| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Time taken in seconds | CPU : | Graphics card : | RAM : | CAS : | HDD : | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 102.33 | i7 12700kf @ 3.7GHz | GTX 1050ti | 32 GB 3600MHz | CAS : 16/16/16/36 | WD Black SN-850 | Putz1103 | I finally finished my overclocking process. I don't mess with voltages because overclocking is not worth damaging any of the computer parts. My memory would not overclock in the slightest (could be a motherboard issue as that is a little common right now). My CPU would overclock to 5.3GHz, 5.5GHz on any of the processors would cause a blue screen as the Windows logon sound was playing. I also tested underclocking my ram to 3200MHz, that resulted in a time of 142.55, so virtually identical. I'm not sure what the bottleneck is now since faster processor and faster ram resulted in negligible differences. | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | 103 | 10900kf@5.2ghz/4.9ghz core/ring and HT off | MSI Ventus LHR RTX 3060 ti | 2x16gb 4500mhz Dual Rank | 16-17-17-34 | Adata SX8200 Pro 1tb | Krunkkracker | Hey there everyone! I've actually done this before and made a Reddit post about it. I built this system with ONI and other simulations like X4 Foundations, Dwarf Fortress, Aorura4x, and others in mind. If anyone wants further details about my subtimings, voltages, etc just ask! Also I can do a capture came recording/livestream in order to prove the 103. I still have some headroom left on my ram, I could probably get sub 100s with daily safe and stable settings if I took a day or two to tune my ram subtimings. I own an Intel system, Zentimings is an AMD based program and does not work. Ram voltage is currently set to 1.58v as it is Samsung B-die, which comes in XMP kits as high as 1.6v. VCCIO at 1.35v, VCCSA at 1.4v but the sensors are SuperIO so they're often showering inflated values compared to what they are in reality. Same with the DRAM voltage sensor. I stability tested using 3 cycles of TM5 with the anta777 extreme preset, 1 hour of OCCT memory, 1 hour of OCCT CPU Large AVX2 and several hours of Karhu. It is a Trident Z Neo 4000mhz cl16-16-16 1.4v 2x16gb kit of ram. Based on linear voltage ram predictions, 4400-4500 cl16-17-17 should be achievable using this kit of ram while the 4000mhz cl14-15-15 1.55v 2x16gb kit of ram now being sold should be able to hit 4400-4500 cl16-17-17 at even lower voltage or tighter timin | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | 103 | i7 12700kf @ 3.7GHz | GTX 1050ti | 32 GB 3600MHz | CAS : 16/16/16/36 | WD Black SN-850 | Putz1103 | Time : 1:43.32 (103.32s) - 1:42.99 (102.99s) (cpu-z says it was running at 4689 - 5287 MHz) | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | 105 | intel i9 11900k | RTX 3080 ti | 32GB 3200mhz | 16-18-18-36 | Game is intel 1TB 660p | Alex Thivierge | NVMe : saved is samsung 256GB 980 PRO | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | 106 | Ryzen 5 5600X | GTX 1660 TI | 32 GB DDR4 3733 Mhz (4*8GB) | 16 16 16 28 42 290 (Trfc) Command Rate 1 | SSD Samsung 970 Evo M.2 1TB | Kerdeld | Note: I have overclocked my CPU / Ram / GPU (which has no effect on this benchmark) I have adjusted every overclock in detail and spends weeks on some things and finding more information and testing everything. Let me know if anyone need more 3200cl14 14 14 34 48information, this is pretty bare since a lot of factors count in. Tried at multiple resolutions, 1080p and 1440p exact same result. https://imgur.com/a/1FbNzbB Hwinfo, | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | 106 | i9-11900K @ 3.50GHz | ATI RX480 8G RAM | 32G DDR4 3200 Mhz | Corsair MP600 SSD M2 1Tb -Game Drive, 1T SSD SATA3 for Docs drive | GScully | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 107 | r9 5900x PBO been tweak a bit | GTX 1080 | 3600 @ 3766 | 16-16-16-36 | Crucial mx500 2T | Claude P | Time : 107 & 108 man your save file uses a shit load of Ram, was about 19Gb... with a solid 15-16 fps lol | ||||||||||||||||||
9 | 110 | Ryzen 7 5800x@4.6ghz | GTX 1080ti | 32GB 3600mhz | 22/22/22/42 | WDS500G2B0B | Rashnar | cooler noctua nh-u12s | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | 111 | Ryzen 7 5800X | AMD 6900XT (not a custom card) | 32GB 3600MHz | 16-19-19-39 | SanDisk Extreme Pro 500GB [NVMe] / ONI: SanDisk 2TB [S-ATA] (SDSSDH32000G) | theich | MB: Gigabyte Aorus Pro V2 PowerSupply: 750W be quiet Dark Power 12 80+ Titanium Cooler: (takeover of old pc) Aplenföhn Brocken 2 PCGH edition | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | 111 | Ryzen 9 5900X (non PBO i think, unless it is enabled by default). | 5700 XT Sapphire Pulse. | 32 GB DDR4 3600 | 16, 19, 19, 39. | PCIE 4.0 SSD, using an AIO CPU cooler. | melquiades | Two tests run Time: 1:53.1 & 1:49.66 . Didn't restart, had the browser with the video open, using an X570 board, using a PCIE 4.0 SSD, using an AIO CPU cooler. | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | 111 | 5800x | GTX 1070 8gb | 32GB (2 x 16GB) 3600 | 16-16-16-36 | DeadlyPunker | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 111 | 5800x | GTX 1070 8gb | 32GB (2 x 16GB) 4000 | 16-16-16-34 | DeadlyPunker | ||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 111 | 5900x | 3080 Asus TUF (Non OC) | 32 GB DDR4 3600 | 16 19 19 39 | 1TB 980 Pro | Jacob Hergenrader | My time might be slightly better as its a custom water loop so PBO2 might be boosting the 5900x single core clocks higher than other cooling solutions | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | 111 | Intel i7-10700K @ 5.2 GHz (Hyperthread off) | Gigabyte RTX 3080 Gaming OC | 32 GB DDR4 4000 MHz | CAS: 18-22-22--42 | WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD 1Ttb | dezixn | I decided to upgrade my RAM and retest this. Was $200 worth a 6.7% increase? IDK, but I do play a lot of simulation games so it is what it is. Plus it looks cool https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08TQVC3HR | ||||||||||||||||||
16 | 112 | i7-10700K @5.0GHz Allcore | GTX 1060 6GB (running at 1440p) | 64GB (4*16) DDR4 3800MHz | 17-22-22-42 | Seagate Firecuda 510 2TB M2, NVMe | m.stitek | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | 112 | Ryzen 5900X @ 4.4GHz | RX 5700XT SE | 32GB (2x16GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4 3600MHz | 20-20-20-40 | Samsung 970 EVO NVMe 1TB (system drive) | lautasdf | Storage : Kingston SA400S37480G (install media) | ||||||||||||||||||
18 | 112 | i7-10700F running@4.6Ghz | MSI GTX1060 | 2x8Go DDR4-3733 @1.4V RipjawsV | 15-15-15-35 | SSD 860EVO 250Go (Win10Pro64) + SSD 860EVO 1To (games) + hdd Samsung 2To | FGPraxis | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | 112 | Ryzen 7 5800X | RTX 3090 trinity oc | 2*16GB 3400 | 14/15/15/35 (XMP-200MHz) | Corsair MP600pro 2TB | StB155 | |||||||||||||||||||
20 | 113 | 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11700k @ 3.60GHz | Nvidia 3080ti | 32GB @ 3600MHz | 16-18-18-36 | WD Black SN850 1TB NVMe | Simonbt | |||||||||||||||||||
21 | 113 | 5800X | 6900XT | 3600mhz | no idea right now but got XMP enable | 7200 RPM HDD | Pixelplanet5 | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | 113 | Ryzen 5600x (no overclocking and stock cooler) | RTX 3060ti | 16gb @ 3600Mhz | 18-22-22-42 | 500gb Samsung 980 (pcie gen 3) | Koobluh | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | 113 | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | RTX 3080 Ti | 32GB at 3600MHz | Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB | Shaeden | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 113 | 5600x | 3060ti | 32 Gig 3200 | 16-18-18-36 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Gabberworld | i ran the test again with limited amount of cores to 4 set in task manager and got same amount of time lol | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | 114 | Ryzen 5800X | RX 5700XT | 3200 16GB | 14/14/14/34 | SSD EVO 970 Plus | Orzelek | Also a bit lazy mode (no restart and browser open). Did 2 runs results were within a second. | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | 114 | i7-10700F running@4.6Ghz | MSI GTX1060 | 2x8Go DDR4-3733 @1.4V RipjawsV | 16-16-16-36 | SSD 860EVO 250Go (Win10Pro64) + SSD 860EVO 1To (games) + hdd Samsung 2To | FGPraxis | |||||||||||||||||||
27 | 114 | Ryzen 7 5800x (with CTR perfil ON) | 6900xt | 32Gb 3600 | 16 18 18 38 | Samsung 980 Pro 500Gb, saves: Samsung 970 EVO 1Tb | des06des | Time : 1:54,43 - So 114,43 sec | ||||||||||||||||||
28 | 115 | 10850k @ 5Ghz | RTX 2070 8Gb | 32Gb @3600Mhz | 16-16-16-36 | Enmotus P200-160 Gen3 | Cbjake | Home PC | ||||||||||||||||||
29 | 115 | Ryzen 5800x | GTX 1070 8gb | 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 4000 (PC4 32000) | 16-19-19-39 | DeadlyPunker | ||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 115 | i7-10700F running@4.6Ghz | MSI GTX1060 | 2x8Go DDR4-3466 @1.4V RipjawsV | 15-15-15-35 | SSD 860EVO 250Go (Win10Pro64) + SSD 860EVO 1To (games) + hdd Samsung 2To | FGPraxis | |||||||||||||||||||
31 | 115 | i7-9700k | 3080TI FTW Ultra | 32GB DDR4-3466 | 16 18 18 36 | Samsung EVO Pro 500 GB NVMe | nehio | |||||||||||||||||||
32 | 116 | Ryzen 9 5950x | Nvidia 3090 founders | 32GB 3600mhz | 16-19-19-39 | Samsung 970 EVO 2tb NVME | Theheadtwo | |||||||||||||||||||
33 | 116 | Ryzen 9 5900X | GTX 780 | 2x16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | WD Black SN750 1TB M.2 | Zalmaniac | GPU does indeed practicly nothing. I had a 1:56 with my GTX 780, got my new RTX 3060TI today and got a 1:54. | |||||||||||||||||||
34 | 116 | CPU : Ryzen 5900x | GTX 1660ti | 32GB 3200mhz | 16-18-18-36 | Toshiba X300 HDWE140UZSVA / SSD Samsung 980 | Tafe_Lynx | |||||||||||||||||||
35 | 116 | Ryzen 5 5600X | GTX 1660 Ti | 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz | 14,14,14,34 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | ulnor | |||||||||||||||||||
36 | 117 | i9-9900k @ 4.9 all core | 3090 Kingpin Edition | 4 sticks of G.Skill 8192 MB (DDR4-3800) | 14-16-16-36 | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe Gen3x4 PCIe M.2 2280 | EnduringDev | CAS : 16-18-18-36 (CRUCIAL Ballistix BL8G32C16U4W) | ||||||||||||||||||
37 | 117 | i7-10700F running@4.6Ghz HyperThreading off (55°C during test) | MSI GTX1060 | 2x8Go DDR4-3200 RipjawsV (XMP on) | CAS : 14-14-14-34 | SSD 860EVO 250Go (Win10Pro64) + SSD 860EVO 1To (games) + hdd Samsung 2To | FGPraxis | - i didn't have a lot of occasions to test with/without HT, thanks to this test i know i benefit a little from HT off, thanks FJ- this save is very laggy compared to my current 4500 cycles game that have almost no lag or stutter, but i don't have 3000 pacus, and the two large planetoids (main and 2nd) are almost entirely filled with oxygen and/or clean water - Max frequency of CPU 1core/4cores and RAM (and low CAS) is the key i guess - my CPU is cooled by a Thermalright TrueSpirit 120A + BeQuiet PureWing2 : i consider silent even at full charge | ||||||||||||||||||
38 | 117 | i9 9900k @ 3.6GHz | nVidia RTX 3080 | 32 GB 3200MHz | CAS : 16/18/18/36 | Samsung 970 EVO NVME | Sjotime | This run happened on the last Rad New Worlds build on 10/28 | ||||||||||||||||||
39 | 118 | Intel 10900K (no OC) | RTX 3090 (no OC) | 120 GB 3500MHz | 16-18-18-36 | Regular SSD 500Mb/s | Enceos | |||||||||||||||||||
40 | 118 | Ryzen 5 5600X | RTX 2060 SUPER | G.Skill 16,0 GB 3600 | Cannibal Mtl | And I was lazy to disable my mods. to be honest I have only few of them, Also I run ONI in 1440p | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 118 | i9-10900K CPU @3.70GHz (20 CPUs) | RTX 2080 Super 8 GB | 32 GB DDR4 3200 (1600MHz) (Though my task manager says it's running at 2933MHz...) | 21, 22, 23, 24 | Intel Raid 2TB SSD | Screwygirl | I'd like to add that this is an Alienware 51m R2 laptop. I never OC. I didn't have time to restart before I ran the test. Sorry. | ||||||||||||||||||
42 | 119 | Ryzen 5800x | rtx3080 | 32gb 3600cl16 | Samsung 860evo | PowerXsardi2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 119 | Intel i7-10700K @ 5.2 GHz (Hyperthread off) | RTX 3080 Gaming OC | 32 GB DDR4 3000 MHz | 19, 19, 19, 43 | dezixn | WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD 1Ttb | |||||||||||||||||||
44 | 119 | Intel i9-9990k @ 3.6GHz | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 2080Ti | 32 GB DDR4 (2x16) | CAS : 15-17-17-36-69 | SSD Samsung 4TB QVO | cpy | |||||||||||||||||||
45 | 120 | Ryzen 5900X | RTX 3090 | 32GB 3200 | 16-18-18-36 | Seagate Firecuda 520SSD (1TB, R/W up to 5GB/4,4GB/sec) | Oxydiser | |||||||||||||||||||
46 | 120 | Ryzen 5 5600x | Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC | 32 GB 3200 MHz | 16-20-20-38 | WD Blue SN550 2 TB | back14 | 3440:1440, Packed into Ncase M1 | ||||||||||||||||||
47 | 120 | Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7GHz, | RTX 3080 10G, | 32GB DDR4 RGB (3600mhz), | SSD M.2, | Paulus | Test took pretty much exactly 2 minutes. | |||||||||||||||||||
48 | 121 | i7 8700k | Radeon VII | 32GB @ 3000mhz | 14-14-14-34 | Samsung 970 Evo NVME | thehaunted318 | |||||||||||||||||||
49 | 121 | Intel i9-9900k @Stock | MSI RTX 2080 | 4x8GB DDR4 3600 | 16-19-19-39 | Intel 660P 2TB NVME SSD | Christian Heide | |||||||||||||||||||
50 | 121 | Ryzen 5800X | RTX 3060 Ti | 32 GB 3600 MHz | cl 16 | ADATA SX8200PNP | ponsai | |||||||||||||||||||
51 | 122 | 5900x PBO + custom curve undervolt | RTX 2080 | 16GB 3200mhz | CL 16 | Samsung 850 | ArkturusRX | |||||||||||||||||||
52 | 122 | Ryzen 9 5950x - Base 3.4GHz | RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA GAMING | 64GB 3200MHz CL16 | Jared Sheppard | |||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 123 | Ryzen 9 5950x | RTX 3090 | 2x 32GB 3600 MHz | 16/17/17/36 | 1tb NVME SSD | SpoonWasTaken | |||||||||||||||||||
54 | 123 | i7 8700k overclocked 4800 | RTX 3080 | 64 GB DDR4 3333(OC) Mhz (4x16) | 14/14/14/34 | NVMe Samsung 256 GB | Raukgorth | Today I overclocked my RAM to 3333 and CPU to 4800 It brought down the time to 2:03 from 02:14:58 | ||||||||||||||||||
55 | 123 | i7 11800H @ 2.3 GHz, 8 cores | nVidia RTX 3060 | 32 GB 3200 MHz CL22 | CAS : 21/22/23/24 | WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 | Zarquan | I run a gaming laptop (MSI GE76 Raider). These are my results: | ||||||||||||||||||
56 | 124 | Ryzen 5600x - 3.6GHz base - Stock cooler | EVGA 1080 FTW - replaced thermal paste 7/21 | 16GB DDR4 2400MHz (2x8GB) | 15-15-15-35 | Gigabyte PCI-e 3.0x4 512GB NVMe SSD - GP-GSM2NE3512GNTD | Lee Shaub | 2:02 - 122 sec, 2:05 - 125 sec, 2:03 - 123 sec Steam drive: Teamgroup 1TB CX2 SATAIII 2.5in SSD - TEAM T253x6001T | ||||||||||||||||||
57 | 124 | Ryzen 5 5600X | GTX 970 | 32GB@ 3200MHz | 16-16-16-38 | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB M.2 (Boot) and Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB (game folder) | Bossheus | |||||||||||||||||||
58 | 125 | AMD 5600X | 3060 Ti | 16GB at 2800MHz (Two 8GB sticks) | 16-18-18-32 | 1TB Kingston A2000 NVMe SSD | Tuberi | |||||||||||||||||||
59 | 125 | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Radeon RX 6800 XT | 2x32GB 3600mhz | 18/22/22/42 | SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-2TB | Nase | I was hovering right at my CPU's thermal ceiling for the entire test, so the CPU was almost certainly throttled. Not unexpected as I'm using a small form-factor case with a single 120mm fan/rad. Looks like I'm not too far behind similar setups despite that. | ||||||||||||||||||
60 | 125 | i9-10850k CPU @ 3.60GHz | RTX 3080 | 32 GB | Squinch | |||||||||||||||||||||
61 | 126 | Ryzen 5 3600 @ 4.325 GHz | Gigabyte RX 6700 XT Gaming OC 12G | 32GB @ 3600 MHz | 16-19-16-40 | Sabrent Rocket M.2 NVMe 1TB | Santosch | |||||||||||||||||||
62 | 128 | Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | GeForce GTX 1070 | 64 GB DDR4 2667 MHz | 16/18/18/36 | 1TB NVMe SSD + 6 TB (4 HDD RAID 5) (but game installed at NVMe only) | mix5003 | |||||||||||||||||||
63 | 128 | 3800XT | RTX 3070 | 36 GB 3600MHz | CAS : 16-19-19-39 | SATA SSD for game and operating system | liu200806317 | |||||||||||||||||||
64 | 129 | I7 8086K @5gz | 3080TI | 16GB DDR4 3200 | 16-18-18-36 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO (2 1TB in RAID 0) | Notes: Running in 4k. My FPS was around 13. After the time trial took a look at task manager. GPU usage ~2.6% and CPU usage was around 22%. The game took up about 7,434 MB of RAM so definitely need more than 16GB. Not sure what the bottleneck here was but the load is distributed across my 12 threads equally so not CPU core bound. | |||||||||||||||||||
65 | 129 | i9-10900K | RTX 3060 Ti | 64 GB DDR4 2400 MHz | 12-14-14 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB | Kemicaze | |||||||||||||||||||
66 | 130 | i7 9700 at 4.9GHz (all core) | RTX 2080Ti | 32GB @ 3200MHz | 16-18-18-38 | Game is on a Samsung SSD 970 (NVMe) | maladendron | save file is on an 860 EVO (SATA) | ||||||||||||||||||
67 | 130 | Ryzen 9 3900X @3.8 GHz (stock clockspeed) | X570 AORUS MASTER | 32 GB DDR4 XMP on 3600 MHz | 16, 19, 19, 39 | Crucial P1 1TB 3D NAND NVMe PCIe M.2 SSD | Roskis | |||||||||||||||||||
68 | 131 | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz | RTX 2060 | 16 GB DDR4 3000 MHz | 15,17,17,35 | MX500 500 GB CT500MX500SSD1 | Francis John | |||||||||||||||||||
69 | 133 | Ryzen 9 3900X | RTX 2080 | (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 | 16-19-19-39-1T (+Gear-down mode) | Samsung 850 EVO | Manny_White | |||||||||||||||||||
70 | 133 | i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz | GeForce RTX 3070 | Corsair 32 GB (2x16GB) DDR4 2666 MHz | 16,18,18,35 | HDD : INTEL NVMe SSDPEKNW512G8 | JohnDou | |||||||||||||||||||
71 | 133 | Ryzen 5 3600x | RTX 2060 | 32GB DDR4 3600 MHz | 16-19-19-39 | Samsung 970 EVO PLUS NVMe M.2 MZ-V7S1T0BW | gigamoi | |||||||||||||||||||
72 | 134 | i7 8700k (no OC) | RTX 3080 | 64 GB DDR4 3200 Mhz (4x16) | 14/14/14/34 | NVMe Samsung 256 GB | Raukgorth | (no restart, Firefox open) | ||||||||||||||||||
73 | 135 | R5 3600 | GTX 980 | 32GB @ 3600 MHZ | 18-20-20-36 | 960GB @ Sata 3 (Crucial CT960M500SSD) | Galdo | Some notes: I did a few passes, and had around 3 seconds of jitter in results, so the difference between these two is hard to be certain of. Background programs had minimal impact, as having chrome open playing music was inside the jitter window. | ||||||||||||||||||
74 | 135 | Ryzen 7 3700x 8 core 3600 Mhz stock clock | NVIDIA RTX 2080 super | 32mb of corsair 3200 speed ram | samsung SSD 970 EVO | James Bates | built 2 summers ago, all settings stock no overclocks. | |||||||||||||||||||
75 | 135 | 3950x 16-core | RTX 2070 Super | 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz | CAS : 16, 18, 18, 36 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | GrindThisGame | I run at 4k resolution but I don't think it makes a difference. I think I read somewhere the dev still have lots of logging turned on in Spaced Out but not sure. | ||||||||||||||||||
76 | 136 | Intel 1165G7 2.8ghz | inbuilt xe 96 EU | 16GB 4267MHz | John Mann | |||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 137 | i7-7700K @ 4.9Ghz | 1060 G6 - 1º gen (2113Mhz) | 32Gb - DDR4 3300Mhz | 18T, 18T, 18T, 38T, 400T, 2T | custume | ||||||||||||||||||||
78 | 137 | Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core Processor 3.89(base) GHz I was running at (4.15) | RTX 2060 | 16GB 3600mhz | 16/18/18/36 | SSD: Kingston 1TB A2000 M.2 NVMe | Dsutc3 | Power Saver 3.41 or 221sec 2.21 ghz, High Performance 2:16 or 136 seconds 4.17ghz, Balanced 2:17 or 137 seconds 4.17ghz, Ryzen Balanced 2:19 or 139 seconds 4.17ghz, Ryzen Performance 2:25 145 seconds at 4.17ghz. | ||||||||||||||||||
79 | 137 | Ryzen 5 3600 @4.2GHz | RX 5700 XT | 32GB @3000MHz | 16-18-18-38 1.2v | Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB | shadowingx | |||||||||||||||||||
80 | 139 | Ryzen 3700X | RTX 2070 | 16 GB DDR4 3200Mhz (2x8) | 16,18,18,36 | Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB | Smyger | |||||||||||||||||||
81 | 139 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | GTX 1660 Super | 16GB 3200MHz | Nicklaus Sauer | |||||||||||||||||||||
82 | 139 | 3900x stock | RTX 2080 TI | 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz | CAS : 14,15,15,35 | HDD : NVM SSD | Big Hat Logan | |||||||||||||||||||
83 | 140 | Ryzen 7 3800X @ 4.2 Ghz | Radeon RX5700 | 32 GB DDR4 3200 Mhz | SSD 970 Evo 500 Gb OS Location | Tartarus Plays | Time : 2:23 or 143 Seconds I did try it before rebooting and got 2:17 on that one | |||||||||||||||||||
84 | 141 | i7-10875H CPU @ 2.30GHz | RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 32GB (16G*2) DDR4 3200MHz | 1TB NVMe SSD | darthon | I have a gaming laptop with 8 cores but ONI only maybe utilizes 2 at the most and doesn't help me much with slower processor speed: | |||||||||||||||||||
85 | 141 | Intel i7-4790k @ 4.00 GHz | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 16 GB DDR3 (2x8) | HDD : SeagateST3000 3 TB 7200 RPM | ThePenaltyBox | ||||||||||||||||||||
86 | 142 | i7-9700F CPU@3.00GHz (approx 4.4GHz) | RTX 2060 Super 8GB | DDR4 2133Mhz 32GB | Samsung 1TB 870 EVO 2.5in SATA SSD | Durandal337 | Display: Gigabyte G34WQC 3440x1440 @144hz MB: ROG Strix B360-F Gaming | |||||||||||||||||||
87 | 143 | Ryzen 5 3600X @ 3.99 GHz | RTX 2080 Ti | 16Gb 1600 Mhz (3200XMP) | 16/18/18/36 2T | Samsung SSD 860 EVO M.2 1TB | Oweoweownster | |||||||||||||||||||
88 | 144 | i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz 2.59 GHz | GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | 32 GB DDR4 2667 MHz | 15-17-17-35 | Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB M.2 NVMe | GregoPL | Lenovo Legion laptop. Not a beast but does the job ;) | ||||||||||||||||||
89 | 144 | Ryzen 7 3700X | GeForce RTX 2080 | 16GB, DDR4-3600 + 2x Corsair Dominator Platinum DIMM Kit 8GB, DDR4-3600 | Orpheus2468 | SSD: Samsung MZ-76E1T0B/EU 860 EVO 1 TB (For the game 500GB SSD for OS) | ||||||||||||||||||||
90 | 144 | i5-8400 CPU @ 2.8GHz | GTX 1060 6GB | 64GB DDR4 3600MHz | 16,19,19,39 | M.2 SanDisk SD9SN8W128G1102 | M0nkeyDung | Did not bother to "restart" and these are those results: As you can see, some of those here with faster CPUs (Intel), better graphics cards, and more memory are slower than mine with my hardware. It's all about the tuning of the system! | ||||||||||||||||||
91 | 145 | 3960X 24-Core | RTX 2080 Ti | 128 GB DDR4 3600 MHz | CL18-22-22-42 1.35V | WD_BLACK SN750 2TB NVME M.2 | Frough | |||||||||||||||||||
92 | 146 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X @4GHz | RTX 2060 | 32GB @ 3200 MHz | 16/18/18/36 | WD 1048 | smstrm | maybe my HDD is an issue, because i run oni from an USB device :/ | ||||||||||||||||||
93 | 146 | i9-10980HK CPU @ 2.40GHz | RTX 2070 Super | 32GB DDR4 2666MHz | 19,19,19,43 | 2TB (2x 1TB PCIe M.2 SSD) RAID 0 [Boot] + 512GB PCIe M.2 SSD [Storage] | Vitakaninen | Computer Type: Alienware m 17 R3 Laptop (6 results provided, averaged 2 of them, one overclock and one normal) | ||||||||||||||||||
94 | 146 | i7-9700 CPU @ 3.00GHz | RTX 2060 | 16GB DDR4 2666MHZ | 20/21/22/23 (I think) | BC511 NVMe SK hynix 512GB | MaxxNotBinary | This is a Dell pre built G5 desktop | ||||||||||||||||||
95 | 146 | Ryzen 9 5900HX | RTX 3070 | 32GB 3200mhz | 22,22,22,52 | ADATA XPG S7 2TB | Orical019 | CAS : 22,22,22,52 (wish ASUS allowed me to load the XMP profile but this model laptop doesn't allow any overclocking) | ||||||||||||||||||
96 | 146 | i7-10750H | RTX2070 Max-Q | 32GB @2933MHz | 21-21-21-47 | Western Digital PC SN730 1TB M.2 | Bossheus | I did the test three times on 2 different machines (twice on the first one at 1440p 150,85s and 1080p 146,46s and one on the second at 1080p) | ||||||||||||||||||
97 | 146 | Ryzen 9 3950x | Geforce RTX 3080Ti | 32GB (3000MHz) | CL-15-16-16-35 | akathoth | X570 chipset 4TB Hard drive w 7200rpm (OS is on a Samsung 970 pro M2 SSD with 1 TB, should have moved ON first :D) | |||||||||||||||||||
98 | 147 | i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz | RTX 2060 | 16 GB DDR4 3000 MHz | intel ssdpeknw010t8 | Sloppy | ||||||||||||||||||||
99 | 148 | Ryzen 9 3900X @ 3.8 GHz | RX 6900 XT | 32 GB DDR4 3600 MHz | CL 26.0 tRCD 25 tRP 25 tRAS 58 tRC 85 CR 1T | HDD : ADATA SX8200PNP | PiggyWhiskey | CAS : I don't know if I'm reading this right, | ||||||||||||||||||
100 | 149 | i9-10940X @3.30GHz | RTX 2080 Super | 32GB 3200mhz | Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB | petrios |