Institutional Category-Evaluation Criteria.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E
1	Institutional Category-Evaluation Criteria
2	No	Criteria	Allocated Marks including sub- Categories	Allocated Total Marks	Assigned Marks
3	1	Novelty/Innovativeness and Inventiveness	0-8	8
4	2	Contribution to the Sustainable Development	0-8	8
5	3	Eco Friendliness		8
6		a. No Pollution	8
7		b. Cause to Pollution and Available of Precaution	6
8		c. Cause to Pollution and No Precaution	0
9	4	Usefulness to General Public/Target Market		6
10		a. For Niche Market	2
11		b. Few Selected Groups of People	4
12		c. To Wider Local Society/National Level	5
13		d. International with Export Potential	6
14	5	Safety during the usage of the invention		6
15		a. No need	6
16		b. Action Taken	0-6
17		c. Not Taken	0
18	6	Strategy and clearly solve the problem	0-6	6
19	7	User-Friendliness of the invention	0-4	4
20	8	Nature of the Invention		8
21		a. The Concept	3
22		b. Workable Prototype	6
23		c. Finished Product	7
24		d. Value Addition	8
25	9	Intellectual Property Requirements (Patent/PCT)		8
26		a. If Not Applied	0
27		b. If Already Applied or Patent or PCT	5
28		c. Availability of PCT Positive Search Report	7
29		d. Patent Obtained	8
30	10	Invention Ready to be Commercialized	0-6	6
31	11	Economic Potential of the Invention	0-8	8
32	12	Scientific Evidences (Ex: Test Reports)		8
33		a. Required but Not Obtained	4
34		b. Already Obtained/Granted	6
35		c. Doesn’t Require	8
36	13	Application of Scientific Principles	0-8	8
37	14	Performed a Feasibility Study (analysis of project's relevant factors including economic, technical, legal, scheduling etc..) and Availability of the Business Plan	0-8	8
38	Total			100	0
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100