Malaria Project rubric
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGH
1
2
Students name of presentationBreakdown of knowledge and ideason a scale of 0-4
3
English Standards (4 pts)
Collaboration/ use of technology (3 pts)overall project (3 pts)Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas - see column to the right (20 pts)Map was clear, & easy to understand where the location is
4
1Lack of scientific vocabulary or incorrect use of terms. Uses slang language. References not in APA format OR only used the scenario sheet and a map.Poor use of class time. Did not share properly with each other and/or the teacher. Lack of respect among group members. Students were usually off task. Only evidence of technology was the presentation itself.The project is not acceptable given the time students had in class (very incomplete).Information and evidence lack key points or contain false or incomplete details. The challenges to this area were explained well.
5
2Correctly applies and uses some relevant scientific vocabulary OR misuses some of the scientific vocabulary. Uses slang language. References available and in APA format.Could have used class time better. Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. All group members respect each other. Students had to be redirected to stay on task. Could have used techology better to produce a satisfactory quality presentation. There are parts of the project not easy to read OR very little color OR appears a little messy/thrown together. (font size, too many words per slide, not enough pictures)Presents mostly correct information and evidence, HOWEVER several facts are missing OR incomplete in detail.Students chose 3 initiatives that fit that area well
6
3Correctly applies and uses most relevant scientific vocabulary, HOWEVER does not completely explain new terms. Uses proper English terms. References Available and in APA format.Good use of class time. Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. All group members respect each other. Students were usually on task. Good use of technology to produce a presentation of satisfactory quality. Project is neat, colorful and easy to read. Everything is typed out or written VERY neatly.Presents 75% or more correct OR complete information and evidence (some details are lacking).
But the organization is difficult for listeners to follow.
Students clearly explained why they chose their 3 initiatives.
7
4Correctly applies and uses all relevant scientific vocabulary. Uses proper English terms. References appear complete and accurate and in APA format.Presents 85% or more correct OR complete info (lacking a few details) Evidence clearly and logically such that listeners can follow the reasoning and organization. Students explained why they did not choose at least of the other 2 initiatives.
8
5Presents 100% correct and complete information and evidence clearly , concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the reasoning and organization.
9
totals/30
10
total points earned
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Loading...
 
 
 
poster