activity | % | Household Survey, Q53 (New HHS Q67) | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | Behavior Adoption Interventions - Reporting | Proportion of communities where reporting activities associated with the professional fisher campaign are completed | Campaign Reach | N | N | Fishers believe that catch data is important to sustain fishery | Proportion of fishers believe fishers believe catch data is important to sustainably manage fisheries | % | Household Survey, Q61b (New HHS Q74b) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
39 | Fishers catch is recorded by buyers | Proportion of registered fishers with reported catch | % | OurFish | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | Behavior Adoption Interventions - Compliance | Proportion of communities where compliance activities associated with the professional fisher campaign are completed | Campaign Reach | N | N | Fishers believe that compliance with fishing regulations will improve catch | Proportion of fishers who believe that compliance with fishing regulations will help to maintain or improve fish catch | % | Household Survey, 62 (New HHS Q76) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
41 | Proportion of fishers who believe that it is important to have a strong enforcment system | % | Household Survey, 61d (New HHS Q74d) | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | Fishers comply with fishing regulations | Proportion of fishers who claim that other fishers comply with fishing regulations | % | Household Survey, 51a-c (New HHS Q65 a-c) | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Gender Mainstreaming | Build key training components into the curricula to ensure gender equity in the establishment and operation of fisheries management groups, recognize and highlight the critical role of women in coastal community-based fisheries and enhance the important influence women play in promoting and maintaining sustainable fishing behaviors in communities | Facilitate women's access to financial tools and information | Proportion of community enterprise members who are women | IF data entry form | N | Y | Strenghten women's role in financial decision making | Proportion of women in community who make financial decisions for the household | % | Household Survey, Q78 (New HHS Q91) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||
44 | Proportion of OurFish buyers who are women | Ourfish | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | Proportion of savings clubs members who are women | Savings Clubs | Y | Y | Proportion of women in community who have access to financial services | % | Household Survey, Q25 (New HHS Q27) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||
46 | Proportion of women in community who received financial literacy training | Campaign Reach | N | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Promote women's participation in fisheries management | Proportion of workshops with examples and references using both women and men in leadership positions | Campaign Reach | Y | N | Increased participation by women in fisheries management | Proportion of women in community that have attended a management body meeting in the last month | % | Household Survey, Q44 (New HHS Q54) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
48 | Proportion of management bodies that hold meetings at a time and place suitable for women (MA+R Tracker) & Proportion of women who believe management body meetings are scheduled at a time and place suitable for women to participate (HHS) | MA+R tracker and New HHS Q56 | Y | N | Proportion of women in community that hold leadership positions in the management body | % | Household Survey, Q45 (New HHS Q57) | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||
49 | Proportion of women who share their interest/ opinions during FMB meetings. | % | New HHS Q60 | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | Promote the inclusion of women's interests in MA+R design and management plan development | Proportion of workshops that include gender neutral/inclusive language | Campaign Reach | Y | N | Women's role represented and opinions considered by management | Proportion of women who feel that their role in the fishery is represented in the management body | % | Old Household Survey Q47 (New HHS Q58) | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
51 | Proportion of workshop attendees who were women | Campaign Reach | Y | Y | Proportion of women who feel that their opinions/concerns are represented/considered in decision-making processes | % | New HHS Q61 | Learning | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||
52 | Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change | Identify and plan for the effects of slow onset and sudden shock impacts associated with climate change, especially regarding coral reef health, distribution of target fish populations and access to fishing grounds. We will also support local governments develop and embed fisheries management into climate change adaptation strategies. | Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment completed | Proportion of communities with a climate change vulnerability assessment completed | MA+R Tracker (Data Collection tab) | N | N | Improved capacity to adapt to effects of climate change | Ecological adaptive capacity score | Score | Climate change vulnerability assessment | Learning | N | N | ||||||||||||||||
53 | Proportion of communities with a risk or disaster plan within or separate from the management plan that incorporates climate change response actions based on CCVA recommendations | % | MA+R Tracker ("A risk or disaster plan exists (within or separate from the management plan) that incorporates climate change response actions based on CCVA recommendations: yes/no") | Learning | N | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | Social adaptive capacity score | Score | Climate change vulnerability assessment | Learning | N | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | Policy and Governance | An enabling environment through clear policy that gives priority and preference to local communities in their access to and management of local fisheries. | Institutional partnerships and arrangements | Establish institutional arrangements and partnerships among government and other stakeholders for widespread adoption of Managed Access with Reserves | Formal partnerships and arrangements are established to enable effective implementation and/or support to communities of sustainable coastal fisheries approaches | Proportion of potential partners in each tier of relevance with signed formal agreements (e.g MOU, contracts etc) and shared workplans for training and / or implementation. | Policy Data Entry Form (MOUs or equivalent and workplans) | Y | Partners have formal mechanisms for working together on shared goals leading to sustainable and resilient coastal communities | Proportion of partnerships that lead to replication or scale of MA+R and community-based fisheries management approaches (to be defined, but may include agreements to work in new geographies, address financing or policy issues, etc.) | % | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | ||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | Legal Regulatory pathway | Identify and establish clear pathways for communities to secure access rights and implement managed access with reserves | National level policy landscape analysis identifies potential legal pathways for establishing community rights-based management for coastal fisheries (Managed Access) | Proportion of coastal waters with an identified critical path for establishing Managed Access with their constituent communities | Policy Data Entry Form (Country Policy Review) | Y | Y | Country teams are able to formulate a clear strategy for engaging key decision-makers and stakeholders towards the formulation and adoption of legal instruments enabling managed access and CBM | Country policy engagement strategy reflects existing legal framwork, policy opportunitiy windows, and relevant stakehholders to engage and influence | Y/N | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | National level policy landscape analysis identifies potential legal pathways for establishing no-take reserves in territorial seas both within and beyond the boundaries of existing Marine Protected Areas / National Parks | Proportion of coastal waters where the legal authority and process for delcaring no-take reserves is clear | Policy Data Entry Form (Policy and mapping review) | Y | N | Country teams are able to formulate a clear strategy for engaging key decision-makers and stakeholders towards the formulation and adoption of legal instruments declaring NTZ's | Country policy engagement strategy reflects existing legal framework for NTZs, opportunity areas and relevant stakeholders to engage and influence | Y/N | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | Analysis of stakeholder capacity identifies and categorizes partnerships that will enable widespread adoption of Managed Access with Reserves | Proportion of LGUs under various governance structures that have formulated appropriate policy instruments needed to enable managed access and community based management | Policy Data Entry Form (Policy instruments) | Y | N | Policy instruments enabling managed access and CBM, which reflect key stakeholder interests, are developed | Proportion of LGUs that have agreed to appropriate policy instruments formulated to enable managed access and community based management | % | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | Relevant legal instrument/s enabling MA+R and community-based fisheries management is adopted | Proportion of communities or LGUs that have legally adotped appropriate policy instuments needed to enable managed access and community-based management | Policy Data Entry Form (Legally adopted policy instruments ) | Y | N | Relevant legal instruments are in place to ensure that fisheries management bodies have clear, unambiguous management authority and decision-rights over clearly designated areas/bodies of water. | Proportion of communities with legal authority for area-based management of coastal and fisheries resources (to be determined per country, but can include Coastal Zone Planning authority, MPA legislation, Fisheries Management Zone designations, etc.) | % | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Proportion of communities with legal provisions enabling co-management of ocean resources (to be determined per country but can include provincial letter granting rights to associations, municipal ordinances identifying user rights, etc.) | % | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | Policy | Identify and secure relevant national, sub-national and local policy commitments towards sustainable and resilient coastal fisheries | Policy landscape analysis and strategy are developed, which priortizes opportunities to influence relevant plans, policies, and projects of government and other institutions / organizations , including in the areas of biodiversity, climate, development, etc | Number of country / sub-national level opportunities included in the engagement plan along with the opportunity windows for each option, completed | Policy Data Entry Form (Policy Review) | Y | N | Country teams are able to formulate a clear strategy that prioritiizes opportunities for securing government commitments to sustainable and resilient coastal fisheries | Country policy engagement strategy reflects and prioritizes opportunities for securing government commitments to sustainable and resilient coastal fisheries | # | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | N | ||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | Partnership engagement plan used to build and manage relationships with relevant decision-makers and influencers | Proportion of partners identified in engagement plan that formal or informal relationships have been established | Policy Data Entry Form (Noting country differences, this could be documents like MOUs, (TBD)) | Y | Y | Rare is able to provide inputs to the formulation of prioritizes policies, plans, and projects | Number of opportunities/times (per partnership) that Rare has supported policies and/ or has initiated to provide technical or policy inputs, asked to convene or facilitate consultations, etc. | # | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | Relevant plans, policies and projects incorporate principles/language/provisions/ approaches etc of Fish Forever. | Number of plans, policies, laws and projects of the government relevant to coastal resource management that reflect principles / language / provisions / approaches of Fish Forever | Policy Data Entry Form (Offical government documents) | Y | Y | Number of national level plans, policies, regulations and projects that reflect principles / language / provisions / specific approaches (eg., national development plans, NDCs and National Action Plans, etc.) | Number of national level plans, policies, regulations and projects that reflect principles / language / provisions / specific approaches (eg., national development plans, NDCs and National Action Plans, etc.) | # | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | Number of sub-national plans, policies, regulations and projects that reflect principles / language / provisions / specific approaches (eg, governor decree, Fishery Managerment Area managemement plan, RESEX plan, etc.) | # | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Number of local government documents, plans, policies, regulations and projects that reflect principles / language / provisions / specific approaches (local development plan, etc.) ; as relevant, this may need to specify one policy commitment around prioritization of coastal fisheries and fishers within a country's territorial waters | # | Policy Data Entry Form | Influence | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | Network of Champions | Build network of political champions that will elevate the issues of coastal fisheries in national and international discussions, push for effective implementation at sites, and encourage peers to support solutions | Local government leaders make public commitment to coastal fisheries reform through signing the pledge | Proportion of local government leaders from coastal areas that have signed the leadership pledge | Leadership Commitments (Signed pledges) | Y | Y | Leaders that Rare works with are highly engaged advocates of community based management within and outside their communities | Number of actions taken by members of the Network against the pledge (implementing, policy or financing) | # | Leadership Commitments | Influence | N | N | ||||||||||||||||
100 |