| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR) (SANGGUNIANG BAYAN OFFICE) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | I, JONATHAN V. ALFARO, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY to JUNE 2018. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | JONATHAN V. ALFARO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Secretary to the Sanggunian | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Name & Signature of Department Head | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Date: _________________________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Approved by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | ATTY. MARIA THERESA D. CONSTANTINO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Municipal Mayor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 5 - Outstanding 4 - Very Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 1 - Poor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | MFO/PAP | Success Idicators (Targets + Measures) | Alloted Budget | Division/Individuals Accountable | Targets & Accomplishments | Rating | Remarks | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | E | E | T | E1 | E2 | T3 | A4 | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | CORE FUNCTIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | POLICY FORMULATION SYSTEM | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 1. Policy Analysis | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 1.a. Problem Analysis | 100% of referred matters/current issues identified/received were assessed, inquired and evaluated. | 65 | SB Committee | 80 | 52 | 100% of identified Issues/Problems were explored, assessed and evaluated as to relevance in general, economic and social policy development | 65% of identified Issues/Problems were explored, assessed and evaluated as to relevance in general, economic and social policy development | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
28 | 1.b. Policy Recommendation | 100% of the evaluated matters were recommended for appropriate legislative action and or policy formulation. | 76 | 80 | 61 | 100% of evaluated Issues/Problems were recommended for policy formulation in respect to its relevance on general public services, economic services and social services | 76% of evaluated Issues/Problems were recommended for policy formulation in respect to its relevance on general public services, economic services and social services | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||
29 | 1.c. Decision Making | 100% of the matters/issues were decided upon for reporting and adoption of the Sanggunian. | 88 | 80 | 61 | 100% of matters/problems were decided upon for policy formulation | 65% of matters/problems were decided upon for policy formulation | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||
30 | 1.d. Policy Formulation | 100% of recommended policy were formulated and submitted for approval/enactment of the Sanggunian. | 88 | 80 | 68 | 100% of recommended policy were formulated, drafted to answer the issues and concerns identified | 85% of recommended policy were formulated, drafted to answer the issues and concerns identified | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||
31 | 2. Research and Studies | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 2.a. Identification of Services needing Development Research and Studies | 60% of the LGU services/programs were identified and proposed for research and study. | SB Members/ Committees | 1 | 0 | 60% of the LGU services/programs were identified and proposed for research and study as to current trends and demands. | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
33 | 2.b. conduct of the study/research | 100% of the research proposal were conducted and facilitated. | 1 | 0 | - | 100% of development research proposal conducted and facilitated not exceeding the time frame set on its design | 1 | - | 1 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | 2.c. Validation | 100% of the research conducted were validated, explained and justified. | 1 | 0 | 100% of the research conducted validated, explained and justified as to its usefulness and rationale. | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
35 | 2.d. Demand Planning/enrichment of the development plans | 100% of development plans supplemented and enhance. | 1 | 0 | 100% of development plans and services. were review checked and enrich based on the validated research | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
36 | Policy Approval System | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 1. Policy Review | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | 1. a. Change and impact identification | 100% of new trends and its impact of were identified. | 88 | SB Members/ Committees | 80 | 52 | 100% of new trends and its impact of were identified versus the previously approved policies | 65% of new trends and its impact of were identified versus the previously approved policies | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
39 | 1.b. Committee Referral Study, Committee Hearings/meetings | 100% of change affected policies. | 88 | 80 | 52 | 100% of change affected policies were referred and subjected to committee processes. | 65% of change affected policies were referred and subjected to committee processes. | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
40 | 1.c. Policy Drafting | 100% of policies were crafted and studied carefully and enhanced. | 88 | 80 | 68 | 100% of policies were crafted and studied carefully and enhanced base on the emerging trends and needs | 85% of policies were crafted and studied carefully and enhanced base on the emerging trends and needs | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
41 | 1.d. Harmonization and direction | 100% of draft policies were harmonized. | 88 | 80 | 68 | 100% of draft policies were harmonized as to applicability and significance and has clear direction for implementation. | 85% of draft policies were harmonized as to applicability and significance and has clear direction for implementation. | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
42 | 2. Policy Enacted | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 2. a. Agenda Management | 100% of matters needing legislative action received and calendared. | 87 | Secretary to the Sanggunian/LLSO-I | 224 | 195 | 100% of the matters needing legislative action were properly received and calendared; | 87% of the matters needing legislative action were properly received and calendared. | 100% of the matters needing legislative action were calendared and disseminated prior to the conduct of session. | 87% of the matters needing legislative action were calendared and disseminated prior to the conduct of session. | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
44 | 2.b. referral to the committee | 100% of matters calendared for referral referred and properly endorsed to committees | 65 | VM/Presiding Officer | 80 | 52 | 100% of matters calendared for referral were referred to appropriate committees | 65% of matters calendared for referral were referred to appropriate committees | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
45 | 2.c. Committee Reporting | 100% of referred matters reported out. | 104 | SB Committee | 80 | 61 | 100% of referred matters were reported out by the committees | 76% of referred matters were reported out by the committees | 100% referred matters were reported out/acted upon within a month | 76%referred matters were reported out/acted upon within a month | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
46 | 2.d. Floor deliberations | 100% of draft resolutions/ordinances and urgent matters deliberated on the floor. | 88 | SB Members | 80 | 68 | 100% of the submitted draft resolution/ordinances were deliberated/scrutinized/ amended on the floor | 85% of the submitted draft resolution/ordinances were deliberated/scrutinized/ amended on the floor | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
47 | 2.e. Approval or enactment | 100% of draft resolution/ordinances and urgent matters aproved/enacted. | 88 | Sanggunian | 80 | 68 | 100% of the deliberated draft resolutions/ordinances were approved/enacted | 85% of the deliberated draft resolutions/ordinances were approved/enacted | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
48 | Advocacy | 2.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 1. Consultation | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 1. a. Pre entry engagement | 100% of Proposed Policies were consulted to the Public and concern organizations/groups. (Public Hearings) | SB Members/Committees | 1 | 0 | 100% of proposed policies were consulted and informed the public | 100% of proposed policies were consulted and informed the public before the enactment of the sanggunian | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
51 | 1.b. Promotion | 100% of the approved policies conducted IECs/information drive. | 1 | 0 | % approved policies informed the public as to its validity and implementation process/strategies | 100% IECs conducted after approval of the LCE and mandatory posting/publication and prior its implementation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
52 | 2. Post Approval Actvities | 4.066666667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 1. a. attestation | 100% of approved policies were signed and attested. | 88 | VM Secretary to the Sanggunian | 77 | 68 | 100% of approved policies were checked, and attested | 88% of approved policies were checked, and attested | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
54 | 1.b. posting/ publication | 100% of approved policies posted. | 125 | Secretary to the Sanggunian LLSO-I | 4 | 5 | 100% of approved policies were properly posted in compliance to the provision of R.A. 7160. | 125% of approved policies were properly posted in compliance to the provision of R.A. 7160. | 100% of approved policies posted after its approval | 125% of approved policies posted after its approval | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4.67 | ||||||||||||
55 | 1.c.. Sealing | 100% of approved policies sealed. | 88 | 77 | 68 | 100% of approved policies were properly sealed | 88% of approved policies were properly sealed | 100% of approved policies were sealed after its approval | 88% of approved policies were sealed after its approval | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | |||||||||||||
56 | 1.d. Submission for SP Review | 100% of approved policies were submitted for review of higher authority in compliance to the provision of R.A. 71.60. | 125 | 4 | 5 | 100% of approved policies were submitted for review of higher authority in compliance to the provision of R.A. 71.60. | 125% of approved policies were submitted for review of higher authority in compliance to the provision of R.A. 71.60. | 100% of approved policies were submitted for review within 3 days after approval | 125% of approved policies were submitted for review within 3 days after approval | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4.67 | |||||||||||||
57 | 1.e. Dissemination | 100% of approved policies transmitted and disseminated. | 88 | 77 | 68 | 100% of approved policies were transmitted and dissiminated to concern offices, agencies, etc. | 88% of approved policies were transmitted and dissiminated to concern offices, agencies, etc. | - | - | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | ||||||||||||||
58 | Administrative Services | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 1. Information Management System | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | 1.a. receiving | 100% of matters needing legislative action were properly received. | 87 | CCLPalec RGBrigole EJPLlenado-Brigole | 224 | 195 | 100% of the matters needing legislative action were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized with respect to the request presented within 3 minutes. | 87% of the matters needing legislative action were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized with respect to the request presented within in less than 3 minutes. | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | 16% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
61 | 1.b. entry to LMIS/LTS | 100% of received matters needing legislative action and committee reports were correctly entried to the LMIS/LTS. | 93 | CCLPalec DMFernando JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 307 | 284 | 100% of documents entered in the LMIS/LTS correctly within 5 minutes | 103% of documents entered in the LMIS/LTS correctly within 5 minutes | 100% of documents entered in the LMIS/LTS correctly within 5 minutes before calendaring | 103% of documents entered in the LMIS/LTS correctly within 5 minutes before calendaring | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
62 | 1.c. agenda generation/ e-session administration | 100% of Agenda Generated includes all received matters needing legislative action; its pertinent attachments were scanned and uploaded for the e-session. | 104 | RGBrigole | 26 | 27 | 100% of Agenda were properly generated, scanned and uploaded for e-session | 104% of Agenda were properly generated, scanned and uploaded for e-session | 100% of Agenda Generated and uploaded every Friday of the week | 104% of Agenda Generated and uploaded every Friday of the week | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4.33 | ||||||||||||
63 | 1.d. downloading of e-copy of agenda to individual laptops | 100% of the e-copies agenda and its attachments were properly downloaded to individual laptops for the e-session. | 120 | JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 260 | 312 | 100% of the ecopy agenda were properly downloaded and available to individual laptops for the e-session | 120% of the ecopy agenda were properly downloaded and available to individual laptops for the e-session | 100% of the agenda downloaded and available to individual laptops every Friday of the week | 120% of the agenda downloaded and available to individual laptops every Friday of the week | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4.67 | ||||||||||||
64 | 1.e. generation, encoding and preparation of referrals' and review endorsements | 100% of endorsements were prepared, encoded and generated/printed. | 87 | Rexie G. Brigole | 98 | 85 | 100% of endorsements prepared with accuracy within 5 minutes | 87% of endorsements prepared with accuracy within 5 minutes | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
65 | 1.f. receiving of the endorsed referral and its pertinent documents. | 100% of endored referral were cheked, scrutinized and received. | 60 | JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 87 | 52 | 100% of the referral endorsements and its attachments were checked and scrutinized prior its receiving within 3 minutes | 60% of the referral endorsements and its attachments were checked and scrutinized prior its receiving within 3 minutes | - | - | 5 | - | 5.00 | |||||||||||||
66 | 1.g. encoding, preparation and dissemination | 100% of notices and invitation letters prepared, encoded correctly and disseminated. | 154 | JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 170 | 261 | 100% of notices and invitation letters were prepared with accuracy | 154% of notices and invitation letters were prepared with accuracy | 100% of the prepared notices and invitation letters were disseminated at least 3 days before the scheduled activity | 154% of the prepared notices and invitation letters were disseminated at least 3 days before the scheduled activity | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4.33 | 10% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
67 | 100% of reports, drafts and research/study/activity/project proposals/designs prepared and encoded correctly. | 71 | JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 119 | 84 | 100% of reports, drafts, and proposals prepared with accuracy | 71% of reports, drafts, and proposals prepared with 1 minor lapse | - | - | 2 | 4 | - | 3.00 | |||||||||||||
68 | 100% of transmittal letters, memos, communications, and notice of posting/special session prepared , encoded correctly and disseminated/submitted. | 89 | CCLPalec | 600 | 531 | 100% of communications/ activiy designs prepared with accuracy | 89% of communications/ activiy designs prepared with 1 minor lapse | 100% of prepared communictaions/ activity designs disseminated/ submitted before the sheduled activity | 89% of prepared communictaions/ activity designs disseminated/ submitted before the sheduled activity | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3.67 | 16% of the task done by CEW | ||||||||||||
69 | 1.h. . consolidation and finalization | 100% of approved ordinances and resolutions | 88 | EJPLlenado-Brigole | 77 | 68 | 100% of reports and policies were consolidated and finalized with accuracy | 88% of reports and policies were consolidated and finalized with accuracy | 100% of reports and policies consolidated and finalized after committee meeting/ session | 88% of reports and policies consolidated and finalized after committee meeting/ session | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
70 | 2. Records and Archive/Database Management | 4.333333333 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | 2.a. LMIS/LTS Administration | LMIS/LTS updated and maintained regularly. | RGBrigole | - | - | LMSI/LTS updated and maintained daily | LMSI/LTS updated and maintained daily with 1 minor lapse | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||||||
72 | 2.b. recording and documentation | 100% of Legislative activies recorded and documented. | 104 | MISPerlas DMFernando JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 114 | 119 | 104% of activities were properly recorded and attendance and supporting documents were captured | 104% of activities were properly recorded and attendance and supporting documents were captured | 100% of activities were properly recorded and documented during its schedule | 104% of activities were properly recorded and documented during its schedule | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 16% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
73 | 2.c. transcription | 100% of minutes and journal of legislative activities transcribed. | 101 | MISPerlas DMFernando JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 114 | 115 | 100% of minutes and journal were transcribed with accuracy | 101% of minutes and journal were transcribed with accuracy | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | 18% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
74 | 2.d. filing/ archiving | 100% of Legislative and administrative documents filed and archived. | 117 | EJPLlenado-Brigole MISPerlas DMFernando | 784 | 916 | 100% of documents filed and archived properly | 117% of documents filed and archived properly | - | - | 4 | 5 | - | 4.50 | 97% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
75 | 2.e. downloading and printing of requested copy of SB Documents | 100% of requested copy of SB documents downloded and printed. | 280 | RGBrigole | 30 | 84 | 100% of requested copy were downloaded and printed with accuracy | 280% of requested copy were downloaded and printed with 1 minor lapse | 100% of requested copy were downloaded and printed within 5 minutes | 280% of requested copy were downloaded and printed within 1-2 minutes | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.67 | 187% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
76 | 3. Other financial and administrative services | 4.527777778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 3.a. Preparation of Reports and Plans | 100% of reports and plans prepared. (SB Performance Report, SPMS, PPMP, etc) | 150 | EJPLlenado-Brigole | 2 | 3 | 100% of reports and plans prepared with accuracy | 150% of reports and plans prepared with accuracy | every end of the semester | every end of the semester | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
78 | 3.b. preparation of CA, Travel orders, itinerary of travel, Liquidations, Payrolls, PRs | 100% of CA, Travel orders, itinerary of travel, Liquidations, Payrolls, PRs prepared and submited. | 130 | CCLPalec JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 377 | 491 | 100% of financial documents prepare and submitted with accuracy | 130% of financial documents prepare and submitted with accuracy | - | - | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 22% of the task done by CEW | ||||||||||||
79 | 3.c. receiving and outgoing of other administrative and financial documents | 100% of other administrative and financial documents received and release to concern person/office. | 122 | CCLPalec JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 1268 | 1544 | 100% of documents received were acted upon and properly released to the concern | 122% of documents received were acted upon and properly released to the concern | - | - | 4 | 5 | - | 4.50 | 27% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
80 | 3.d. releasing of reviewed barangay ordinances and certificate of accreditation | 100% of reviewed barangay ordinances and certificate of accreditation properly released. | 115 | CCLPalec | 34 | 39 | 100% of the documents stamped released or Official Reciept were presented | 115% of the documents stamped released or Official Reciept were presented | 100% of documents released within 3 minutes upon presentation of necessary documents | 115% of documents released within 1 minute upon presentation of necessary documents | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4.67 | ||||||||||||
81 | 3.e. Sealing | 100% of approved policies, certificate of accreditation and other SB documents properly sealed. | 86 | CCLPalec | 85 | 73 | 100% of the documents sealed properly within 1 minute | 86% of the documents sealed properly within 1 minute | 100% of documents sealed after approval | 86% of documents sealed within 1 minute after approval | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
82 | 3.f. submission of IPCR | 100% of IPCR submitted on time. | 100 | JVAlfaro EJPLlenado-Brigole MISPerlas JTMaluya DMFernando RGBrigole CCLPalec JLPEscalada KJCSCatedral MCBatobalani VPAnfone ALRuto DVMConstantino EMTanggan NJSalazar IVRSantos MTTaladucon RRGocotano | 19 | 19 | 100% of the IPCR submitted 2-3 days before the deadline | 100% of the IPCR submitted on time | IPCR submitted every end of the semester | IPCR submitted every end of the semester | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
83 | 4. Janitorial and utility services | 3.638888889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | 4.a. Driving services | conduct officials and employees on official business. | HBAlegario,Jr. | - | - | safely conduct officials and employees to official travels | safely conduct officials and employees to official travels | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||||||
85 | 4.b. maintenance of SB Offices and premises | SB Offices and surroundings maintained. | 100 | JTMaluya | 132 | 132 | offices and surroundings maintained daily | offices and surroundings maintained once a day | offices and surroundings maintained daily before the office hour starts | offices and surroundings maintained daily after the office hour starts | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.33 | ||||||||||||
86 | 4.c. waste segregation | waste materials properly segregated and disposed. | JTMaluya | - | all waste materials collected and properly segregated daily | all waste materials collected and properly segregated daily | segregated waste disposed before the office hour ends | segregated waste disposed before the office hour ends | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3.00 | ||||||||||||||
87 | 4.d. scheduling and reservation of SB facilities | 100% of activities sheduled using SB facilities reserved and prepared. | 118 | JTMaluya | 40 | 43 | 100% of the activities scheduled and reserved | 118% of the activities scheduled and reserved not logged book | facility reserved and prepared at least 30 minutes before the actvity | facility reserved and prepared 30 minutes before the actvity | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 70% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
88 | 4.e. maintenance of equipments | 100% of SB office equipments maintained regularly. | RGBrigole | - | equipments maintained everyday | equipments maintained everyday | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||
89 | 4.f. delivery of SB Documents | 100% of SB documents delivered. | 91 | JTMaluya | 600 | 544 | 100% of documents properly delivered with receipt | 91% of documents properly delivered with receipt | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | 63% of the task done by CEW | |||||||||||
90 | 5. Supervisory Management | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | 5.a. supervision and management | 100% of sb employees were supervised and monitored. | 98 | JVAlfaro EJPLlenado-Brigole | 40 | 39 | 100% of employees supervised | 98% of employees supervised | - | - | 2 | 5 | - | 3.50 | ||||||||||||
92 | 100% of office documents and activitities were facilitated. | 123 | JVAlfaro EJPLlenado-Brigole | 470 | 580 | 100% of documents and activities signed and facilitated | 123% of documents and activities signed and facilitated | - | - | 4 | 5 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||||||
93 | Average Rating | Total Overall Rating | 151.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | Final Average Rating | 151.50 | / | 39 | = | 3.885 | ||||||||||||||||||||
95 | Adjectival Rating | Satisfactory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Assessed by: | Date | Final Rating By: | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | NONITO V. NUÑEZ/MPDC | MARIANO S. ESCALADA, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | PMT | MUNICIPAL VICE-MAYOR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | Legend 1 - Quantity 2 - Efficiency 3 - Timeliness 4 - Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||