lab rubric 2013
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGH
1
Lab report RubricStudent Name:_________________________________Per:________
2
3
CategoryGoodFairPoor
4
Title (5 pts)Stated as a question or purpose and properly punctuated. Based on observations, background and or research. (5 pts)Stated as question or purpose, Missing punctuation. No clear focused connection to background, research or observations. (3 pts)Incomplete. Good intention but not focused. Is not written properly as a question or purpose. (less than 3 pts)
5
Introduction /Background (5 pts)Very through. Relates very well to the problem. Uses proper science vocabulary. (5 pts)Relates somewhat to the problem. Is missing important information. Attempts to use science vocabulary. (3 pts)Does not relate to the problem. (less than 3 pts)
6
Hypothesis (10 pts)Is stated as an “if...then...” statement. Is directly related to the problem with important supporting detail. (10 pts)Is stated as an “if...then...” statement, but needs to relate to the problem directly. (7 pts)Not stated as in “if...then...” Needs to relate directly to the problem. Needs supporting details. ((less than 3 pts)
7
Misc (5 pts)No spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Neat and easy to read. (5 pts)No more than 2 spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Relatively neat and easy to read. (3 pts)3 or more spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Not very neat, hard to read. (less than 3 pts)
8
Materials list (5 pts)List is complete, and accurate. List includes quantities of measurements. (5 pts)List is complete, but quantities not always there or missing completely. (3 pts)List is not complete, quantities completely missing or rarely there. (less than 3 pts)
9
Methods (15 pts)Written as though giving directions. Written in complete sentences. Clear, logical, and descriptive.(15 pts)Steps are in sequence, but missing some steps. Some incomplete sentences. Some details lacking. (11 pts)Not enough steps to be able to repeat this experiment. Out of sequence, not logical, and/or lacking details. (less than 11 pts)
10
Misc (5 pts)No spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Neat and easy to read. (5 pts)No more than 2 spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Relatively neat and easy to read. (3 pts)3 or more spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Not very neat, hard to read. (less than 3 pts)
11
Data and results (10 pts)Tables are complete. Data is recorded in the accurate units. Calculations are correct. If necessary, additional information such as charts, graphs, drawings, etc are included. (10 pts)Tables are not complete, or not properly labeled. Some calculation are missing or not correct. Additional information not complete, or more information could be added. (5 pts)Tables are not complete, and not properly labels. Calculations are missing. No additional information added, or what was added was confusing and not labeled well enough to understand. (less than 5 pts)
12
Analysis Questions (10pts)Questions asked in the pre-lab and throughout the lab have been answered completely. It is clear that time and thought has been put into answering these questions. (10 pts)Questions have been answered. Some of the questions may not have been completely answered. It is not clear that time and thought put into answering these questions. (5 pts)Questions are either not answered or very incomplete. It is clear that little time has been put into answering the questions. (less than 5 pts)
13
Misc (5 pts)No spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Neat and easy to read. (5 pts)No more than 2 spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Relatively neat and easy to read. (3 pts)3 or more spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Not very neat, hard to read. (less than 3 pts)
14
Discussion (20 pts)The hypothesis is restated and supported or denied by the evidence from the data. Trends, patterns, and observations are described. Sources of error, and areas for further investigation are discussed. (20 pts)The hypothesis is restated, but not clearly supported or denied through the data. There is a lack of explanation of trends, patterns, and observations. Details are lacking regarding sources of error. Little discussion of further investigation. (10 pts)Hypothesis was not restated. Data was not used to support conclusion. Lacking discussion over sources of error and further investigation. (less than 10 pts)
15
Misc (5 pts)No spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Neat and easy to read. (5 pts)No more than 2 spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Relatively neat and easy to read. (3 pts)3 or more spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes. Not very neat, hard to read. (less than 3 pts)
16
17
Student responsible for:
18
19
20
other comments:title & hypothesis
21
22
materials & methods
23
24
data/questions
25
26
discussion
27
28
total
29
30
31
Notice each responsibility is worth 1/4 of your grade 20% had to do with good spelling and grammar,
32
proofreed each others results you are a group!
Loading...
 
 
 
lab
Sheet3