A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PH3 Data | Greaves 2020a | Encrenaz 2020 | Snellen 2020 | Villanueva 2020 | Mogul 2020 | Thompson 2020 | Greaves 2020b | Greaves 2020c | Trompet 2020 | Akins 2021 | Lincowski 2021 | Greaves 2021 | Cordiner 2022 | Greaves 2022 | Cordiner 2023 | |||||||||
2 | Greaves 2020a | Discovery paper | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response in Greaves 2020b,c (see also Greaves 2021) | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2022 | ||||||||||||||
3 | Encrernaz 2020 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Mid-IR observations, upper limit above the clouds | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response: upper limits can be reconciled by PH3 photolysis, as high/low abundances correspond to Venusian mornings/evenings | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Snellen 2020 | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Reanalysis of ALMA data, no signal in ALMA data | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | Response: ALMA signal revisited. JCMT signal revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | Villanueva 2020 | Response in Greaves 2020b,c (see also Greaves 2021) | Reanalysis of ALMA (no signal) and JCMT data (signal but attribute to SO2) | Response: JCMT signal attributed to SO2 | Response: recovery of ALMA signal using 3 different calibration methods. JCMT revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | Response: ALMA signal revisited. JCMT signal revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | Response in Greaves 2020b,c (see also Greaves 2021) | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Mogul 2020 | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Indepedent detection of PH3 in the clouds in Pioneer Venus legacy data | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response: Reanalyis of the Pioneer Venus legacy data suggestive of in-cloud PH3 | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | |||||||||||||||||
7 | Thompson 2020 | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response: JCMT signal attributed to SO2 | Reanalysis of JCMT data, no signal in JCMT data | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | Response: JCMT signal attributed to SO2 | Response in Greaves 2020c | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | ||||||||||||||||
8 | Greaves 2020b | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2020c | Response: recovery of ALMA signal using 3 different calibration methods. JCMT revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Recovery of ALMA and JCMT signal, SO2 an unlikely explanation for the signal | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2022 | ||||||||||||||
9 | Greaves 2020c | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response: polynomial fitting revisited; different non-subjective method (via FTs) also recovers signal | Polynomial fitting revisited, recovery of the signal with non-subjective method (via FTs) | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2022 | ||||||||||||||
10 | Trompet 2020 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Mid-IR observations, upper limit above the clouds | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response: upper limits can be reconciled by PH3 photolysis, as high/low abundances correspond to Venusian mornings/evenings | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Akins 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Reanalysis of ALMA data, no signal in ALMA data | Response: ALMA data revisited with half of the planetary disc. Further assesment on SO2 minimal contamination | Response in Greaves 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | Lincowski 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response: Reanalysis of the Pioneer Venus legacy data suggestive of in-cloud PH3 | Response: JCMT signal attributed to SO2 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | JCMT signal is consistent with mesospheric (above the clouds) SO2 | Response: nearly simultaneous SO2 observation from the JCMT archive rule out SO2 as a source | Response in Greaves 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response: ALMA signal revisited. JCMT signal revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | Response: ALMA signal revisited. JCMT signal revisited; SO2 contamination is minimal. | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response in Greaves 2020c | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response: ALMA data revisited with half of the planetary disc. Further assesment on SO2 minimal contamination | Response: nearly simultaneous SO2 observation from the JCMT archive rule out SO2 as a source | Nearly concurrent measurements of SO2 show that the signal cannot be SO2 | Response in Greaves 2022 | ||||||||||||||
14 | Cordiner 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | Response in Greaves 2022 | SOFIA telescope shows no PH3 in Venus’ atmosphere | Response: recovery of Venusian PH3 in SOFIA spectra by reducing contaminating signals; the PH3 abundance is ~3 ppb | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | Greaves 2022 | Response: upper limits can be reconciled by PH3 photolysis, as high/low abundances correspond to Venusian mornings/evenings | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response in Greaves 2020b,c (see also Greaves 2021) | No response needed; Results consistent with the original detection | Response in Greaves 2020c (see also Greaves 2021) | Response: upper limits can be reconciled by PH3 photolysis, as high/low abundances correspond to Venusian mornings/evenings | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response in Greaves 2021 | Response: recovery of Venusian PH3 in SOFIA spectra by reducing contaminating signals; the PH3 abundance is ~3 ppb | Recovery of Venusian PH3 (above the clouds) in SOFIA spectra | ||||||||||||||
16 | Cordiner 2023 | SOFIA telescope shows no PH3 in Venus’ atmosphere; Fourier analysis in Greaves 2022 is too "aggressive" likely introducing spectral artifacts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |