| A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Objective | Current | Goal | Percent Achieved | KR Lead | ||
2 | O1: Fish Helped | Improve the lives of many fish. | 25% | ||||
3 | O2: Welfare Standard | Develop a subtheory of change of how welfare improvements influence fish welfare. (Link C) | 0% | Overall objectives achieved: | 13% | ||
4 | O3: Farmers | Develop a subtheory of change of how farmers influence welfare improvements. (Link B) | 11% | Total fish helped currently: | 515,914 | ||
5 | O4: Corporations (Institutions) | Develop a subtheory of change of how corporations influence farmers. (Link A) | 29% | Total fish farming ponds working with currently: | 73 | ||
6 | O5: Government (Institutions) | Develop a subtheory of change of how government and other institutions influence farmers. (Link A) | 0% | ||||
7 | O6: International | Enable fish welfare work in other high priority countries. | 48% | Water quality measurements collected from ARA fish farming ponds that are within the required range: | 84% | ||
8 | |||||||
9 | O1: Fish Helped | Improve the lives of many fish. | |||||
10 | Objective Lead | Jennifer | |||||
11 | |||||||
12 | KR 1 | Fish lives already improved in India in 2022: | 100,050 | 600,000 | 17% | Jennifer | |
13 | KR 2 | Net additional fish farm ponds in 2022 committed to the Alliance for Responsible Aquaculture: | 24 | 70 | 34% | Jennifer | |
14 | |||||||
15 | O2: Welfare Standard | Develop a subtheory of change of how welfare improvements influence fish welfare. (Link C) | |||||
16 | Objective Lead | Tom | |||||
17 | |||||||
18 | KR 1 | Welfare standard version 2 developed and published: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Tom | |
19 | |||||||
20 | O3: Farmers | Develop a subtheory of change of how farmers influence welfare improvements. (Link B) | |||||
21 | Objective Lead | Karthik | |||||
22 | |||||||
23 | KR 1 | Farms surveyed in order to assess ideal population: | 100 | 300 | 33% | Teja | |
24 | KR 2 | Literature review completed for farmer behavior change in lower/middle income countries: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Karthik | |
25 | KR 3 | Decision-making tree completed on how farmers make decisions on water quality (1) and disease management (2): | 0 | 2 | 0% | Karthik | |
26 | |||||||
27 | O4: Corporations (Institutions) | Develop a subtheory of change of how corporations influence farmers. (Link A) | |||||
28 | Objective Lead | Haven | |||||
29 | |||||||
30 | KR 1 | States for which we have completed scoping writeups of supply chains and consumer behavior: | 1 | 2 | 50% | Anu | |
31 | KR 2 | Corporations for which we have gathered procurement data: | 28 | 30 | 93% | Anu | |
32 | KR 3 | Roundtable held with key aquaculture stakeholders: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Haven | |
33 | KR 4 | Trial completed of a corporation selling higher welfare fish: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Anu | |
34 | KR 5 | Corporate commitments secured: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Haven | |
35 | |||||||
36 | O5: Government & Other (Institutions) | Develop a subtheory of change of how government and other institutions influence farmers. (Link A) | |||||
37 | Objective Lead | Karthik | |||||
38 | |||||||
39 | KR 1 | Evaluate implementation partnerships: Gain non-FWI funding for a project with a government agency. | 0 | 1 | 0% | Karthik | |
40 | KR 2 | Evaluate knowledge partnerships: Be listed as an official partner of a government agency. | 0 | 2 | 0% | Karthik | |
41 | |||||||
42 | O6: International | Enable fish welfare work in other high priority countries. | |||||
43 | Objective Lead | Haven | |||||
44 | |||||||
45 | KR 1 | New Chinese aquaculture stakeholders met: | 5 | 12 | 42% | Lu | |
46 | KR 2 | 1 and 3 year strategies for China work set: | 2 | 2 | 100% | Lu | |
47 | KR 3 | Successful Aquatic Animal Welfare Forum at WCFAW hosted: | 1 | 1 | 100% | Lu | |
48 | KR 4 | Farms in Philippines in which producer-centric projects and write-ups completed: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Chiaw | |
49 | KR 5 | Candidates in shortlist for Philippines MD-type role: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Chiaw | |