Summary of MVP Responses
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
Summary of Institution Responses to MVP Recommendation
2
3
New Milestones
4
September 6
Additional comments from institutions due
5
September 12
Cap Plan Team responses completed
6
September 20Final issues resolved
7
Septmeber 25
Final MVP recommendation released
8
October 2
Go/No Go decisions due from institutions
9
10
11
Reminder: If a feature is added to the MVP, a feature of equal value must be removed!
12
13
Institution
# of go-live features still needed
# of first quarter after go-live features
Total go-live & 1st quarter
Comments
14
FLO022Clearly easiest to implement
15
Leipzig01313ERM only--please note we do not track ERM capacity
16
U of AL101828Was 25 at go-live, but moved 15 to 1st quarter after go-live on September 6
17
Cornell14136150
Cornell said they only have 8 at go-live, but new speadsheet still has 14; added 1st quarter after go-live count
18
Lehigh15145160
Added in the can wait - up to a quarter go live and can review those 1st quarter jiras again
19
GBV202343Was 18 at go-live, but added 2 on September 6
20
Five Colleges251237
21
Chicago35439
22
TAMU363470
Was 43 at go-live, but removed 7 on September 6 (added 7 to 1st quarter after go-live)
23
Duke4274116
24
25
26
Status# Non-MVP FeaturesComment
27
Uncontested378We do not need to review these
28
6 inst need at go-live
1Need to review
29
5 inst need at go-live
4Need to review
30
4 inst need at go-live
2Need to review
31
3 inst need at go-live
11Need to review
32
2 inst need at go-live
27
There may be a reasonable workaround
33
1 inst needs at go-live
80
There is probably a reasonable workaround
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...