A | B | |
---|---|---|
1 | Notes on how to engage with our cost-effectiveness analysis | |
2 | ||
3 | Published: November 14, 2020 | |
4 | ||
5 | This workbook contains our cost-effectiveness analyses. On the "Moral weights and discount rate" tab, we've included GiveWell and conventional estimates for a few parameters. If you'd like to see how our results would change based on different inputs for these parameters, you can enter your own values in the "Anyone" column of this sheet, the select "Anyone" from the dropdown menu in the "Results" tab. To see the results for programs in specific countries, select a country from the dropdown menus in the "Results" tab. Expanding the formula bar at the top of the page (by clicking and dragging the bottom boundary) may make it easier to read the contents of explanatory cells. | |
6 | ||
7 | Click here to make an editable copy of this document. This is necessary to be able to interact with drop-downs and other interactive features. | |
8 | ||
9 | Notes on text color coding | |
10 | Blue text: direct input | |
11 | Green text: pulling from another cell in this workbook | |
12 | Black text: calculation | |
13 | ||
14 | Index | |
15 | List of funding gaps | Estimates of the size and cost-effectiveness of top charities' current funding gaps |
16 | Moral weights and discount rate | Allows staff members or anyone else to supply discount rates and numbers used to trade off different good outcomes |
17 | Results | Shows cost-effectiveness estimates for each top charity |
18 | AMF | Cost-effectiveness analysis for long-lasting insecticide-treated net distributions by the Against Malaria Foundation. |
19 | GiveDirectly | Cost-effectiveness analysis for uncondtional cash transfers by GiveDirectly. |
20 | Deworm the World | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Deworm the World |
21 | END Fund | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by The END Fund |
22 | SCI Foundation | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by SCI Foundation |
23 | Sightsavers | Cost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Sightsavers |
24 | Malaria Consortium | Cost-effectiveness analysis for seasonal malaria chemoprevention by Malaria Consortium |
25 | Helen Keller International | Cost-effectiveness analysis for vitamin A supplementation by Helen Keller International |
26 | Counterfactual non-philanthropic | Used in the leverage and funging adjustment to our cost-effectiveness analyses |
27 | Inclusion/Exclusion | Used in the adjustment for excluded effects of our cost-effectivenes analyses |
28 | RFMF_AMF | Room for more funding projections for the Against Malaria Foundation |
29 | RFMF_GD | Room for more funding projections for GiveDirectly |
30 | RFMF_DtW | Room for more funding projections for Deworm the World |
31 | RFMF_END | Room for more funding projections for The END Fund |
32 | RFMF_SCI | Room for more funding projections for SCI Foundation |
33 | RFMF_Sightsavers | Room for more funding projections for Sightsavers |
34 | RFMF_MC | Room for more funding projections for Malaria Consortium |
35 | RFMF_HKI | Room for more funding projections for Helen Keller International |
36 | ||
37 | Helpful GiveWell references | |
38 | Guide to GiveWell cost-effectiveness analyses | |
39 | Full reviews of our top charities | |
40 | Past versions of our cost-effectiveness analyses | |
41 | Discussion of cost-effectiveness as a criterion | |
42 | Blog posts discussing cost-effectiveness |