FRC Team Risk Chart

Still loading...

	A	B	C	D	E
1	Level	Stable (1)	Needs Monitoring (2)	Unstable (3)	Catastrophic (4)
2	Contact Frequency	6 Months	3 Months	1 Month	1 Week

3	Community	Has a positive, demonstrable impact on their community (ex: has won EI/CA in last 4 years)	Some outreach efforts, primarily only robot demos	No visible outreach efforts, school district aware of team's existence	District/Community unaware of team existence/No interaction with community or school
4	Competitive	Made eliminations the current or previous year	Made eliminations in the last 2 previous seasons	Made eliminations in the last 3 previous sesons	Hasn't made eliminations in the previous 4 seasons
5	Communication	Responsive to general emails Registration on time	Responsive to directed communications	Unresponsive to directed communication/Occasionally emails questions	Completely unresponsive
6	Student	Good distribution of student ages Reasonable student/mentor ratio (7:1 or better)	Reasonable student/mentor ratio (7:1 or better) Heavily biased towards younger students	Mediocre student/mentor ratio (>10:1) Heavily biased towards older students	Bad student/mentor ratio (>12:1) Small number of students < 10
7	Financial	Attends multiple events (or more than 2 districts)	Attends one event (or two districts) consistently and pays on time. Economic issues in local region	Attends one event (or two districts) struggles to pay on time Loss of core sponsor	Constant issues paying for event registration on time. Loss of primary/founding sponsor
8	Mentor	Numerous mentors have been with team for > 4 years	Most mentors appear to be short term only (< 4 years)	Mentors have all only been involved for a year or two	Less than 2 mentors
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100