ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Institution: UC RiversideSecond Review Finding Second ReviewThird Review Finding Third Review
2
Program(s) and Pathway(s): Education Specialist: Mild to Moderate Support Needs (MMSN) and Extensive Support Needs (ESN) (traditonal, intern, and bilingual pathways)
3
Link to Submission: https://education.ucr.edu/ctc-accreditation#standard-7-effective-literacy-
4
Initial Review
5
Table 3.1 - 7.5/U7.5 Foundational SkillsIntroducedPracticedAssessed
6
The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly introduced/included in coursework
(Indicate Y or N)		The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly practiced by candidates in coursework or clinical practice
(Indicate Y or N) 		The information provided in 3.1 indicates that candidates are assessed on these concepts
(Indicate Y or N)		If no is indicated on any of the previous three columns, please comment on what is missing or unclear.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, please review institution's response and indicate if the response addresses the feedback. If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column I to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, please review institution's response and indicate if the response addresses the feedback. If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.
7
a. print concepts, including letters of the alphabetYesNoYesIntroduced in 171 textI: I:
8
P: Minimal evidence of P concerning specifically print concepts or letters of the alphabetYesP: P:
9
A: Assessed in the RICA practice test.A: A:
10
b. phonological awareness, including phonemic awarenessYesYesYesI: in week 1 lectureI: I:
11
P: 171 syllabusP:
12
A: RICA practice textA:
13
c. phonics, spelling, and word recognition, including letter-sound, spelling-sound, and sound-symbol correspondencesYesYesYesI: 171I:
14
P: ProjectP:
15
A: RICA practice textA:
16
d. decoding and encoding, including morphological awarenessYesNoNoI: Minimal evidence in week 5.I:
17
No evidence of P specific to decoding and encoding, nor including morphological awareness.NoP: Evidence of practicing in encoding (sounds into writing) is not evident.YesP:
18
A: No evidence of A specific to decoding and encoding, nor including morphological awareness.NoA: Evidence of assess for encoding is not evident. The syllabus bookmark in EDUC 171 does not link to any specific assignment or assessment. YesA:
19
e. text reading fluency, including accuracy, prosody (expression), and rate (as an indicator of automaticity)YesNoNoI: I:
20
P: No evidence of PracticeNoP: The 7 links provided do not provide evidence of practice for this TPE, but rather lead to the first page of each document, and these initial pages are unrelated to this TPE. YesP:
21
A: No evidence of A specific to fluencyNoA: The 7 links provided do not provide evidence of practice for this TPE, but rather lead to the first page of each document, and these initial pages are unrelated to this TPE. YesA:
22
f. instruction that is structured and organized as well as direct, systematic, and explicitYesYesYesI: I:
23
P: P:
24
A: A:
25
g. connected, decodable textYesNoYesI: I:
26
P: No evidence of Practice NoP: Evidence of practice with connected, decodable texts continues to be absent. YesP:
27
A: One question on RICA multiple choice test for decodable text; connected, decodable text was not evidenced. NoA: Evidence of assess with connected, decodable texts continues to be absent. YesA:
28
h. Provide instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling and syllable patterns, semantics, morphology, and syntax.YesNoNoI: I:
29
P: No evidence of PracticeNoP: Continued lack of evidence concerning practicing instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling.YesP:
30
A: No evidence of A specific to fluencyNoA: Continued lack of evidence concerning assessing instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling.YesA:
31
i. Advance students’ progress in the elements of foundational skills, language, and cognitive skills that support them as they read and write increasingly complex disciplinary texts with comprehension and effective expression.YesNoNoI: I:
32
P: No evidence of PracticeNoP: The program has provided 6 bookmarks, yet all 6 do not lead to assignments or practice of this TPE.YesP:
33
A: No evidence of AssessmentNoA: This program has proveded 6 bookmarks, yet all 6 do not lead to assignments or assessments for this TPE. A Find Search was conducted on each document but to no avail. Yes
34
Standard 7a. Foundational Skills: English Learners

Reviewers can find informationon 7a in Section 3.2 of the institution's submission.		The evidence contained in the literacy coursework indicates program is aligned to standard 7a as it relates to multilingual and English Learner students. (Indicate Y or N)If the response in the previous column is no, please indicate what is missing or unclear related to this aspect of standard 7a.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column I to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.
35
Standard 7a: The program also includes evidence-based means of teaching foundational skills to multilingual and English learner students while they are simultaneously developing oral English language proficiency, and in some cases literacy skills in an additional language. The program teaches candidates to plan foundational skills instruction based on students’ previous literacy experiences in their home languages and to differentiate instruction using guidance from the ELA/ELD Framework, including knowledge of cross-language transfer between the home languages and English.Yes
36
The feedback on this sheet is provided for all programs and pathways listed on Row 2 of this sheet.The feedback above is for all programs and pathways (Indicate Y or N)General Comments: The reviewers did not see that the linked evidence is connected to the TPE element.
37
Yes
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100