ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-
ENABLING MECHANISMS
2
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
3
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
4
NOPARTLYYES
5
1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
6
1.1 Has the organization created/ reconstituted its GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) in accordance with Magna Carta of Women Implementing Rules and Regulations (MCW IRR) Sec. 37-C and other pertinent policies issued by oversight agencies? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)GFPS not created/ reconstituted in accordance with MCW IRR Sec
37-C and pertinent policies issued by concerned oversight agencies		GFPS or similar GAD mechanism created/ reconstituted in the central office and/ or selected regional and/or attached
agencies/offices only		GFPS or similar GAD mechanism created/ reconstituted in the central office and all regional offices and attached agencies1.67Attach the directory of the newly-created/recon- stituted GFPS of the organization, including its regional and attached offices as applicable*
*Agencies with created/reconstituted GFPS or similar GAD mechanisms in accordance with mentioned pertinent guide- lines with no regional and attached offices will be awarded
1.67 points equivalent to a “yes” answer
7
1.2 Has the organization initiated exploratory activities with the Philippine Commission on Women (PCW) or other agencies/LGUs, institutions and/or individuals to facilitate gender mainstreaming? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No exploratory activities initiated at allOrganization conducted initial meetings/
consultations with PCW, organizations and/or individuals to facilitate gender mainstreaming		Organization initiated exploratory activity/activities with PCW, organizations and/or individuals
to facilitate gender mainstreaming		1.67If yes, list down the exploratory activities initiated by the organization (e.g. meeting with PCW for the identification of necessary capacity develop- ment activities for GFPS and staff members) to facilitate gender mainstreaming
8
List of Organizations/ IndividualsExploratory Activities ConductedRemarks
9
10
11
12
13
1.3 Has the organization collected information towards the establishment of sex- disaggregated database and enhancement of its M&E system? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)No information collectedData and information collected but are not yet disaggregated by sexIntake forms developed and used to collect sex- disaggregated data or gender statistics1.67Attach intake forms such as attendance sheets, profile forms, etc., with separate columns for sex, used by the organization to gather sex- disaggregated data. Include list of information that can be disaggregated by sex (e.g. list of client beneficiaries, service providers, partners, etc.)
14
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms)		5.01
15
16
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
17
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
18
NOPARTLYYES
19
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
20
2.1 Does the organization have a functional GAD Focal Point System based on the provisions of the guidelines issued by relevant oversight agencies? (e.g. PCW MC 2011-01 for NGAs, JMC 2013-01 for LGUs and CHED MO 2015- 01 for SUCs) (possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)No functional GFPS based on the provisions of the
guidelines issued by relevant oversight agencies		GFPS performing limited functions based on the provisions of the guidelines issued by relevant oversight agenciesGFPS members actively performing all the functions based on the provisions of guidelines issued by relevant oversight agencies1If GFPS is performing limited functions, explain the challenges faced by the GFPS of the organization in mainstreaming GAD.
21
2.2 Has the organization established other GAD mechanisms? (possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)


*Other GAD Mechanisms refer to those in addition to the GFPS and the GAD
Database		No other GAD mechanism established1 other GAD mechanism established2 or more other GAD mechanisms established0.5Enumerate other GAD mechanisms established [e.g. Committee on Decorum and Investigation (CODI), Violence against Women and their Children (VAWC) Referral System, Barangay Violence against Women (VAW) Desk, Women’s Economic Empowerment (WEE) Desk, etc.]
22
Other GAD Mechanism/s EstablishedFunction/sMembersDate Established
23
24
25
26
2.3. Has the organization utilized at least 5% of its budget* to implement GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or COB for GOCCs		No GAD budget utilizedOrganization utilized less than 5% of total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 5% or more of total budget to implement GAD PAPs1Attach the GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) and GAD Accomplishment Report (GAD AR) of the organization for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and GAD AR)

If no, explain why budget allocated for the imple- mentation of GAD PAPs is less than 5%?
27
2.4. Has engagement with organizations such as PCW, LGUs and/or other agencies, and individuals been established towards the conduct of GAD- related PAPs for the organization? (possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)Organization has not engaged with agencies/LGUs, institutions and/or individuals towards the conduct of GAD- related PAPsOrganization has sporadic
engagement with agencies/LGUs, institutions and/or individuals towards the conduct of GAD- related PAPs		Organization has established working engagement with agencies/LGUs, institutions and/or individuals towards the conduct of GAD- related PAPs1List down consultations with organizations/ individuals regarding the conduct of GAD-related PAPs of the organization (e.g. conduct of a series of capacity development activities and technical assistance for the preparation of GPB, etc.):
28
List of Organizations/ Individuals EngagedPurpose of Engagement (e.g., request for review of GAD PB etc.)Results of
Engagement
29
30
31
32
2.5. Is the organization able to collect or generate sex- disaggregated data (SDD) and/or gender statistics*? (possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)No effort from the organization yet to collect or generate SDD and/or gender statisticsOrganization is in the process of collecting or generating SDD and/or gender statisticsOrganization collecting and generating SDD and/or gender statistics1If yes, enumerate types of SDD and/or gender statistics collected or generated (e.g., sex- disaggregated profile of employees, client beneficiaries, cases of VAW, etc.).






If applicable, list down installed gender- responsive data collection system/s of the organization (e.g. National Violence Against Women (NVAW) referral system, gender- responsive Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) etc.)
33
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 2 Enabling Mechanisms)		4.5
34
35
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
36
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
37
NOPARTLYYES
38
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
39
3.1 Do the organization’s other GAD mechanisms coordinate, monitor and report the progress of the implementation of its functions? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)Other GAD mechanisms established but not functionalOther GAD mechanisms coordinate and monitor progress of implementation
but do not generate status/progress report		Other GAD mechanisms coordinate, monitor and generate status/ progress report of implementation1Attach status/progress report of the other GAD mechanisms established by the organization, including analysis of its functions and recommendations.
40
3.2 Has the organization utilized 30% or more of its total budget* to implement GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or COB for GOCCs		Organization utilized 5% or less of total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 6-29% of total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 30% or more of total budget to implement GAD PAPs1Attach the GPB and GAD AR from the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)
41
3.3 Has the organization judiciously utilized its GAD budget to implement GAD activities based on its GPB? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)With AOM indicating non-utilization
of at least 5% of its budget for GAD or Notice of Disallowance
from COA with no justification from the organization		With AOM indicating non-utilization of
at least 5% of its budget for GAD with acceptable justification from the organization		With AOM commending the judicious use of GAD funds or no AOM from COA indicating non- utilization of at least 5% of its budget for GAD1Attach a copy of the Audit Observation Memo (AOM) or Notice of Suspension and Disallowances (NDs) received from the Commission on Audit (COA) and the organization’s justification, if applicable.
42
3.4 Has the organization partnered with agencies/LGUs, institutions and/or individuals towards the strategic implementation of its GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)Has not partnered with other organizations towards the strategic implementation of GAD PAPsPartnered with 1 organization
towards the strategic implementation of GAD PAPs		Partnered with 2 or more organizations towards the strategic implementation of GAD PAPs1List the partnership/s or joint program/s towards the strategic implementation of the organization’s GAD PAPs (e.g. partnership for the conduct of a GAD-related program)
43
Name of Partner Agency/ Institution/ IndividualGAD
Effort Implemented		Type of EngagementInclusive Dates
44
45
46
If applicable, attach copies of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Terms of Reference (TORs), Partnership Agreement, etc.
47
3.5 Is the organization utilizing sex- disaggregated data and/or gender statistics in the development planning cycle (planning, implementation
and management and monitoring and
evaluation)? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)		No SDD or gender statistics utilized in the development planning cycleSDD and/or gender statistics utilized
in 1-2 stages of the development planning cycle		SDD and/or gender statistics utilized
in all stages of the development planning cycle		1List GAD-related data and indicators used in the development planning cycle.
48
Development Planning Cycle StageData UtilizedOutputIndicators Used to Measure Gender- Related Impacts of PAPs
49
50
51
52
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 3 Enabling Mechanisms)		5
53
54
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
55
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
56
NOPARTLYYES
57
4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
58
4.1 Are the organization’s other GAD mechanisms able to contribute towards the attainment of its desired impact/s? (possible scores are 0,
0.5 and 1)		Other GAD mechanisms are fully functional but still has to contribute to the attainment of desired impact/sOther GAD mechanisms are fully functional and contributing to the attainment of desired impact/sOther GAD mechanisms are fully functional and resulted in desired impact/s0Attach status/progress report, client satisfaction survey, results of gender impact assessment, documented testimonies, etc.
59
4.2 Has the organization utilized 70% or more of its total budget* to implement GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or COB for GOCCs		Organization utilized 30% or less of total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 31-69% of total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 70% or more of total budget to implement GAD PAPs0Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR).
60
4.3 Is the organization’s database with sex- disaggregated data and/or gender statistics able to generate sector- specific knowledge products (KPs) on GAD? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)Database has no SDD and/or gender statistics and is not able to generate sector-specific KPs on GADDatabase with SDD and/or gender statistics generated 1-2 sector-specific KPs on GADDatabase with SDD and/or gender statistics generated 3 or more sector-
specific KPs on GAD		0.5Enumerate sector-specific KPs developed from database with SDD and/or gender statistics (e.g. caselets, case studies, briefers, fact sheets, etc.).
61
Title of Sector Specific Knowledge ProductsContent of the Knowledge ProductsUtilization of the Knowledge Products
62
63
64
65
4.4 Is the organization’s M&E system able
to track the desired gender-related impacts of its GAD PAPs on clients (internal and external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)		M&E system is not able to track gender- related impacts
of GAD PAPs on clients (internal and external)		M&E system able to track gender- related impacts of
GAD PAPs on either internal or external clients		M&E system able to track gender- related impacts of GAD PAPs on both
internal and external clients		0.5Attach copies of M&E reports reflecting gen- der-related impacts of the organization’s GAD PAPs on its internal and external clients, such as:
66
1. NGAs: Gender Impact Assessment (GIA); Annual Audit Reports (AARs); Audit Financial Reports (AFRs); Special Audit Reports (SARs); Socio-Economic Reports (SERs), Philippine Development Plan (PDP) Reports, program/project reports, accomplishment reports and other related knowledge products (KPs);
67
2. LGUs: End of term reports; Annual Audit Reports (AARs); administrative/ accomplishment reports; State of the Municipal Address (SOMA); State of the Province Address (SOPA), Socio- Economic Reports (SERs), Regional Project Monitoring & Evaluation System (RPMES) Reports, program/project reports, and other related knowledge products
68
Identify indicators that measure gender-related impacts of the organization’s GAD PAPs.
69
4.5 Does the organization have a Knowledge Management (KM) System with GAD- related knowledge products (KPs)? (possible scores are 0,
0.5 and 1)		KM system does not have GAD-related KPsKM system has GAD-related KPs accessed and utilized by either internal or external clientsKM system has GAD-related KPs accessed and utilized by both internal and external clients0.5Explain how the organization’s KM system facilitates the sharing of GAD-related KPs to its clients (internal and/or external).
Attach the list of KPs produced and shared through the KM system as well as the KM Plan/ framework or link of the KM system, if applicable.





Attach the list of KPs produced and shared through the KM system as wekk as the KM Plan/Framework or link of the KM system, if applicable.
70
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 4 Enabling Mechanisms)		1.5
71
72
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
73
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
74
NOPARTLYYES
75
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems (max score: 5; for each item or question:1)
76
5.1 Has the organization’s GAD Focal Point System been recognized or awarded as a model GAD mechanism
by reputable local, national, and international organizations on
gender mainstreaming?
(possible scores are 0,
0.5 and 1)		GFPS not yet recognized as model GAD mechanism
by reputable organizations on gender mainstreaming		GFPS nominated, shortlisted or cited as model GAD mechanism by reputable organizations
on gender mainstreaming		GFPS awarded as model GAD mechanism
by reputable organizations on gender mainstreaming		0List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.
77
Awarding InstitutionsLocal/ National/ InternationalAward/ Citations ReceivedYear
78
79
80
81
82
5.2 Has the organization’s other GAD mechanisms been recognized as models by other organizations? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)Other GAD mechanisms not yet recognized by other organizations as modelsOther GAD mechanisms recognized as models by 1-2 organizationsOther GAD mechanisms recognized as models by 3 or more organizations0List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.
83
Awarding InstitutionsLocal/ National/ InternationalAward/ Citations ReceivedYear
84
85
86
87
5.3 Has the organization utilized 100% of its total budget* to implement GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or COB for GOCCs		Organization utilized 70% or less of its total budget to implement GAD PAPsOrganization utilized 71-99% or less of
its total budget to implement GAD PAPs		Organization utilized 100% of its total budget to implement GAD PAPs0Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)
88
5.4 Has the organization established a centralized database with sex-disaggregated data and/or gender statistics accessible to its regional offices and attached agencies, as well as external clients and partner organizations? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)
Database with SDD and/or gener statistics established but accessible only to the central officeDatabase with SDD and/or gender statistics establsihed and accessible to the central office, regionla offices and attached agencies, as well as to external clients and partner organizationsDatabase with SDD and/or gender statistics established and accessible to the central office, regional offices and attached agencies, as well as, to external clients and partner organizations0.5Please provide link of database with SDD.

If the data is not uploaded in a website, list the informmtion/data that are accessible to regional offices, attached agencies, external clients and partner organizations
89
5.5 Is the Knowledge Management (KM) System of the organization integrated with GAD and replicated by other organizations? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)KM system of the organization not integrated with GAD and not replicated by other organizationsKM system of the organization integrated with GAD and replicated by 1-2 organizationsKM system of the organization integrated with GAD and replicated by 3 or more organizations0.5Explain how GAD is integrated in the KM system of the organization and list down other organizations that replicated the KM system
90
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 5 Enabling Mechanisms)		1
91
TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(Enabling Mechanism)		17.01
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100