ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Evaluation CriteriaTeam 1Team 2Team 3Team 4Team 5
2
Critical Thinking, Content, and Structure (45%)
· Effective strategic approach and frame
· Reflects robust and ample research
· Analyzed for audience, purpose, and context
· Sequenced, logical progression of ideas
3
Slide Design (9%)
· Design strategies enhance communication
· Consistent with professional expectations
4
Q&A (6%)
· Clear and concise answers with respectful tone
· Demonstrates team synergy and equity of answers to questions
5
Delivery (34%)
· Poised, relaxed, and confident non-verbal cues
· Language that is precise, concise, and fluid; not reading from notes
· Engages effectively with the audience
6
Error Interference (6%)
7
Total Score0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
8
9
General comments for all teams:
10
11
12
Comments for Team 1:
13
14
15
Comments for Team 2:
16
17
18
Comments for Team 3:
19
20
21
Comments for Team 4:
22
23
24
Comments for Team 5:
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100