Local Government Survey Results
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
ABCDE
1
Local Government that you representDoes your local government regulate siting of oil and gas locations?If your local government regulates the siting of oil and gas locations, do you desire COGCC to conduct its siting regulatory protocol before, after, or concurrent with your local government siting protocol?Does your local government have a moratorium on oil and gas development in your jurisdiction?Do you have any questions for COGCC?
2
Adams CountyNoAfter (Local Government goes first)YesDoes the COGCC anticipate having siting regulations in the future? What is the timeline to adopt these regulations? How long will the objective criteria be in place?
3
Arapahoe CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoRe: "... do you desire COGCC to conduct its siting regulatory protocol before, after or concurrent with your local government siting protocol?" Our preference is concurrent, to allow our citizens to provide comments to both agencies at roughly the same time, but after would be workable too.
4
Archuleta CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoAbove answer (concurrent) is Staff's preference. Have not polled the elected officials or Planning Commission.
5
Baca CountyNoConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
6
Boulder CountyYesAfter (Local Government goes first)No
7
City and County of DenverNoNo
8
AuroraYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoHow do operator agreements play into local government control and the new mission of the COGCC and the rulemaking yet to come?
9
DaconoYesAfter (Local Government goes first)NoYes
10
Fort CollinsNoAfter (Local Government goes first)NoWe have one operator, who is interested in a re-completion at an existing well within City limits, which will introduce new development at a previously shut-in well within 350' of a platted subdivision. We are exploring interest in delaying this, in order to have a robust community conversation about the new authority granted under SB181.
11
Fort LuptonYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoPrefer concurrent review, but with local government final approval of location. Would like to discuss logistics of this in more detail.
12
GreeleyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNot at this time.
13
LafayetteYesAfter (Local Government goes first)YesNo
14
LongmontYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
15
ThorntonYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNo
16
WestminsterYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNot at this time
17
Douglas CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
18
East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation DistrictNoConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoWe do not currently regulate siting. We are planning on taking siting regulations to our Board of directors.We are currently work with our Board to establish siting regulations
19
Elbert CountyNoNo
20
Fremont CountyNoNoNo
21
Garfield CountyYesBefore (COGCC goes first)NoGarfield County does not regulate siting EXCEPT within a PUD and flood plains. We regulate certain tankage, pipelines, compressors, etc. We do not regulate siting on Federal lands. Where a local permit is needed, we require evidence of a COGCC permit prior to issuing final county permit to operators.
22
huerfano countyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)Nono
23
huerfano county YesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)Nono
24
Jackson CountyNoNo
25
Jackson CountyNoNo
26
Jefferson CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
27
Kit Carson CountyNoNo
28
La Plata County YesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNope, LGD meeting that occurred on 5/15/19 was very informative and helpful to understand the next steps in implementing SB19-181. Thank you for doing that.
29
Las Animas CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNot at this time
30
LGD Delta CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNone at this time
31
Lincoln CountyNoNo
32
Logan CountyNoNo
33
Mesa CountyYesNo
34
Moffat CountyNoConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoWe participate in on-site visits and provide siting input during onsite visits, case by case, so that is really not a "siting regulation" but definite Local Government Input regarding siting... So I answered "no" above. Is that appropriate or should I change to yes?
35
Montezuma CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
36
Montrose CountyNoNo
37
Morgan CountyYesAfter (Local Government goes first)No
38
Otero County, ColoradoYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)YesWe do not have a moratorium, we regulate through the 1041 regulations
39
Park CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)Nonot at this time
40
Prowers CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)YesNo
41
Rio Blanco Co.NoConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNot at this time.
42
Rio Grande CountyNoNo
43
Routt CountyYesNo
44
BerthoudYesAfter (Local Government goes first)Yes
45
BrooksideNoNo
46
Cheyenne WellsNoNo
47
ErieYesBefore (COGCC goes first)YesWhat is the definition of siting? (What steps/processes are included on behalf of COGCC?)
48
ErieYesBefore (COGCC goes first)YesYes, what is the COGCC definition for siting? Can I receive other LGD's responses? Who has moratoriums currently in place and why and until when? When will this survey be completed by?
49
ErieYesAfter (Local Government goes first)YesQuite a few!
50
JohnstownYesAfter (Local Government goes first)NoSeeking clarity on changes to COGCC protocols and review - what did you review/regulate and will or will not moving forward? What are the gaps between new COGCC and our local codes?
51
KerseyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
52
ParachuteYesAfter (Local Government goes first)No
53
PlattevilleYesBefore (COGCC goes first)NoNo
54
SeveranceYesAfter (Local Government goes first)No
55
Silt, ColoradoYesBefore (COGCC goes first)NoNot at this time.
56
SuperiorYesAfter (Local Government goes first)Yes
57
WindsorYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoUse of the term "siting" is misleading, as locational, or siting requirements (e.g. spacing) are dictated by the COGCC. It would be more appropriate to ask local jurisdictions if they have an approval process for those aspects of oil and gas under their purview.
58
Traditions Metropolitan DistrictNoAfter (Local Government goes first)NoNot at this time
59
Unincorporated Teller CountyYesBefore (COGCC goes first)NoIf interest was received for any oil & gas development, a Special Use Review permit would be required at the minimum. If and when an application is received ,COGCC participation and timing in the process will be determined at that time. For survey purposes, I clicked Before for question #2.
60
Washington County ColoradoNoNo
61
Weld CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoWeld County Commissioners are having a hearing on June 10, 2019 to designate the unincorporated area of the County as a Mineral (Oil and Gas) Resource Area of State Interest Pursuant to C.R.S. §24-65.1-202(1).
62
Yuma CountyConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)No
63
Pitkin CountyYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoIs COGCC contemplating the use of MOUs (with local jurisdictions that request them) as a means of establishing basic standards for items like (as one possible example,) what constitutes a complete application for initiation of review, etc.
64
Northglenn YesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoN/A
65
Timnath YesBefore (COGCC goes first)YesWe have a temporary suspension of applications while we update our regulations relative to SB-181.
66
BoulderYesAfter (Local Government goes first)Yes
67
CollbranYesConcurrent With (both processes initiated and conducted simultaneously, with no preference for order of completion)NoNot at this time
68
Commerce CityYesAfter (Local Government goes first)No
69
LochbuieYesAfter (Local Government goes first)Yes
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...