ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
REPOPSI
2
Repository of psychological instruments in Serbian [Repozitorijum psiholoških instrumenata na srpskom jeziku]
3
The list of all of the instruments in the REPOPSI, with direct links to instruments. [Spisak svih instrumenata u REPOPSI-ju, sa direktnim linkovima ka instrumentima.]
4
Please visit the website for more information:https://www.repopsi.f.bg.ac.rs/en/
5
Molimo Vas posetite veb-sajt radi dodatnih informacija:https://www.repopsi.f.bg.ac.rs/sr/
6
OSF landing page [OSF glavna strana]https://osf.io/5zb8p/
7
Terms of use [Uslovi korišćenja]The instruments available in full in REPOPSI may be used without permission for noncommercial clinical, research, and educational purposes provided you cite instrument authors and translators (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
[Instrumenti u celini dostupni u REPOPSI-ju mogu da se koriste u nekomercijalne kliničke, istraživačke i edukativne svrhe, bez potrebe da se traži dozvola, pod uslovom da se citiraju autori i prevodioci instrumenta (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).]
8
Contribute [Doprinesite]If you want your original instrument/instrument translation to be deposited into REPOPSI, please fill in the online contribution form.
[Ako želite da se Vaš originalni instrument/prevod instrumenta nađe u REPOPSI-ju, molimo Vas da popunite onlajn obrazac za doprinošenje.]
9
10
Title in English. Title in Serbian.Abbreviation.Version.License.Original publisher.Local publisher.Funding.Abstract.Keywords.Available languages.Contact person.Contact email address.Citation of the original instrument.Source of the original instrument.Author of the original instrument.Date of creation of the original instrument.Citation of the translation/adaptation.Source of the translation/adaptation.Author of the translation/adaptation.Date of creation of the translation/adaptation.Additional notes.Instrument availability.Link to instrument in the Repository.Link to instrument outside of the Repository.Is the scoring/recoding syntax file available in the Repository?
11
5C Antecedents of Vaccination ScaleSkala 5C prediktora vakcinacije5Clong form; short formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The 5C scale measures the following psychological antecedents of vaccination: confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility. A long (15-item) and short (5-item) 5C scale has been developed.vaccine hesitancy, vaccination behaviorsrpBetsch, C., Schmid, P., Heinemeier, D., Korn, L., Holtmann, C., & Böhm, R. (2018). Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PloS one, 13(12), e0208601.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208601Lazić, Aleksandra; Žeželj, Iris2021-03The 5C scale is available in English and German at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208601Repositoryhttps://osf.io/fp4ke/no
12
7C Scale of Vaccination ReadinessSkala 7C spremnosti na vakcinisanje7Cadult; long form; short formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The 7C scale measures the following components of vaccination readiness: confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, collective responsibility, compliance, and conspiracy. A long (21-item) and short (7-item) 7C scale has been developed.vaccination readiness, vaccine acceptance, conspiracysrpLazić, Aleksandraaleksandra.lazic@f.bg.ac.rsGeiger, M., Rees, F., Lilleholt, L., Santana, A.P., Zettler, I., Wilhelm, O., Betsch, C., & Böhm, R. (2021). Measuring the 7Cs of vaccination readiness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000663Lazić, A., Dojčinović, S., & Draginić, K. (2022, April). Preliminary findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia. Poster presented at the 28th Empirical Studies in Psychology (virtual).https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XSV4DLazić, Aleksandra; Manojlović, Milica; Medojević, Mia; Ilić, Stojan2021-09The 7C scale is available in other languages at https://www.vaccination-readiness.comRepositoryhttps://osf.io/k4yqp/https://www.vaccination-readiness.com/measure/no
13
Actively Open-Minded Thinking ScaleSkala aktivnog mišljenja otvorenog umaAOT88-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0actively open minded thinking, thinking styles, rational thinking style, intuitive thinking styleeng; srpPetrović, Marija; Žeželj, Irismarija.petrovic@f.bg.ac.rs; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsBronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101832Žeželj, Iris; Petrović, Marija2022Repositoryhttps://osf.io/qwekv/yes
14
Actively Open-Minded Thinking ScaleSkala verovanja o aktivnom mišljenju otvorenog umaAOTrevised; short formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0actively open-minded thinking, thinking styles, reasoning styleeng; srpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsHaran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgement and Decision Making, 8(3), 188–201.http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13124a/jdm13124a.pdfDamnjanović, K., Graeber, J., Ilić, S., Lam, W. Y., Lep, Ž., Morales, S., Pulkkinen, T., & Vingerhoets, L. (2018). Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00735Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2018Italian, German, Chinese, Spanish, Slovenian, Finnish, and Dutch translations are available upon request from the contact person.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/qwekv/yes
15
Adherence to COVID-19 GuidelinesPridržavanje mera tokom COVID-19 pandemijeRHBCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Adherence to COVID-19 guidelines is measured with 12 items based on the official WHO and the Serbian Ministry of Health COVID-19 guidelines. Five items related to newly introduced (e.g., physical distancing) or enhanced (e.g., thorough handwashing) health behaviors, in the previous 2 weeks, rated on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very Often). Additional seven items referred to behaviors recommended to be avoided during the outbreak (e.g., visiting other households or attending social gatherings). Participants rated the frequency of these behaviors in the previous 2 weeks by entering a number. These seven items were multiplied by −1 so that higher scores would always correspond to greater adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. To convert into a common metric, all item scores were standardized. To handle outliers, z values above 3.29 were winsorized. A total score was calculated as an average of all 12 items. Collected measures were negatively skewed, but showed fair internal consistency.recommended health behaviors, adherence to guidelines, health related behavior, covid-19srp; engTeovanovic, P., Lukic, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M., & Zezelj, I. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 486-496.https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.37702020Repositoryhttps://osf.io/fvn6a/https://osf.io/9njp3/no
16
Adolescent Invulnerability ScaleSkala adolescentske neranjivostiAISCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The Adolescent Invulnerability Scale (AIS) measures one’s felt invulnerability to threat, harm and danger; and includes two sub-scales: Danger Invulnerability and Psychological Invulnerability. The AIS requires participants to rate 20 items along a 5-step Likert continuum (strongly disagree to strongly agree). The instrument demonstrates good internal and external psychometric properties.adolescents, physical invulnerability, psychological invulnerability, young adults, perceived invulnerabilitysrp; engDojčinović, Sarasara.dojcinovic@gmail.comLapsley, D. K., & Hill, P. L. (2009). Subjective invulnerability, optimism bias and adjustment in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 847–857.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9409-9Dojčinović, S. (n.d.). Testiranje intervencija usmerenih na zdravstvena ponašanja mladih: poređenje efekata na zdravstveno ugrožavajuća i unapređujuća ponašanja [neobjavljen master rad]. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.Dojčinović, Sara2022The full scale in English is also available at: https://maplab.nd.edu/assets/223500/adolescent_invulnerabililty_scale_and_scoring_revised.pdfRepositoryhttps://osf.io/t7c23/no
17
Adult Crying InventoryInventar za procenu sklonosti ka plakanju za odrasleACICC BY-NC-SA 4.0The 24-item section on attitudes toward crying covers a range of positive and negative attitudesadult crying, emotion regulation, attachment anxiety, crying attitudes, crying pronenesssrpLazarevic, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsVingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2001). “Adult Crying Inventory (ACI),” in Adult Crying a Biopsychosocial Approach, eds A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets and R. R. Cornelius (Hove: Brunner-Routledge), 303–316.Lazarevic, Ljiljana2018Repositoryhttps://osf.io/8p4qs/no
18
Affective Neuroscience Personality ScalesSkale ličnosti zasnovane na afektivnoj neuronauciANPSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0personality, affective neuroscience, affective neuroscience theory, subcortical brain emotion systemssrpKnezevic, Goran; Lazarevic, Ljiljanagknezevi@f.bg.ac.rs; ljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsDavis, K. L., & Panksepp, J. (2011). The brain’s emotional foundations of human personality and the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1946-1958.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.004Montag, Davis, Lazarevic, & Knezevic (2019). A Serbian version of the ANPS and its link to the five-factor model of personality. Open Psychology, 1: 303–316.https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0019Knezevic, Goran; Lazarevic, Ljiljana2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/bmzj2/https://osf.io/gp2z8/no
19
Ambivalent Sexism InventorySkala ambivalentnog seksizmaASIshort formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0ambivalent sexism, hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, short scaleeng; srpGlick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.; Rollero, C., Glick, P., & Tartaglia, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(2), 149–159.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491; https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.2.3Vasilijević, Maja; Osmani, Dajana; Stanković, Sanda; Lazarević, Ljiljana2021Repositoryhttps://osf.io/qwzep/no
20
Amoralism ScaleSkala amoralnostiAMRL954-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0amoralism, moral behavior, dark personalitysrpKnežević, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsKnezevic, G. (2003). Koreni amoralnosti. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju, IKSI, Institut za psihologiju.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/pxmrf/no
21
Anchoring Effect TasksZadaci za merenja efekta ukotvljavanjaAECC BY-NC-SA 4.0In the initial phase, 24 general knowledge questions are presented on a computer screen, one at a time, and participants are instructed to state their estimates (E1) by using a numeric keypad. In the next phase, which follows immediately, the standard paradigm of anchoring is applied and participants are instructed to answer the same set of questions with an option to amend their initial responses. More precisely, for each of the 24 questions, participants are administered a comparative task and a final estimation task. In the comparative task, participants are required to indicate if their final response is higher or lower than the value of anchor (A). Anchors is set automatically by multiplying anchor-free estimates (E1) with predetermined values (that ranges from 0.2 to 1.8 between questions). Afterwards, on the estimation task, participants state their final response (E2) by using the numeric keypad. On each question, a bias score is calculated as a difference between the two estimates (E2 − E1), divided by a distance of anchor from the initial estimate (A−E1).anchoring effect, cognitive biases, normative rationalitysrp; engTeovanović, Predragteovanovic@gmail.comTeovanović, P. (2013). Sklonost kognitivnim pristrasnostima. Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:8171Teovanović, P. (2013). Sklonost kognitivnim pristrasnostima. Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:8171Repositoryhttps://osf.io/w5yvn/no
22
Anti-Science Attitudes ScaleSkala antinaučnih stavovaANTISCICC BY-NC-SA 4.0The Anti-Science Attitudes Scale is a self-report measure assessing an individual's beliefs and attitudes towards science, including their preference for intuition over objective scientific methods and their perception of science's credibility. It consists of 5 items (adapted from Stanovich et al., 2016) where participants rate their agreement with given statements on a six-point Likert-type scale. The instrument demonstrates good internal consistency. Administration time is 1 minute.anti-scientific attitudes, attitudes towards scienceeng; srpGutić, Srećko; Purić, Dankasreckogutic@gmail.com; dpuric@f.bg.ac.rsRizeq, J., Flora, D. B., & Toplak, M. E. (2020). An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 187–211.https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1759688Gutić, S. (2024). Odnos religioznosti i iracionalnih uverenja – zajednički uticaj stilova mišljenja i dezintegracije [Relationship between religiosity and irrational beliefs – the common effect of thinking styles and disintegration; Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy.Gutić, Srećko; Putić, Danka2024Repositoryhttps://osf.io/ur27m/no
23
Assessment Checklist for Qualities Relevant in Rhythmic Gymnastics TrainingČek-lista za procenu kvaliteta relevantnih za bavljenje ritmičkom gimnastikomRG23rhythmic gymnastics, assessment, sportssrpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsDamnjanović, K., Lazarević, Lj. B. i Petrović, B. (2009). Ček-lista za procenu kvaliteta relevantnih za bavljenje ritmičkom gimnastikom RG23 – preliminarni rezultati. International Scientific Conference "Theoretical, Methodological, and Methodical Aspects of Competition and Athletes' Preparation". Belgrade, December 11th, 2009. Book of abstracts p. 72. ISBN 978-86-80255-60-6Lazarević, Ljiljana; Petrović, Boban; Damnjanović, Kaja2009From Contact personno
24
Assessment of Sadistic PersonalityProcena sadističke ličnostiASPCC BY-NC-SA 4.0sadism, dark triad, dark tetrad, sadistic personalitysrpDinic, Bojanabojana.dinic@ff.uns.ac.rsPlouffe, R. A., Saklofske, D. H., & Smith, M. M. (2017). The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 166–171.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.043Dinić, B. M., Bulut Allred, T., Petrović, B., & Wertag, A. (2020). A Test of Three Sadism Measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 41(4), 219–227.https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000319Repositoryhttps://osf.io/r3ysk/no
25
Attitude Toward Traditional, Complementary and Alternative MedicineStav prema tradicionalnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj mediciniTCAM-ATTCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This research was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT 7739597, Irrational mindset as a conceptual bridge from psychological dispositions to questionable health practices – REASON4HEALTHA very short scale measuring the attitude towards traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM).alternative medicine, complementary medicine, traditional medicine, folk medicine, CAM, TCAM, attitudesrp; engPurić, Danka; Žeželj, Irisdpuric@f.bg.ac.rs; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsPurić, D., Živanović, M., Petrović, M. B., Lukić, P., Knežević, G., Teovanović, P., Ninković, M., Lazić, A., Opačić, O., Branković, M., Lazarević, Lj. B., & Žeželj, I. (2022, December 7). Something old, something new, something borrowed, something green: How different domains of traditional, alternative, and complementary medicine use are rooted in an irrational mindset.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/agp5yPurić, D., Živanović, M., Petrović, M. B., Lukić, P., Knežević, G., Teovanović, P., Ninković, M., Lazić, A., Opačić, O., Branković, M., Lazarević, Lj. B., & Žeželj, I. (2022, December 7). Something old, something new, something borrowed, something green: How different domains of traditional, alternative, and complementary medicine use are rooted in an irrational mindset.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/agp5yRepositoryhttps://osf.io/h8fsp/yes
26
Attitudes on Academic HonestyStavovi prema akademskom poštenjuATTAHCC BY-NC-SA 4.0academic honesty, academic normssrpČolić., M.V., Mrkobrad, K., & Žeželj, I. (2015, April). Iluzija promjene stavova: Kako se studenti prisjećaju svojih stavova o akademskom poštenju i visokom obrazovanju? [Illusion of change: How students remember their attitudes on academic honesty and higher education?]. Paper presented at 22. Days of Ramiro and Zoran Bujas, Zagreb, Croatia, book of abstracts p. 128.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/25gjc/yes
27
Attitudes on Higher EducationStavovi prema visokom obrazovanjuATTHEDCC BY-NC-SA 4.0higher education, need for educationsrpČolić., M.V., Mrkobrad, K., & Žeželj, I. (2015, April). Iluzija promjene stavova: Kako se studenti prisjećaju svojih stavova o akademskom poštenju i visokom obrazovanju? [Illusion of change: How students remember their attitudes on academic honesty and higher education?]. Paper presented at 22. Days of Ramiro and Zoran Bujas, Zagreb, Croatia, book of abstracts p. 128.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/4dehq/yes
28
Attribution of Entrepreneurs' AchievementsAtribucija postignuća preduzetnikaAPPCC BY-NC-SA 4.0cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship, subjective assessment of success and failure, organizational psychology, cognitive psychologysrpManasijević, M. (2017). Tumačenje postignuća preduzetnika: atribucioni pristup [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:17363Manasijević, MarijaRepositoryhttps://osf.io/s26fd/no
29
Autonomous Motivation for Teaching ScaleSkala autonomne motivacije za poučavanjeAMTCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Autonomous motivation for teaching scale (AMT) is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 16 items that measures four types of motivation: external, introjected, identified, and intrinsic. External motivation is the least autonomous, and this type of behaviour regulation can be done using rewards and punishments, and the behavior is present as long as such reinforcements exist. Next on the continuum of autonomy is introjected motivation - behavior is regulated by the desire to avoid feelings of guilt, shame, etc., and strives for positive (self) evaluations. Identified motivation is more autonomous than the previous type and is the result of identifying with the importance of behavior in terms of personal values and goals. Intrinsic motivation is the most autonomous and involves engaging in activities for its own sake, and is characterized by enthusiasm, excitement, spontaneity, high concentration and enjoyment. Based on the scale, the respondent receives five scores - one score for each type of motivation (average value on 39 items) and a total score.motivation, teaching motivation, intrinsic, extrinsic, introjected, identifiedeng; srpRoth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761-774.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761Jokić, T. (2021). Psihološka tranzicija ka inkluzivnom nastavniku u kontekstu inkluzivne obrazovne politike [Psychological transition towards inclusive teacher in the context of inclusive educational policy] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:25610https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:25610Repositoryhttps://osf.io/j5763/no
30
Balanced Inventory of Desirable RespondingBalansirani inventar socijalno poželjnog odgovaranjaBIDRCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Two subscales: Self-Deceptive Enhancement; Impression Management.desirable responding, impression management, self-deceptive positivity, social desirabilitysrpLazarević, Ljiljana; Knežević, Goranljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rs; gknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsPaulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-XPeruničić, I. (2009). Predmet merenja skala za detekciju socijalno poželjnih odgovora. Master rad, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.More information and original instrument in English are at: https://sjdm.org/dmidi/Balanced_Inventory_of_Desirable_Responding.htmlRepositoryhttps://osf.io/zd6up/no
31
Base Rate Neglect TasksZadaci za merenje sklonosti zanemarivanja osnovne verovatnoćeBRNCC BY-NC-SA 4.0For each of 10 causal base rate problems, participants are presented with two kinds of information: base-rates (background information), and information concerning the specific case (which were supposed to cue stereotypical beliefs). Participants are required to estimate the probability of the criterion behavior on an 11-point percentage scale. The base rate neglect score was expressed as the proportion of responses that differed from the base rate information in the direction implied by the specific information.base rate neglect, cognitive biases, normative rationalitysrpTeovanović, Predragteovanovic@gmail.comTeovanović, P. (2013). Sklonost kognitivnim pristrasnostima. Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:8171Repositoryhttps://osf.io/x9tyh/yes
32
Behavior Congruent With Gender RolesPonašanje u skladu sa rodnim ulogamaURU-Pfor menCC BY-NC-SA 4.0gender roles, masculinity, femininity, gender norms, gender valuessrpRadović, O. B. (2014). Usklađenost sa rodnim ulogama kao faktor subjektivne dobrobiti u ranom odraslom dobu [Congruence with gender roles as a factor of subjective well-being in early adulthood] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:9498Radović, Olivera B.Instrument URU-O, also available in this Repository, contains similar items but measures perceptions of gender roles.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/bpjz5/no
33
Belief in a Competitive Jungle World ScaleVerovanja u kompetitivnu džungluBCJWSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0beliefs, worldview, competitive jungleeng; srpKnežević, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsDuckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75Knežević, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/rqegy/no
34
Belief in a Dangerous World ScaleVerovanja u opasan svetBDWSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0beliefs, worldview, dangerous worldeng; srpKnežević, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsDuckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.755Knežević, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/ngvmf/no
35
Belief in a Just World ScaleSkala verovanja u pravedan svetBJWSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0beliefs, worldview, just world, just treatmenteng; srpLazarević, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsStroebe, K., Postmes, T., Täuber, S., Stegeman, A., & John, M. S. (2015). Belief in a just what? Demystifying just world beliefs by distinguishing sources of justice. PloS one, 10(3), e0120145.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120145Lazarević, Ljiljana2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/aw6hv/no
36
Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories ScaleSkala verovanja u COVID-19 teorije zavereTZCOVCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories scale consists of 13 items representing most popular conspiracy theories circulating in digital media and conversations on social networks. Response options ranged from 1 (Completely Disagree) to 5 (Completely Agree), and total score is calculated by averaging item responses. Collected measures showed excellent internal consistency.conspiracy beliefs, covid-19srp; engTeovanovic, P., Lukic, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M., & Zezelj, I. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 486-496.https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.37702020Repositoryhttps://osf.io/wrtaz/https://osf.io/9njp3/no
37
Belief in Specific and Contradictory Conspiracy TheoriesUpitnik specifičnih i kontradiktornih teorija zavereBSCCT25-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0conspiracy theories, contradictory beliefs, belief in conspiracy theories, specific conspiracy theoriessrp; engLukić, Petarpetar.lukic@f.bg.ac.rsLukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (Ir) rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 94-107.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690Lukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (Ir) rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 94-107.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690Repositoryhttps://osf.io/gkd8p/https://osf.io/3hjx7/no
38
Belief in Specific and Contradictory Conspiracy TheoriesUpitnik specifičnih i kontradiktornih teorija zavereBSCCT19-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0conspiracy theories, contradictory beliefs, belief in conspiracy theories, specific conspiracy theoriessrpLukić, Petarpetar.lukic@f.bg.ac.rsLukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (Ir) rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 94-107.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690Lukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (Ir) rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 94-107.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.16900Repositoryhttps://osf.io/gkd8p/no
39
Bidimensional Acculturation ScaleDvodimenzionalna skala akulturacijeBASCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This scale measures an individual's acculturation degree by observing how much one uses one’s mother language and how much one uses the new, foreign language in everyday life. Therefore the scale provides scores for two domains - one referring to the native (Hispanic in the original study) and the other one referring to the foreign cultural domain (English in the original study). Items in both domains are grouped into three categories regarding language utility - language use, language proficiency and electronic media subscale - thereby examining how well one understands, speaks, reads and writes in two languages and how often are both of them used in everyday life (e.g. when communicating with friends, listening to the radio, reading the news, etc.). The scale shows high internal consistency and high validity coefficients.culture, acculturation, language, migrationspa; eng; srpMarin, G., Gamba J.R. (1996). A New Measurement of Acculturation for Hispanics: The Bidimensional Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (BAS). Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,18, 297-316.https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863960183002Vukojević, V. (2016). Uticaj akulturacije, etničkog identiteta, samovrednovanja i percipirane diskriminacije na subjektivno psihičko blagostanje srpskih imigranata u Kanadi [Influence of acculturation, ethnic identity, self-esteem and perceived discrimination on subjective well-being of Serbian immigrants in Canada] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:13941Repositoryhttps://osf.io/86hd3/no
40
Bidimensional Impression Management IndexDvodimenzionalni indeks upravljanja utiskomBIMICC BY-NC-SA 4.0The BIMI contains 20 items equally distributed into two subscales – Agentic Management (intentional exaggeration of social and intellectual status) and Communal Management (deliberate denial of flaws and socially unacceptable desires and impulses).impression management, social desirability, circumplex modeleng; srpDinić, Bojanabojana.dinic@ff.uns.ac.rsBlasberg, S. A., Rogers, K. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(5), 523–531.https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.862252Radević, L. (2021). Vreme latencije kao indikator davanja socijalno poželjnih odgovora na upitnicima ličnosti [Response latency as an indicator of socially desirable responding on personality questionnaires] [Master’s Thesis, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy].https://remaster.ff.uns.ac.rs/materijal/punirad/Master_rad_20211012_psi_320057_2020.pdfDinić, Bojana; Radević, Luna2021Repositoryhttps://osf.io/w5gr6/no
41
Big Five Forced-ChoiceSkala prisilnog izbora za procenu Velikih petPP150CC BY-NC-SA 4.0A 150-item measure.Big Five, forced choice, personality structuresrpKnežević, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rs; gknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsLazarević, Lj. & Knežević, G. (2012). Da li se ipsativnim merama mogu zameniti inventari u formi prisilnog izbora? [Can ipsatized measures substitute forced-choice inventories?]. Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji, XVIII naučni skup. Beograd, Srbija, 10-11. februar 2012., str. 159.http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Knjiga-rezimea-EIP-2012.pdfLazarević, Ljiljana; Knežević, Goran2012Repositoryhttps://osf.io/ebksh/no
42
Big Five Inventory 10Inventar Velikih Pet 10BFI-10CC BY-NC-SA 4.0KAVIAR Project – Kammus Validity Investigation Across Different Regions. International Project initiated by Schubert, Zickfield, Seibt, Fiske and Blomster (University of Oslo, Norway)big five, short big five, five factor modelsrpLazarevic, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsRammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001Lazarevic, Ljiljana; Petrovic, Boban2018English and German translations are available in Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://osf.io/j4bdr/Repositoryhttps://osf.io/bt2fd/https://osf.io/cbrs7/no
43
Big Five Inventory 20Inventar Velikih Pet 20BFI-20CC BY-NC-SA 4.0BFI-20 is an abbreviated, psychometrically evaluated version of the well-known BFI-44 (44-item Big Five Inventory; John et al., 1991). This version of the instrument might be helpful in a superficial assessment of basic personality traits in large-scale studies. This 20-item includes Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness, each measured by four items on a 5-point scale.Big Five, personality, traitssrpNedeljković, Bobanboban.nedeljkovic@f.bg.ac.rsJohn, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.; Tucaković, L., & Nedeljković, B. (2023). From the BFI-44 to BFI-20: Psychometric Properties of the Short Form of the Big Five Inventory. Psychological Reports, 00332941231161754.https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231161754Other two versions of BFI-20. Important note: only the 20-item format is the same - the items are not. [Druge dve verzija BFI-20. Bitna napomena: samo je format od 20 ajtema isti, stavke nisu.] Engvik, H., & Clausen, S. E. (2011). Norsk kortversjon av Big Five Inventory (BFI-20) [A Norwegian short version of the Big Five Inventory]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 48(9), 869–872. https://psykologtidsskriftet.no/oppsummert/2011/09/norsk-kortversjon-av-big-five-inventory-bfi-20; Gouveia V. V., de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo R., Vasconcelos de Oliveira I. C., Pereira Gonçalves M., Milfont T., Lins de Holanda Coelho G., Santos W., De Medeiros E. D., Silva Soares A. K., Pereira Monteiro R., Moura de Andrade J., Medeiros Cavalcanti T., Da Silva Nascimento B., Gouveia R. (2021). A short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on construct validity. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 55(1), e1312. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312Repositoryhttps://osf.io/bt2fd/no
44
Big Five Inventory 44Inventar Velikih Pet 44BFI-44CC BY-NC-SA 4.0The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a self-report inventory designed to measure the Big Five dimensions. It is quite brief for a multidimensional personality inventory (44 items total), and consists of short phrases with relatively accessible vocabulary.
big five, personality, extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, opennesssrpJohn, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.; John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California,Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.; Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
Čerović, S., Pejić, M., i Petrović, I. (2013). Metrijske karakteristike i faktorska struktura upitnika ličnosti BFI-44. Savremeni trendovi u psihologiji 2013, str. 273-274, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
http://psihologija.ff.uns.ac.rs/repository/clanak.php?sifra=stup2013189Čerović, Sofija; Pejić, Mina; Petrović, Ivana
2013
The instrument is available in other languages at https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~johnlab/bfi.htmRepositoryhttps://osf.io/bt2fd/yes
45
Blatant and Subtle Prejudice ScaleSkala očiglednih i suptilnih predrasudaBSPSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0prejudice, blatant prejudice, subtle prejudiceeng; srpKnežević, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsPettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106Repositoryhttps://osf.io/dgue8/no
46
Blind and Constructive PatriotismSlepi i konstruktivni patriotizamBCPCC BY-NC-SA 4.0generalized political attitudes, blind patriotism, constructive patriotismeng; srpSchatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151-174.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792008Petrović, N. (2005). Psihološke osnove pomirenja između Srba, Hrvata i Bošnjaka. Beograd: Dokumentacioni centar “Ratovi 1991-99” i Institut za psihologiju.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/qbgkc/no
47
Body Image QuestionnaireUpitnik slike o teluBIQ19-item; self-report; unisexCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Body image questionnaire is a measure of general body satisfaction. It consists of 19 bipolar items of opposite meaning where participants need to rate the frequency of their body feelings on all of the dimensions listed. There is no time restriction, but the questionnaire takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. The instrument demonstrates good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.body image, body satisfactioneng; srpOrlić, Ana; Čolić, Marijaana.orlic@fsfv.bg.ac.rs; marija.colic@fsfv.bg.ac.rsBruchon-Schweitzer, M. (1987). Dimensionality of the body-image: the body-image questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65(3), 887-892.; Koleck, M., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Cousson-Gélie, F., Gilliard, J., & Quintard, B. (2002). The body-image questionnaire: an extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(1), 189-196.https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1987.65.3.887; https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.189Bruchon-Schweitzer, MarilouOrlić, Ana; Čolić, Marija2019The instrument is originally in French, but it was translated into English by the original authors (see original citations) and adapted into Serbian from English.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/3hn9s/no
48
Body Mindfulness ScaleSkala telesnog majndfulnesaBMSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0mindfulness, body, assessment, embodimentsrp; engBurg, J. M., Probst, T., Heidenreich, T., & Michalak, J. (2017). Development and psychometric evaluation of the body mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 8(3), 807-818.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0659-9Milojičić, J. (2021). Mindfulness among emerging adults in Serbia (Unpublished master's thesis). Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.Milojičić, Jelica; Conić, Ljubica; Krstić, KsenijaRepositoryhttps://osf.io/tpzr3/no
49
Body Perception Questionnaire - Short FormUpitnik telesne percepcije - kratka formaBPQ-SFshort formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The Body Perception Questionnaire (BPQ) was created in the framework of polyvagal theory (Porges, 1995, 2011). As an instrument for self-assessement, it was developed to conceptually connect the subjective experience of the body with neurophysiological bases. The original BPQ (122 items, Porges, 1993) assessed body awareness, autonomic nervous system reactivity, cognitive-emotional-somatic stress response, styles of bodily and cognitive stress responses, and health history. The BPQ aspects that were mainly used in research studies were subscales of body awareness and autonomic reactivity that inspired the authors to offer a short form of 46 items (BPQ-SF). BPQ-SF validation results revealed that body awareness can be described by a single factor (which may reflect common afferent goals of cranial and spinal pathways in the brainstem), and autonomic reactivity is best described by sub-diaphragmatic and supra-diaphragmatic responses (implying different efferent control systems that lead to individual differences in physiological responses in different parts of the body; Cabrera et al, 2018).body perception, body awareness, autonomic reactivity, autonomic nervous system, ANS, subdiaphragmatic reactivity, supradiaphragmatic reactivityeng; srpCabrera, A., Kolacz, J., Pailhez, G., Bulbena-Cabre, A., Bulbena, A., & Porges, S. W. (2018). Assessing body awareness and autonomic reactivity: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(3), e1596.; Porges, S. W. (1993). Body Perception Questionnaire. Laboratory of Developmental Assessment, University of Maryland.https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1596Purić, D., Jokić, B. & Kolacz, J. (2022). Factorial validity of the Body Perception Questionnaire - Short Form (BPQ-SF). Paper presented at the 28th Empirical Studies in Psychology conference. Belgrade, Serbia.http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdfJokić, Biljana; Purić, Danka; Marjanović, Vladimir; Manojlović, Milica; Damnjanović, Milica; Medojević, Mia2021BPQ Manual and translations to other languages can be found on the author's website: https://www.stephenporges.com/body-scalesRepositoryhttps://osf.io/3ym2k/https://stephenporges.squarespace.com/body-scalesno
50
Brief COPEStrategije prevladavanja stresa - kratka formaBRIEF-COPECC BY-NC-SA 4.0Subscales: Self-distraction, Active coping, Denial, Substance use, Emotional support, Instrumental support, Behavioral disengagement, Venting, Positive reframing, Planning, Humor, Acceptance, Religion, Self-blamecoping, coping strategies, avoidance, stresssrpŽivanović, Markomarko.zivanovic@f.bg.ac.rsCarver, C. S. (1997). You want to Measure Coping But Your Protocolʼs Too Long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92-100.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6Živanović, Marko; Vukčević Marković, Maša2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/h6xzf/no
51
Brief HEXACO InventoryKratki HEXACO inventarBHI24self-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI), which represents the 24 HEXACO facets with 1 item per facet (i.e., 4 items per domain) and which takes approximately 2–3 min to complete.personality traits, HEXACOeng; srpde Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 871–880.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003de Vries, Reinout E.2013Lazarević, Ljiljana2020The instrument is originally in Dutch but it was translated into English by the original authors (see original citations) and adapted into Serbian from English.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/yc3mw/no
52
Brief Psychiatric Rating ScaleKratka skala za procenu psihijatrijskog statusaBPRSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0psychopathology, general psychopathology, psychiatric ratingsrpOverall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1988). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): Recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24(1), 97–99.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/u8ybk/no
53
Bullying Participant Behaviors QuestionnaireUpitnik učestvovanja u siledžijskom ponašanjuBPBQschoolCC BY-NC-SA 4.0bullying, roles, bullying participantsrpLazarevic, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsDemaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188.https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801Pfattheicher, Stefan; Lazarevic, Ljiljana; Krstic, Ksenija2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/jwqzx/no
54
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short FormKratka verzija upitnika Traumatska iskustva u detinjstvuCTQshort formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This is a shortened version of the original Childhood Trauma Questionnaire which serves as a retrospective assessment of the type and intensity of traumatic experiences in childhood. The scale consists of 28 items that measure 5 different types of childhood trauma - physical abuse, psychological abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect and emotional neglect. Each type of trauma is assessed with 5 items, while 3 items belong to the control scale named Idealization.childhood, trauma, abuse, family, attachmenteng; srpBernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., ... & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child abuse & neglect, 27(2), 169-190.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0Protić, S. (2016). Doprinos vezanosti i mentalizacije razumevanju veze između traume i delinkvencije [The role of attachment and mentalization in understanding the relationship between trauma and delinquency] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:14842Serbian version is on 168-169 of the thesis file. English version is at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336531235_CHILD_TRAUMA_QUESTIONAIRE_CTQ_SHORT_FORM_-_A_RE-DESIGN_OF_CTQ-SFRepositoryhttps://osf.io/jpzmh/no
55
Childhood Vaccines SurveyUpitnik o vakcinisanju deceCVSvaccines, vaccine communication, vaccine attitudes, vaccine concernssrp; ita; ger; chi; spa; slv; fin; dutDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsKempe, A., Daley, M. F., McCauley, M. M., Crane, L. A., Suh, C. A., Kennedy, A. M., Basket, M. M., Stokley, S. K., Dong, F., Babbel, C. I., Seewald, L. A., & Dickinson, L. M. (2011). Childhood Vaccines Survey [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS.https://doi.org/10.1037/t31248-000Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2018From Contact personno
56
Choice OverloadTeret izboraCOCC BY-NC-SA 4.0choice overload, decision-making, outcome, free will, experience of freedomeng; srpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsLau, S., Hiemisch, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). The experience of freedom in decisions – Questioning philosophical beliefs in favor of psychological determinants. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 30–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.008Damnjanović, K., Graeber, J., Ilić, S., Lam, W. Y., Lep, Ž., Morales, S., Pulkkinen, T., & Vingerhoets, L. (2018). Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00735Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2018Italian, German, Chinese, Spanish, Slovenian, Finnish, and Dutch translations are available upon request from the contact person.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/xwjnb/no
57
Civic ActivismGrađanski aktivizamCIVACTCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Contains online and offline civic activism subscales.civic activism, offline activism, online activism, civic participationengŽeželj, Irisizezelj@f.bg.ac.rsMilošević-Đorđević, J. S., & Žeželj, I. L. (2017). Civic activism online: Making young people dormant or more active in real life?. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 113-118.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.070Repositoryhttps://osf.io/be7tg/no
58
Cognitive Reflection TestTest kognitivne refleksijeCRTnon-numericcognitive reflection, dual-process theory, heuristicssrpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsThomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113.www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron/journal/15/151029/jdm151029.pdfIlić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2019From Contact personno
59
Cognitive Reflection Test 8MTest kognitivne refleksije 8MCRT-8Mcognitive reflection, dual-process theory, heuristicssrp; engDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsToplak, M., West, R., & Stanovich, K. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275-1289.; Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42.; Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The development and testing of a new version of the Cognitive Reflection Test applying Item Response Theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453-469.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1; https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732; https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1883Damnjanović, K., Novković, V., Pavlović, I., Ilić, S., & Pantelić, S. (2019). A cue for rational reasoning: Introducing a reference point in cognitive reflection tasks. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 25-40.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1701Damnjanović, Kaja2019spojene tri verzije CRT, izbačen jedan ajtem nediskriminativan za našu populacijuFrom Contact personno
60
Collective Narcissism ScaleSkala kolektivnog narcizmaCN9-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The collective narcissism scale was adapted from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory by changing references from the self to the in-group. It measures "emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness and prominence of an ingroup" (Golec de Zavala et al., 2009, p. 17). The scale shows good psychometric properties.collective narcissism, intergroup bias, in-group favoritismeng; srpDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Irislazo.dragas02@gmail.com; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsGolec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904Dragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Iris2025The instrument is available in other languages at https://collectivenarcissism.com/resourcesRepositoryhttps://osf.io/9gx7f/no
61
Collective Narcissism ScaleSkala kolektivnog narcizmaCN5-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The collective narcissism scale was adapted from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory by changing references from the self to the in-group. It measures "emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness and prominence of an ingroup" (Golec de Zavala et al., 2009, p. 17). The scale shows good psychometric properties.collective narcissism, intergroup bias, in-group favoritismeng; srpDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Irislazo.dragas02@gmail.com; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsGolec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096.; Golec de Zavala, A. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of “in-group love.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 309–320.; Golec de Zavala, A., Dyduch‐Hazar, K., & Lantos, D. (2019). Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 37–74.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x; https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12569Dragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Iris2025Repositoryhttps://osf.io/9gx7f/no
62
Collective Narcissism ScaleSkala kolektivnog narcizmaCN3-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The collective narcissism scale was adapted from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory by changing references from the self to the in-group. It measures "emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness and prominence of an ingroup" (Golec de Zavala et al., 2009, p. 17). The scale shows good psychometric properties.collective narcissism, intergroup bias, in-group favoritismeng; srpDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Irislazo.dragas02@gmail.com; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsGolec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096.; Golec de Zavala, A., Mole, R. & Ardaq, M., (2018). Three-item Collective Narcissism Scale.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904; https://collectivenarcissism.com/blog/3item_cnsDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Iris2025Repositoryhttps://osf.io/9gx7f/no
63
Community Assessment of Psychic ExperienceProcena psihotičnih iskustava u zajedniciCAPEratingCC BY-NC-SA 4.0psychosis, psychosis proneness, psychotic experiencessrpStefanis, N. C., Hanssen, M., Smirnis, N. K., Avramopoulos, D. A., Evdokimidis, I. K., Stefanis, C. N., . . . Van Os, J. (2002). Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 32(2), 347-358.; Mossaheb, N., Becker, J., Schaefer, M. R., Klier, C. M., Schloegelhofer, M., Papageorgiou, K., & Amminger, G. P. (2012). The Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) questionnaire as a screening-instrument in the detection of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia research, 141(2-3), 210-214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701005141; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.008Repositoryhttps://osf.io/tdua7/no
64
Community Assessment of Psychic ExperienceProcena psihotičnih iskustava u zajedniciCAPEself-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0psychosis, psychosis proneness, psychotic experiencessrpStefanis, N. C., Hanssen, M., Smirnis, N. K., Avramopoulos, D. A., Evdokimidis, I. K., Stefanis, C. N., . . . Van Os, J. (2002). Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 32(2), 347-358.; Mossaheb, N., Becker, J., Schaefer, M. R., Klier, C. M., Schloegelhofer, M., Papageorgiou, K., & Amminger, G. P. (2012). The Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) questionnaire as a screening-instrument in the detection of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia research, 141(2-3), 210-214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701005141; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.008Repositoryhttps://osf.io/tdua7/no
65
Comprehensive Assessment of Sadistic Tendencies ScaleSkala sveobuhvatne procene sadističkih tendencijaCASTCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The CAST consists of three subscales including items assessing direct verbal sadism (“I enjoy making jokes at the expense of others”), direct physical sadism (“I enjoy physically hurting people”), and vicarious sadism (“In video games, I like the realistic blood spurts”).sadism, sadistic tendencies, sadistic personalityengLazarevic, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsBuckels, E. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Comprehensive Assessment of Sadistic Tendencies (CAST). Unpublished instrument, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/vfsdh/no
66
Comprehensive Assessment of Sadistic Tendencies ScaleSkala sveobuhvatne procene sadističkih tendencijaCASTschoolCC BY-NC-SA 4.0The CAST consists of three subscales including items assessing direct verbal sadism (“I enjoy making jokes at the expense of others”), direct physical sadism (“I enjoy physically hurting people”), and vicarious sadism (“In video games, I like the realistic blood spurts”).sadism, sadistic tendencies, sadistic personalitysrpLazarevic, Ljiljanaljiljana.lazarevic@f.bg.ac.rsBuckels, E. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Comprehensive Assessment of Sadistic Tendencies (CAST). Unpublished instrument, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Lazarevic, Ljiljana2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/vfsdh/no
67
Conjugal Understanding MeasureUpitnik uzajamnog razumevanjaCUMCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Conjugal Understanding Measure assesses the quality of marital communication on the basis of social cognitive processes of mutual understanding. It consists of 12 items answered on a 5-point Likert scale, 8 of which measure marriage-specific social cognitive tendencies, and the other 4 represent general social cognitive tendencies. The instrument demonstrates good internal and external psychometric properties.marriage, marital communication, mutual understandingeng; srpdeTurck, M. A., & Miller, G. R. (1986). Conceptualizing and measuring social cognition in marital communication: A validation study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 14(2), 69–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/00909888609360306Šaćiri, B. (2020). Interpersonalni činioci doživljaja kvaliteta braka u različitim fazama porodičnog životnog ciklusa [Interpersonal factors of experience of marital quality in different stages of the family life cycle] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:22961Repositoryhttps://osf.io/awvms/no
68
Connotative DifferentialKonotativni diferencijalCD15-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0A scale designed to measure participants' subjective evaluation of a given concept. It consists of 15 pairs of opposing adjectives, presented in the form of 7-point bipolar rating scales (ranging from -3 to +3). The adjectives can be grouped into three factors: affective (e.g., [un]pleasant), cognitive (e.g., [un]known), and conative or arousal (e.g., [un]motivating).semantic space, connotative meaning, connotative differential, semantic differentialsrpJanković, D. (2000). Konotativni aspekt značenja: utvrđivanje latentnih dimenzija. Psihologija, 33, 199‒221.; Janković, D. (2000). Konotativni aspekt značenja: konstrukcija konotativnog diferencijala. Psihologija, 33, 221‒239.; Janković, D. (2014). Razvoj estetske preferencije slika [Development of aesthetic preference of visual stimuli]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/334; https://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/332; https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:10692Janković, DraganRepositoryhttps://osf.io/azxup/no
69
Conspiracy Mentality QuestionnaireZaverenički mentalitetCMQCC BY-NC-SA 4.0beliefs, conspiracy theories, conspiracy mentalitysrpBruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 225.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225Lukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (Ir) rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 94-107.https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690Repositoryhttps://osf.io/62dtg/https://osf.io/3hjx7/no
70
Conspiracy Mentality QuestionnaireZaverenički mentalitetCMQCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This Serbian version of the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ) was successfully validated in two independent representative surveys of adult Serbian citizens (N1 = 1194; N2 = 1258). In both studies, the results demonstrated good psychometric properties of the CMQ and its predictive capacity for endorsing the international conspiracy theories and the locally specific conspiracy theories over and above the measures of perceptions of political climate (trust in institutions, corruption perception, feeling of insecurity) and generalized political attitudes (right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, political cynicism).conspiracy theories, conspiracy mentalityeng; srpŽeželj, Irisizezelj@f.bg.ac.rsBruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225Milošević Đorđević, J., Žeželj, I., & Đurić, Ž. (2021). Beyond general political attitudes: Conspiracy mentality as a global belief system predicts endorsement of international and local conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 144-158.https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5609Repositoryhttps://osf.io/62dtg/https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4550no
71
COPE InventoryStrategije prevladavanja stresaCOPECC BY-NC-SA 4.0Subscales: Positive reinterpretation and growth, Mental disengagement, Venting emotions, Instrumental social support, Active coping, Denial, Religious coping, Humor, Behavioral disengagement, Restraint, Emotional social support, Substance use, Acceptance, Suppression of competing activities, Planningcoping, coping strategies, avoidance, stresssrpŽivanović, Markomarko.zivanovic@f.bg.ac.rsCarver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267Vukčević Marković, Maša; Živanović, Marko2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/h6xzf/no
72
Copenhagen Burnout InventoryKopenhagen upitnik izgaranjaCBICC BY-NC-SA 4.0Subscales: Personal burnout, Work-related burnout, Client-related burnout.burnout, work, exhaustion, human service work, fatiguesrpVukčević Marković, Mašamasa.vukcevic@f.bg.ac.rsKristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192–207.https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720Vukčević Marković, Maša; Živanović, Marko2019Repositoryhttps://osf.io/abwnv/no
73
Coping With Infertility QuestionnaireUpitnik izlaženja na kraj sa neplodnošćuCIQCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Coping with Infertility Questionnaire (CIQ) represents a context-specific measure of overcoming the problem of sterility. It includes 51 questions and 14 subscales representing different coping mechanisms: social withdrawal, denial, self-blame, self-neglect, sharing with others, acceptance, positive reinterpretation, seeking partner support, compensation, investing in oneself, seeking social support, planning and informing, spiritual overcoming, hope. Respondents assess the degree to which each of the listed reactions is characteristic of them, using a five-step Likert-type scale, from never to all the time.coping mechanism, stress, coping assessment, infertilityeng; srpBenyamini, Y., Gefen-Bardarian, Y., Gozlan, M., Tabiv, G., Shiloh, S., & Kokia, E. (2008). Coping specificity: The case of women coping with infertility treatments. Psychology & Health, 23(2), 221–241.https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601154706Milovanović, J. (2018). Problem steriliteta u kontekstu teorije stresa: značaj rezilijentnosti i samoefikasnosti za odnos mehanizama prevladavanja, stresa i kvaliteta života [Infertility problem in the context of theory of stress: The importance of resilience and self-efficacy for the relationships between coping mechanisms, stress and quality of life] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:19974Repositoryhttps://osf.io/4mv9h/no
74
Core Knowledge Confusions ScaleSkala ontoloških konfuzijaCKCS14-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0ontological confusions, core knowledge confusionseng; srpPetrović, Marija; Žeželj, Irismarija.petrovic@f.bg.ac.rs; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsLindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63–76.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008Žeželj, Iris; Petrović, Marija2021Repositoryhttps://osf.io/esdux/no
75
Crystalized Associations TestTest kristalizovanih asocijacijaCA-TESTCrystalized associations test is a measure of Crystalized intelligence (Gc). It consists of 32 items where participant needs to decide which of the five presented options does not fall into the same category as the rest of the options. All items are verbal and reflect crystallized knowledge from more that 10 clusters of knowledge. The instrument demonstrates good internal and external psychometric properties. Administration time is 4 minutes.crystallized intelligence, comprehension-knowledge, cognitive abilities, intelligence, executive functionssrpŽivanović, Markomarko.zivanovic@f.bg.ac.rsŽivanović, M. (2019). Efekti transkranijalne neuromodulacije fronto-parijetalne funkcionalne mreže na više kognitivne funkcije (Doktorska disertacija). Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:20270Živanović, Marko2019From Contact personno
76
Dark Triad Dirty DozenPrljavih dvanaest Mračne trijadeDTDDCC BY-NC-SA 4.0dark triad, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathyeng; srpDinić, Bojanabojana.dinic@ff.uns.ac.rsJonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265Dinić, B. M., Petrović, B., & Jonason, P. K. (2018). Serbian adaptations of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD) and Short Dark Triad (SD3). Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 321–328.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.018Repositoryhttps://osf.io/b8udf/no
77
Defense Style QuestionnaireUpitnik o odbrambenom stiluDSQ-4040-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0defense style, defense mechanismsrpAndrews, G., Singh, M., & Bond, M. (1993). The Defense Style Questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(4), 246-256.https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199304000-00006Čabarkapa, M. M., & Dedić, G. (2002). The onset, development, basic patterns and empirical norms of DSQ-40 psychological test. Vojnosanitetski pregled, 59(5), 507-514.https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP0205507CRepositoryhttps://osf.io/4aj2u/yes
78
Digital Literacy ScaleSkala digitalne pismenostiDIGLITCC BY-NC-SA 4.0digital literacy, media literacy, news literacysrpUNICEF Serbia. (2017). Znanje, stavovi i prakse u vezi sa imunizacijom dece u Srbiji [Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Relation to Immunization of Children In Serbia].https://www.unicef.org/serbia/media/9226/file/Znanje,%20stavovi%20i%20prakse%20.pdfRepositoryhttps://osf.io/3qkec/no
79
Disintegration ScaleSkala dezintegracijeDELTA10120-item; self-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0disintegration, schizotypy, psychosis proneness, schizo-phenomena, deltasrp; eng; norKnezevic, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsKnezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Knezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001The 110-item version of DELTA9 should be used instead of the 120-item version (DELTA10) because the 10 items of Social Anhedonia have been excluded from the instrument. The syntax files for the 120-item version are provided for users who wish to calculate DELTA9 scores based on a previous version of the instrument (the 10 Social anhedonia items are part of the instrument, but are not taken into account when calculating the total score).Repositoryhttps://osf.io/s9ezy/yes
80
Disintegration ScaleSkala dezintegracijeDELTA920-item; self-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0disintegration, schizotypy, psychosis proneness, schizo-phenomena, deltasrp; eng; gerKnezevic, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsKnezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Knezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Repositoryhttps://osf.io/s9ezy/no
81
Disintegration ScaleSkala dezintegracijeDELTA910-item; self-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0disintegration, schizotypy, psychosis proneness, schizo-phenomena, deltasrp; engKnezevic, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsKnezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Knezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Repositoryhttps://osf.io/s9ezy/no
82
Disintegration ScaleSkala dezintegracijeDELTA9110-item; self-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0disintegration, psychotic-like experiences, psychotic-like behavior, psychosis pronenesssrp; engKnezevic, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsKnezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Knezevic, G., Savic, D., Kutlesic, V., & Opacic, G. (2017). Disintegration: A Reconceptualization of Psychosis Proneness as a Personality Trait Separate from the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality. 70, 187-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001Repositoryhttps://osf.io/s9ezy/yes
83
Dissociation QuestionnaireUpitnik disocijacijeDIS-Qlong formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0A new self-report instrument for the screening of dissociative symptoms, the Dissociation Questionnaire (DIS-Q), has been administered to a representative sample of the Dutch and Flemish population on two occasions (N= 374 and N=378). Four subscales were found, which together accounted for 77% of the common variance: (1) identity confusion; (2) loss of control over behaviour, thoughts and emotions; (3) amnesia; and (4) absorption. The DIS-Q shows good to excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability together with good construct and congruent validity.dissociative experience, identity confusion, loss of control over behaviour, thoughts and emotions, amnesia, absorptioneng; srpPurić, Danka; Kidžin, Nemanjadpuric@f.bg.ac.rs; nemanja.kidzin@f.bg.ac.rsVanderlinden, J., Van Dyck, R., Vandereycken, W., Vertommen, H., & Jan Verkes, R. (1993). The dissociation questionnaire (DIS‐Q): Development and characteristics of a new self‐report questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1(1), 21-27.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.5640010105Purić, Danka; Kidžin, Nemanja2021-03Repositoryhttps://osf.io/k6v9h/no
84
Domestic Violence QuestionnaireUpitnik o postojanju nasilja u brakuNUBCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Domestic Violence Questionnaire collects data on whether the respondents were exposed to violence by their spouse and its frequency. It consists of three subscales that represent three types of domestic violence - psychological, physical, and sexual. Every subscale is represented by 6 items.domestic violence, marriage, psychological violence, physical violence, sexual violencesrpŠaćiri, B. (2020). Interpersonalni činioci doživljaja kvaliteta braka u različitim fazama porodičnog životnog ciklusa [Interpersonal factors of experience of marital quality in different stages of the family life cycle] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:22961Šaćiri, BejanRepositoryhttps://osf.io/h6qfp/no
85
Dyadic Trust ScaleSkala međusobnog poverenjaDTSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Dyadic Trust Scale contains 8 items measuring trust in partner and marital relationships.trust, marriage, relationshipseng; srpLarzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595–604.https://doi.org/10.2307/351903Šaćiri, B. (2020). Interpersonalni činioci doživljaja kvaliteta braka u različitim fazama porodičnog životnog ciklusa [Interpersonal factors of experience of marital quality in different stages of the family life cycle] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:22961Repositoryhttps://osf.io/rb2qz/no
86
Dysfunctional Attitude ScaleSkala disfunkcionalnih stavovaDAS-AFORM ACC BY-NC-SA 4.0The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) measures pervasive negative attitudes towards self, the outside world and the future. These attitudes are believed to be linked with depression and are even believed to be the cause of its development. The instrument consists of 40 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1-Totally agree to 7-Totally disagree) depending on how much the participants agree with the provided statement. Lower scores indicate the absence of negative attitudes, i.e. adaptive beliefs about one's self-worth and well-being, while higher scores indicate more negative attitudes, i.e. disordered cognition and presence of negative affect. The instrument demonstrates good internal psychometric properties.dysfunctional attitudes, negative beliefs, depression, self-wortheng; srpWeissman, A., & Beck, A. T. (1978). Development and validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS). Paper presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago.; Weissman, A.N. (1979). Assessing depressogenic attitudes: A validation study. Unpublished thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Miloševa, L. (2015). Faktori rizika za nastanak depresije u adolescenciji iz ugla transakcionog stres modela kognitivne vulnerabilnosti [Risk factors of depression occurrence in adolescence from the perspective of the Cognitive vulnerability - transactional stress model] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:10727More information on the original instrument is available at https://beckinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DAS-Full-Documents-1.pdfRepositoryhttps://osf.io/4sekq/no
87
Early Maladaptive Shema Questionnaires Set for Children and AdolescentsSet upitnika za merenje ranih maladaptivnih shema kod dece i adolescenataSQSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0maladaptive schemas, trauma, attachmentsrpGüner, O. (2017). Psychometric properties and normative values of early maladaptive schema questionnaires set for children and adolescents (SQS). Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 24(2), 534-554.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2049Marjanović, S. (2016).Povezanost ranih maladaptivnih shema sa socijalnom kompeticijom na dečijem uzrastu [The connection between early maladaptive schemas and social competence in children] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:17366Repositoryhttps://osf.io/yxc9j/no
88
Elaboration on Potential OutcomesElaboracija mogućih ishodaEPOCC BY-NC-SA 4.0decision-making, outcomes, outcome elaboration, self-regulationeng; srpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsNenkov, G. Y., Inman, J. J., & Hulland, J. (2008). Considering the future: The conceptualization and measurement of elaboration on potential outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 126–141.https://doi.org/10.1086/525504Damnjanović, K., Graeber, J., Ilić, S., Lam, W. Y., Lep, Ž., Morales, S., Pulkkinen, T., & Vingerhoets, L. (2018). Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00735Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2018Italian, German, Chinese, Spanish, Slovenian, Finnish, and Dutch translations are available upon request from the contact person.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/2mzet/no
89
Emotion Regulation QuestionnaireUpitnik emocionalne regulacijeERQself-reportCC BY-NC-SA 4.0emotion regulation, reappraisal, suppressioneng; srpKnežević, Gorangknezevi@f.bg.ac.rsGross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348Knežević, Goran2021Repositoryhttps://osf.io/fdpc2/no
90
Entitativity of the Ethnic Group ScaleSkala entitativnosti etničke grupeEEGSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This scale estimates the unity (entitativity) of the ethnic group. The scale consists of six items that are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Scale demonstrates satisfactory internal psychometric properties.unity, entitativity, ethnic groupsrp; engBranković, M. (2016). Psychological strategies of defence from the fear of death. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:14998Branković, MarijaBranković, M. (2016). Psychological strategies of defence from the fear of death. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:14998Branković, MarijaThe original scale provided in the thesis consists of 8 items. Since two of the negatively formulated items had low correlations with the rest of the scale, they were excluded from the analysis in the thesis and are therefore not provided in the Repository.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/nkbq4/no
91
Entrepreneur's Success Self-assessment QuestionnaireUpitnik samoprocene uspeha preduzetnikaUSUPCC BY-NC-SA 4.0entrepreneur's success, self-assessment, cognitive psychology, organizational psychologysrpManasijević, M. (2017). Tumačenje postignuća preduzetnika: atribucioni pristup [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:17363Manasijević, MarijaRepositoryhttps://osf.io/trxqm/no
92
Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity QuestionnaireSkala epistemičkog poverenja, epistemičkog nepoverenja i epistemičke lakovernostiETMCQ15-itemCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This work was supported partly by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (contract number: 451-03-47/2023-01/200163) and the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy; and partly (APC incl.) by a research grant from Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme doo (grant number #100867).Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) globally measures a person's trust in communication and communicated knowledge, including epistemic stances about the quality of information and its sources. This is a short 15-item version of the scale which retains three separately scored subscales that refer to specific epistemic stances: Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity (5 items each). High scores indicate a tendency to be adequately open to information and learning (Trust), to be distrustful of any source of information thus tending to reject communicated knowledge (Mistrust), and to be undecided or unselective about the reliability and quality of information either way (Credulity) (Campbell et al., 2021). Cronbach’s alpha obtained in our study for subsamples of healthcare providers, parents, and laypeople was satisfactory for Trust (respectively, α₁ = .70, α₂ = .73, α₃ = .70) and Mistrust (α₁ = .66, α₂ = .56, α₃ = .66), and good for Credulity (α₁ = .82, α₂ = .78, α₃ = .77).epistemic trust, epistemic mistrust, credulityeng; srpDamnjanović, Kaja; Ilić, Sandra; Kušić, Marijakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rs; sandra.ilic@f.bg.ac.rs; marija.kusic996@gmail.comCampbell, C., Tanzer, M., Saunders, R., Booker, T., Allison, E., Li, E., O’Dowda, C., Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2021). Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PloS one, 16(4).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250264Damnjanović, K., Ilić, S., Kušić, M., Lazić, M., & Popović, D. (2023). Psychological factors of vaccination intent among healthcare providers, parents, and laypeople. Vaccines, 11(12), 1816.https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816Repositoryhttps://osf.io/tshbx/no
93
Ethnic (National) Identification ScaleSkala etničke (nacionalne) identifikacijeENISCC BY-NC-SA 4.0This scale consists of 9 Likert-type statements which measure one's feeling of belonging to the Serbian people. Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of ethnic attachment to the Serbian people and vice versa. The scale demonstrates extremely good internal psychometric properties.ethnic identity, feeling of belonging, attachment, nationalitybosNiškanović, J. B. (2016). Etnički identitet i poimanje kolektivne krivice u Bosni i Hercegovini [Ethnic identity and notion of collective guilt in Bosnia and Herzegovina] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:15099Niškanović, Jelena B.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/5xnb2/no
94
Ethnic Identity Delegitimization ScaleSkala delegitimizacije etničkog identitetaEIDLCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Grant No. 179018, Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological DevelopmentEIDL scale captures general tendency to believe that some ethnic groups are less legitimate than others. Items are formulated as general statements about ethnic groups and do not refer to any specific group. The scale contains 14 items, half of which are reverse coded. Participants answer on 7-point Likert scale. The instrument demonstrates excellent internal psychometric properties. Scores on EIDL are found to correlate with attitude towards ethnic outgroups, as well as with political conservativism.ethnic identity, identity delegitimization, inter-ethnic beliefssrpNinković, Milicamilica.ninkovic@f.bg.ac.rsNinković, M. (2020, October). My ethnicity is older than yours! Ethnic identity delegitimization predicts inter-ethnic attitudes [Conference presentation abstract]. XXVI scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology and Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbiahttp://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2020.pdf#page=131Ninković, Milica2020Repositoryhttps://osf.io/bm5v4/no
95
Ethnocentrism Scale 2-12Skala etnocentrizma 2-12ES2-12CC BY-NC-SA 4.0Ethnocentrism is conceptualized as an individual-level and multidimensional attitudinal construct, consisting of six specific dimensions, which have a specific subject matter: a strong preoccupation with the importance of one’s own ethnic group. 1. Devotion: an attitude in favor of strong, passionate, and ardent commitment to one’s own ethnic group. 2. Group cohesion: an attitude in favor of ethnic group unity at the expense of individual freedoms. 3. Preference: an attitude in favor of preferring and liking one’s own ethnic group and its members over outgroups. 4. Superiority: an attitude in favor of the belief that one’s own ethnic group is superior to and objectively better than any other ethnic group. 5. Purity: an attitude in favor of ethnic ingroup’s “purity” and intolerance of ethnic diversity. 6. Exploitativeness: an attitude in favor of giving overwhelming importance to ethnic ingroup interests over outgroup interests, even when this leads to impinging on the rights and feelings of ethnic outgroups.ethnocentrism, intergroup bias, in-group favoritismeng; srpDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Irislazo.dragas02@gmail.com; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsBizumic, B., Monaghan, C., & Priest, D. (2021). The return of ethnocentrism. Advances in Political Psychology, 42(S1), 29–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12710Dragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Iris2025Repositoryhttps://osf.io/z7e3y/no
96
Ethnocentrism Scale 2-6Skala etnocentrizma 2-6ES2-6CC BY-NC-SA 4.0Ethnocentrism is conceptualized as an individual-level and multidimensional attitudinal construct, consisting of six specific dimensions, which have a specific subject matter: a strong preoccupation with the importance of one’s own ethnic group. 1. Devotion: an attitude in favor of strong, passionate, and ardent commitment to one’s own ethnic group. 2. Group cohesion: an attitude in favor of ethnic group unity at the expense of individual freedoms. 3. Preference: an attitude in favor of preferring and liking one’s own ethnic group and its members over outgroups. 4. Superiority: an attitude in favor of the belief that one’s own ethnic group is superior to and objectively better than any other ethnic group. 5. Purity: an attitude in favor of ethnic ingroup’s “purity” and intolerance of ethnic diversity. 6. Exploitativeness: an attitude in favor of giving overwhelming importance to ethnic ingroup interests over outgroup interests, even when this leads to impinging on the rights and feelings of ethnic outgroups.ethnocentrism, intergroup bias, in-group favoritismeng; srpDragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Irislazo.dragas02@gmail.com; izezelj@f.bg.ac.rsBizumic, B., Monaghan, C., & Priest, D. (2021). The return of ethnocentrism. Advances in Political Psychology, 42(S1), 29–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12710Dragaš, Lazo; Žeželj, Iris2025Repositoryhttps://osf.io/z7e3y/no
97
Exam Anxiety Salience ScaleSkala ispitne anksioznostiEASSCC BY-NC-SA 4.0exam anxiety, salience, academic stresssrp; engBranković, M. (2016). Psychological strategies of defence from the fear of death. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:14998Branković, MarijaBranković, M. (2016). Psychological strategies of defence from the fear of death. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/view/o:14998Branković, MarijaRepositoryhttps://osf.io/32n4z/no
98
Experience of Freedom in DecisionsIskustvo slobodne odlukeEFDCC BY-NC-SA 4.0experience of freedom, decision-making, free willeng; srpDamnjanović, Kajakdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rsLau, S., Hiemisch, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). The experience of freedom in decisions – Questioning philosophical beliefs in favor of psychological determinants. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 30–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.008Damnjanović, K., Graeber, J., Ilić, S., Lam, W. Y., Lep, Ž., Morales, S., Pulkkinen, T., & Vingerhoets, L. (2018). Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00735Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanović, Kaja2018Italian, German, Chinese, Spanish, Slovenian, Finnish, and Dutch translations are available upon request from the contact person.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/8qydv/no
99
Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised, German VersionIskustva u bliskim vezama - revidirana verzija, NemačkaECR-RD12short formCC BY-NC-SA 4.0attachment anxiety, attachment avoidanceeng; srpBrenk-Franz, K., Ehrenthal, J., Freund, T., Schneider, N., Strauß, B., Tiesler, F., et al. (2018). Evaluation of the short form of “Experience in Close Relationships” (Revised, German Version “ECR-RD12”) - A tool to measure adult attachment in primary care. PLoS ONE 13(1), e0191254.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191254Brenk-Franz, Katja; Ehrenthal, Johannes; Freund, Tobias; Schneider, Nico; Strauß, Bernhard; Tiesler, Fabian; Schauenburg, Henning; Gensichen, Jochen2018Stankovic, Sanda; Lazarevic, Ljiljana2021Repositoryhttps://osf.io/ekcru/no
100
Explicit Math and Language Gender Stereotypes ScaleSkala eksplicitnih rodnih stereotipa o matematičkom i jezičkom talentuRSMJTCC BY-NC-SA 4.0gender, stereotypes, mathematical ability, language ability, school, teachersrpLazić, M. (2012). Uticaj ,,pretnje stereotipom’’ na pretpostavljeno i stvarno postignuće žena na testu numeričnosti. Nepublikovana master teza. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.Jakšić, I. (2021). Rodni stereotipi o matematičkim i jezičkim sposobnostima u osnovnoj školi: mehanizmi uticaja na obrazovne ishode [How math and language gender stereotypes impact educational outcomes in elementary school children] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Belgrade]. E-theses.Repositoryhttps://osf.io/6k3fc/no