| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Section | Topic | Are There New Outcomes Not Previously Seen by the Community? | Rationale/Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.1 Continuing Subsequent Procedures | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.2 Predictability | Likely to go out Again for Comment with proposed framework structure. | Work remains to be done to at a minimum, refine and clarify the framework. For instance 1) clear boundaries are needed between the framework and any existing GNSO proceses and 2) clear usage guidance is needed for ICANN Org and the community, who will be asked to implement and eventually execute against this framework. | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.2.1 Community Engagement | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.2.2 Clarity of the Application Process | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.3 Applications Assessed in Rounds | Possible | if we suggest a specifc threshold on when to start accepting applications for next subsequent round | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.4 Different TLD Types | Not anticipated | While work remains to come to agreement on exact types within each of the buckets (e.g., application type, string type, or applicant type), deliberations have not surfaced new types for consideration by the WG. | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.5 Application Submission Limits | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Overarching Issues | 2.2.6 Accreditation Programs (RSP Pre-Approval) | Possible | There remain questions about several elements, like re-testing RSPs, differences (if any) between RSP pre-approval and technical requirements. There are also touchpoints here with the technical evaluation and pre-delegation testing. | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Foundational Issues | 2.3.1 Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Foundational Issues | 2.3.2 Global Public Interest | Possible | There remains substantial opposition from parts of the community, though some of this resistance may be related to the naming convention (i.e., public interest) and the WG may want to make sure that all have the opportuntity to provide public comment. We may want to test this notion in a public comment period. There is also the question of whether we should codify the notion of the sensitive / regulatory strings where PICs were added to address initial GAC concerns (Category 1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Foundational Issues | 2.3.3 Applicant Freedom of Expression | Not anticipated | It remains unclear what the additional implementation guidance might look like from a practical perspective. | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Foundational Issues | 2.3.4 Universal Acceptance | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Pre-Launch Activities | 2.4.1 Applicant Guidebook | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Pre-Launch Activities | 2.4.2 Communications | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Pre-Launch Activities | 2.4.3 Systems | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Application Submission | 2.5.1 Application Fees | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Application Submission | 2.5.2 Variable Fees | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Application Submission | 2.5.3 Application Submission Period | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Application Submission | 2.5.4 Applicant Support | Not anticipated | Some open questions remain, such as a selection process if there are more qualified applicants than funds,agreeing on a definition for Global South/underserved/underrepresented (potentially reference work ICANN org is doing), metrics for reviewing the program. | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | Application Submission | 2.5.5 Terms & Conditions | Not anticipated | This section is dependent on agreement to a limited appeals mechanism. | ||||||||||||||||||||
22 | Application Processing | 2.6.1 Application Queuing | Not anticipated | The WG may make recommendations on prioritizing the processing of applications from previous rounds. | ||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Application Processing | 2.4 Application Change Requests | Possible | Possibly on new processes/procedures discussed if they gain traction. | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.1 Reserved Names | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.1.1 IGO/INGO Protections | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.1.2 Geographic Names | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.2 Registrant Protections | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
28 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.3 Closed Generics | Possible | If we get a consensus or a good amount of support for something other than 2012 rules. | ||||||||||||||||||||
29 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.4 String Similarity | Possible | There was some discussion that the recommendations could extend beyond singular/plural. | ||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.5 IDNs | Not anticipated | Some questions remain about the interplay between SubPro's work and future work that is looking at IDNs more holistically. | ||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.6 Security and Stability | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
32 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.7 Applicant Reviews: Technical/Operational, Financial and Registry Services | Not anticipated | The WG is awaiting data on EBERO/SLAM data, which could impact the evaluation criteria (as well as the RA and pre-delegation testing). | ||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.3 Role of Application Comment | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Application Evaluation/Criteria | 2.7.8 Name Collisions | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Dispute Proceedings | 2.8.1 Objections | Undetermined | There are a number of unresolved elements, but unclear if the outcomes will be something the community has not had the opportunity to comment against. | ||||||||||||||||||||
36 | Dispute Proceedings | 2.8.2 Accountability Mechanisms | Likely | Additional detail being formulated here, much of it not in earlier reports. | ||||||||||||||||||||
37 | String Contention Resolution | 2.9.1 Community Applications | Not anticipated | The WG is currently considering whether the implementation guidance provides the needed additional clarity. If something substantially different is agreed upon, that could require additional community review. | ||||||||||||||||||||
38 | String Contention Resolution | 2.1 Auctions: Mechanisms of Last Resort | Possible | The WG is considering changes to the precise type of auction. | ||||||||||||||||||||
39 | String Contention Resolution | 2.2 Private Resolution of Contention Sets (including Private Auctions) | Undetermined | This may be dependent on the outcomes of 2.2 above. | ||||||||||||||||||||
40 | Contracting | 2.10.1 Base Registry Agreement | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Contracting | 2.10.2 Registrar Non-Discrimination / Registry/Registrar Standardization | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
42 | Contracting | 2.5 Registrar Support for New gTLDs | Not anticipated | |||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Pre-Delegation | 2.11.1 Registry System Testing | TBD | |||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Post-Delegation | 2.12.1 TLD Rollout | TBD | |||||||||||||||||||||
45 | Post-Delegation | 2.12.2 Second-Level Rights Protection Mechanisms | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||
46 | Post-Delegation | 2.12.3 Contractual Compliance | TBD | |||||||||||||||||||||
47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |