[LIVE AI] Evaluation Guidelines

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L
1			Incomplete		Average		Good		Excellent		Outstanding
2			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
3	Design	User Interface	- UI is non-functional or unusable - Severe layout issues or broken navigation - Little to no attention to design		- UI partially functional, but confusing layout - Basic or inconsistent styling - Lack of coherent brand identity		- Generally stable, but needs more visual consistency - Standard design with some creativity - Basic layout with minor usability issues		- Organized layout with clear design concept - Easy navigation with minor design flaws - Responsive design meets most user needs		- Visually appealing and highly responsive - Consistent, professional look and feel - Clear brand identity and intuitive navigation - Follow accessibility guidelines
4	Design	User Experience	- System or flow is confusing or impossible - Key features are missing or entirely broken		- Some essential flows are incomplete - Significant friction points hamper usage - Minimal user guidance or help		- Core features work and user journey shows potential - Some friction in completing tasks - Sufficient user guidance but no personalization		- Smooth overall flow with minor hiccups - Easy to learn and navigate - Thoughtful in-app guidance and well-organized features		- Exceptional end-to-end user journey - Features anticipate user needs - Highly intuitive design with thoughtful prompts, accessibility, and user delight
5	Develop	Tech Innovation	- Concept is outdated or trivial - No new features, purely imitative		- Concept has limited novelty - Only incremental improvements to existing ideas		- Demonstrates a standard approach with a slight twist - Limited but noticeable creativity		- Clear unique selling points or approach - Evidence of creative problem-solving - Shows potential to spark new use cases		- Breakthrough idea or approach - Significant potential to reshape existing solutions - Impressive originality and forward-thinking
6	Develop	Code Quality	- Codebase is disorganized, unworkable - No proper structure, indentation, or documentation		- Code runs but is messy or heavily bug-prone - Minimal comments or guidelines - Hard to read, inconsistent naming conventions		- Generally readable with occasional inconsistencies - Some comments and basic structure - Might contain repeated or unclear segments		- Well-structured code with logical organization - Consistent naming, good formatting - Strong comments or documentation for maintainability		- Clean, maintainable, and efficient code - Comprehensive documentation and consistent style - High professional degree of readability, modular design, and best-practice patterns
7	Demo	Production Values	- Pitch video (if any) is unclear, inaudible, or missing - No editing or effort in production		- Pitch video has poor audio/visual quality - Minimal editing and production elements - Does not strongly engage the audience		- Acceptable video and audio clarity - Some basic editing - Production quality is acceptable but not memorable		- Engaging audio and visuals with good clarity - Cohesive editing and pacing - Overall polished and appealing		- High production standards; crisp audio, clear visuals, cohesive effects - Professional editing that enhances the message - Strongly impactful and memorable presentation
8	Demo	Pitch Presentation	- Pitch lacks coherence and structure - Fails to explain the product’s purpose or value		- Pitch explains concept, but lacks clarity or enthusiasm - Fails to highlight key benefits or fails to convey importance or urgency		- Pitch is adequate, covers main points - Some engagement with audience but could be more dynamic - Value proposition is clear but not strongly emphasized		- Clear, convincing pitch that highlights advantages - Good pacing and confident delivery - Strong articulation of key features and benefits		- Outstanding, memorable presentation with clear storytelling - Captivates audience, addresses questions convincingly - Compellingly articulates the product’s unique strengths and vision
9	Product	Market Fit	- No clear market or user base identified - Product has limited or no practical appeal		- Broad or vague market definition - Lacks compelling evidence of real-world need - Uncertain or incomplete go-to-market approach		- Addresses a defined market but lacks strong proof of demand - Some demonstration of interest or potential, but limited depth		- Clear target audience with credible market need - Evidence of viability and competitive analysis - Reasonable go-to-market strategy		- Clearly well-researched, validated demand - Strong alignment with market trends and user needs - Robust strategy indicating high adoption potential
10	Product	Disruptive Potential	- Vision for future is unclear or weak - Unable to scale or adapt		- Able to enter a mature market - Limited scalability or uncertain longevity		- Incremental improvement in a mature market - Some potential for moderate disruption		- Shows promise to reshape part of the market - Potential for adoption in multiple segments - Measurable scaling and growth plans		- Visionary product with strong future outlook - High potential to lead or transform entire market - Well-positioned for longevity and eventual dominance
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100