ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Voting rates in Municipal Council elections, estimate in percent by country of citizenship/region, sex and election year
2
3
2002200620102014
4
SVSweden1men79,680,983,585,1
5
2women80,582,184,986,7
6
1+2total80,181,584,285,9
7
NordExSv
The Nordic countries excluding Sweden
1men30,134,536,437,9
8
2women40,740,544,146,8
9
1+2total35,937,640,442,5
10
EuroExNord
Europe excluding the Nordic countries
1men33,335,430,028,4
11
2women35,038,532,229,5
12
1+2total34,136,931,028,9
13
ASAsia1men23,830,229,324,1
14
2women35,035,939,434,3
15
1+2total29,633,234,229,1
16
AFAfrica1men25,830,840,643,3
17
2women25,135,946,849,5
18
1+2total25,533,143,346,1
19
NAME
North America
1men35,837,144,139,5
20
2women41,342,644,141,2
21
1+2total38,239,544,140,3
22
SAME
South America
1men38,640,937,736,3
23
2women50,442,541,740,9
24
1+2total44,041,639,538,4
25
OV+US
other countries (including missing values)
1men22,729,027,922,8
26
2women31,532,829,525,1
27
1+2total26,030,428,523,6
28
SAtotal1men77,378,780,781,7
29
2women78,580,182,684,0
30
1+2total77,979,481,682,8
31
32
The electoral participation survey is a sample survey based on a probability sample. The given percentages, the voting rates, are therefore estimates and the uncertainty should be taken into account when conclusions are drawn. The uncertainty is expressed as the margin of error. The interval formed by the percentage estimate ± the margin of error is a 95 percent confidence interval, i.e. an interval that with repeated samples would contain the true population value in 95 of 100 cases, given that no systematic errors are present. Estimates based on less than 50 observations are considered too unreliable and are therefore presented as (..).
33
country of citizenship/region:
34
In the classification of countries after continents used here, Europe includes both Turkey and Cyprus.
35
36
election year:
37
2002:
38
In year 2010, the statistical method behind the estimates produced in the electoral participation survey were revised. Therefore, new estimates for earlier rounds of the survey have been made. The estimates presented here are revised and can therefore differ some from what has previously been published regarding the electoral participation in the general elections.
39
40
election year:
41
2002:
42
In the election to the Municipal Council in Orsa, an appeal against the result was made. The Election Review Board approved the appeal. A re-election took place on March 16, 2003. However, the estimates presented here refer to the election day on September 15, 2002.
43
44
election year:
45
2006:
46
In year 2010, the statistical method behind the estimates produced in the electoral participation survey were revised. Therefore, new estimates for earlier rounds of the survey have been made. The estimates presented here are revised and can therefore differ some from what has previously been published regarding the electoral participation in the general elections.
47
48
election year:
49
2010:
50
In the election to the Municipal Council in Örebro, an appeal against the result was made. The Election Review Board approved the appeal. A re-election for the northeast constituency in Örebro municipality took place on May 15, 2011. However, the estimates presented here refer to the election day on September 19, 2010.
51
52
53
Latest update:
54
20150330 09:30
55
56
Source:
57
Statistics Sweden
58
59
Contact:
60
Mikaela Järnbert, Statistics Sweden
61
+46 010-479 42 43
62
mikaela.jarnbert@scb.se
63
64
Jonas Olofsson, Statistics Sweden
65
+46 010-479 47 18
66
jonas.olofsson@scb.se
67
68
Valstatistik, Statistics Sweden
69
+46 010-479 44 10
70
valstatistik@scb.se
71
72
73
74
75
Units:
76
Percent
77
78
Data type:
79
Stock
80
81
Reference period:
82
Election year
83
84
85
86
87
88
Official statistics
89
90
Database:
91
Statistical database
92
93
Internal reference code:
94
ME0105M1
95
96
97
98
99
100