Effects of ascertainment bias on admixture proportions
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGH
1
FRENCH ascertainmentHAN ascertainmentPAPUAN1 ascertainment
2
3
Mozabite28.7Mozabite26.8Mozabite26.3
4
BantuKenya92.7BantuKenya91.6BantuKenya91.5
5
Mandenka96.1Mandenka95Mandenka94.6
6
BantuSouthAfrica97.8Yoruba96.8Yoruba96.7
7
Yoruba98.2BantuSouthAfrica97.3BantuSouthAfrica97.2
8
San98.4San98San97.8
9
BiakaPygmy100BiakaPygmy100BiakaPygmy100
10
MbutiPygmy100MbutiPygmy100MbutiPygmy100
11
12
SAN ascertainmentYORUBA ascertainment
13
14
Mozabite19.6Mozabite23.4
15
BantuKenya78.3BantuKenya83.6
16
Mandenka80.9Mandenka87.7
17
Yoruba82.9Yoruba89.9
18
BantuSouthAfrica86.9BantuSouthAfrica90
19
BiakaPygmy94.7San92.4
20
MbutiPygmy97.1BiakaPygmy96.9
21
San97.9MbutiPygmy97.2
Loading...
 
 
 
African in diff. ascertainments
Panel 1 (French, 111,970 SNPs)
Panel 2 (Han, 78,253 SNPs)
Panel 3 (Papaun1, 48,531 SNPs)
Panel 4 San (163,313 SNPs)
Panel 5 Yoruba (124,115 SNPs)