A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Objective | Current | Goal | Percent Achieved | KR Lead | ||
2 | O1: Fish Helped | Improve the lives of many fish. | 10% | ||||
3 | O2: Welfare Improvements | Determine welfare standard(s) that are both sufficiently impactful and implementable. | 0% | Overall objectives achieved: | 13% | ||
4 | O3: Producers | Transition producers to higher welfare practices. | 28% | Total fish helped currently: | 505,914 | ||
5 | O4: Market | Build relationships and knowledge for transitioning future demand. | 25% | Total fish farming ponds working with currently: | 65 | ||
6 | O5: Government | Partner with government entities to enable a welfare-oriented policy environment. | 0% | ||||
7 | O6: International | Enable fish welfare work in other high priority countries. | 25% | Water quality measurements collected from ARA fish farming ponds that are within the required range: | 84% | ||
8 | |||||||
9 | O1: Fish Helped | Improve the lives of many fish. | |||||
10 | Objective Lead | Tom | |||||
11 | |||||||
12 | KR 1 | Fish lives already potentially improved in India in 2022: | 100,050 | 500,000 | 20% | Tom | |
13 | KR 2 | Fish lives already potentially improved internationally (non-India) in 2022: | 0 | 5,000 | 0% | Jennifer | |
14 | |||||||
15 | O2: Welfare Standard | Determine welfare standard(s) that are both sufficiently impactful and implementable. | |||||
16 | Objective Lead | Tom | |||||
17 | |||||||
18 | KR 1 | Welfare standard(s) determined: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Tom | |
19 | KR 2 | Environmental change mechanisms evaluated through a multi-method review: | 0 | 8 | 0% | Vivek | |
20 | KR 3 | Evaluation of extensive systems writeup completed: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Vivek | |
21 | KR 4 | Preliminary writeup of economics of our welfare standard(s) completed: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Tom | |
22 | |||||||
23 | O3: Producers | Transition producers to higher welfare practices. | |||||
24 | Objective Lead | Jennifer | |||||
25 | |||||||
26 | KR 1 | Net additional fish farm ponds in 2022 committed to the Alliance for Responsible Aquaculture: | 14 | 50 | 28% | Jennifer | |
27 | |||||||
28 | O4: Market | Build relationships and knowledge for transitioning future demand. | |||||
29 | Objective Lead | Haven | |||||
30 | |||||||
31 | KR 1 | States for which we have completed scoping writeups of supply chains and consumer behavior: | 1 | 2 | 50% | Anu | |
32 | KR 2 | Corporations for which we have gathered procurement data: | 28 | 30 | 93% | Anu | |
33 | KR 3 | Roundtable held with key aquaculture stakeholders: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Haven | |
34 | KR 4 | Procurement commitments with aligned institutional buyers secured: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Anu | |
35 | KR 5 | Consultation commitment with aligned institutional buyers secured: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Anu | |
36 | KR 6 | Trial of a corporation selling higher welfare fish: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Anu | |
37 | |||||||
38 | O5: Government | Partner with government entities to enable a welfare-oriented policy environment. | |||||
39 | Objective Lead | Karthik | |||||
40 | |||||||
41 | KR 1 | Funding from an Indian-government approved entity for CSIR secured: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Karthik | |
42 | KR 2 | FWI India staff serves as an official advisor to government entity: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Vivek | |
43 | KR 3 | Government fish markets where we have built relationships with officials: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Karthik | |
44 | |||||||
45 | O6: International | Enable fish welfare work in other high priority countries. | |||||
46 | Objective Lead | Haven | |||||
47 | |||||||
48 | KR 1 | New Chinese aquaculture stakeholders met: | 3 | 12 | 25% | Lu | |
49 | KR 2 | 1 and 3 year strategies for China work set: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Lu | |
50 | KR 3 | Successful Aquatic Animal Welfare Forum at WCFAW hosted: | 1 | 1 | 100% | Lu | |
51 | KR 4 | Farms in Philippines in which producer-centric projects and write-ups completed: | 0 | 1 | 0% | Chiaw | |
52 | KR 5 | Candidates in shortlist for Philippines MD-type role: | 0 | 2 | 0% | Chiaw |